User Talk: Thi

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Thi. Voting in the '''2017 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Vital Records move item

Thi, thanks for moving that item on the Manx cat in the talk page for me. I totally goofed on that one. I will be more diligent to put items in the correct section next time. <i style="color:#800000;">dawnleelynn</i><sup>(talk)</sup> 17:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

:You're welcome. --Thi (talk) 18:40, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Thi. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

About your closure of the discussion about whether to replace "Sons and Lovers ↗" by D. H. Lawrence ↗

You claimed that the proposal completely succeeded, yet only four Wikipedians agreed to remove the novel, thus only the addition part passed.--RekishiEJ (talk) 14:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

:Thanks for the correction. --Thi (talk) 09:11, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

::By the way, after sanctioning the proposal, I closed it marking it passed. Although according to the 15-day rule if after 15 days after the proposal there are at least five votes and at least two-thirds of votes are supportive it can be closed as passed, I wonder if it is appropriate to close the proposal right after voting to support it, making it to meet the criterion of passing according to the rule I mentioned. What do you think?--RekishiEJ (talk) 14:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

:::I think that consensus has been reached. --Thi (talk) 15:46, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

::::I see.--RekishiEJ (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Foxconn ↗ VA-4 closure

Hi Thi! I noticed that you closed Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles/Level/4/Archive_62#Add_Foxconn ↗ as no consensus, 2-0. I think the proposal has a reasonable chance of passing, as no one has yet voiced any objection to my nomination, but I'm not sure how to draw enough attention to it to have a discussion. Should I nominate it again, or is there a way to re-open the discussion? Thanks for the help, Sdkb (talk) 19:36, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

:I have now reopened the discussion. --Thi (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Vital articles count

I understand you are the remaining moderator of the "vital articles" projects. I just want you to be aware of this ↗. Fr.dror (talk) 20:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

About closing discussion

Hi Thi. Actually I "would" agree with no consensus for removal Heisenberg (I had on my mind to keep oppose vote for straight removal of Heisenberg without Niels Bohr, or without swap with Copenhagen interpretation) but technically removal was 4-1 (or 3-1 if You were neutral on removal at the closing). Cheers Dawid2009 (talk) 17:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Your Wikipedia talk:Vital articles ↗ move

Hello Thi! You recently moved my proposed change on Wikipedia talk:Vital articles ↗ to Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/2 ↗. However, the Level 2 talk page introduction says the following: “Since changes to this list may affect lower-level lists, discussions regarding its composition are best initiated at Wikipedia talk:Vital articles”. Since the proposed change only involves a Level 2 page and a Level 3 page, shouldn’t the discussion be on the main page rather than on the Level 2 page? Drevolt (talk) 21:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

:The intro text was added many years ago when only few people watched Level 2 talk page, but last year there were lots of proposals and active discussions in Level 2. Currently it is quite silent at all levels of the project and it is possible that the discussion will be open for several months. I added a link to moved proposal in talk:Vital articles ↗. --Thi (talk) 22:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

I've noticed that lately you've been providing more detail when contributing to the vital articles discussions. I just wanted to thank you for that. Cheers, Cobblet (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

Happy holidays

This year, many people had COVID to fear,
<br>
The holidays are getting near,
<br>
One thing that will be clear,
<br>
We will still have holiday cheer,
<br>
Happy holidays and happy new year!!
<br>
From Interstellarity (talk) 14:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Ehrman 2012 ''DJE''

Do you have a quote of Ehrman (2012). ''DJE'', pp. 184–185 ? --2db (talk) 16:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

:No, I'm sorry. --Thi (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of :Template:Vital articles ↗

30px|link= ↗:Template:Vital articles ↗ has been nominated for deletion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page ↗. Elli (talk ↗ | contribs ↗) 19:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

About the proposal you closed recently on WT:VA/E ↗

I just noticed that your proposal to add Cesare Beccaria ↗ to WP:VA/E/P ↗, which you had closed recently, is a bit problematic since "On Crimes and Punishments" and "Dei delitti e delle pene", which mentioned in it were not Italicized or punctuated, which is non-standard. Hope that you Italicize them a.s.a.p.--RekishiEJ (talk) 07:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>

Holiday greetings (2021)

Thi,
<br>
I sincerely hope your holiday season goes well this year especially with what we went through last year. I'm optimistic that 2022 will be a better year for all of us: both in real life and on Wikipedia. Wishing you the best from, Interstellarity (talk) 13:09, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Thi, and warmest wishes to Happy New Year !! I have some questions to you (will write point by point as I have quite not idiomatic language ability in English when write long sentences):
1 Could you please not close soonly discussion about Peru and Singapoor until there will be no few more comment by various people there (just as discussion about Design was opened for long stage). I noted you recently closed discussion about Netherlands, and I am ok with that, I admit but would wish to wait unitil something more will be said about Peru and Singapoore which are two examples of countries which are vital for entirely diffrent factors. 2 I know it is not my stuff but what do you think to add few more things to your userpage? (at least what your nickname mean, or to we know how we should reffer to you, "he?", "she?") 3I years ago noted article on :en:Joulupukki ↗ has bit specific form, I noted you retired from constributions into articles on Wikipedia but would you ever have time to split it into at least List of Christmas and winter gift-bringers by country ↗, Santa Claus ↗, Joulupukki ↗ on suomi wiki ? Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 22:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

:Happy New Year for you too. 1) I will not close the mentioned discussion. 2) Maybe I should have chosen some other username, but for me it is just three letters. Finnish has only gender-neutral pronouns, so I haven't paid attention for them. You can refer to me as you wish. 3) Unfortunately I already have too long list of potential articles to edit. --Thi (talk) 13:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

About your proposal to add musicology ↗ to WP:VA4 ↗

Actually in "I think that the study of music is clearly vital topic at this level." "a" should be added after "clearly" and before "vital". Hope that next time you can proofread what you type carefully before submission.--RekishiEJ (talk) 06:10, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

The way you count removal/addition support in VA swap proposal

In a number of vital articles swap proposal you closed the discussion in ways like "result=Swap 1-1, removal 2-1, addition 1-2.". In my opinion this is not enough useful when most votes are voting removal and addition separately, and thus I think it is more meaningful to count votes that support/oppose swaps as simultaneously supporting/opposing removal and addition, such that result cited above would become "removal 3-2, addition 2-3.". C933103 (talk) 02:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

:I counted the votes separately, it was "removal 2-1, addition 1-2". "Swap 1-1" was meant as a sidenote. --Thi (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

How it is going?

Hello, noticed it is almost couple months since you did anything at VA or anything at Wikipedia. Dawid2009 (talk) 08:47, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Suggestion to create your own list of vital articles

Hi Thi, I would like to see your own list of vital articles to see what you think is important to cover for Wikipedia especially the People section for levels 3 and 4. Let me know what your thoughts are regarding my suggestion. There hasn't been a lot of activity on the vital articles pages within the past few months, so if you compiled your own list of vital articles, we could see what holes the list has in order to improve it. Interstellarity (talk) 00:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Thraupidae Family

Hello I noticed that you have not included a bird in the thraupidae family Pettymars0193 (talk) 13:55, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Vital-2 Archiving

Hey Thi!

Hope you're doing well :)

I just wanted to let you know I undid your archive of my Vital-2 proposal because it made me sad.

I put my reasoning as since you'd opposed it and it'd only been 5 days past the minimum, and proposals auto-archive after 60 days anyway, I could undo it.

But I'm not trying to step on your toes or anything. I wanted to discuss with you to see how you felt about possibly incorporating some of these ideas into the vitals pages. Specifically, maybe we shouldn't let people archive proposals they opposed, and possibly we shouldn't even bother archiving proposals since we've established auto-archiving? What do you think?

Thanks,

LightProof1995 (talk) 02:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

:Category:Ex-Muslims ↗ has been nominated for merging

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Ex-Muslims ↗ has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Thi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at :Former Muslims organizations ↗ that may not have been. "Minor edit ↗" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections ↗ or reverting obvious vandalism ↗. Any edit that changes the <em>meaning</em> of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.  Mason (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

January 2025

30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗  according to the reverts you have made on :Finland ↗. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.'''  TylerBurden (talk) 19:39, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Third opinion

A request for a Third opinion on the disputed sentence has now been posted.Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:03, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

You can find the response on the Talk page at Talk:History of Christianity#Third Opinion ↗ or in this diff https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Christianity&diff=prev&oldid=1272521339 ↗. The conclusion is there is nothing wrong with the sentence you removed, so I am putting it back. Please do not remove it again. Jenhawk777 (talk) 04:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Thi, even though the Third opinion came down in my favor, I don't want to ignore your concerns. Therefore, I have added an opening paragraph, and modified the others, in late Modernity that I hope you will approve of. It reads: {{tqq|Historians have referred to the period from 1760 to 1830 as a "historical watershed" and in many cases, Christianity was weakened by the various revolutions.[518][519] The influence of anticlerical socialism and communism in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries produced secession and disruption in many locations.[520]}} Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Question

Hello Thi. I remember you prepared somewhere (on meta.wikimedia.org probably) table which showed ballance beetwen ENwiki 1000 list (VA) and meta lis (list the articles which every Wiipedia should have) but I can not find that now when I am looking for your history of edits there. Was it removed or something? I remember it was table which showed how Enwiki has less biographies but more articles related in history and something other in other sections too AFAIR. I am looking for it long time but I can not find that. Do you knowwhere it is visitable in history of editions or archives? Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 20:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

:Hi Dawid2009. I haven’t made such a table, nor do I remember having seen one. --Thi (talk) 20:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

:: Ahhh. I already found that. You can see that for exaple here ↗ after checking ctrl+F " Vital articles". Not sure why someone removed that from metalist nor why I though you earlier added such an alasysis. Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 20:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy 25th Anniversary of Wikipedia!!

Feel free to read my story at User:Interstellarity/My Story and join in for some Wikipedia-related fun. I hope you like it. Interstellarity (talk) 22:23, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Finland ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}}  TylerBurden (talk) 09:43, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

:I have added a neutrality dispute template. Please make a request for comment, as I do not have time for that. On the talk page, reasons have been presented for why the addition is misleading and should be avoided in order to prevent misconceptions. Wikipedia should use wording that is on firmer ground. The burden of proof is on you, but you have not presented any counterarguments. Discussion is needed because errors can easily remain unnoticed in articles for a long time. --Thi (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2026 (UTC)