User Talk: Tigers1984

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!

Hi Tigers1984! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing!  —Bagumba (talk) 16:35, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Scalextric (video game) ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Waxworker (talk) 09:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

:Hi! Thank you so much for flagging. All my edits were drawn from the existing citations already listed on the page. I didn't conduct new original research. Rather, I just expanded upon the existing section in an attempt to make for a more substantive reading experience for users viewing that article. Please let me know if additional action is still needed. Thank you again! Tigers1984 (talk) 19:57, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
::In-line citations are needed so it's clear what references the content added is sourced from - the 'Development' section added was unsourced. Waxworker (talk) 09:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
:::Got it, thanks Tigers1984 (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Major additions to Featured articles

Re. your additions to Evelyn Waugh, can I suggest that you discuss on the article Talkpage, before making major amendments. The article has gone through a thorough review process and, while it is as susceptible to further improvement as is any other article, the additions you're making don't seem, to me at least, to bring an overall improvement. I should also say that the prose style you use seems rather forced - is it a summary of another source, or generated in some other way? KJP1 (talk) 20:42, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

:Hey -- certainly a reasonable request. However, everything I included you should be able source in Waugh's Britannica entry, the Evelyn Waugh Society website, and the book "Evelyn Waugh: A Life Revisited" which came out in 2016. I believe the prose style I've used is neutral and clinical with some deal of descriptiveness for readability, which I understand to be preferable in an encyclopedic context. While I am fairly new to editing on Wikipedia, I have copy editing experience professionally. I am also from the U.S., and am therefore probably naive to some of the English literary customs, which only reinforces your point about utilizing the Talk Page. My feeling about the Waugh page was that it could stand to benefit from further segmentation and some contextual passages concerning style and biographical experiences. Again, I do see now that this should have been addressed in the Talk Page before taking such actions. Fair and helpful feedback. Tigers1984 (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

AI

Hi, are you using AI tools for your edits here? If so, can you mention ↗:

What tool(s) you are using, and what versions

The process: what features, prompts, etc

What review you are doing of the output

Thank you. Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:39, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

:Hi there. I often run my edit drafts through an LLM for copy editing and assistance conforming language to neutral, encyclopedic style. The only one I've experimented with is ChatGPT 4o and ChatGPT 5. I almost always include third-party sourcing and cite Wikipedia editing doctrine but I apologize for any errors. What do you recommend? Tigers1984 (talk) 01:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
::Hi, sorry for the delay - our AI guidance is changing quickly but WP:LLM ↗ is the overall essay for it. In particular it's recommended to mention all that in any edit summaries for AI-assisted edits. Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

مصتختم

مصتختم ~2026-16070-79 ↗ (talk) 11:32, 14 March 2026 (UTC)