W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Trabzonluyuz-rumuz-elhamdulillah

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->

Welcome!


thumb|alt=A plate of chocolate chip cookies.|Help:Getting started|'''Welcome!''' ↗ ↗
Hello, Trabzonluyuz-rumuz-elhamdulillah, and '''''welcome to Wikipedia ↗'''''! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the '''Wikipedia Teahouse ↗'''.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗! Please sign your name ↗ on talk pages ↗ using four tilde ↗s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our '''help pages''' ↗, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place '''{{Tlc|Help me}}''' on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!<!-- Template:Welcome_cookie -->

Wikipedia and copyright



30px|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello Trabzonluyuz-rumuz-elhamdulillah! Your additions to :Johannes Grant ↗ have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted ↗ content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain ↗ or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible ↗ copyright license—''to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗''. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright ↗ and plagiarism ↗ issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked ↗ from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copyright-new --> — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 16:48, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
:ah, okay i understand. i thought that the portion i took was small enough, but apparently not. i'll try to be more careful from now on.

Disambiguation link notification for May 14



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johann Wolfgang von Goethe ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Euphorion ↗ was added. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to ''' Armenia ↗, Azerbaijan ↗, or related conflicts''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics <em>procedures</em>, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> Birthay boy ↗ (talk ↗&nbsp;&bull;&#32; contribs ↗) 10:35, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agha Pasha Mosque ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arcadia ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026



30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Fall of Constantinople ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}} <!-- Template:uw-ew --> R Prazeres (talk) 20:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi R Prazeres,
:I am contacting you because User:Trabzonlu elhamdullah has completely ignored the warning you issued to them 6 days ago regarding edit warring and disruptive changes to the casualty numbers on the Fall of Constantinople ↗ article.
:Yesterday, they once again performed a blanket revert to wipe out well-researched, consensus-backed modern historical ranges that I had added, which were fully supported by standard academic citations (including specific ISBNs and page numbers).
:In place of established historical consensus, they have reinstated absurdly low, un-cited figures (3,600 Ottoman KIA and 840 Byzantine KIA). These numbers represent an extreme fringe interpretation or a selective misreading of isolated primary sources (such as tracking a single day's skirmish or a single elite unit), completely misrepresenting the actual scale of the 53-day siege and the subsequent three-day sack of the city.
:The editor's username ("Trabzonlu" referring to Trebizond/Trabzon and "Elhamdullah") strongly suggests a nationalistic, non-neutral point of view (POV) motivation behind these edits. They appear determined to sanitize the historical data to minimize Ottoman losses and downplay the intensity of the conflict, treating the article as a venue for regional/nationalist POV-pushing rather than an objective historical record.
:Given that this editor has shown blatant disregard for your recent warning and is actively engaging in a disruptive, single-purpose edit war to enforce an inaccurate version of the page, I kindly request that their edits be reverted to the sourced consensus version, and that appropriate administrative action or page protection be applied to prevent further disruption.
:Thank you for your time and assistance in maintaining the integrity of the article. Abdullah Sahbaz (talk) 10:13, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
::Alright, this is getting ridiculous now. Not only am I being called a Turkish nationalist, but I'm also being accused of a revert I didn't do, lol. Trabzonluyuz-rumuz-elhamdulillah (talk) 13:32, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
::As an observer of the disagreements in Talk:Fall of Constantinople ↗, this accusation torwards User:Trabzonluyuz-rumuz-elhamdulillah is unfair, since he hasn't edited the page Fall of Constantinople ↗ since June 1st, and therefore did not ignore the warning.
::Also, he certainly is not a nationalist. His other contributions do not praise the Ottomans, and even the folk song he has in his profile comes from anti-Ottoman 20th century rebel groups from the region of Trabzon. So the accusation of nationalism is also unfair.Neoptolemos7 (talk) 12:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24



An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
:Italian war crimes ↗
::added a link pointing to Carte Blanche ↗
:Kingdom of Albania in personal union with Italy ↗
::added a link pointing to Carte Blanche ↗

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italian war crimes ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carte Blanche ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Gunter ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Melson ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 July 2026 (UTC)