User Talk: Unofficial Jurassic World

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Tmbox
| style = background: #f8eaba
| image = 55px ↗
| text = '''''This account has been blocked ↗ indefinitely''''' from editing for sockpuppetry ↗{{#if:| per evidence presented at {{{evidence}}}}}. Note that multiple accounts are allowed ↗, but using them for ''illegitimate ↗'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted ↗. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block ↗ by first reading the guide to appealing blocks ↗, then adding the text <code><nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code> below. PhilKnight (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)}}

Concern regarding Draft:Gangapur Formation ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Unofficial Jurassic World. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gangapur Formation ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gangapur Formation ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Unofficial Jurassic World. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Gangapur Formation ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hexaprotodon sivalensis ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Unofficial Jurassic World. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hexaprotodon sivalensis ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Unblock Appeal

{{unblock reviewed |1=I acknowledge the conduct that led to my block. I assure that I have learned from my mistakes that I previously created and I would humbly request a final opportunity to contribute constructively. I assure that I'll behave sincerely this time and won't cause anymore trouble. |decline = This does not even mention the problems that lead to your block and is so generic as to be completely meaningless. Yamla (talk) 12:59, 3 December 2025 (UTC)}}

Unblock Appeal 2

{{unblock reviewed|Hello, I'm very sorry for the abuse caused by my actions (as stated here ↗ where I created and illegmatly used my other accounts, which are Hknb and Paleonerboirel respectively) that led to my block, I'm genuinely sorry for doing Sock puppetry and I promise that I will never gonna create Sock Puppet account or do any sort of Sock Puppetry activity in future. I would humbly request for a last chance on Wikipedia.|accept=You are conditionally unblocked subject to a one-account restriction. This will be logged at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Unofficial Jurassic World ↗. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs ↗) 16:51, 10 December 2025 (UTC)}} Unofficial Jurassic World (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi! While this is a good start, you should also address the other issues, such as sourcing and behavior with other editors. While the block itself was for sockpuppetry, these are also aspects that should be discussed before you return to editing. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs ↗) 19:12, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you, ik for some my previous edit sourcing I used used deviant user(like Hodari Nundu) description (even though they have no valid paper backing the statments), and I have previously been involved in atleast 1 edit war on List of Indian and Madagascan dinosaurs ↗ but atleast I added some taxa like ''Jaklapallisaurus ↗'', ''Nambalia ↗'' and ''Tharosaurus ↗'' which were missing in time zone part(which was being reverted by one user for no reason). I'm so sorry for using sources that weren't backed by any scientific literature or paper(specifically on the ''Vishnuictis ↗'' page) and I promise that I will use actual backed-up scientific literature, source and citation in my future edits about paleontological taxons or other, but atleast as I'm aware, I'm not guilty in second one(as I'm trying to add the said taxons to the timeline section of the said page but they were kept being reversed for no reason). Unofficial Jurassic World (talk) 10:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

::I strongly invite you to read Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle ↗. If an editor disagrees with your edit, you should discuss the merits of the edit with them, not attack the other user. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs ↗) 11:14, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

:::Thanks for the advice, but I already tried to discuss with the user as seen in the revision of May, 2024 of history section ↗ (sorry if the message and title is offensive as I was sort of frustrated due to constant revert), but he later removed it with no reply. Unofficial Jurassic World (talk) 13:19, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

::::Respectfully, this is far from an adequate way to discuss with another user, and their removal is absolutely understandable. You should not let your frustration get the best of yourself. If you cannot understand that, I am sorry to say that you are unlikely to be unblocked for now. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs ↗) 13:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

:::::This message was like a year ago and I am usually able to balance my anger and frustration nowadays. I also promise that I won't be angry or behave offensively in future too and I would calmly discuss with other users in future regarding the edit I make and they being reverting it(i.e disagree with my the edit I made). Unofficial Jurassic World (talk) 13:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

::::::Thanks. @PhilKnight, what do you think of a last chance ↗ unblock? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs ↗) 13:33, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

::::::::: {{ping|Chaotic Enby}} - I'm okay with an unblock with a one account restriction. PhilKnight (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::@Unofficial Jurassic World, is that okay for you? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs ↗) 15:14, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::Hmm, yea I mean its ok to have only 1 account access. Unofficial Jurassic World (talk) 16:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::Welcome back! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs ↗) 16:51, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Thanks, I will show my better self now, once you thank you so much Chaotic Enby and Philknight. Unofficial Jurassic World (talk) 00:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Lopingian tetrapods of Asia ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Lopingian tetrapods of Asia ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 17:56, 16 December 2025 (UTC)