User Talk: User3749
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{Vandalism information|prefix=User:Fetchcomms/}}
{{Contentious topics/aware|a-i}}
{{Talk header}}
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1322758825 -->
Case
The German IP have also violated the 3RR. By reverting several times. It is just a strange case.BabbaQ (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
:Yeah, I might want to add that to the report. My suggestion now is given I've already raised it at ANI, just don't respond to them any further given they now resorted to other personal attacks and wikilawyering. WP:DENY ↗. User3749 (talk) 08:28, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Temporary account IP viewer granted
right|80px|alt=The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address ↗
Hello, User3749. Per your request, your account has been <span class="plainlinks">granted ↗</span> {{mono|temporary-account-viewer}} rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts ↗ that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is <strong>only</strong> to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer ↗ for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:
- You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy ↗.
- Access <strong>must not</strong> be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).
- When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
- Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
- Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP address ↗es (using the CIDR notation ↗ format).
:Thanks! That's actually the fastest ever that I had a RFPERM request responded to :) User3749 (talk) 08:59, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
Check now ashoknagar
now check ashoknagar assembly constituency Partha Bala 26 (talk) 10:28, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
:@Partha Bala 26 Thanks for clarifying that. To prevent future confusions, I would suggest you add an edit summary before saving your edits; this could be something as simple as "remove duplicated information" based on your description, especially when removing large content. Thanks! User3749 (talk) 10:30, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
::multiple edit need sometime, so all time not possible for minor change. Still I'll try Partha Bala 26 (talk) 10:32, 8 May 2026 (UTC)