W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: User3749

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Vandalism information|prefix=User:Fetchcomms/}}
{{Contentious topics/aware|a-i}}
{{Talk header}}

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1322758825 -->

Case


The German IP have also violated the 3RR. By reverting several times. It is just a strange case.BabbaQ (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

:Yeah, I might want to add that to the report. My suggestion now is given I've already raised it at ANI, just don't respond to them any further given they now resorted to other personal attacks and wikilawyering. WP:DENY ↗. User3749 (talk) 08:28, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Temporary account IP viewer granted



right|80px|alt=The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address ↗
Hello, User3749. Per your request, your account has been <span class="plainlinks">granted ↗</span> {{mono|temporary-account-viewer}} rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts ↗ that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is <strong>only</strong> to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer ↗ for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:
It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:
Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences ↗. Happy editing! <!-- Template:Temporary account IP viewer granted -->—&nbsp;<b style="font-family:Papyrus;color:DarkSlateGrey;">rsjaffe</b>&nbsp;🗣️ 08:57, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

:Thanks! That's actually the fastest ever that I had a RFPERM request responded to :) User3749 (talk) 08:59, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Check now ashoknagar



now check ashoknagar assembly constituency Partha Bala 26 (talk) 10:28, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

:@Partha Bala 26 Thanks for clarifying that. To prevent future confusions, I would suggest you add an edit summary before saving your edits; this could be something as simple as "remove duplicated information" based on your description, especially when removing large content. Thanks! User3749 (talk) 10:30, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
::multiple edit need sometime, so all time not possible for minor change. Still I'll try Partha Bala 26 (talk) 10:32, 8 May 2026 (UTC)