W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Vydrakk

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

<div style="text-align:center; font-size:165%;">20px|link= ↗ '''Welcome!''' 20px|link= ↗</div>

<div style="font-size:120%; margin:0.6em auto 0 auto; text-align:center; max-width:52em;">
This is my talk page. Feel free to leave questions, notices, or constructive discussion here.
</div>

<div style="text-align:center; font-size:85%; font-style:italic; margin-top:1em;">
Please keep the following in mind:
</div>

<div style="max-width:60em; margin:0.5em auto 0 auto;">

</div>

<div class="plainlinks" style="text-align:center; font-size:140%; margin-top:0.9em;">
'''[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit&section=new}} ⇒ Start a new topic ⇐]'''
</div>

<div style="text-align:right; font-size:60%; font-style:italic; margin-top:0.8em;">
~ VYD
</div>
{{RC patroller topicon}}

Gibson Kyle


Thank you for your edit of the above. Please note that there is more than one Willington Hall, and when you linked this one, you moved it from Durham to Cheshire. Please kindly check your links before publishing. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 21:44, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Ahem. Utmost, not upmost. All the best. Storye book (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you for your comment @Storye book, you are correct in that I indeed did not notice the fact that there are more than one Willington Hall, I shall keep this in mind and double-check links on future edits.
:Thanks once more, and kind regards Vydrakk (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
:: You're welcome. All the best. Storye book (talk) 10:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Removing content without source



Hi!
Content that does not have a source, in general should be removed. If you can find a source, in thai names, please provide it. &#126;2026-22682-36 ↗ (talk) 15:53, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

:Hi! The removal of that specific paragraph as unsourced was justified, because the article version at that time lacked an inline source for it and the wording contains several claims that are not adequately verified by the sources. What is not justified is any broader claim that there are no valid sources for the underlying claim at all.
:There are valid sources for a narrower replacement, but not enough here to vindicate the paragraph in its original form, therefor I have made a new revision ↗ on the article reflecting this and included sources for this. Vydrakk (talk) 07:58, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

SP (Socialist Party)



Hi, I saw you just reversed my edit. However, it says an unexplained edit was removed. That's not the case at all. My edit was explained very well. The source provided to claim SP is culturally conservative does in fact not mention this. As an SP member myself I can confirm we are not culturally conservative and the claim is simply untrue. A wrong claim with a wrong source should always be removed. &#126;2026-25024-63 ↗ (talk) 08:48, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

:Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have reverted your recently made contributions because they seem to be in violation of WP:COI ↗, WP:NPOV ↗, and WP:OR ↗. I suggest you propose the desired changes on the talk page of the affected article ↗, and/or use the Edit Request Wizard ↗ to put in an edit request. I have also left a message on your talk page, and lastly I suggest you check out the COI Edit Guide ↗. Thank you, and happy editting! Vydrakk (talk) 09:03, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Reverting good faith edits



Hello and thanks for helping edit Wikipedia. When reverting good faith edits, such as you did here ↗, please make sure to add a reason as to why you reverted. Just reverting it as good faith does not leave the user with much to improve, and if it's good faith and has no reason to be reverted, then it shouldn't be reverted. Cheers. <i style="font-family:cursive,Serif;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #f008;background:linear-gradient(90deg,#fb0,#f0b);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:#0000">– LuniZunie</i><sub>(talk)</sub> 16:54, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

:Hi! Reasons for reverting the article were left on the user's talk page. Perhaps you had missed this? If there are more questions, lemme know! Vydrakk (talk) 07:25, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
::Hey, I did see this! But it is good practice to still use the edit summary since that's what most people are likely to see and it won't be affected by archives. <i style="font-family:cursive,Serif;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #f008;background:linear-gradient(90deg,#fb0,#f0b);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:#0000">– LuniZunie</i><sub>(talk)</sub> 11:32, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Reverted sourced edit



Hello. I simply added the fact that the player was born in South Africa. This is already supported by this page, which has already been cited. Tufflikethat (talk) 07:14, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

:in the meantime, I will add my edit back Tufflikethat (talk) 07:15, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
::Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia ↗!
::Thank you for your comment @Tufflikethat, regarding the article of Matt Montgomery (cricketer) ↗, you are correct in that the birthplace of Johannesburg ↗ is mentioned on the aforementioned ESPNCRICINFO ↗ page.
::Thank you, and happy editting! Vydrakk (talk) 07:33, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
:::No problem! Thanks for wishing me well. Tufflikethat (talk) 07:34, 11 July 2026 (UTC)