User Talk: WP Ludicer

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

≠{{NoACEMM}}

WP Ludicer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- valign="top"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hi '''WP Ludicer'''! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse ↗! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|Mz7}} (talk ↗).

<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;">Visit the Teahouse ↗</div>

<div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there!

Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the Teahouse hosts ↗

16:03, 27 November 2018 (UTC)</div>
</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation ↗

Please advise on reversion of my edit

There is no documentary evidence supporting the assertion that the SCCA was once the prewar ARCA. The true origins of the SCCA are
clearly discussed in Pete Hylton's book The Gentleman's Club. I suggest, in true wikipedia style, that you find
an actual citation if you want to assert this claim.
Note that I requested such a citation more than 10 years ago on the talk page, and got no response. I'm not real impressed right now. Nfgusedautoparts (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

November 2018

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions ↗ —specifically this edit ↗ to :Richard Green (referee) ↗— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox ↗. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk ↗. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:22, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Curious as to why my contribution was deleted

Hello, I'm Widjididji. Recently you deleted an external link that I had added to Ingvar Kamprad ↗'s page, where I linked to an MSN article titled ''Ikea's enigmatic founder's amazing and controversial life''. You didn't give any reason for this deletion, and I'm wondering why you didn't think it belonged there. Do you not consider MSN an appropriate source? I thought it was an interesting article that other people might like to read. Please advise. Widjididji (talk) 02:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions ↗ is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions ↗ on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies ↗, or the page-specific restrictions ↗, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions ↗ and the Arbitration Committee's ↗ decision here ↗. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}} Doug Weller talk 16:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

May 2021

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm RoseGold1250. I noticed that you recently removed content from :It's Not Unusual ↗ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary ↗. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thanks. It's rose gold! (T? ↗) 14:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

25px|alt=Information icon|link= ↗ Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|Ludicer often ↗|often}} edit without using an edit summary ↗. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks!  - CorbieVreccan ☊ ↗ ☼ ↗ 18:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Rose

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Rose of Solidarity '''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | This was the picture of the day consiquently Contrariagirl (talk) 06:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
|}

Happy First Edit Anniversary WP Ludicer 🎉

Hey @WP Ludicer. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 7 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:54, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Fortuna imperatrix mundi. I noticed that you made a comment on the page :Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates ↗ that didn't seem very civil ↗, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you.  '''—'''''Fortuna'' ↗, imperatrix 05:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
:Yes, I was getting uncivil, which is why I stopped participating in that discussion immediately thereafter. WP Ludicer (talk) 01:17, 19 December 2025 (UTC)