W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Zestfully-smokeless

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

A belated welcome!



thumb|The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm! {{smiley}} ↗

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Zestfully-smokeless! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions ↗. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

{{Div col|colwidth=18em}}
{{Div col end}}

If you have questions, '''{{edit|Special:MyTalk|just use this link to ask for help|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}}'''; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center ↗.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗! Again, welcome! Xnioh (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2026 (UTC)<!-- Template:Welcome-belated -->

Hey, please stop altering Heroic Effort as you have (Warning)



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗ did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted ↗. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines ↗. You can find information about these at our welcome page ↗ which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia ↗. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 -->

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not use misleading edit summaries ↗ when making changes to Wikipedia pages. This behavior is viewed as disruptive ↗, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-mislead2 -->

Hello and welcome to wikipedia. Wikipedia apreciates your decision to participate. However your recent editing actions in Heroic measure ↗ violate multiple Wikipedia guidelines and recommendations that you should read before editing further.. You removed a lot of content which was in the article on consensus and had received peer review. It is imperative you discuss such with other editors on the talk page of the article. You also did not properly explain your changes in the edit summaries. That is not apropriate behavior. For those reasons I reverted your edits.

I hope you will take a look at guidelines and policies related to content deletion, consensus, and edit summarier before editing more. You can find those in the Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines ↗ aswell as Wikipedia:Manual of Style ↗. If you have questions go to Wikipedia:Teahouse ↗. You are a new editor and new editors make mistakes. It is important you not take time to learn from them. This will help you be a better editor and positively contribute to Wikipedia. Have a nice day! Finfixer (talk) 09:28, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

:I would also add that you edit articles in small chunks. On Wikipedia making one or at most few large edits is apreciated over fragmented editing where it can be avoided. Ofcourse there are exceptions like discovering new information and then correcting what you just added. Or perhapse you notice something else in the article that needs editing. You should, however, work to prevent these two example scenarios, as them taking place makes reviewing and in general understanding your changes more difficult. This you can do by reading the article broadly and reviewing your changes once or twice. Doing more background research also helps a lot. I hope this advise is usefull and you implement it in the future as warranted. Cheers, Finfixer (talk) 09:42, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francesco Ingoli ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genesis (book) ↗ was added. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Fritz Künkel ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Fritz Künkel ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Zestfully-smokeless&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Fritz Künkel}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1355979854 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:57, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Drew Stanley. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions ↗&#32; to :Funerals ↗, you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable ↗. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material ↗, user-generated content ↗, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources ↗ that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists ↗ of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unreliable --> Drew Stanley (talk) 02:17, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

:My bad, thanks for amending those. Zestfully-smokeless (talk) 02:25, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1



An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
:Falls Road, Belfast ↗
::added a link pointing to Ireland football team ↗
:False Bay ↗
::added a link pointing to Sand River (South Africa) ↗

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)