User Talk: Zolgoyo

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

March 2026

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}}  Largoplazo (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Tatar Roma ↗ for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Tatar Roma ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatar Roma ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Romani Tatar language ↗ for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Romani Tatar language ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romani Tatar language ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

LLM-generated text at discussion pages

You shouldn't use AI to generate your comments on discussion pages, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romani Tatar language ↗. Per Wikipedia talk page policy: {{tq|LLM-generated comments: Comments, nominations, and opening statements that are obviously generated (not merely refined) by a large language model or similar AI technology may be struck or collapsed with {{template|Collapse AI top}}. In formal discussions, this may result in the speedy closure of irrelevant or disruptive discussions, as explained on Wikipedia:Closing discussions § Closing vs archiving. If a worthwhile conversation has already started, it may be left open. The proposer of a closed discussion may be politely invited to start a new discussion using their own thoughts and words.}} <span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #00c9c2; color: #000000; font-family:Frutiger">🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 ↗</span> 20:18, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

:Dear @Kepler-1229b,
:Thank you for your message.
:I want to be absolutely clear: the thoughts, research, and arguments presented in my comments are entirely '''my own'''. I have thoroughly reviewed the provided academic sources, identified the relevant passages, and formulated the arguments based on my understanding of Wikipedia's policies on notability, verifiability, and original research.
:I understand that the phrasing or structure might appear refined. In an effort to present my arguments as clearly, concisely, and persuasively as possible, and to ensure they directly address Wikipedia policies, in some cases I have used tools to assist with grammatical refinement or clarity of expression. However, these tools were used solely for polishing my own generated content, not for generating the arguments.
:I am happy to clarify any point or provide further details from the sources if needed. Zolgoyo (talk) 23:09, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
::Replying using AI when '''I explicitly told you this is forbidden''' on Wikipedia is certainly something. These comments do not read as AI-assisted, they read as raw AI chatbot output. It is not {{tq|"in some cases"}}, it is '''all of them''' (at least in recent discussions). Please respond using your own written text and not AI output next time. I would like to clarify that this is not intended as a personal attack or anything of the sort, although it may read as blunt. <span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #00c9c2; color: #000000; font-family:Frutiger">🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 ↗</span> 23:37, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
:::I am amazed that you perceive all of these, as well as my answer to you, as raw AI-generated. Your accusation is untrue, and I am offended by this warning. I clearly emphasize that I have not and will not use AI replies in comments or in the content of articles. Zolgoyo (talk) 08:38, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
::::If you will no longer use AI to generate your replies, then I am fine with that. However, you very clearly have used AI in the past, as myself and another editor have realized. <span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #00c9c2; color: #000000; font-family:Frutiger">🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 ↗</span> 15:30, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Tessaract2. I noticed that you recently removed content ↗ from :Dobrujan Arabs ↗ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary ↗. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thanks. <span style="color:#bf3c2c !important">'''Tessaract2'''</span> <span style="font-size: 85%;"><span style="color:#0000ff !important">(talk to me here!)</span></span> 19:03, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hi @Tessaract2, I did add this information, but it seems it's not true, because no source uses this term to refer this people. I would like to correct it. Zolgoyo (talk) 19:44, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
::If that's the case, feel free to revert my edit. You do seem to be the one who added it in the first place, so I'll leave that up to you. <span style="color:#bf3c2c !important">'''Tessaract2'''</span> <span style="font-size: 85%;"><span style="color:#0000ff !important">(talk to me here!)</span></span> 20:07, 14 May 2026 (UTC)