W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Πpuπsnuπ

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.


<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->

Welcome!


thumb|Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|'''Welcome!''' ↗ ↗
Hello, Plupsnup, and '''''welcome to Wikipedia ↗'''''! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗! Please sign your name ↗ on talk pages ↗ using four tilde ↗s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our '''help pages''' ↗, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place '''{{Tlc|Help me}}''' on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!<!-- Template:Welcome_cookie --> Moneytrees🏝️<sup>Talk/CCI guide</sup> 05:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Letter to Gorbachev ↗ (March 16)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
-->{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

<strong><span style="color: #606060;" class="nowrap">AngusW🐶🐶F</span></strong> (<span style=" color: #663300;">bark</span> • <span style="color: #006600;">sniff</span> ↗) 06:16, 16 March 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Plupsnup'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <strong><span style="color: #606060;" class="nowrap">AngusW🐶🐶F</span></strong> (<span style=" color: #663300;">bark</span> • <span style="color: #006600;">sniff</span> ↗) 06:16, 16 March 2023 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Concern regarding Draft:ATCOR ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Plupsnup. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ATCOR ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Collaboration On Georgism-Related Topics


Hello Plupsnup.
I noticed that we both share an interest in editing articles that are related to Georgism, economics, and history.
I'm working on a skeleton draft for Freiland, which is a similar yet different alternative to the Georgist approach to land reform.
It was proposed by Silvio Gesell ↗ as part of his Freiwirtschaft ↗ theory and proposal.
I might later decide to merge the draft into the Freiwirtschaft article though, since Freiland only exists as a subsection on the German Wikipedia: :de:Freiwirtschaft#Freiland ↗.

I'm trying to find for sources to complete the Freiland article, but there may be a language barrier to finishing the article, since many of the sources that talk about it are written in German and Spanish instead of English.
Due to their histories and spreads of influence, Georgism is more well known in the Anglosphere ↗, whereas Freiland and Freiwirtschaft are more well-known in the German-speaking ↗ and Spanish-speaking ↗ worlds.

I've also been editing articles related to Demurrage currency ↗, since it's become one of my main interests.
I've been working with another editor on translating the :de:Silvio Gesell ↗ German article into the Silvio Gesell ↗ English article.
I think it would be awesome if we could potentially edit articles together. Zero Contradictions (talk) 06:47, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hello Zero. I'm not well versed in Gesell's theories besides having amateur understanding about how a demurraged currency works. cooperative-individualism.org has available ''The Case for Nationalisation of the Land ↗'' and ''The Natural Order ↗.'' Plupsnup (talk) 07:35, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Georgist activists ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Georgist activists ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 23:54, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1322758825 -->

Georgism sidebar versus footer



Hi RAC. I see you've restored the 2010-style Georgism sidebar to Frederic C. Howe ↗. You seem to be dedicated to Georgism and I was wondering if I could persuade you to work up a modern-style Georgism FOOTER rather than a layout-clogging sidebar? These are basically low-value links that can be had just as easily through the categories feature; I'm not adverse to having them in two places, but eating up 6 inches of vertical layout is highly suboptimal. A footer does not affect page layout and is just as easy for people to find. Thanks, —tim //// Carrite (talk) 22:06, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

:@Carrite, I'm glad that you just said something about this because I've been thinking the exact same thing for a few months. The Template:Georgism ↗ sidebar looks really intrusive and distracting on pages like Single tax ↗ and Theory of fructification ↗, for example. I agree that a Georgism footer would be massively more preferable than the current sidebar.
:If a footer was created with all of the sidebar's current links, then I would also support deleting the sidebar template. Zero Contradictions (talk) 06:35, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
:Sure thing. I'll get to work on a Footer.
:Kind regards, Πpuπsnuπ (talk) 06:43, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
::What do you think about this Georgism footer that I just created?: Template:Georgism footer ↗. In my opinion, it looks better and is more user navigation friendly than the sidebar. I'd like it to replace the sidebar in all articles, if you agree.
::I don't think it's perfected just yet though, as it would need more nested navboxes to attain the best organizational aspects of Draft:Georgism footer ↗. Perhaps you could help me with that? Juna Urso Tropika (talk) 05:37, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::i agree that it's much better than the sidebar. You can go ahead and add replace the sidebar with it in the relevant articles.
:::On the question of nested navboxes, I think my Draft ↗ does a better job at categorising the types of professions that each article on a person belongs to. If we could move onto creating relevant and nested navboxes, that would be great (and I'm more than happy to assist). Πpuπsnuπ (talk) 08:04, 30 June 2026 (UTC)