W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: 3f45188

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!



Hi 3f45188! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage ↗, or you can always find a task here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Search the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing! <!-- Template:Welcome--> Heyallkatehere (talk) 15:25, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary ↗. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary ↗, or by discussion on the talk page ↗. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief ↗.

The edit summary field looks like this:
{{Edit summary field/OOUI}}

or in the visual editor:
{{Edit summary field/VisualEditor}}

{{strong|Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.}} When logged in to your Wikipedia account ↗, you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{myprefs|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}, and then click the "{{int:saveprefs}}" button.
Thanks!{{sp}}<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> <span style="background-color:#556B2F; padding:4px 4px 2px 4px;border-radius:8px;"><span style="color: #FFFFF0">'''MossOnALog'''</span><span style="color: #FFFFF0"><sup>Talk</sup></span></span> 21:56, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

:@3f45188, please see the above message. <span style="background-color:#556B2F; padding:4px 4px 2px 4px;border-radius:8px;"><span style="color: #FFFFF0">'''MossOnALog'''</span><span style="color: #FFFFF0"><sup>Talk</sup></span></span> 22:49, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
:Please heed these messages. Your continued editing without summaries is disruptive. Crs5827 (talk) 01:49, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Toboso encounter ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Toboso encounter ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%203f45188&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Toboso encounter}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1352100841 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:52, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Central Treaty Organization ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Central Treaty Organization ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%203f45188&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Central Treaty Organization}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1353065189 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:33, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Gulf Cooperation Council ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Gulf Cooperation Council ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%203f45188&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Gulf Cooperation Council}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1353070016 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:23, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For merging all those duplicate references! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat ↗』 02:56, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
|}

Erroneous edit to Rama Duwaji ↗



Hello,

I do not like to revert people, but you latest edit to the Rama Duwaji page did not remove the duplicated citation. It seems to have removed the hyperallergic interview link and replaced it with an earlier citation that does appear to have been duplicated.

Pietrus1 (talk) 18:02, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. I noticed that your recent edit to :Maidan casualties ↗ did not have an edit summary ↗. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary ↗, or by discussion on the talk page ↗. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief ↗.

The edit summary field looks like this:
{{Edit summary field/OOUI}}

or in the visual editor:
{{Edit summary field/VisualEditor}}

{{strong|Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.}} When logged in to your Wikipedia account ↗, you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{Preferences|Editing|Editor|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}, and then click the "{{int:saveprefs}}" button.
Thanks!{{sp}}<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> Rsk6400 (talk) 04:58, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

:3f45188, you have been notified 4 times and you haven't acknowledged or tried to improve. Do you want to be included in the category of problematic users? <span style="font-family:Segoe Script"> Jay</span><span style="font-size:115%"> 💬</span> 02:49, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
::no sorry I can work on it 3f45188 (talk) 14:05, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Colonial Parkway murders ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Colonial Parkway murders ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%203f45188&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Colonial Parkway murders}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1353884087 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:20, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on International sanctions against Afghanistan ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :International sanctions against Afghanistan ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%203f45188&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:International sanctions against Afghanistan}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1354191352 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Hydrogen ion ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Hydrogen ion ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%203f45188&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Hydrogen ion}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1354330898 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:37, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Pamiris ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Pamiris ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%203f45188&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Pamiris}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1354482833 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:37, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Rearrangement of references ("combined duplicated citations")



In your recent edits, I'm concerned that you might be reducing text-source integrity ↗. (I reverted one ↗.) Is there an important principle that you are upholding by making changes like these, and given your substantial number of similar edits, could you explain how it applies generally? What efforts are you making to balance that principle against other relevant ones? <span style="font-family:Constantia; color=#0077bb; font-size:medium; line-height:0.0;">'''''TheFeds'''''</span> 03:28, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

:i do not really know genuinely 3f45188 (talk) 13:14, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
::You need to pause this immediately. Edits like https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamization_in_Bangladesh&diff=prev&oldid=1357459874 ↗, among many others, are taking a sentence with a reference, and changing it to a paragraph with a reference. This means that future readers don't know if the preceding paragraph is in its entirety supported by the source, or just the last sentence. I am asking you for a clear explanation (several sentences, citing Wikipedia guidelines or consensus) for why you think this is justifiable on such a large scale. <span style="font-family:Constantia; color=#0077bb; font-size:medium; line-height:0.0;">'''''TheFeds'''''</span> 21:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
:::I do not really know. 3f45188 (talk) 21:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
::::I may have an idea, but I do not know how I can explain it substantively. The best way for me to explain it may be that I think that the references may be redundant in some way, perhaps that the references are the same thing and are used in succession. By trimming them in the way you are implying, it seems to me that it is more clear, perhaps. This is supposed to be a site that values clarity, and the way I see it, I am making it a bit more clear. I apologize if the above is confusing, but it is the best way I can explain it. 3f45188 (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::If that does not suffice, I apologize in advance. 3f45188 (talk) 21:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::Let me give you another example, and an opportunity to try explaining substantively again. At The Holocaust in Bulgaria ↗, you changed ↗ (in part): {{text diff|1=<nowiki>The Law for Protection of the Nation ↗ prohibited the granting of Bulgarian citizenship to Jews;<ref name="ragaru2" /> it prohibited Jews from holding elected office or serving in the civil service; it prohibited them from serving in a military capacity and mandated that they complete their national service in the Labour Corps ↗.<ref name="ragaru2" /></nowiki>|2=<nowiki>The Law for Protection of the Nation prohibited the granting of Bulgarian citizenship to Jews; it prohibited Jews from holding elected office or serving in the civil service; it prohibited them from serving in a military capacity and mandated that they complete their national service in the Labour Corps ↗.<ref name="ragaru2" /></nowiki>}} There are 2 ways to interpret the first version: either that "ragaru2" supports the 1st & 3rd prohibitions (but not the 2nd); or that "ragaru2" supports the entire thing and is redundantly cited. There are 2 ways to interpret the second (your) version: either that "ragaru2" supports the entire thing; or that "ragaru2" only supports the 3rd prohibition (but not the 1st & 2nd).<p>You made that edit, and it changed the possible meaning, so please explain to me why. <span style="font-family:Constantia; color=#0077bb; font-size:medium; line-height:0.0;">'''''TheFeds'''''</span> 23:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::I interpreted that ragaru2 supports the entire thing. I believe that the reference explains that all of the prohibitions mentioned and thus makes it not redundant. I did not intend to change the meaning in such a way as to make it unclear because I believe that in a line/paragraph, everything before a reference (and after the preceding reference, if there is one) directly applies to the reference in question. As a result, I thought ragaru2 applied to the entire text except you provided, so it is redundantly cited. 3f45188 (talk) 23:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::I'm glad that you are considering it systematically. But wouldn't you agree that your belief is one of multiple reasonable interpretations, and as a result, when you change from one structure to the other, it is strongly preferable to check the original source to ensure that you aren't introducing a discrepancy? Did you check the source before editing, after editing, or not at all? What about for the hundreds of other similar edits? <span style="font-family:Constantia; color=#0077bb; font-size:medium; line-height:0.0;">'''''TheFeds'''''</span> 00:22, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::I regret to say not always, but I know I can do better. 3f45188 (talk) 00:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::I can make a conscious effort to do so. 3f45188 (talk) 00:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Question



Impressive stuff you are doing fixing duplicate references. Could i request you fix one for me? Monathephantom (talk) 14:53, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

AJMN



Regarding your edit ↗, is it possible to save the quotes - since the article is controversial - I like to save the quotes. Cinaroot (talk) 00:57, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

:I do not think so, sorry. 3f45188 (talk) 01:07, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
::Or maybe it is, I just have no clue how. 3f45188 (talk) 01:08, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
:::@ChomponU_Pongsawet do you know? Cinaroot (talk) 01:08, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Yes, it is possible. The standard way to preserve important quotes from a source—especially on controversial topics—is to use the |quote= parameter inside the citation templates (such as {{tl|cite web}} or {{tl|cite news}}). For example: <code><nowiki>{{cite news |last=... |first=... |title=... |url=... |quote=The exact text from the source goes right here.}}</nowiki></code> This keeps the quote attached to the reference at the bottom of the page without cluttering the main article text, making it easily verifiable for other editors. --<span style="background-color:blue; color:yellow; padding:2px">'''Ch'''</span><span style="background-color:yellow; color:blue; padding:2px">'''Po'''</span> ^_^ <sup>(talk)</sup> 01:52, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Yah - you placed a duplicate citations template. The question is how to have different quotes from the same source at different points in the article. That was the reason for duplicate citations. Cinaroot (talk) 02:35, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::@3f45188 @ChomponU Pongsawet are you guys ok - restoring the quotes ? Cinaroot (talk) 03:23, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Note: better to use edit summaries



Follow up on this revert ↗: after looking at your other edits, I now see your edit here ↗ likely came from a constructive copy-editing intention, but when seeing the edit on its own, in the absence of an edit summary to explain the deletion, it looks non-constructive. (For context: deleting or adding mentions of certain religions or ethnicities is a very common type of tendentious edit ↗ in the topics of Turkey, the Middle East, etc.) To avoid this kind of confusion, I recommend you always include an edit summary to signal your intention, especially for deletions, even if your edit is otherwise routine. The summary can be as simple as "copy edit".

In this particular case, I think the extra few words are worth including for explicit clarity, so I would prefer to leave it as is anyways. Cheers, R Prazeres (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

:Ok. I was unaware of this and thought it was redundant. 3f45188 (talk) 17:05, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::What were you unaware of? <span style="font-family:Segoe Script"> Jay</span> 07:16, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
:::The fact that the clarification was necessary and not redundant. 3f45188 (talk) 13:16, 1 July 2026 (UTC)