User Talk: 9yz
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
Good revert!
Good catch with this revert ↗ at Lou M. Taylor ↗. For future reference, while it's not required, when you revert an editor it's helpful to give them a warning ↗. In this case I gave that user the warning {{tls|uw-defamatory2}}. There's also Twinkle ↗, which streamlines the process (and lets you do a one-click "rollback" undo). Anyways, just a suggestion; like I said, this isn't required. Keep up the good work! <span class="nowrap"> <span style="font-family:courier">-- <span style="color:deeppink;">Tamzin</span></span><sup>[''<span style="color:deeppink;">cetacean needed</span>'']</sup> (she/they)</span> 05:49, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
:Hey, thanks! I usually leave a warning on registered users' pages, but I guess I forgot ;) I'll check out Twinkle, thanks again! 9yz (talk) 06:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Trouted
{{trout}}
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 168.212.64.157 ↗ (talk) 18:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC) i clearly cited a source, although i see that you are clearly on the grass and are probably higher than an airplane, i will not report you to get you fired but i warn you... think twice before you strike me you trout i hope someone slaps you in the face with a trout irl. goodbye loser. not even gonna let someone have a bit of fun, the journal is clearly communist, i am sorry for the loss of your eyes. get trouted.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
:Citing a source requires...citing a source. 9yz (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
United States
I reverted your edit re Osama bin Laden because it was less than accurate. Per the Wikipedia article, Bin Laden conceived and directed the September 11 attacks ↗, but 19 others actually "perpetrated" them. Mason.Jones (talk) 15:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Perhaps then it would have been better to edit it to say that instead of just removing it? 9yz (talk) 18:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
It was inaccurate (even erroneous) info, so no. Otherwise I wouldn't have removed it. I should have said this in the edit summary, so there, my apologies. Mason.Jones (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1322758895 -->
Season's Greetings
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | 211px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
----
'''Hello 9yz, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion ↗. Spread the WikiLove ↗ by wishing another user a Merry Christmas ↗ and a Happy New Year ↗, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. <br />Happy editing,'''<br />
Abishe (talk) 16:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}''
|} Abishe (talk) 16:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
March 2026
Hey, I am responding to your comment earlier about the edits to the Comcast page. I made the edits myself and did not use an AI chatbot or an LLM--I quite literally typed it myself. I made the edits myself and I would greatly appreciate it if you could restore the changes I made. Did you have a problem with the substance of the changes that were made? I did read reliable sources and then summarize them in my own words. ~2026-13638-86 ↗ (talk) 10:50, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Why WP:SPS for revert on Waymo?
I have no connection with either the interviewer, the subject company or that interviewee. Your reversion returns outdated material to the article and deletes the source for all the other stuff I added. Lfstevens (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
:I didn't mean to say that you have a connection to the source, just that the source itself is self-published. It's a podcast run by John Collison ↗ who is a tech billionaire but doesn't seem to have any expertise in autonomous vehicles nor any qualifications as a journalist. If some bloke started a podcast and interviewed his neighbors about what they do every day, we wouldn't consider that a reliable source, so I don't see it being any different if the guy running it is rich.
:The guest on the podcast ''is'' an expert on autonomous vehicles but he's also co-CEO of Waymo, so it's a primary source which doesn't serve to establish the notability of the material.
:As for the material that I restored - while it's old, we don't have any indication that Waymo isn't still using it (unless it's mentioned in the podcast, forgive me for not watching the whole hour). 9yz (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
::I checked before deleting it. That stuff is long dead. Pretty random revert. If the info was incorrect, fine. Otherwise, just find a better source. Or ask me to find one. You're not helping. Lfstevens (talk) 05:44, 30 March 2026 (UTC)