User Talk: ALittleButterfly15

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Orphaned non-free image File:Taylor Swift - Lover (Live From Paris).jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Taylor Swift - Lover (Live From Paris).jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Like Jennie cover

The cover was officially released without the remix header in release. It was updated and now has a header. No one cropped anything 47.223.51.77 ↗ (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello! I'm Paper9oll. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page :2 ((G)I-dle album) ↗ have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source ↗, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you.  '''— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝 ↗)''' 03:58, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Fate ((G)I-dle song) ↗. Your edits appear to be disruptive ↗ and have been or will be reverted ↗.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute ↗ with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page ↗, and seek consensus ↗ with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution ↗ page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards ↗.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you. '''— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝 ↗)''' 04:37, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jump Blackpink artwork.png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Jump Blackpink artwork.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dreamer (Chris Brown song) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Your revert on 2.0 (song) ↗

Hello. In your revert of my edit last week on 2.0 (song) ↗, you also reverted a perfectly fine update to the Circle Chart peak position ↗ while telling ''me'' to "check the source" and noting the new chart position (31) I '''literally added that you undid'''. Then I see you silently re-updated the chart position yourself mere hours later ↗. How about ''you'' not revert the entire edit in the first place and check what ''you're'' doing before telling me to? As for your made-up "more than one main chart is allowed because the artist is Korean", no such exception exists. There is a rough consensus (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts/Archive_19#About_Billboard's_Hits_of_the_World_charts ↗) for only using the official chart provider for a country once a song has charted on the main char of that country and leaving out the equivalent ''Billboard'' chart for it. I suggest not making exceptions based on the nationality of the artist in future because nobody else appears to believe this on Wikipedia. Thank you. Skyversay (talk) 03:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Paper9oll, and welcome to Wikipedia ↗. I appreciate your contributions ↗, but in one of your recent edits to :Arirang World Tour ↗, it appears that you added original research ↗, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources ↗ in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source ↗ for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources ↗. Thank you. '''— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝 ↗)''' 06:49, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

:Can you explain why it is WP:OR ↗? The source stated explicitly the dates, venue, and number of show information, so just because it doesn't say explicitly "This is Arirang World Tour" doesn't mean it's SYNTH. ALittleButterfly15 (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
::@ALittleButterfly15 I was already clear and the policy is clear as well. KOPIS does not explicitly identify the event. When editors are expected to "search it themselves" by selecting the date range or location or other search criteria, then concluding that the returned figures correspond to a particular event, constitutes WP:SYNTH ↗. The same is true of arguments that this was the only event held on those dates, at that venue, or during that period. Unless the source itself explicitly makes that connection, the conclusion rests on editorial inference and therefore amounts to original research. '''— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝 ↗)''' 13:46, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
:::WP:SYNTH ↗ is only used when editors ''imply a new conclusion''. The dates are unmistakable, the venue is exactly clarified (not just in a city, in a district,... the exact stadium / arena), and when all road leads to one event only, that is not editorial synthesis. Unless you can prove the data isn't for that event, please don't use this poor excuse. ALittleButterfly15 (talk) 14:27, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
::::@ALittleButterfly15 No, I won't repeat myself the second time, the policy is already clear. You are arguing around it by treating editorial inference as verification. If the source does not explicitly identify the event, editors cannot supply that conclusion themselves. '''— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝 ↗)''' 14:31, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::I'd give it to you that the grossing data isn't clear, but the attendance data is explicitly identifies by venue and date, thus making it unmistakable and verified. If anything, it is closer to normal numerical summarization ↗ and WP:NOTJUSTANYSYNTH ↗ rather than SYNTH. ALittleButterfly15 (talk) 14:41, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::@ALittleButterfly15 You can cite WP:NOTSYNTH ↗ as you wish, but it remains a {{tq|page [that] provides additional information about concepts}} for the page(s) it supplements i.e. WP:NOR ↗. NOTSYNTH also states that it {{tq|is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community}}. Nor does WP:NOTSYNTH#SYNTH is not numerical summarization ↗ help you here, because that section is likewise only {{tq|additional information about concepts}} connected to WP:CALC ↗, which is already clear enough. It does not apply, nor does it permit, cases where editors must use venue and date to infer that the data belongs to a particular event. That attribution is still an editorial inference, so the policy point remains unchanged. '''— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝 ↗)''' 14:52, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::::And you failed the fifth pillar ↗ and WP:IAR ↗. But that's unrelated anyways, cause dates and venues (the exact venue, not just the area of the venue, you can double-check here ↗) information can clearly pinpoint which event was reported, therefore using it cannot be seen as SYNTH. Again, you have yet to state the reason why the information is unreliable. ALittleButterfly15 (talk) 15:07, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::::@ALittleButterfly15 Invoking WP:IAR ↗ or the fifth pillar does not override WP:NOR ↗. Neither is it a substitute for WP:CONSENSUS ↗. You made a '''B'''old edit by adding KOPIS, it was '''R'''everted, and the issue has now been '''D'''iscussed. What matters at this point is consensus for inclusion, and you have not shown that such consensus exists. You would be better off finding secondary source(s) that explicitly state those figures than continuing to argue against a policy that has been affirmed through repeated community consensus since Wikipedia's founding. '''— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝 ↗)''' 15:14, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Born Pink World Tour ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Born Pink World Tour ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A URL ↗ error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Born_Pink_World_Tour&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1350721280%7CBorn%20Pink%20World%20Tour%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20ALittleButterfly15&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Born Pink World Tour}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1350721280 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:17, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Different World (Alan Walker album) ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}}  '''''Vestrian24Bio''''' 09:47, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Vestrian24Bio, and welcome to Wikipedia ↗. I appreciate your contributions ↗, but in one of your recent edits to :Different World (Alan Walker album) ↗, it appears that you added original research ↗, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources ↗ in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source ↗ for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources ↗. Thank you. '''''Vestrian24Bio''''' 09:48, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

:WP:OR ↗ means adding information that has not been published, while all the reasons for the removal of the singles are just me compiling facts and information ↗, as the tracklist for his previous EPs is available on his discography article ↗. ALittleButterfly15 (talk) 10:56, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
::There are also included in the traacklist for this album making them very much a part of this album as well. Being included in previous EPs doesn't mean they cant be included in future releases; which is something you're saying here...
::There are no sources saying these singles were not part of this album; are they?? '''''Vestrian24Bio''''' 10:59, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
:::In one of my previous edits I have given an example about ''Blackout ↗'' and "Radar ↗" right? The keyword on the Template:Infobox album#Template:Singles ↗ guideline is that the included singles were released "during the marketing and promotion of the album", while these 3 singles have been appearing on his previous projects. This is also the reason why ''Good Girl Gone Bad: Reloaded ↗'' infobox doesn't include any singles from the original releases. ALittleButterfly15 (talk) 11:06, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
::::"Prior to the album" and "during the marketing and promotion of the album" are not the same thing; most of these singles came out before even the album was conceived...
::::Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS ↗... what's the reason to remove them from this article and that's the question. what other articles are doing is irrelevant to that. '''''Vestrian24Bio''''' 11:10, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS ↗ specified "comparing with articles that have been through some kind of quality review such as Featured article, Good article, or have achieved a WikiProject A class rating, makes a much more credible case", and ''Good Girl Gone Bad: Reloaded ↗'' is a Featured article, ''Blackout ↗'' and "Radar ↗" are Good articles. I've made 5 edits on this article, all only removed 3 singles "Faded", "Sing Me to Sleep" and "Alone" as they have been appearing on Walker's previous EPs, I do acknowledge the "All Falls Down", "Darkside" and "Diamond Heart" as pre-release singles. ALittleButterfly15 (talk) 11:17, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::* ''Good Girl Gone Bad: Reloaded ↗'' is a reissue, so it doesn't list singles from the original release; which is different from the situation here.
::::::* "Radar" was released as a single 2 years after the album ''Blackout''; which is also different from the situation here.
::::::If you're going to select random pages with situations entirely different from this; then that's not going to help make your case here.. '''''Vestrian24Bio''''' 07:20, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::If you want an exact match: the infobox of ''Map of the Soul: 7 ↗'' (a good article) doesn't include "Boy With Luv ↗" or "Make It Right ↗" because they already appeared on their previous EP. ALittleButterfly15 (talk) 09:47, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ↗ regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring ↗. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:ALittleButterfly15 reported by User:Vestrian24Bio (Result: ) ↗.  Thank you. '''''Vestrian24Bio''''' 10:54, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Please always log in

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits that could be considered controversial, and you might have been logged-out while making some of them. Please be mindful Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts ↗ prohibits editors from using alternate accounts (including temporary ones) to mislead, deceive, disrupt, or undermine consensus as detailed at {{section link|Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts}}. You can avoid issues related to this by making sure you are logged in before editing. Thank you.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:56, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

:Hi! I'm pretty sure Vestrian24Bio might have been mistaken, I didn't make any edits while logging out, and the content that me and that temporary accounts removed aren't similar, and for different reasons too. Anyways, thanks for the reminder, much appreciated. ALittleButterfly15 (talk) 05:48, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::Thanks for the clarification! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:49, 3 July 2026 (UTC)