User Talk: AderynMelyn
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
Welcome!
Hi AderynMelyn! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
Happy editing! <!-- Template:Welcome--> fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four ↗ (talk) 22:57, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
National Patriotic Front (Wales) ↗ moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to National Patriotic Front (Wales) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources''' and '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <span style="font-family: calisto;border: 2px solid white; background-color:navy; color:white; padding:2px">SnowyRiver28</span> (talk) 23:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Owain Williams (politician) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangor ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 22:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi AderynMelyn. Thank you for your work on National Patriotic Front (Wales) ↗. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:
{{Bq|1=Thanks for creating this page for a significant Welsh nationalist movement; the prose is well-written and engaging; it's appropriately referenced and linked from elsewhere. Great!}}
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Klbrain<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->
Klbrain (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Help me!
{{help me-helped}}
Please help me with...
Hello, I would like a second opinion on a dispute on the article Cymuned ↗. The organisation was a Welsh nationalist language campaign group that emerged from Plaid Cymru ↗ in a dispute over English immigration in the 2000s. The article was effectively devoid of citations or much content until I recently started building it, but despite how extensively I've already written it detailing the group's activities, Helper201 has twice deleted the ideology section citing WP:SYNTH ↗.
Having raised this in the talk section, they are arguing that Welsh language activism doesn't fall under Welsh nationalism ↗, despite it falling under the Wiki's definition for it. The group also emerged from a major public debate concerning English immigration and anglicisation in Wales (from a Welsh nationalist party). This is discussed at length with citations at the start of the article, and they've also deleted anti-English sentiment ↗ (alleged). They haven't actually provided the criteria for either ideology they're working on, and I can't help but feel like this is profound pedantry. The group cooperated with hardline Welsh republican ↗ organisations in protests (mentioned in the article) and its rhetoric concerning anglicisation was more direct than anything Plaid Cymru ↗ is involved in. Admittedly, I'm still working on the article, but I can't help but feel like they're attempting to imply that only explicit references to independence constitute nationalism. Meanwhile, they've also deleted references to nationalism from the Welsh Language Society ↗ Wiki since, which officially supports independence. AderynMelyn (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
:This is a question of Wikipedia:Verifiability ↗, a <em>core content policy</em> of Wikipedia. Firstly, infoboxes ↗ are summaries of an article, so anything that you say in an infobox must come from the body of the article. And article content must be able to be verified by means of reliable sources, and if a statement is challenged, an inline citation must be added. What you are presenting is an argument for why Cymuned is nationalist, which is all well and good, but Wikipedia is not the place for that, because comments on a Wikipedia talk page are not reliable sources. Wikipedia will state that this organization is nationalist if and only if reliable sources do so. <b style="font-family:Monospace">-- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH)</b> 22:56, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
March 2026
30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon ↗ Your edit to :Draft:Mudiad Eryr Wen ↗ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted ↗ material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. If you {{em|are}} the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate ↗ and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of {{em|information}}, but not as a source of {{em|content}}, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources ↗ for more information. <!-- Template:uw-copyright --> <span style="color: #EE1C25; font-family: 'Trebuchet MS';">thejiujiangdragon</span> 🔥🐉 ↗ 19:39, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
:Which content is copyrighted? AderynMelyn (talk) 19:50, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
::Since looked at the revision history, understood. Thought it was acceptable as a block quote from the source website, alas. AderynMelyn (talk) 19:55, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Mudiad Eryr Wen ↗ has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Mudiad Eryr Wen ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />
The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme ↗ to find out how to improve the article.
'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</div>
'''Next steps'''
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article ↗. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories ↗.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article ↗ within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section ↗.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines ↗ once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse ↗, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Nighfidelity (talk) 20:09, 7 May 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->
May 2026
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions ↗—specifically <span class="plainlinks">this edit ↗</span> to :National Patriotic Front (Wales) ↗—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox ↗. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse ↗ or the Help desk ↗. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 -->Materialscientist (talk) 19:40, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
:You've just erased a load of well sourced information and wiped out the subheadings from the article. Also, his name is Gethin ap Grufydd - Ap Gruffydd is the correct form for his surname, this was a mistake (that I previously made while making the article) that I was amending. You should revert your changes. AderynMelyn (talk) 19:44, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dennis Coslett ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph ↗ was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 2 June 2026 (UTC)