W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Nighfidelity

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(90d)
| archive = User talk:Nighfidelity/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 400K
| archiveheader = {{Archive}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
{{Talk header|search=yes|arpol=no|wp=no|disclaimer=no|bottom=no||}}
<!-- Template:Setup auto archiving -->

Your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Megan Skiendiel ↗


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">

50px|left ↗

Hello Nighfidelity. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Megan Skiendiel ↗ is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Megan Skiendiel ↗ will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

</div>

Misclasification of draft as AI?



I'm trying to understand why you declined Draft:Indigo (bus service) ↗ for being LLM generated? When I reviewed and declined it previously, nothing about it stood out as AI to me. I've also just put it through GPTZero and it came back as 100% human generated MangoMan11 (talk) 02:06, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

:I not sure why I did. Nighfidelity (talk) 02:10, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
:Looking at the draft, it's currently, in my opinion, notable, so I'll accept it. Nighfidelity (talk) 02:11, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Question on draft feedback and notability criteria



Hi Nighfidelity,

Thank you for reviewing the draft for Kevin J. Bozic. I really appreciate the feedback.

I wanted to ask for a bit more clarity on the notability criteria. I understand that the main issue is the lack of strong independent sources, and I’m currently working on adding more third-party coverage from healthcare publications.

Would in-depth articles from outlets like Becker’s or similar industry publications be considered sufficient if they discuss his work in detail?

Also, is there anything specific you would recommend prioritizing to better meet the academic notability standard?

Thanks again for your time and guidance. Ketakib (talk) 15:41, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

:As long as the articles don't consist of mostly quotes from him (this Becker's article ↗ is an example). Currently, the draft consists of 15 references, the first two are from the colleges he graduated from, the third, forth, and fifteenth are articles he co-authored, the fifth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, and thirteenth are just press releases, and finally, the sixth, seventh, and twelfth are from databases. Nighfidelity (talk) 15:47, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
::Hi Nighfidelity,
::Thank you again for your earlier feedback on the Kevin J. Bozic draft. I’ve since revised the source list and found several stronger independent references, including older coverage from major national publications.
::Before resubmitting, I wanted to ask whether you think older mainstream media articles (2000s) are still appropriate for establishing notability. I also wanted to ask whether you have any recommendations regarding the body/content of the article itself beyond sourcing. For example, should the article be shortened, simplified, or restructured in any way to better align with Wikipedia standards?
::I appreciate the guidance.
::Ketaki Bakre Ketakib (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Draft submission declined: Petrus Buwalda



Dear Nighfidelity,

Thank you for going through my Wikipedia submission on Petrus Buwalda. This is my first submission, and I have a question concerning your feedback, specifically which sections require (better) references. I have attempted to include all the references I have already found, and try to not repeat where it isn't necessary and for which parts already reference to other pages. Would you be able to give me a breadkdown of the sections that require references that are not already included in the article?

Your feedback seems to be similar to the initial feedback I received from another user, and so I would like to request some more specific information.

Many thanks in advance, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

DiplomatPurSang DiplomatPurSang (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

:The first and third paragraphs of the diplomatic career section, the first and second paragraphs of the Refuseniks section, and the sentence in the persoanl life section on his brother need sources. Nighfidelity (talk) 13:51, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive



{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1350894664 -->

Disambiguation link notification for May 2



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Not Without Laughter ↗, links pointing to the disambiguation pages EBSCO ↗ and The Walls of Jericho ↗ were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Article support



Hi @Nighfidelity I'm hoping you can please provide further feedback on my article for creation: Draft:Ryan Stokes ↗ that you have previously reviewed. It has undergone further significant changes, however it's still waiting review from February. Please can you let me know if you have any tips? Thank you. Wikifanap07 (talk) 00:18, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Floyd L. Carlisle


25px ↗ Hello! Your submission of Floyd L. Carlisle ↗ at the Did You Know nominations page ↗ has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''your nomination's entry ↗''' and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> Morogris<small> (</small><big><span style="color:darkred">'''✉'''</span></big> • <span style="color:darkgreen">'''✎'''</span> ↗<small>)</small> 00:50, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Apoy sa Dugo ↗


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">

50px|left ↗

Hello Nighfidelity. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Apoy sa Dugo ↗ is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Apoy sa Dugo ↗ will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

</div>

Concern regarding Draft:Urban Diteman ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Nighfidelity. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Urban Diteman ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026



<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per H:DL ↗, causes errors for screen readers -->
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

thumb|400px|New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026 ↗

'''Backlog update'''

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

'''2024 and 2025 NPP Awards'''

74px|left ↗{{no ping|JTtheOG}} was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
{{no ping|Hey man im josh}} and {{no ping|MPGuy2824}} won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

{{no ping|BoyTheKingCanDance}}, {{no ping|Rosiestep}}, {{no ping|SunDawn}}, and {{no ping|Vanderwaalforces}} were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame ↗ for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

'''January–February backlog drive'''

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

'''May backlog drive'''

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026 ↗.

'''PageTriage'''

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed ↗ to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket ↗ if you're interested in following along.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

{{refend}}
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Novem Linguae@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1353812553 -->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: 1 Picasso for 100 Euros ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''1 Picasso for 100 Euros ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hoary (talk) 23:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Not only have you "made at least 10 edits over more than four days", you're a reviewer of new pages ↗. I think you're competent to create new articles, skipping the (horribly overloaded) "Articles for Creation" stage. That said, thank you for 1 Picasso for 100 Euros ↗ ... but NB it's just one link away from "orphan" status. -- Hoary (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2026 (UTC) --- PS That one link is from the article Péri Cochin ↗, which I have trivially improved today but which remains terrible. If you happen to have some spare time and energy..... Hoary (talk) 05:41, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Apoy sa Dugo ↗


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">

50px|left ↗

Hello Nighfidelity. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Apoy sa Dugo ↗ is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Apoy sa Dugo ↗ will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

</div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: The Digital Delusion ↗ (June 3)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Stuartyeates, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=Please fact check this, it appears to be internally inconsistent.|}}<!--
--
-->

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
Stuartyeates (talk) 09:22, 3 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

:What do you mean by that? Are you referring to the reception section? Nighfidelity (talk) 11:08, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Nighfidelity'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 09:22, 3 June 2026 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: The Digital Delusion ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''The Digital Delusion ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time ↗. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ChrysGalley (talk) 20:51, 5 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Mickey Unrapped ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Mickey Unrapped ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time ↗. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
phuzion (talk) 01:42, 7 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

New message from Narutolovehinata5


{{talkback|Wikipedia talk:Did you know|Floyd L. Carlisle|ts=23:27, 7 June 2026 (UTC)}}
<B><span style="color:#0038A8">Naruto</span><span style="color:#FCD116">love</span><span style="color:#CE1126">hinata</span>5</B> (talk · contributions ↗) 23:27, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Samuel E. Sheppard ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Nighfidelity. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samuel E. Sheppard ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

WP:Before


Hello. There are two recent discussions concerning a merge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Emily_Grierson ↗ and a deletion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pepe_(footballer,_born_October_1983) ↗ that you have nominated. In both instances participating editors have found sources that support the article's notability. It is laudable that you have interest in the outcome of articles on Wikipedia. However, for merge discussions and deletion discussions, the nominator is supposed to have a done at least a cursory search for sources before nominating that action be taken on any given article. I am guessing you can see the benefit of having found sources on a subject before nominating it for action. So, please see WP:DILIGENCE ↗ and WP:CONRED ↗ regarding this matter. Thanks. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 13:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

:Ok. Nighfidelity (talk) 13:56, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Re-review Request for Previously Declined Draft



Hello, and thank you for taking the time to review my article previously.

I have carefully addressed the concerns that led to its decline by improving the sourcing, structure, and overall compliance with Wikipedia's content guidelines. If you have the opportunity, I would greatly appreciate it if you could take another look at the draft and let me know if any further improvements are needed.

Thank you for your time and continued assistance. Nubelbariloe (talk) 19:59, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Convera



Hi @Nighfidelity, thank you for taking the time to review Draft:Convera ↗. I understand the guidelines for corporate notability are strict and have worked to update the draft's sourcing according to Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) ↗ guidelines. The new draft cites in-depth coverage from Britannica and Fortune and elaborates on the history of Convera under its previous name of Western Union Business Solutions. If you're willing to take a look, I would greatly appreciate any advice or input you might have on the new draft. Thank you again. Greatjonesguy (talk) 15:56, 10 July 2026 (UTC)