User Talk: ArthurTheGardener
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:ArthurTheGardener/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=90|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
Draft:Magyar Abdullah
Thank you for your review and comments. I have edited in all the suggestions. Please take a look and let me know. Thanks again. Murat (talk) 11:21, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
Request on 17:39:32, 9 July 2026 for assistance on AfC ↗ submission by Digi-mar-at
{{anchor|17:39:32, 9 July 2026 review of submission by Digi-mar-at}}
{{Lafc|username=Digi-mar-at|ts=17:39:32, 9 July 2026|declinedtalk=Draft:Hotel_Westend}}
<!-- Start of message -->
Hi {{Reply to|ArthurTheGardener}}
Thank you for taking the time to review my draft (Hotel Westend) and for your valuable feedback regarding the tone and neutral point of view.
I have thoroughly revised the text to comply with WP:NPOV ↗, WP:W2W ↗, and WP:TONE ↗. Specifically, I have made the following adjustments:
Neutralized Tone: Removed subjective marketing descriptions and phrases such as "luxury spa treatments" and changed them to purely factual historical context ("spa town").
Removed Peacock Terms: Stripped away puffery and peacock words like "richly decorated" and "architectural innovation" to let the objective architectural facts speak for themselves.
Refined Sourcing: Completely removed the hotel's website as a primary source for interior descriptions to ensure strict compliance with COI and independent sourcing guidelines.
I have updated the draft with these changes. Before I officially resubmit it for another formal review, are there any other specific passages or further modifications you would recommend to ensure it fully meets the community's standards?
Thank you again for your guidance and help in improving this article!
Best regards,
Mari
<!-- End of message -->Digi-mar-at (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
:Hello, Digi-mar-at, Yes, that looks a lot better. I'm going to let someone else review it to make sure there are fresh eyes on the article, but if you have a personal interest in the subject and you have not yet declared it on your page, you should do it before resubmitting. Good luck, ArthurTheGardener (talk) 17:58, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
::Hello @ArthurTheGardener,
::Thank you so much for taking the time to review the draft and for your helpful feedback!
::Regarding the personal interest declaration: I actually already declared my conflict of interest on both my User page and on the Talk page of the draft the day I created it.
::Since you mentioned it, now I'm not entirely sure if my current disclosure is sufficient, or if you were looking for it in a different format or somewhere else?
::Thanks again for your guidance! Digi-mar-at (talk) 18:18, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
:::That's fine, thank you: and good luck with the draft! ArthurTheGardener (talk) 15:00, 10 July 2026 (UTC)