W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Axisstroke

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

'''Welcome!'''

Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and welcome ↗ to Wikipedia! {{#if:||Thank you for your contributions ↗.}}

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called '''Your first article ↗'''. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the '''New contributors' help page ↗''', where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type '''<code>{{tl|help me}}</code>''' on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗! Please sign your name ↗ on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question ↗ or ask me on {{#if:|User talk:{{{2}}}{{!}}my talk page|my talk page}}. <!-- Template:Firstarticle --> Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 23:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1187132222 -->

July 2024



Please do not add fake footnotes as you did here ↗. - Altenmann ↗ >talk ↗ 06:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

:The reference shows A) Univ. Prof. title b) retired. Why do you remove it!?! Axisstroke (talk) 07:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1258243549 -->

RFC Notice



Hello, this notice is for everyone who took part in the March 2024 AfD on lists of airline destinations ↗. I have started a new RfC on the subject. If you would like to participate please follow this link: {{slink|Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not|RfC on WP:NOT and British Airways destinations}}. Sunnya343 (talk) 00:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Augusta, Princess of Eulenburg



Rathter than leave this article to be PRODded, which seemed the likely outcome, I've redirected it to the section "Marriage and family" in the article on Philipp, Prince of Eulenburg. The text on Augusta is saved in the history, including the references you added. Would you perhaps like to incorporate them in the article on Philipp, along with any additional text/refs from the redirected article? Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 09:27, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
:If you disagree with the redirect you're of course able to restore the article, but it does then risk being taken to AfD, and in the current climate (strongly pro-deletion and anti-nobility) I would not be optimistic of its chances, to be frank. Ingratis (talk) 09:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
::Dear Ingratis Thank you for the intervention. Indeed that is an ok outcome. Only started to look briefly at her as female figures often by bias get badly treated.
::I'll soon expand her role in the husband's article. Axisstroke (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Bare URL references



Please don’t use bare URLs ↗ as references. They’re unhelpful to the reader and are subject to link rot. Please use templates like template:cite web ↗ instead. Danners430 (talk) 08:42, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

:ok fine. I thought one of the bots does this anyway. Axisstroke (talk) 20:10, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
::Only bots which are run manually - which means others are having to “clean up” after your edits. It’s not difficult to use templates, so please do :) Danners430 (talk) 22:21, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
:::Great, will do. Thank you for your explanations on the referencing with the templates Danners430. Axisstroke (talk) 06:25, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

List of Transavia France destinations ↗



Please don’t put sources in edit summaries, unless you’re removing content with a cite - in this case a source isn’t needed anyway, as the route starting on a specific date was in the existing source, so it’s just a cleanup exercise… just making you aware for the future, that’s all :) <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 17:41, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

:Good, fine (: Axisstroke (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

aeroroutes



A courtesy note to let you know that aeroroutes.com is not a reliable source - see the discussion at WP:AEROROUTES ↗. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

:ok good to know. Thank you. Axisstroke (talk) 14:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1322758710 -->

CS1 error on Delta Air Lines ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Delta Air Lines ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Axisstroke&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Delta Air Lines}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1362413425 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Danners430. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions ↗&#32; to :Delta Air Lines ↗, you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable ↗. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material ↗, user-generated content ↗, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources ↗ that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists ↗ of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unreliable --> <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 20:54, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

:Ok. Let me know please which source has been classified as not reliable. Thank you. Axisstroke (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::The big ones are Aeroroutes and Routes Online. You cannot be making edits which add unreliable sources. <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 07:54, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::No Aeroroutes ref to be seen in the Delta destination table. Please point to the routes online discussion/classification. Thank you. Axisstroke (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::::They're both covered at WP:AEROROUTES ↗ - they're basically the same site run by the same guy <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 11:16, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::ok fine. Overread the pointer. thank you. Axisstroke (talk) 11:52, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Delta Air Lines ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}} <!-- Template:uw-ew --> <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 11:23, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

:The edit warning is warranted on the editor that improperly removed content without even discussing or reaching consensus on the removal. I am sorry to have to resort on reverts to properly reinsert the original content. (As you can see from my edit history of more than ten years I do not lightly revert. please stop your unexplained removal @Danners430 Thank you. Axisstroke (talk) 11:42, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::Another editor boldly removed it… and you've restored it three times. That is edit warring. <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 11:47, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Boldy removing without discussion is what you are advocating. Great way to trample on others work. Axisstroke (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::::Boldly removing is perfectly legitimate - see WP:BOLD ↗ <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 11:54, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::The same policy can be read completely orthogonal that one should be bold and have the things incorporated in WP so that they can be fixed further down the way. I find it incredible that due to the removal of one single editor you fully discredit previous work. I really disagree as it guides WP to be less and less relevant as people like you diminish it wrongly. Axisstroke (talk) 20:44, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::You seem to be ignoring what I've said repeatedly quite badly at the moment. I have repeatedly said I have no problem with the table being added back - provided the unreliable sources are replaced with reliable sources, and the unsourced content either removed or sourced… see WP:BURDEN ↗. (Edited as the WP link I used wasn't the one I was thinking of, so removed and reworded) <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 20:48, 5 July 2026 (UTC)