User Talk: Danners430

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(7d)
| archive = User talk:Danners430/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 10
| maxarchivesize = 100K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 1
}}
{{User talk:Danners430/Header}}

You broke it!

Airport destination list at Zurich Airport ↗ is borked after your edit. I had a quick look but couldn't see what the issue is. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:29, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

:Please hold, unborkification in progress Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 09:32, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::This calls for a...
::{{trout}}
::You have been trouted for: Missing one singular square bracket In solidarity, ↗ Kristi ☎️ 12:52, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:Syntax highlighting for the win… a single ] missing! Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 09:39, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::Nice one. Funnily enough I used syntax highlighting for the first time today when I pressed the button accidentally. Looks useful. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:53, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::I can’t live without it now tbh 🤣 Just be careful, the MOS:DATES script doesn’t like syntax highlighting being on Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 09:58, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Useful, noted thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:02, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::FYI. Not sure if Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyways Cargo ↗ is listed on the project yet. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:55, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::I saw it appear because that editor's talk page is on my watchlist… their argument against deletion is something to behold Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 15:59, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::Quite! 10mmsocket (talk) 16:05, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::Hey SuperSunshiiine. How are you doing? :) 10mmsocket (talk) 15:20, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Another duck? Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 15:21, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::Not going 3RR on West Midlands Police ↗, so an unconnected third party view would be useful. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:33, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::Kuching International Airport ↗. Keep an eye WP:SYNTH ↗ 10mmsocket (talk) 17:11, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::Sigh… FR24 has even been verified as synth at RSN… and people ask why our edit counts are skyrocketing… Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 17:14, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::By the way, do you use citation watchlist? Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 17:15, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::Wassthat? 10mmsocket (talk) 17:26, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::It's a really useful user script that adds an icon to edits on your watchlist (provided it hasn't auto-refreshed) showing what category of source has been added Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 17:28, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Ooh, nice, thanks. Link? 10mmsocket (talk) 17:47, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::I found it. JFGI! 10mmsocket (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::British Rail Class 150 ↗. Starting to hear the faint sound of quacking. Just can't put my finger/beak on it yet. Keep an eye though, the photos added to this and other articles are not necessarily an improvement. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::Can’t recall any fowl that made image edits, at not in my memory… Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 21:10, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::::thumb|120px ↗Happy to admit I'm wrong. I'll keep my eye on it though. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:32, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::::Slightly unrelated... Are you seeing a similarity...? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FlightDelivery ↗https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/~2026-93973 ↗ Only the fact that one is on mobile and the other isn't... Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 09:36, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Corrections or intrusions?

Good morning.

For some time now, <Mariam nei> has been scrutinizing and questioning my work. As a result, I sent him the message below. I wanted you to be aware of this...

;Quote
Good day. Considering that you seem to be very careful about erasing/correcting/amending my texts, why you don't clearly and completely describe my "mistakes." Naturally, your observations should be supported by absolutely referenced sources. I'm ready to read, understand, and adapt…
=UNQUOTE= Settignano (talk) 07:31, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

:As you should be well aware of by now, ANY editor has every right to scrutinise your work. This is a collaborative project, and you do not own your contributions. Any editor is free at any time to view your contributions and disagree with them, or many changes, provided they fall within policy. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 07:35, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Re: Scope of the Flag carrier ↗ article

Just a polite reminder about my June 30 comment on the talk page since you mentioned you are willing to continue discussion on this issue.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:38, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
:FYI, just wanted to let you know I asked for additional assistance and feedback at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. Hopefully they can help us settle this content disagreement constructively.--MirkoS18 (talk) 23:36, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

{{{icon|25px ↗ }}}This is your '''only warning''': if you continue to constructively edit Wikipedia, you may be '''given a barnstar ↗ without further notice.''' {{#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}}}  WikiPate (talk) 23:16, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

The end of the funerals

Good morning.

I'm pleased to inform you that I've completed the review/correction of British defunct airlines page(s).

There are still a few small tweaks to be made here and there.

I'd love for you to take a look at this (hard) work of mine and get your opinion... Settignano (talk) 09:03, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

:Perhaps if you actually included some links I could actually go and look instead of using my non-existent mind reading skills Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 09:06, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
::Check it out...
::en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_defunct_airlines_of_the_United_Kingdom
::and enjoy... Settignano (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Regarding reverts

Just wanted to follow up regarding the revert at Japanese Air Force One ↗. I agree that something needed to be done about the Planespotters source, but the policy at WP:PRESERVE ↗ discourages entirely removing the content if the problem is limited to one area, and a tag or a partial revert is preferred. I also noticed the other editor only has about a thousand edits, and at that point I try to explain things in less jargony or accusatory language to avoid making them feel bitten, regardless of whether they're in the right. '''Thebiguglyalien''' (talk) 22:25, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

:The problem is, I have no clue what part of an addition was sourced to the reliable source and what part to the unreliable source - only the editor who made the edit knows that. I took care to only revert the specific edit where they added the bad source, and used the standard “unreliable sources” notice template to let them know. I was surprised when it escalated to the point it did, with the other editor rather out of sorts… that’s why I just left it with a final reply and walked away Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 22:29, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
::Yeah, I've definitely been there with edits I've checked. In this case, looking at the diff at Special:Diff/1362637261 ↗, it looks like the changes in that paragraph were copyedits, and the Planespotters source was just added for good measure separately from the rest of the edit. So I can understand both perspectives here. '''Thebiguglyalien''' (talk) 22:41, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Query

Hi @Danners430,

I have a small query, if you have sometime, please clarify, I'd understand if you can't reply.

This reference ↗ says Vijayawada International Airport in text body, but says Vijayawada Airport in the title, and there are many references which say similarly (Title- Vijayawada Airport, Text body - Vijayawada International Airport).

In such cases, how does one determine common name? Like, is it purely based on references, or is it a mix of interpretation from editors along with references? Wikipicked (talk) 10:21, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

:Personally I'd be giving more weight to the title, as it's not uncommon for news outlets to put the longer, full names of places or businesses in the body, while keeping the more common, succinct name in the title. However, that's better raised in the move discussion tbh Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 11:15, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Excursions in Germany

Hello!

I'm very happy to be able to safely correct the page(s) on defunct German airlines. It was definitely in need of corrections and updates.

So far, there have been no "intruders" visits... Settignano (talk) 15:25, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

:You need to learn, and fast, that there is no such thing as "intruders" - and labelling other editors as such will see you on a fast track to an administrator's noticeboard. The amount of WP:OWN ↗ behaviour you've been displaying of late is exceedingly concerning. You are part of a collaborative project, you are not the only editor on these pages. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 15:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

BRD

Hi {{u|Danners430}}, I've told so many people I was sure I'd have written it here somewhere too; if I previously did, please disregard my message. Special:Diff/1363355935 ↗ shows nicely why citing BRD as if it was a policy is problematic: It isn't, and people have a point when ignoring such a message. Neither would BRD justify reverting by itself even if it was a policy; it explicitly does not. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:39, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

:At the time, I cited it because I hadn’t realised they had been edit warring in the days prior, so I thought it was their first revert. It’s also the reason I used the toned down warning. However it’s a very good point, thanks for that - in your opinion, what would you recommend citing, as at the end of the day summaries like that are me trying to encourage them to actually discuss? Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 19:42, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
::Well, if you had any reasons beyond "the other user is edit warring", you could cite these (often it's WP:ONUS ↗/WP:BURDEN ↗/WP:BLPRESTORE ↗ for me, all policy sections), and if there isn't, WP:PREFER ↗ is limited to administrators protecting pages. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:45, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
:::I'll have a good think - thank you for the advice :) Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 19:46, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
::::(If I may add, the stability/duration of a revision is practically irrelevant as that kind of consensus ends when something is disputed or reverted ↗.) Thanks and no worries! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:47, 9 July 2026 (UTC)