W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Bromogi

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Dmitry Rybolovlev




alt=Information icon|25x25px ↗ Hi Bromogi! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy ↗ disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages ↗ to try to reach consensus ↗. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options ↗ to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft -->

Less Unless (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Playmakerstats



Hi Bromogi. Please do not use the website Playmakerstats as a reference. It has been categorised as unreliable; see WP:WPFLINKSNO ↗ for details. I have removed a Playmakerstats reference at Luis Abarca ↗. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 12:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:Hi Robby.is.on! Sorry, I didn't pay attention to it. Thank you for letting me know! Regards) Bromogi (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
::No problem. It's impossible to know everything. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:23, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
:::Please carefully read the WP:WPFLINKSNO ↗ guideline that Robby mentioned above. In the same vein as Playmakerstats, Transfermarkt is also not considered a reliable source ↗. Please don't cite it, or any of the other unreliable sources mentioned in WP:WPFLINKSNO ↗, in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:11, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
::::Hi! I'm really sorry! I will have another careful look. Thank you Bromogi (talk) 07:27, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1322758983 -->

January 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Mazhar Abdel Rahman ↗. Your edits appear to be disruptive ↗ and have been or will be reverted ↗.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. ''It's one thing to unknowingly cite unreliable source, but you've been told multiple times now to not cite the sources listed in WP:WPFLINKSNO ↗. You should know by now that these sources are not reliable. Continuing to cite them anyway is disruptive. Please don't do that again.''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:23, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

:Hi, Sir Sputnik! Sorry, I don't really understand how adding a source can be a disruptive edit. I see, I made a mistake by using one source twice. Really sorry for that, didn't notice Bromogi (talk) 13:32, 31 January 2026 (UTC)