W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: CartoonDiablo

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Archives:


ArbCom 2018 election voter message



{{Ivmbox|Hello, CartoonDiablo. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=866997930 -->

Disambiguation link notification for June 11



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frankfurt School ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Brooks ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Frankfurt_School check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Frankfurt_School?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:13, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

"Second referendum" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗


30px|left ↗
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Second referendum ↗. Since you had some involvement with the ''Second referendum'' redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion ↗ if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> &nbsp;&#8209;&nbsp;Iridescent 17:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=926750292 -->

A heads-up



In 2011 you created ↗ a redirect, at Amir_Mohamed_Meshal ↗.

In my opinion that kind of redirection is generally a bad idea. It misleads contributors who might otherwise see the redlink, and work to create an article about individuals like Meshal.

And it is generally confusing to our readers. What one will often see are sentences with two links, one of which is a mere redirect to the second link.

We have policies and procedures on redlinks. When a redlink could credibly have an article at that page I think those wikidocuments recommend leaving it as a redlink. Geo Swan (talk) 23:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
:You're more than welcome to nominate the redirect for deletion, I just thought it was helpful given that case but if it's not I won't have any problems with getting rid of it. --CartoonDiablo (talk) 00:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hello, CartoonDiablo

Thank you for creating Kairon; IRSE! ↗.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for this new article but it needs more than a basic mention of the band's existence. Wikipedia is not merely a directory of bands. The article needs more on their history and any media attention they may have received. There is some material available in the Guardian article that is already cited, and additional reliable sources would help too.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Doomsdayer520<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with {{code|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}} .

<small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

---<span style="font-family: Candara"><b style="color: DarkCyan"><small>DOOMSDAYER</small>520</b> (Talk&#124;Contribs ↗)</span> 00:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=990308077 -->

"Medicare for All" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗



30px ↗
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Medicare for All ↗. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#Medicare for All ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> &#8211;<span style="font-family:CG Times, times"><span style="color:black">MJL</span>&thinsp;‐'''Talk'''‐<sup>☖ ↗</sup></span> 20:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of :Wikipedia:Conservative Wikipedians ↗


30px ↗ :Wikipedia:Conservative Wikipedians ↗, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion ↗. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Conservative Wikipedians&#32; (2nd nomination) ↗ and please be sure to sign your comments ↗ with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of :Wikipedia:Conservative Wikipedians ↗ during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> — <span style="background-color:#fff0bf;padding:2px;border:2px solid black">''Coolperson177''</span> <span style="color:red">(t&#124;c ↗)</span> 20:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Second American Civil War ↗ has a new comment


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Second American Civil War ↗. Thanks! 45dogs <small> (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) ↗</small> 18:44, 8 April 2026 (UTC) </div>

:Thanks for the comment, is it possible for me to reply to it or is that reserved just for reviewers? CartoonDiablo (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
::I mostly noted it for other reviewers to be aware, but you may wish to look over why there was consensus to delete it here ↗ and here ↗ in order to avoid it getting sent to AFD if its moved to mainspace. 45dogs <small> (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) ↗</small> 19:13, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Second American Civil War ↗ (July 5)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Grapesurgeon, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion ↗. The draft requires multiple published secondary ↗ sources that:

Please add references that meet ''all three'' of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->{{divbox|blue|3=The previous deletion discussion still very much applies to this. '''Please do not resubmit this''' unless geopolitical circumstances greatly shift and a war seems much more likely.}}

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
grapesurgeon (talk) 07:19, 5 July 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''CartoonDiablo'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! grapesurgeon (talk) 07:19, 5 July 2026 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗