W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: CountryLad

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!



Hello, CountryLad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions ↗. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure ↗, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign ↗ your messages on talk page ↗s by typing four tilde ↗s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions ↗, ask me on my talk page ↗, or <span class="plainlinks">{{input link |label=click here |page=Special:Mytalk |preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload |preloadtitle=Help me! |type=newsection}}</span> to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> <span style="white-space:nowrap;">&mdash;<span style="background:#0000CD;color:gold;"><b>&nbsp;Masum Ibn Musa&nbsp;</b></span> <sup><span style="color:#006400">'''Conversation'''</span></sup></span> 03:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1187132262 -->

Logan Evans (footballer) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Logan Evans (footballer) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GMH Melbourne (talk) 01:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1258243549 -->

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi CountryLad. Thank you for your work on Victorian Trugo Association ↗. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Good start}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>North8000<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

<b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> (talk) 00:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

February 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text ↗ to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as :Port Wakefield Proof and Experimental Establishment ↗. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism ↗, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources ↗, including the usage of an attribution template ↗. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unattribcc --> GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 03:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Port Wakefield Proof and Experimental Establishment ↗ moved to draftspace



An article you recently created, Port Wakefield Proof and Experimental Establishment ↗, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable ↗, independent sources ↗. <small>(? ↗)</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability ↗ is of central importance ↗ on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace ↗ (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗ and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 11:33, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ticketek ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Regal Theatre ↗, Allianz Stadium ↗ and Accor Stadium ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

April 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Veverve. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view ↗. Your recent edit to :Sedeprivationism ↗ seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. ''You have also made the page less encyclopedic and more essay-like (on top of adding a nonsensical link to the essay Wikipedia:The Pope is Catholic ↗ inside of the WP article)'' <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> Veverve (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Veverve. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view ↗. Your recent edit to :Alfredo Méndez-Gonzalez ↗ seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> Veverve (talk) 20:38, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to :Donald Sanborn ↗. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy ↗ and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> Veverve (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy ↗ by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at :Society of Saint Pius V ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. ''Among other problems, please throwing the word "schismatic" every sentence.''<!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> Veverve (talk) 20:48, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

:@CountryLad Some of your recent edits to Most Holy Family Monastery ↗ are similarly problematic. You shouldn't substitute "Mass" with "service" without some explanation at least. It looks like you're weighing in on the validity of their religious services. Jahaza (talk) 19:11, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Manunka ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Manunka ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG ↗.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> '''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''' <sup><i style="color:blue">TT me</i></sup> 22:21, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Neutral point of view



We dont insert our personal points of views into biographies of living persons. Keep stuff like "claims", "unsubstantiated" etc. out FMSky (talk) 10:24, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

WP:PROD ↗s


Hello, CountryLad,

If you want to tag an article for Proposed deletion, please review and follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Proposed deletion#Before nomination ↗. It is very important to follow the guidelines, especially regarding leaving a descriptive edit summary and a notification of the tagging on the article creator's User talk page. It is easiest to do all of your deletion tagging with Twinkle ↗, an editing tool which will make sure you don't forget any steps. Just remember to set your Twinkle Preferencea to "Notify page creator". If you look above this message, you'll see a PROD notification that another editor left for you so you can see how useful and important they are. Thank you. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 19:39, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

David Wicks (judge) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to David Wicks (judge) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Allblessed (talk) 08:17, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: David Wicks (judge) ↗ (July 22)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Dan arndt was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Fails WP:ANYBIO ↗, requires significant coverage about the individual in <u>multiple</u> independent reliable secondary sources. Without references or sources the majority of the article is original research ↗.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Dan arndt (talk) 08:30, 22 July 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''CountryLad'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:30, 22 July 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Concern regarding Draft:Port Wakefield Proof and Experimental Establishment ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, CountryLad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Port Wakefield Proof and Experimental Establishment ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

AfD creation



You have nominated a series of articles for deletion on important figures in Catholic traditionalism. Please ensure you do WP:BEFORE ↗ before nominating articles for deletion. Also carefully read the articles to ensure that you understand the claims that are being made and the sources that are present in the articles. Keep in mind that AfD is not cleanup. Jahaza (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Port Wakefield Proof and Experimental Establishment ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, CountryLad. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Port Wakefield Proof and Experimental Establishment ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Port Wakefield Proof and Experimental Establishment|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --> DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

SSPX as a reference



You need to read the talk page discussions of the article sedevacantism ↗. You added into the article as references the SSPX. After a long process of discussion it was unfortunetly found that there is no consensus to use the SSPX as a source for the article. Personally, I am all in favour of having them as a reference, so long as it is clearly denoted as'' their'' opinion, but you will have to make your argument there to Ververe that it can be used as a source. Aside from that you merely inexplicably cut out part of the etymology and for some reason formatted the article to have single stand alone sentences. Not sure what the purpose of that was? JustAChurchMouse (talk) 17:16, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

:For clarification, the user you're referring to is Veverve, it is misspelled above. Jahaza (talk) 17:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
:Hey mate, please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia:ROWN ↗ and the numerous messages I have left on your talk page. Your wholesale reverting of all of my efforts because you have a few quibbles with some of them is getting old. Then I am happy to chat about these other issues you are raising. CountryLad (talk) 04:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1322758710 -->

Concern regarding Draft:David Wicks (judge) ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, CountryLad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Wicks (judge) ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:09, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:David Wicks (judge) ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Hello, CountryLad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "David Wicks ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 07:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jackson Mead ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, CountryLad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jackson Mead ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jackson Mead ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, CountryLad. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Jackson Mead ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Jackson Mead|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --> DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

List of songs about Adelaide ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to List of songs about Adelaide ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <span style="color:#FF4500">QEnigma</span> <span style="color:#0033FF">论</span> 03:40, 22 May 2026 (UTC)