User Talk: Foxtrot1296
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{ACE MassMessage opt-out}}
<!-- Nothing here. -->
Ancor in Corruption ↗
Regarding this edit ↗. I afraid you created this anchor improperly in several respects. Please let me know where this anctor is used and I will redo it in a proper way. Please keep in mind there are redirects Systemic corruption ↗ and Corruption (systemic) ↗, which I think solves most of wikilinking issues without anchor. Please let me know which linking issues cannot be resolved without anchor. I hope you are familiar with WP:ANCHOR ↗. --Altenmann ↗ >talk ↗ 18:19, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
:First, please explain why you think the anchor was created improperly. I have been hand-coding Web pages over 25 years and I believe I know how anchors work. — Foxtrot1296 (talk) 01:13, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
::Just read the guideline I cited. Wikipedia anchors are not the same as general html anchors. Anchors to sections are creatied in a specific way. --Altenmann ↗ >talk ↗ 19:46, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
"Piped" links
Hi,
I've noticed a number of your edits in which you changed redirected links (like <code><nowiki>heart attack ↗</nowiki></code> into piped links (like <code><nowiki>heart attack ↗</nowiki></code>). In general this isn't recommended. Please read WP:NOPIPE ↗, MOS:NOPIPE ↗ and WP:NOTBROKEN ↗.
Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
I see this is something you're already aware of ↗. It's not just that this doesn't ''need'' to be done. In many cases it actually causes problems when pages are moved or restructured. Please stop it. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 18:49, 22 April 2026 (UTC)