Back to Profile

User Talk: Frank Anchor

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{archive box|

2007 - 2008 ↗

2009 - 2010 ↗

2011 - 2014 ↗

2015 - Q2 2018 ↗

Q3 2018 - 2019 ↗

2020 - 2021 ↗

2022 - 2023 ↗

}}

Nomination of :Where is Kate? ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Where is Kate? ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.</div> IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Runs scored/tiebreaker on MLB rivlaries

Hi Frank, I was adding the tiebreakers to all those MLB rivalry pages to keep consistent with the Lone Star Series ↗ page, which already had those descriptors there. Would something as simple as "X team outscores X ##–##", and not mentioning the word "tiebreaker" be a worthwhile addition? Spesh531(talk, contrib. ↗, ext.) 18:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
:No. There is no need for this content in MLB rivalry pages. The Lone Star Series ↗ is an exception as it awards a trophy to the team that wins each season series and stipulates total runs as the first tiebreaker. This is not common among other MLB rivalries. '''Frank Anchor''' 18:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

":LeBron Jim ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LeBron_Jim&redirect=no LeBron Jim] has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#LeBron Jim}}''' until a consensus is reached.  Mazewaxie (talk • contribs ↗) 13:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ownership at 2023 NFL season ↗. Thank you. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts ↗> 13:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
:Thank you for the notice. '''Frank Anchor''' 14:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

":Sangerpedia ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sangerpedia&redirect=no Sangerpedia] has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 31#Sangerpedia}}''' until a consensus is reached.  ''(Notification being sent to all who participated in the DRV.)'' Cheers, Daniel (talk) 21:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

{{ombox
| name = First Edit Day
| image = 50px ↗
| imageright = 50px ↗
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(to right, #a8ff78, #78ffd6);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| plainlinks = yes
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big> Hi Frank Anchor! On behalf of the Birthday Committee ↗, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit ↗ and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
}}

Orphaned non-free image File:NorthCoastLeague2.JPG

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:NorthCoastLeague2.JPG ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

:Bay Bridge Series ↗

You forgot to fix this page on :Bay Bridge Series ↗ please fix it you only fix five interleague play rivals. 63.104.222.98 ↗ (talk) 22:26, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

:Please be aware that I have a life outside of editing Wikipedia ↗. I plan on getting to all inter league and same-league series within the next several weeks. '''Frank Anchor''' 00:31, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

An essay on sports rivalries

Hi there, I'd like to invite you to read over and discuss User:Conyo14/Sports rivalries. Your input may be very helpful in accurately determining how to view sports rivalries in relation to the general notability guideline ↗. Conyo14 (talk) 01:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

{{ombox
| name = Happy Birthday
| image = 50px ↗
| imageright = 50px ↗
| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| text = <big>'''Happy birthday!'''</big> Hi Frank Anchor! On behalf of the Birthday Committee ↗, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
}}


{{ombox
|type = notice
|image = 150px ↗
|style = background:Darkgreen;border: 1px solid #CC9999;
|text = Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee ↗.--Macrobreed2 (talk) 06:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
}}

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Merry Christmas!

...and thanks for the kind words at DRV. :] ―'''''"Ghost of Dan Gurney"''''' (hihi) ↗ 10:38, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

RFC Notice

Hello, this notice is for everyone who took part in the March 2024 AfD on lists of airline destinations ↗. I have started a new RfC on the subject. If you would like to participate please follow this link: {{slink|Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not|RfC on WP:NOT and British Airways destinations}}. Sunnya343 (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Pro sports retro colors

Hi, Frank Anchor. I want to update professional sports teams history with retro colors without confusion. So, can you help me guide this without vandalizing? 2600:1700:B0A1:5F0:F5DD:A71C:1014:C3A0 ↗ (talk) 03:20, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
::These tables are NOT the place to use retro colors. The purpose of the rivalry tables is to quickly identify which team won a game and/or a season series. This is best done using a single color per franchise. Adding multiple colors for a franchise can confuse readers. '''Frank Anchor''' 16:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Closing of Deletion

I noticed you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NCAA Division II football win–loss records ↗ as delete - I am a bit confused, as the last relister indicated there was no clear consensus; yet when you deleted/closed, there had been no further discussion. I'd love some insight. glman (talk) 15:06, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
:Coming back because I typed this and realized it may have seemed terse - I promise it is not meant that way! I am just interested and just started drinking my morning coffee, haha. glman (talk) 15:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
::I did not close this discussion. I added a "delete" vote after the third and final relist. The discussion was subsequently closed as "delete" by User:OwenX. '''Frank Anchor''' 15:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Ohio Catholic Athletic Conference ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Ohio Catholic Athletic Conference ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''High school athletic conference announced it is disbanding before its scheduled August 2026 start date. https://www.wfmj.com/story/52641049/football-ohio-catholic-athletic-conference-with-ursuline-and-cardinal-mooney-ends-before-it-starts ↗ making it unlikely to be notable.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you. Perhaps it is possible for the notification bots to not send a notification when the original author is the user who submits the PROD template. '''Frank Anchor''' 14:04, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

AAFC stat recognition

Hey Frank, I'm reaching out because of {{diff2|1283596242|this edit}} at List of Cleveland Browns seasons ↗, which I had planned to eventually bring to featured list status. Do you have a source which reflects that the NFL now officially recognizes AAFC stats as part of their all-time stats? Hey man im josh (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
:Hi Josh, please refer to these from NBC sports ↗ and the AP (picked up by NewsDay) ↗. There are several other reports on a simple Google search as well. I can incorporate these into the Browns seasons list and other affected articles. '''Frank Anchor''' 14:19, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
:Also, I just remembered List of San Francisco 49ers seasons ↗ would need a similar update, I can take care of that as well. '''Frank Anchor''' 14:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
::Oh dang, the change you made was the day after the vote, which happened on April 1st. No wonder I hadn't been aware of it yet, it was so darn new! I had just had in mind that it was against a long standing approach the NFL had, so you must be mistaken, but clearly not! I'll take a look through the articles I've worked on and make changes where appropriate. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
:::No problem. I'm (unfortunately) a Browns fan so it was posted everywhere around me. At first I thought it was an April Fools ↗ joke for much of the same reasons you brought up. '''Frank Anchor''' 13:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
::::The timing of it, especially as a Browns fan, is certainly a funny one to consider lol Hey man im josh (talk) 15:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OhioCatholicAthleticConference.jpeg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:OhioCatholicAthleticConference.jpeg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

":Prisca Singamo ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prisca_Singamo&redirect=no Prisca Singamo] has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 11#Prisca Singamo}}''' until a consensus is reached.  LibStar (talk) 15:00, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Re:DRV Ping

I wanted to thank you for the ping to the deletion review, it’s always nice to be consulted for something rather than cut out of the process. I see the review was closed due to socking, in point of fact that and the repeated recreation are the reasons the title is currently salted and requires admin access to unsalt: too many accounts trying to push the actor on here when we’ve already said no - repeatedly. Have a pleasant day! :) TomStar81 (Talk) 16:35, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

The World Destubathon ↗

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help towards making the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ ''Dr. Blofeld'' 13:12, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

{{ombox
| name = First Edit Day
| image = 50px ↗
| imageright = 50px ↗
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(60deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| plainlinks = yes
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big> Hi Frank Anchor! On behalf of the Birthday Committee ↗, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit ↗ and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 23:40, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
}} DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 23:40, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

What to do for Olympian biographies that were deleted without an ATD being accepted

Hi @Frank Anchor, thanks for your great work suggesting WP:ATD ↗s at AfD discussions.

It seems like you're of the opinion that Olympian biographies should generally be converted to redirects instead of being deleted. These are the benefits I can think of in doing that:

# to preserve page history
# to preserve categories
# to preserve Special:WhatLinksHere ↗ structured data
# to preserve inter-language links and other data in the linked Wikidata item

There are at least dozens, and probably hundreds (I haven't got around to counting them all yet) of Olympian biographies that have been deleted for various reasons, these are the four most common I can think of:

# Expired PROD
# Created by a banned/blocked user ({{tl|db-g5}})
# Nominated at AfD and no ATD was ever proposed
# Nominated at AfD, an ATD was proposed, and it was rejected

I'm curious what you think we can do about these cases. I have the technical means to create a near-complete list of deleted Olympian biographies but I suspect a WP:REFUND ↗ would be rejected due to the size. If I just recreated them one-by-one as redirects and re-linked them to Wikidata, we could get benefits #2-4 while only losing benefit #1. Would you support this?

I think there is a case to be made that there's utility in having redirects for each modern Olympian and that utility could override AfD results where ATDs were not proposed or rejected. --Habst (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
::Hi Habst. I agree with you on the benefits to having these redirects over deletion, which is why I have been a strong proponent of redirect as an ATD. I am not overly concerned about the history not being present in newly created redirects, as in most (not all) cases the page history is trivial (especially all of the WP:LUGSTUBS ↗ that were created and deleted). Any redirects that are created would be subject to a deletion/retargeting discussion at WP:RFD ↗ but specifically not subject to WP:G4 ↗ speedy deletion as a redirect is not even close to being {{tq|substantially identical}} to the article that was deleted. '''Frank Anchor''' 18:29, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Paul Diop ↗

Thank you for redirecting his article. I was surprised to see it was deleted. Deleting someone because he's been to two Olympics instead of one seems illogical to me. Papaursa (talk) 13:45, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

NFL ties (September 2025)

For some reason, I can't add "thanks" to edits, so I wanted to personally thank you for that.

In addition, you're # 4835 on "the list," haha ParXivalRPT (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

{{ombox
| name = Happy Birthday
| image = 50px ↗
| imageright = 50px ↗
| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| text = <big>'''Happy birthday!'''</big> Hi Frank Anchor! On behalf of the Birthday Committee ↗, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:51, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
}}

Thank you for the birthday wishes! '''Frank Anchor''' 16:46, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Correction of Inaccurate Viewership Figures and Misuse of Source

Your recent edits listing 24.882 million viewers for Game 7 (plus 1.01 million Spanish-language viewers) have been removed because the figures are incorrect and misleading. The cited source, Programming Insider, did not report complete viewership data for the game. As confirmed by the site’s owner, their figures only covered the broadcast up to 11:00 PM ET, while the game continued past midnight.
The accurate, full-game average viewership—verified by Nielsen and the official Fox Sports press release—is 26.88 million. Please ensure future edits are based on complete, verifiable, and primary data sources to maintain the accuracy and integrity of the article. ~2025-31552-04 ↗ (talk) 23:50, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

I did not make any edits to this section. Please be sure you are talking to the correct user in the future. '''Frank Anchor''' 19:48, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

NFL ties

: I'm wondering if you can clarify a recent change you made to List of NFL tied games ↗. The edit confuses me but you have edited this page more than I have so I may be missing something. In the list of ties from 2025-present, you changed 'in the {{nfly|2025}} season' to 'through week 18 of the {{nfly|2025}} season'. Since Week 18, now completed, was the final week of the 2025 season, I'm not sure why we would use language that suggests the season is still in progress. Of course we still have the playoffs to go, but the text also says we are focused only on regular season games, and it is also reasonable to expect no ties in the playoffs. Am I missing something that causes you to use language to suggest the season is only partially complete? Dash77 (talk) 19:57, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

::Fair point. In previous seasons, the prose was always “through week X of the Y season,” even during the offseason. However replacing with “through the end of the 2025 season” would be fine as well. '''Frank Anchor''' 02:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

":Toad's Turnpike ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toad%27s_Turnpike&redirect=no Toad's Turnpike] has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 17#Toad's Turnpike}}''' until a consensus is reached.  - Excited A. It may be a good idea to look at this ↗. 16:38, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CrownConference.webp

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:CrownConference.webp ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Ang Pag-ibig Kong Ito

I think that you and I are saying essentially the same thing. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:08, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Broncos-Patriots rivalry article restoration

Hi Frank,

I just wanted to ask about the redirect for the Broncos-Patriots rivalry article. I've came across several sources that discuss the Broncos-Patriots rivalry as "renewed" beyond the Tom Brady-Peyton Manning era, particularly in the context of Bo Nix and Drake Maye and the 2025 AFC Championship Game.

Sources: https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/pats-broncos-reignites-an-nfl-rivalry-for-new-generation-of-qbs/ar-AA1UUn9D ↗https://www.denverpost.com/2026/02/15/bo-nix-drake-maye-afc/ ↗https://www.denvergazette.com/2026/01/23/from-bailey-to-brady-broncos-patriots-renew-unforgettable-playoff-rivalry/ ↗https://www.denvergazette.com/2025/12/04/mark-kiszla-could-nix-and-maye-become-the-manning-brady-rivalry-that-broncos-country-has-been-missing/ ↗

Do you think these newer sources warrant restoring the standalone article, or would it be better to wait until broader coverage develops before revisiting the possibility of a restoration?

Thanks. Ccai2053 (talk) 04:07, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
::I voted “keep” in the AFD, so I believe there already was enough in the article. However there was consensus to not keep the article. Personally, I think the references here would do little to change consensus, but you are welcome to take the last version from the article history and add to it in draft space, then move it over to mainspace space directly or go through the WP:AFC ↗ process. '''Frank Anchor''' 21:17, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Okay and I did make some edits to the article before it got redirected. How would I add to it in draft space and then move it over to mainspace space or go through the WP:AFC ↗ process? Ccai2053 (talk) 00:24, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I copied and pasted the most recent version to Draft:Broncos–Patriots rivalry ↗. Please feel free to edit that page as you see fit, and it can be moved to mainspace either through the WP:AFC ↗ process or by simply moving it yourself when you feel it is ready. '''Frank Anchor''' 15:45, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

{{ombox
| name = First Edit Day
| image = 50px ↗
| imageright = 50px ↗
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(to right, #c5c5ec, #bfd1f2, #a9efea);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| plainlinks = yes
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big> Hi Frank Anchor! On behalf of the Birthday Committee ↗, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit ↗ and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:26, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
}}

Happy First Edit Day!

{| style="width: 80%; margin: 4px auto; padding: .2em; border: 1px solid #CC9999; background-color: Yellow;"
|style="text-align:center"|50px ↗
|style="text-align:left" width="100%"|Happy First Edit Day, '''Frank Anchor''', from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee ↗! '''Have a great day!''' ☘︎☘︎☘︎'''ALEX'''Hammeke (talk | guestbook | sandbox) 04:08, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
|}