W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Hirematviru

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.


Welcome!



Hi Hirematviru! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|color=blue|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage ↗, or you can always find a task here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Search the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing! <!-- Template:Welcome--> SomeoneDreaming (talk) 01:51, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

:Thank You(: Hirematviru (talk) 01:52, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright



30px|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello Hirematviru! Your additions to :The Huntsman (2026) ↗ have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted ↗ content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain ↗ or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible ↗ copyright license—''to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗''. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright ↗ and plagiarism ↗ issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked ↗ from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copyright-new --> <span style="color:#EB0533;">GreenLipstickLesbian</span>💌 ↗🧸 ↗ 02:58, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you for the notice. I understand the issue and will be more careful to paraphrase content in my own words and avoid close copying in future edits. Hirematviru (talk) 03:01, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

A cheeseburger and chicken nuggets for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | for your draft :)
-- Least Action (talk) 03:58, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
|}

:Thanks! At this rate I'll have enough virtual food to write articles on the entire chicken. 😄 Hirematviru (talk) 04:01, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Alakmarsaify#c-Helpful_Raccoon-20260628031400-Suspected_sockpuppets_17 ↗ This is my gift I get it 🙁😖 Hirematviru (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Don't worry about it - admins can see the technical evidence and they'll just close the case if its unwarranted. A draft with a different name isn't particularly strong proof in itself (since chicken legs are pretty common food) but admins can also see the old draft and compare them if they need to. Just carry on as you are, it'll get resolved in the background and you probably won't even notice it. Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> ''In solidarity'' ↗ 04:36, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Thanks. I was honestly a bit worried but I'll just keep editing and let the admins handle it. Hopefully it gets resolved soon. Hirematviru (talk) 04:37, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::The timezones of you and that sock do not match. This simply rules that out. -- Least Action (talk) 04:38, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Thank you for taking a look. I appreciate the clarification. Hirematviru (talk) 04:40, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Behaviour too, I'm not seeing it myself. Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> ''In solidarity'' ↗ 04:59, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::BTW Just let the case run, too many comments can make it difficult for admins to pick out the important details and makes it take longer. Mistaken reports happen all the time, they just get closed and everyone moves onto other things. Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> ''In solidarity'' ↗ 05:09, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::Sorry if I added too many comments. I'll step back and let the case run its course. Thank you for the advice. Hirematviru (talk) 05:11, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:{{+1}} Good job! <span style="background-color:black;color:RoyalBlue;font-family:Comic Sans MS;border-radius:20px;padding:2px 2px 2px 2px">''toby''</span> <sup>''(t)(rw ↗)''</sup> 05:10, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::Thank You SOSO Much 🥹 Hirematviru (talk) 05:13, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::@Blue-Sonnet @Least Action @Tarlby Guyss I'm having some trouble moving the article so I've submitted it through AfC instead. Hopefully it gets accepted 🤞 Hirematviru (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Chicken leg ↗ (June 28)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model ↗ (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs ↗ to generate article content.
LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated ↗ may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources ↗ that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models ↗ for more information.|}}<!--
--
-->{{divbox|blue|3=Fuzzy mismatch between source and draft texts.}}

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
ChrysGalley (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

:LLM? Ooh hello which info is large language?? I wrote the article according to Wikipedia's format using only the amount of information supported by the sources and adding citations where appropriate. Hirematviru (talk) 09:18, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::Did you some sort of software to help your English? Such as Grammarly or some word processor utility? The reason being that if you look at the source wording, a very fuzzy version ended up in your draft. So for example the dark meat issue: {{tq|higher concentration of myoglobin}}. That isn't actually the reason it's a dark meat, as the source made clear: it is because when cooked the myoglobin becomes metmyoglobin, which is a reddish protein when cooked (myoglobin is mostly transparent, it's actually the hemes pigments that has the colour). This fuzziness is exactly what AI does, and most humans won't do. ChrysGalley (talk) 09:28, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::I've completely rewritten the article. Could you please take another look and let me know if there are still any issues? Hirematviru (talk) 09:36, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Thanks for working on the article @Hirematviru - I will leave it to another reviewer to consider so that you get an independent perspective, but I would point out that the myoglobin fuzziness is still there. ChrysGalley (talk) 09:51, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Ok ok thank for explain Hirematviru (talk) 10:03, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Hirematviru'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2026 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Tom & Jerry: Forbidden Compass ↗ has a new comment


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tom & Jerry: Forbidden Compass ↗. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2026 (UTC) </div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Tom & Jerry: Forbidden Compass ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Tom & Jerry: Forbidden Compass ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time ↗. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:32, 28 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

:My first article has been accepted through AfC! 🎉 I'm genuinely so happy and emotional right now. 😭 After all the research, sourcing, drafting, and revisions seeing it finally accepted feels incredibly rewarding. A small milestone but one I'll always remember. ❤️ Hirematviru (talk) 14:34, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Teesri Begum



There was no consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teesri Begum ↗ to redirect Teesri Begum ↗ to K. C. Bokadia ↗ so please don't unilaterally impose that as a close. I have reverted it back to an article. You can send it back to AfD a second time by using Twinkle to start a new AfD page, and propose redirect as the outcome, if it is so important to you that this article is removed. <span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span><sup><span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span></sup> 15:58, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

:Why are you supporting this article? Do you have any close connection to it? Hirematviru (talk) 16:00, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

::No, I'm fairly indifferent to it but there was a pattern of concern at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teesri Begum ↗, as the closing administrator summarised well. Bollywood isn't really something I know that much about so can't say for sure if it is notable or not but it's probably best to wait for someone else to nominate it for deletion. If it really is that non-notable, someone else will eventually pick it up. Also please familiarise yourself with WP:BLAR ↗, which explains our process when you want to remove an article and replace with a redirect. ''If editors cannot agree, the content issues should be discussed at the relevant talk page, and other methods of dispute resolution should be used, such as restoring the article and nominating the article for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.'' <span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span><sup><span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span></sup> 16:10, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::But article is failed NFILM and The admin probably closed it because no other editors commented on it. And as far as I know even if a TA was supporting it their opinion alone wouldn't necessarily carry much weight in determining the outcome. Hirematviru (talk) 16:13, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Closing AFD's is a complex operation, it needs the editor to fully understand Wikipedia policies and which ones are being referred to correctly, whether any should or should not apply to the article and which votes should be weighted more highly than others. TA's are entitled to weigh in and their argument should be judged on its own merits in the same way as any named account.
::::If the Wikipedia community hasn't reached a consensus to delete an article (regardless of the reason), then it's not a good idea for a single editor to unilaterally delete it based on their solo judgement. ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 16:24, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::In Afd during an experienced editor also raised the same concern and suggested that the available reviews appeared promotional or paid. I don't know if that's true but after looking at the sources myself I have my doubts as well. That's why I don't think the existence of a few reviews alone should automatically establish notability for Wikipedia. Hirematviru (talk) 16:36, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::Perhaps, but one editor alone can't override community consensus - if the community can't reach a decision, then the next step is to hold another AfD at a later time with a stronger argument or new evidence. ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 16:52, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Ok ok ok cool noted. I appreciate the explanation. Your comments always clear and neutral which makes them easier to understand. Sometimes other like above comments can come across as harsh or confrontational so I prefer not to respond in the same tone and would rather focus on the content and policies instead. Hirematviru (talk) 16:55, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::Sometimes it's useful to have another person explain things using a different perspective, happy to help! ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 17:18, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026


<div class="user-block uw-pblock" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' '''indefinitely ↗''' from editing certain pages (:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alakmarsaify ↗ and :Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alakmarsaify/Archive ↗) for disruptive editing after final warning. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then submit a request through the unblock wizard ↗ or through <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:MyTalk|action=edit&section=new&editintro=Template:Unblock/editintro&preloadtitle=Unblock+request&preload=Template:Unblock/preload&preloadparams%5b%5d=}} your talk page]</span>. Alternatively, add the following text directly to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Your reason here <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}}. &nbsp;In solidarity ↗, asilvering (talk) 22:31, 28 June 2026 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-pblockindef -->

:User talk:Asilvering#c-Hirematviru-20260628160600-Asilvering-20260628055200 i I had already apologized in your Talk page that comment. Then why was I blocked over an SPI comment after receiving a warning? Hirematviru (talk) 22:35, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::check time of comment and my apology comment time check Hirematviru (talk) 22:36, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::I understand that it was inappropriate and I regret making it. I will be more careful in the future and will avoid making similar remarks. I respectfully request that my block be reconsidered. I would like to continue contributing constructively to Wikipedia please Hirematviru (talk) 22:38, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Why would I believe the apology? You'd already been warned twice. In solidarity ↗, asilvering (talk) 22:41, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::But that user were raised but I feel that I have been repeatedly accused without evidence while the matter is still under review. If a CheckUser investigation is ongoing i believe it is best to allow that process to conclude rather than continue speculating about individual editors. That said I do not wish to continue any dispute with that user or participate in discussions about that topic anymore. I have no interest in pursuing the matter further. I sincerely apologize for my comments and any disruption they may have caused. I respectfully request that my block be reconsidered. If unblocked i will avoid replying to or engaging in disputes with other users and will focus solely on constructive editing. I understand the concerns raised and will be more careful going forward. Hirematviru (talk) 22:46, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Please don't removed the declined appeal template, that's the only thing you can't remove here. ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 06:55, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::I thought we were allowed to manage our own user talk pages as we see fit. If that's the issue, couldn't I just archive the discussion instead? Hirematviru (talk) 06:56, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::See WP:BLANKING ↗. Blocked editors are not allowed to remove declined unblock requests. ~Anachronist (who / me) <small>(talk)</small> 07:04, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::Thank you for the clarification. May I ask when or under what circumstances this partial block could be lifted? Hirematviru (talk) 07:06, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|reason=I apologize for my comments and understand that they were inappropriate. I let frustration get the better of me and I will be more careful in the future. I have no interest in continuing any disputes and will focus only on constructive editing if unblocked. I respectfully request a second chance. Thank you. Hirematviru (talk) 22:50, 28 June 2026 (UTC)|decline=The appeal doesn't address the actual scope of the block. You can already edit the millions of pages on Wikipedia, except for two of them. How exactly is that a problem for you? You have not stated what you would do differently from what you can already do now, if that block was lifted. You can make a new block request that addresses your actual block and not imply falsehoods about being hindered in some way. ~Anachronist (who / me) <small>(talk)</small> 01:04, 29 June 2026 (UTC)}}

You're only blocked from the SPI page and nothing else, so your appeal is asking to regain access to the SPI page again - is that what you intended to do? ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 23:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

I forgot to checking another pages



@Blue Sonnet 🥹I thought that once I was blocked I wouldn't be able to edit any page at all. Thank you very much for explaining it to me I understand the situation much better now. I really appreciate your help. Hirematviru (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Username



Sorry for the round trip on your username. I should not have renamed your account while it is blocked. I have returned it to its original name. Cabayi (talk) 07:51, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:I just want the "V" in my username to be uppercase.. I don't want to change my username completely. More Than Nothing (talk) 08:08, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Unblock Page-Specific



{{unblock reviewed|reason=I request that my page-specific block from the SPI page be lifted. I understand the concerns and will avoid further back-and-forth discussion. If unblocked i will comment only when necessary and remain civil. Thank you. More Than Nothing (talk) 08:58, 29 June 2026 (UTC)|decline=To the extent this isn't superseded by the mainspace block, it's meritless - we don't unblock people to "keep [their] editing record clean"; unblocks don't rewrite history and all that would accomplish is present a false veneer of cleanliness that wouldn't fool anyone. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">in solidarity</sub> ↗ 21:29, 7 July 2026 (UTC)}}

:I won't decline your appeal, maybe another admin will come along who would accept it. But I must say, you're kind of creating an unnecessary problem out of nothing. You've been blocked from editing just one SPI file, all the other 65M+ pages in this project are still available to you. You were blocked from that SPI because of your disruptive behaviour there. That SPI is on many, many watchlists, and constantly being updated because of the sock ring's prolific activity; it really doesn't need any extra updates pinging people's notifications and watchlists. The fact that you're now insisting on being unblocked from there implies that you're wanting to get back to editing it. That sounds to me like a Very Bad Idea. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:54, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::I need specific un block for My page history is look affected by this block which is why I request that it be lifted. I couldn't stay silent when serious allegations were made against me but I now understand that responding there wasn't helpful'''. I promise I will not participate in that SPI discussion again.''' More Than Nothing (talk) 10:03, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::@DoubleGrazing would archiving ↗ be possible? If they set up archival for a reasonable period (e.g. three months), would the declined appeal be moved to an archive over time and be less visible? ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 10:18, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::@Blue-Sonnet: I'm assuming automated archiving wouldn't archive anything that shouldn't be archived, in this case declined unblock requests, but I don't know as I don't use automatic archiving tools.
::::That rule (not to deleted declined appeals) only applies while the block in question remains in place. If the user manages to get unblocked, then they're free to do as they please with the earlier decline(s). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Ah, worth asking I guess - I looked through the information pages and couldn't see anything to confirm whether it would happen or not. Thanks for coming back to me! ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 10:26, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::PS: Oh, the penny just dropped (maybe). I was wondering what {{tq|"I need specific un block for My page history is look affected by this block"}} means. Does it mean that the declined appeal gives this page ''brutta figura'', so to speak? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:26, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::That's my read, yep. Since it unlikely to be removed anytime soon due to being a small block, it'll be here for a long time. Unfortunately there's now a second possible template that might not be removable (depending on outcome). ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 10:27, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::@Blue-Sonnet Thank you for understanding my situation and taking the time to explain it. I really appreciate your thoughtful comments. My intention is only to keep my editing record clean and I have no intention of participating in that SPI discussion again. More Than Nothing (talk) 10:40, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Glad to help! I might be wrong, but some of your more recent messages are starting to feel a little like they've been written by AI/LLM.
:::::::If I'm right, please stop using it since AI and Wikipedia just aren't compatible - you can read more at WP:NEWLLM ↗ and WP:AITALK ↗.
:::::::If I'm wrong, feel free to read through the pages anyway if you're interested. ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 14:54, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::I understand why some of my comments may look polished but I generally write that way myself. As for AI I sometimes use it to better understand policies or guidance by asking it to explain documents in more detail. However the opinions arguments and conclusions I post are my own thoughts not AI-generated responses. More Than Nothing (talk) 15:04, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::AI-generated replies often use a lot of extra wording long explanations and phrases like "Thank you for your feedback" or "I appreciate your concern." That's one reason people sometimes become suspicious. My editing style is different. I usually try to keep my comments NETRUALLY , and &ed to what is necessary. When I reply, I fo i on the specific issue being discussed rather than adding unnecessary text. Even if I use AI to better understand a policy or guideline, the mments and opinions I post are my own. More Than Nothing (talk) 15:08, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::Ok, as long as you aren't using AI-generated text on Wikipedia itself, that never goes well!
:::::::::AI also frequently misunderstands (and hallucinates) Wikipedia policies and guidelines, so I ''<u>really</u>'' wouldn't trust it to tell you anything about Wikipedia editing. It's best to just read through them yourself, then ask for help at the Teahouse ↗ if you aren't sure of anything.
:::::::::Honestly, it's just not worth the bother. ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 21:31, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::Oh that makes sense. That could be the reason as well. I'll mostly use the Teahouse if I m confused about a policy or guideline in the future. Thanks for the advice(: More Than Nothing (talk) 21:35, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Sources at Felicia Kingsley ↗



Could you please double-check that the cited refs specifically support every detail you wrote? It might be better to send this article to WP:DRAFT ↗ white you work on it. Biography of living persons ↗ article rules are very strict. DMacks (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you for the suggestion. I have moved the article to draft space for now so I can review the sources more carefully and ensure that all content is properly supported by the cited references before returning it to mainspace. More Than Nothing (talk) 14:46, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::+ 1 Tiktok Book Award ↗ More Than Nothing (talk) 15:31, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:I founded one source for TikTok Award ↗ claimed hope is worked? More Than Nothing (talk) 15:16, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:I have updated the article. Could you please take a look? If everything seems fine i plan to move it back to mainspace. More Than Nothing (talk) 16:11, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::Looks better. My Italian is quite poor. Could you tell me where in https://www.alanews.it/2025/12/23/cultura/chi-e-felicia-kingsley-la-scrittrice-piu-letta-ditalia-nel-2025/ ↗ it says her birthday is 13 October? DMacks (talk) 17:54, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::You're right to ask. I haven't yet found a source among the references currently in the article that explicitly states her date of birth as 13 October 1987. The date came from the Italian Wikipedia ↗ article but that is not itself a reliable source. Until a reliable published source confirming the date is located I'm happy to remove it from the article and leave only the sourced birthplace. More Than Nothing (talk) 17:58, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Yes, do so immediately. Are you sure...100% sure, with no uncertainty...that every single other detail is exactly supported by a cited reliable source? This is a very serious matter! Your future editing privileges are at stake here. DMacks (talk) 18:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Understood. To avoid any sourcing concerns and maintain a clean editing record i will remove the information for now and wait until i can locate a more reliable source that explicitly supports it. Thank you for pointing it out. More Than Nothing (talk) 18:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::Unfortunately, the source for the 'Early life' section doesn't verify any of the statements in it. Vanity Fair ↗ is cited for {{tq|Artioli was born in Carpi, Italy. She attended a scientific high school and graduated with a degree in architecture in 2012}}. What it actually says is that she was born in 1987, currently lives in Modena, and works as an architect, and then lists some of her books.
::::::Also, the 'Personal life' section's only citation is an article that appears to be about someone else entirely ↗.
::::::Can you explain how these problems have happened? Did you perhaps use an AI/LLM to generate some or all of the article? Meadowlark (talk) 04:14, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Removed, but this is very far from ok editing of a WP:BLP ↗, draft or live article don't matter. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:25, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::@Meadowlark @Gråbergs Gråa Sång The subject was Italian so I used machine translation. That was my mistake and I should have checked everything more carefully. I'll be more cautious in the future and won't repeat it. More Than Nothing (talk) 06:28, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::The source you used in the 'Personal life' section is in English, and is very clearly about a Singaporean fashion designer. Additionally, machine translation generally doesn't ignore the actual text and make up other information. I struggle to understand how machine translation could get it so very wrong, including changing a year that was written in standard numerals.
:::::::::Did you use an AI/LLM? Meadowlark (talk) 07:04, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::User: Gråbergs Gråa Sång, feel free to send back to draft-space. I've indef-mainspace-blocked the editor for this ongoing problem. DMacks (talk) 13:18, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Draftifying



Hi, I've just attended to your R2 speedy request at P.L. Santoshi ↗, where you had moved the article into the draft space. While the rationale behind the move may have been justified, the article had only been published literally a minute earlier, and may have been still WIP. We normally allow a grace WP:HOUR ↗ before draftifying new articles. Just something to bear in mind going forward. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:46, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

:Same with Toliver Free ↗ (4 min old) and Tawfiq Shamia ↗ (23 min). Per User:Hirematviru/Draftify log, the page mover tool is warning you against draftifying new articles, but you seem to be ignoring that – any particular reason? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:53, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::Agreed with the point about allowing a grace period. My reasoning was that if the article still needed significant work, I believed it would be better developed in draft space rather than in mainspace. I had also reviewed the creator's edit history and conducted a WP:BEFORE ↗ search but I couldn't find sufficient evidence of notability. I was concerned the article might eventually end up at AfD so I thought draftification would give the creator an opportunity to improve it first. I'll keep the one-hour grace period in mind going forward. More Than Nothing (talk) 08:01, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Yes, if a new article needs significant work, that is indeed best done in the draft space, nobody is disputing that. My point was that per HOUR, even then we give the author a chance to show that they are improving the article. Anyway, that point has now been made.
:::As for BEFORE, if you carried that out properly (meaning, reasonably thoroughly) and couldn't find evidence of notability, then arguably the article ''should'' end up at AfD. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Understood. I'll take care of that next time and make sure to be more careful when assessing new articles and giving editors time to improve them where appropriate(: More Than Nothing (talk) 08:17, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Replaying Gråbergs Gråa Sång



@Gråbergs Gråa Sång Let me answer your question ↗. I didn't come to you on my own. I asked my mentor a question and the message ended up reaching you through them. My mentor was someone else not you so please make sure you have all the facts before placing blame on someone. More Than Nothing (talk) 08:44, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

:I request that someone perform a CU check and close this matter. Every day it's the same bullshit, blah blah blah. More Than Nothing (talk) 08:47, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::Word to the wise: try not to get worked up about the SPI, and certainly don't become adversarial towards others if they are commenting on it. Just chillax, carry on improving the 'pedia... and if you have that SPI on your watchlist, maybe consider unwatching it? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:36, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::For the past two days, it has felt like I was the subject of a court investigation, with all the evidence seemingly being presented against me.🙃 Since I didn't have a lawyer to defend me or speak on my behalf, I felt I had to fight my own case and present my own counterarguments. My goal was simply to ensure that, in the end, the Judge (my lord) AKA CheckUser, c ld make a neutral decision and would not see only accusations against me. That is why I probably got a bit carried away while trying to defend myself. More Than Nothing (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::I will Unwatching now More Than Nothing (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
{{od}}Okay. On an altogether different matter and only because I just happened to see it, why does your userpage say you're an AfC reviewer? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:14, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

:I thought that was for users who have already had an article approved through AfC, or for users who work on articles through the AfC process.?? More Than Nothing (talk) 10:21, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:Maybe i thought wrong I will remove it More Than Nothing (talk) 10:21, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::Yep, it's for editors who do the actual reviewing itself. ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 11:51, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Got it ✔️ More Than Nothing (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026


<div class="user-block uw-pblock" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' '''indefinitely ↗''' from editing certain pages (:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alakmarsaify/Archive ↗ and :Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alakmarsaify ↗) and certain namespaces ↗ ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then submit a request through the unblock wizard ↗ or through <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:MyTalk|action=edit&section=new&editintro=Template:Unblock/editintro&preloadtitle=Unblock+request&preload=Template:Unblock/preload&preloadparams%5b%5d=}} your talk page]</span>. Alternatively, add the following text directly to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Your reason here <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}}. &nbsp;DMacks (talk) 13:14, 30 June 2026 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-pblockindef -->
:You are now also blocked from editing article-space. As we see at #Sources at Felicia Kingsley ↗, you are either unable or unwilling to follow our source rules, which are especially important for biographhical articles, and lying about it. As we see at #Draftifying ↗, you repeatedly disrupt process by ignoring instructions and the explicit warnings the interface gives you. I don't care whether it is AI/LLM, the effective damage here is the same. DMacks (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::🥲👍 More Than Nothing (talk) 13:28, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::You can still edit Wikipedia indirectly by making Edit requests ↗ & submitting drafts through the AFC process ↗, but you must take extra care of you do this because your edits will be reviewed by other editors first. ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 14:06, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::::I agree but can be appropriate to submit another unblock request now? My previous unblock request has not been resolved yet still More Than Nothing (talk) 14:34, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::This block of mine is independent of any other blocks. DMacks (talk) 14:50, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|decline=You were blocked from the article space because of persistent problems despite repeated warnings and advice. I cannot telepathically read {{u|DMacks}}'s mind, but if I could, I'd hazard a guess I would find there a thought pattern along the lines of {{tq|since warnings didn't work, let's protect the encyclopaedia while still letting this user create content, only doing so in draft space so that their creations get reviewed by experienced editors ''before'' publication rather than after; and once they've demonstrated that they understand the various policies and guidelines sufficiently, they can appeal the block and hopefully get back to editing in the main space again}}. Now, if that was indeed the rationale behind this block, then you submitting an appeal immediately, without one single new edit outside of your talk page, gives us no more confidence that you can stay within the rules than we had when this block was placed: you say the right things, but as the old adage has it, words are cheap, whereas we are judged by our deeds. You need to put several (and I don't have a hard figure in mind, but I'd say at least five, and ten wouldn't be too many IMO) drafts through AfC ''and get them approved'' before you can realistically even try to convince us that you've taken all the advice onboard and are ready and willing to comply. (On a purely personal note, I also think that such a quick knee-jerk appeal does not make it seem like you're taking this very seriously. But you do you.) I'm declining your appeal, and ''very much recommend'' that you do not file another way any time soon. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:44, 30 June 2026 (UTC)|1=I apologize for the major issues. First of all i did not do proper BLP sourcing on Felicia Kingsley or any other BLP profile. That was my mistake. I relied on AI because of language and translation difficulties. Secondly i moved the article directly to mainspace without going through AfC. I agree that it should have gone through AfC first. And if any of my replies offended others i apologize for that as well.

I respectfully request that I be unblocked. I promise 3 things

# I will stop using AI for translations and article content.
# For any BLP-related article, I will be much more careful with sourcing and verification.
# I will only create or submit new articles through AfC instead of moving them directly into mainspace.

I understand the mistakes I made and I am committed to following Wikipedia's policies and procedures in the future.}}

:That's a pretty good read of where my thoughts wound up, DoubleGrazing. I was originally thinking about site-indef for a whole stream of WP:ACRONYMS, so what I wound up doing (mainspace-only block) is actually better than that alternative. You should take advantage of the opportunity you have rather than making yet additional promises. For the record, we have seen the evidence that your promises at this time do not have much value, as your actions contradict them. Therefore only action can save you and your actions might be carefully scrutinized. DMacks (talk) 02:09, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Last warning



Hey @Hirematviru, I've seen some of your edits in mainspace (most of what you wrote in stubs) and have concluded that you use an LLM to write articles. In multiple cases you've written things without any verification and then produced an article source that has NOTHING to do with it--NOTHING. There wasn't even a mention of your text in those sources. You've done this in EVERY SINGLE ARTICLE you've written. If you do not stop this and do better research before editing or writing an article, I will have to bring this to admins, and you could even get blocked. It's not really that hard to write good articles. Morris (talk with this worm) 00:02, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

:If you check out the above discussions, you'll see they haven't edited since they were blocked from mainspace - that means every single edit to any article must go through another editor first.
:They've completely stopped editing since then, but if you see any problematic edit requests or drafts going forwards, please do let an admin know about it. ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 00:51, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
:I'd actually not had a chance to review their latest appeal and I'm reasonably certain that it was written by AI, along with this and this, and the majority of this comment.
:As always I really want to be wrong, sadly I don't think I am. ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 01:00, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
::I have already documented this and other things (including WP:PLOTVIO and misrepresentations of multiple sources) and posted a report at ANI. Morris (talk with this worm) 01:03, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

ANI Notice



link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.&nbsp;The thread is User:Hirematviru — Fabricated/misrepresented sourcing and LLM ↗.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> use Morris (talk with this worm) 01:10, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived



{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hello '''Hirematviru'''! The thread you created at the Teahouse ↗, {{tq|Chicken leg}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Chicken leg ↗}}.

<small>
See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 2 July 2026 (UTC)</small>

<div><small></small></div>
</div>
|}
<!-- KiranBOTmsgID:1361464588 --><!-- User:KiranBOT/Teahouse_archival_notification -->

The Huntsman (2026) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to The Huntsman (2026) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it consists of machine-generated text''' and '''Even the remaining content after several passes of ref-citing is not fully supported.'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DMacks (talk) 05:00, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

September 21 (2025 film) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to September 21 (2025 film) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it consists of machine-generated text''' and '''Even the remaining content after several passes of ref-checking
is not fully supported'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DMacks (talk) 05:03, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived



{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hello '''Hirematviru'''! The thread you created at the Teahouse ↗, {{tq|Upload poster}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Upload poster ↗}}.

<small>
See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 3 July 2026 (UTC)</small>

<div><small></small></div>
</div>
|}
<!-- KiranBOTmsgID:1361655216 --><!-- User:KiranBOT/Teahouse_archival_notification -->