User Talk: IrisChronomia

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!

Hi IrisChronomia! I noticed your contributions ↗ to :44,100 Hz ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button 2|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing!  ~Kvng (talk) 15:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Interest areas

If you're interested in health-related articles, then please come join the discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine ↗ and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology ↗. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

:Thank you! I’ll go check it out ^^ irisChronomia (talk) 22:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Friendly advice

You might get some people cranky at you for editing a statement at WP:AN/I ↗ after it's been replied to. Best practice is to do what I did down-thread and to <s>strike through</s> anything you are deleting with a new comment appended (with a new time code) to add additional statements. That's actually best practice in all discussions on WP as it makes it easier for editors to follow the flow of the conversation without looking at diffs but on AN/I this requirement is somewhat heightened. Simonm223 (talk) 13:22, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

:Ah, I see. Thank you ''very much'' for the advice.
:I really didn't <s>to</s> expect ending up in AN/I, having only 1 edit conflict with the discussed editor. 海盐沙冰 (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
::I've run into them rather a lot this summer. I think they really should reexamine how they relate to other editors. Wikipedia isn't social media but it's still social and we won't work as a project if we're constantly insulting each other. Simonm223 (talk) 14:02, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
:::It takes some time for me to remember (and implement) your advice haha, I'm probably too used to instant messaging apps and thought all the timestamps get updated automatically. :) 海盐沙冰 / irisChronomia / Talk 19:56, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Civility

Hi. Regarding Tachyon ↗, I just want to encourage you to treat all newcomers with extra civility ↗, no matter what aspect of Wikipedia they are struggling with. I'm also trying to encourage myself in this direction as I am especially prone to react to posts that degrade Wikipedia. Outsiders think Wikipedia editing is much easier than it turns out to be. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:06, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

:Yeah I get you. I'm just sick of self-promotion stuff and having all of us spending our precious unpaid time to explain everything to them... I really wanted a clearer way to tell them to leave.
:Thanks for reminding me, though. I really need to learn to stay calm.
:Cheers :) 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 16:41, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Your addition of content to Disorganized schizophrenia

Considering the unrelenting vandalism, where different accounts originating in Algeria have edited the article in question to include specific content, I would like to ask you about the content you added in this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disorganized_schizophrenia&diff=prev&oldid=1329046871 ↗ edit. This is because I don't fully agree that the source cited at the end of the big added paragraph actually supports the specific symptoms listed. Specifically, it concerns this sentence: "Examples in disorganized schizophrenia may include repetitive behavior such as stimming, grimacing, joking, mirror gazing, health complaining, utterance of profanity, exposing one's body in public spaces, inappropriate body contact, and urination outside socially acceptable areas (bathrooms)." Thank you for any input. BlockArranger (talk) 20:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

:Yeah I was just trying to make the diff immediately prior to my edit somewhat readable / sound like an encyclopedia; I'm not actually trying to came up with anything new there.
:The prior diff seems to have problem with overly graphical depictions of patient behaviours, so my edit basically WP:SYNTHESIS ↗ed that sentence to make it milder.
:Thank you for reminding me of this; I don't think this is a good diff at all. Please feel free to just restore the sentence back to what it was like before :) 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 05:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Close

Hi! I closed the ANI section after they got indeffed. I don't think revdel is really necessary in this case (the only place that nonsense is visible is in the page history), but if you want you can of course request revision deletion using these instructions ↗. Thanks for reporting! Polygnotus (talk) 12:35, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

:And thank ''you'' for keeping Wikipedia alive and healthy! :) 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 16:41, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Proposal to include NYBOLE Rule 6000.13 regarding applicant misconduct

Hi, I noticed you reverted my recent edit regarding New York Board of Law Examiners (NYBOLE) Rule 6000.13. I understand the concern about talking about specific firms; my intention was actually to highlight the '''regulatory rules''' for bar applicants, as the article already mentions New York's educational requirements.

I’d like to propose re-adding a shortened version that focuses purely on the official board rule and citing the official NYBOLE website directly (https://www.nybarexam.org/Rules/Rules.htm#6000.13 ↗) rather than any secondary legal site. This seems relevant as 'Legal Ethics' begins at the admission stage. What do you think of this version?

''<nowiki/>'The New York Board of Law Examiners (NYBOLE) enforces ethical standards for applicants under Board Rule 6000.13, which allows for the nullification of exam results or disqualification for misconduct during the admission process.'' M4344459 (talk) 23:43, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

:This reads much better, thank you for taking your time with the proposal :).
:This seems like a nice example for an article about legal ethics; I'd personally want to create a new subsection on BAR exams, and write something in the realm of "BAR, is [some description]. Like many other exams, BAR examinees are expected to complete the test without cheating. For example, [...]" and followed by your text, so lay person understand the relevancy between it and legal ethics in general. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 15:42, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
:I've added your proposal to the article (with some other copyediting that might be problematic, as I know nothing about practicing law). Feel free to change my edit as you see fit. :) 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 15:57, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
::Thanks. Appreciate it! M4344459 (talk) 22:46, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Draft:False-Correction Loop ↗

I have closed the request at DRN ↗ for various reasons, including that DRN is not the right forum to discuss draftification of an article. I suggest discussion at the Teahouse ↗, where experienced editors may give useful advice.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

:Yes, I've seen your comment there.
:Thank you for reminding me of civility - I was getting really heated there. It really takes practice to stay calm...
: 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 04:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Mobile Twinkle

FYI I recently found out there's a patch to get Twinkle to work on mobile - User:Plantaest/TwinkleMobile. Thought I'd mention it following your post on my Talk, it's so much better than going into Desktop view & faffing about trying to get things to work 😁 Blue Sonnet (talk) 19:54, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Neither

Minor grammatical point: your edit summary here ↗ is mistaken (though the edit is right). The reason "neither" takes a singular is that "neither" = "neither one", so with a verb it's "neither [one of them] is". When the subject is a collection of size zero, it takes a plural: "None are" (= "None [of them] are"). --JBL (talk ↗) 17:35, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

:!
:Thanks for mentioning, I haven't thought of this before. :) 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 17:56, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at :Talk:FragFx ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. ''I'm placing a bright red warning here against myself as a glaring reminder for future self to be calm and not bite ↗ newcomers.'' 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 17:03, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

IvyWise

Thanks for the thoughtful discussion in this AfD. FWIW, I share your skepticism about corporate articles and think they're often excessively promotional. In this case, I think there's enough coverage for someone to write a more balanced page discussing criticism of IvyWise and the industry it's part of. pburka (talk) 16:04, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Silence

Sorry if I came across as ignoring you. I simply had nothing more to add to what had been said. tgeorgescu (talk) 09:22, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

:I forgive you :) 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 10:54, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

WP:BOLD, revert, revert, revert cycle ↗

Hi, I get it's supposed to be humorous, but linking to Final Solution ↗ and Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ↗ seems a step too far, so I've removed them. I hope you don't think this is a big deal and please keep this in mind in the future, controversial edits never have positive consequences. Have a good day, HKLionel TALK 13:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

{{collapse|1=no worries, these are Wikipedian in-jokes afterall. :) i guess i was replicating the dark humour of the Kamikaze ↗ and wp:spiderman ↗ references in that paragraph. [...] you can just say "i don't like it". [...]|2=translation|float=right|width=20em}}

:没事啊反正都是wikipedian的圈内梗
:我wlink那两个主要是看到旁边的神风特攻队的 link 以及wp:spiderman里 reichstag fire 的link
:关于这个diff的 controversial status……你可以直接说i don't like it，it's a very human response and much more understandable。
:Cheers :) User:HKLionel 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 16:43, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
::hh就是怕麻煩而已你知道海外政治多難搞的我覺得其他例子沒那麼直接吧謝啦 HKLionel TALK 16:49, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
:::嗯呐
:::国内一样啦都不敢写也不敢去zhwiki 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 16:59, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
::::哦去都不敢去嗎原來如此 ._. HKLionel TALK 17:06, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::也有可能是一种精神escape吧，感觉写英文的时候不会有联想起国内的破事带来的负担海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 23:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
::::::hh take care :) HKLionel TALK 10:39, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

AmeriCanSandWitch

I'm like 99% sure it was a sock. They knew too much about Wikipedia. – LuniZunie(talk) 03:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

:They are. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/~2026-20359-17 ↗ 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 03:59, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
::Ah, thank you. I couldn't find the master. Makes sense. – LuniZunie(talk) 04:00, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
:::You're welcome :)
:::I knew exactly who it is but didn't cared to file an spi yesterday, but you know, ropes ↗... 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 04:03, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
::::I know, temporary accounts ↗ was in Filipino. —KuyaMoHirowo (talk • contribs ↗) 04:06, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::@KuyaMoHirowo @IrisChronomia Just so you both are aware, they are a sock of {{noping|WilhelmRein31}}. I've sent a glock request. – LuniZunie(talk) 04:18, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::Thank you, this is more than good to know. :) 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 04:21, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Temporary account IP viewer granted

right|80px|alt=The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address ↗
Hello, IrisChronomia. Per your request, your account has been granted ↗ {{mono|temporary-account-viewer}} rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts ↗ that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer ↗ for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy ↗.

Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.

Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.

Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP address ↗es (using the CIDR notation ↗ format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences ↗. Happy editing! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:59, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Frustration.

An hour of work just vanished because I pressed the "resolve edit conflict" key and messed something up. I just wanted to die. Caffeine is amplifying all my emotions, and every single one of them right now is of the colour of a crimson abyss.

I should take some sleeping pills and force myself to sleep. It'll be fine when I wake up in 16 hours so I can redo everything I have done. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 12:54, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I really appreciate that you have encouraged me by deliberately WP:THANK ↗ing me for several edits I have made within the scope my effort to improve the article on narcissistic personality disorder ↗ and other articles related to mental health, especially to personality disorder(s). I am very happy to see that my work is appreciated! BlockArranger (talk) 09:34, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
|}

:And a thank you for the dedication! You're like singlehandedly maintaining an entire corner of Wikipedia. :) 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 09:57, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Hey

Hey do you know how we archive pages here? I wanna archive my talk page cause I need to start fresh. Morris (talk with this worm) 13:49, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

:Hi! You can do that with plug-ins, like the ones listed in WP:1CA ↗.
:Also, per user page guidelines ↗, you have (almost) absolute freedom in how you manage your own (talk) pages; that means you may remove any content without providing a reason, including blanking. All talk page messages are there for communiation purposes, and removing them is considered as acknowledging. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 13:58, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

RfC

Hey, could you please spare some of your time and add your comment here ↗? If you can't, because your are not familiar with the topic, please leave a comment here, as general opinion. Morris (talk with this worm) 19:12, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

:I decide to not charm in on politics. I'm too pessimistic about that. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 19:50, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
::Not an issue. Morris (talk with this worm) 07:08, 11 July 2026 (UTC)