W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: JFHJr

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{NOINDEX}}{{NoACEMM}}Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery ↗

{{clear}}{{mbox|type=notice|small=yes|image=50px|Search ↗ |imageright=50px|Search ↗ |smallimage=none |smallimageright=none |textstyle=text-align:center; |text=Most posts have been archived:<br>Archive 1 (2005–2023)<br>Archive 2 (2023–present)<br><inputbox>
type=fulltext
prefix=User talk:JFHJr/Archive
width=60
searchbuttonlabel=Search archives
</inputbox>}}{{clear}}

<!-- POST NEW COMMENTS BELOW THIS LINE -->

Amjad Youssef ↗



Thank you so so much for editing the article I started I wasn’t expecting it to have an image and more sources and information when I woke up. I appreciate the help and the added image. Have a nice rest of your day. The Grenadian Historian (Aka. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a) (talk) 07:29, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

:You're quite welcome! JFHJr () 16:55, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your warning at User talk:Aetherialopulentus


{{archive top|User:Aetherialopulentus got indeffed and can't talkpage anymore. JFHJr () 01:49, 6 May 2026 (UTC)}}
Just a quick note that said user had already received an NPA-level 2 notice today and deleted it, so I've posted a level 3 on the same matter that you had posted a level 2, to show a sufficient warning record. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 04:16, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

:I did see that, but I never saw a level 1 so that's what I left. Thanks for splaining, but I think you know I wouldn't dispute this with you, friend. Thanks for working beside me. Cheers. JFHJr () 04:20, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
::Unless I've missed it, there's not actually a requirement to start with level 1 (and indeed, we have the "only warning" templates that suggest this is the case.) Given the user's aggressive statements on several fronts making up a significant portion of their activity, I felt it best to start with something besides the most genteel, but short of the "warning" level. Didn't seem to have much impact, and I doubt we will be heard. Be well! -- Nat Gertler (talk) 04:28, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
:::It will probably be reverted/blanked. Until block. I wasn't schooling on level choice, just explaining my own. I reverted myself because I thought your move was best. Be well. To life. JFHJr () 04:33, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
::::Yep ↗ (in Hank Hill voice). JFHJr () 04:52, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}

A pie for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your help at the BLP Noticeboard! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 20:00, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
|}

:Thank you! It's been a pleasure to work with you! JFHJr () 20:05, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
::@SomeoneDreaming, I closed another discussion ↗ because it looked like everything got resolved. If it comes up again with the same violations, please take it straight to WP:ANI ↗ and ask for a nuke due to the draft's likely ineligibility for a speedy. See an example here ↗ for a recent precedent, though that was on very different grounds. Thank you for all you do! JFHJr () 01:52, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Thank you for your help! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 02:47, 26 May 2026 (UTC)