W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: JR226555

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

December 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗, such as the edit(s) you made to :Thor: Ragnarok ↗, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted ↗. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines ↗. You can find information about these at our welcome page ↗ which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia ↗. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page ↗. ''Do not keep reinstating your edit when you have been reverted multiple times. Take your concerns to the talk page and gain consensus for the change. Stop edit warring. -''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> adamstom97 (talk) 22:17, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

January 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗, such as the edit(s) you made to :Cobra Kai season 2 ↗, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted ↗. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines ↗. You can find information about these at our welcome page ↗ which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia ↗. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> <span style="color:#0000ff;">'''The'''</span><span style="color:#0000ff">'''Doctor'''</span><span style="color:#0000ff;">'''Who'''</span> (talk) 04:42, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Shrek Forever After ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ to see how to add references to an article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> DonIago (talk) 04:45, 14 January 2026 (UTC)


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi JR226555! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of :New York City ↗. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy ↗. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages ↗ in order to try to reach a consensus ↗ with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement&#32;at {{TALKPAGENAME:New York City}} ↗, please use one of the dispute resolution options ↗ that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> Seasider53 (talk) 20:29, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Tron Legacy ↗. Your edits appear to be disruptive ↗ and have been or will be reverted ↗.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. ''It is always implied that viewers know about the events from previous films, especially in the plot. The note is not needed as the article prose already states the film is a sequel. Stop adding the pointless note.''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> – <span style="color:navy">The Grid</span> (<span style="color:navy">talk</span>) 17:58, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

:It's literally what every page about a sequel on Wikipedia does. It's only pointless in *your* opinion. Piss off JR226555 (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
::You're the first and only editor doing it as a footnote. Other editors have stated the same thing and reverting is disruptive. Since you know the term "status quo," it's obvious you're an experienced editor and know the policies and guidelines. – <span style="color:navy">The Grid</span> (<span style="color:navy">talk</span>) 18:26, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Unsourced edits



Hey there,

Make sure you <u>'''add a source'''</u> whenever you make claims like a film is a box office bomb. Adding information without a source is the same as carrying a bow with no arrows: it's useless. NarutoSan6000 (talk) 23:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

March 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Doniago. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view ↗. Your recent edit to :The Bourne Supremacy (film) ↗ seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> DonIago (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

:How was any of that not neutral?
:One of them was literally just adding a note to explain plot information. As for the other one, it is undeniable that the plot of Supremacy is completely different than the book, there's literally a note in the article explaining that. The rest was just adding brief context about the release of the film, just like every other page about a sequel. JR226555 (talk) 23:01, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
::To describe a film as a "loose" adaptation is a matter of perspective. In any event, since there's already an explanatory footnote, it's unnecessary in any case; in fact, it sounds like it's not really an adaptation at all if the plot is ''entirely'' different. I don't have any issues with the rest of your edits. DonIago (talk) 01:38, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Army of Darkness ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ to see how to add references to an article. ''Nothing I saw in the article indicates that the film has a cult following.''<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> DonIago (talk) 14:48, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2026



25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy ↗ by adding your personal analysis or synthesis ↗ into articles, as you did at :Superman Returns ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. <!-- Template:uw-nor3 --> Betty Logan (talk) 15:38, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

:Whatever. You can keep on being intentionally ignorant towards what the movie is making abundantly clear JR226555 (talk) 17:54, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
::25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not attack ↗ other editors. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool ↗ and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 -->
::Refer to WP:ASPERSIONS ↗ for futher information. NJZombie (talk) 11:32, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced ↗ material to Wikipedia, as you did at :Michael Myers (Halloween) ↗. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced4 --> Belbury (talk) 08:22, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

:I'm sorry but I'm pretty sure that was referenced multiple times throughout the franchise JR226555 (talk) 11:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
::Perhaps! But Wikipedia requires verifiable sources. An editor saying they are pretty sure they can remember a character's middle name is not enough. Belbury (talk) 11:22, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

June 2026



25px|alt=icon ↗ Please stop attacking ↗ other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked ↗ from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''Please remember to be civil ↗ to others. Your reply, {{tq|It's literally what every page about a sequel on Wikipedia does. It's only pointless in *your* opinion. Piss off}} violated the WP:CIVILITY ↗ and quite possibly the WP:NPA ↗ policies.''<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> HypnoBlader (talk) 20:26, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

:Um, that was almost 5 months ago but sure I guess JR226555 (talk) 04:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC)