User Talk: Juxlos

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Talk header}}
{{NoACEMM}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(30d)
| archive=User talk:Juxlos/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s
| minthreadsleft=1
| minthreadstoarchive=2
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=User talk:Juxlos/Archive index
|mask=User talk:Juxlos/Archives/<year>/<month>
|indexhere=yes
}}
{{Archive box |search=yes |collapsible=yes |
bot=lowercase sigmabot III |age=30 |
title=Archives ↗|
{{Nowrap|'''2017''': {{Archives by months|2017}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2018''': {{Archives by months|2018}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2019''': {{Archives by months|2019}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2020''': {{Archives by months|2020}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2021''': {{Archives by months|2021}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2022''': {{Archives by months|2022}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2023''': {{Archives by months|2023}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2024''': {{Archives by months|2024}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2025''': {{Archives by months|2025}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2026''': {{Archives by months|2026}}}}
}}

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, while peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|MCE89}} with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Bgsu98}} with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Reconrabbit}} with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit ↗ and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|A.Cython}} with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Generalissima}} with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Paulus Samador da Cunha

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 5 July 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Paulus Samador da Cunha ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''Paulus Samador da Cunha ↗''' lost a vote to become the regent of Sikka ↗, but was appointed anyway?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paulus Samador da Cunha ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Paulus Samador da Cunha ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}} Cielquiparle (talk) 00:04, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Achmad Soebardjo ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Achmad Soebardjo ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Achmad Soebardjo/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jishara -- Jishara (talk) 21:41, 7 July 2026 (UTC)