User Talk: KaijuEditor

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!

Hi KaijuEditor! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing!  Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits ↗ 18:30, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hello '''KaijuEditor'''! The thread you created at the Teahouse ↗, {{tq|AFD Creation}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to AFD Creation ↗}}.


See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

<div></div>
</div>
|}

Introduction to contentious topics

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''the Arab–Israeli conflict ↗''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia ↗;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines ↗;

follow editorial and behavioural best practices;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system ↗.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days ↗, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'', you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic here ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. }} — 🪫Volatile ''' 📲T''' | '''⌨️C''' ↗ 03:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

:Wait… when ↗? – KaijuEditor (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
::The CTOP does not cover just the article Arab–Israeli conflict ↗, it covers all things about it. So for example the article 2010 Gaza flotilla raid ↗ falls under this as it is related to the conflict, even though it is not the article itself. Sophisticatedevening(talk) 16:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
::I just sent this to give you more information per our discussion on Talk:Iran–Israel relations ↗. Basically, WP:ARBPIA ↗ requires extended-confirmed status to even discuss the topic. Making an edit request is ok as long as it's uncontroversial, but discussing the subject matter to attempt to gain consensus for your edit is, unfortunately, not allowed. — 🪫Volatile ''' 📲T''' | '''⌨️C''' ↗ 19:24, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
:::So until I gain the status ↗, my edit request ↗ is a no go? – KaijuEditor (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
::::Pretty much. It’s been declined, so just leave it. Once you hit extended confirmed you may discuss the edits on the talk page — 🪫Volatile ''' 📲T''' | '''⌨️C''' ↗ 00:42, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ of :Zmei (Russian ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
The page :Zmei (Russian ↗ has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Zmei+%28Russian|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review ↗.  Rusalkii (talk) 19:09, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

":Excessive citations ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Excessive_citations&redirect=no Excessive citations] has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 22#Excessive citations}}''' until a consensus is reached.  --Wotheina (talk) 06:58, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse|ts=jolielover♥talk 17:43, 2 October 2025 (UTC)}}

October 2025

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' '''indefinitely ↗''' from editing for since you have (procedurally atleast) evaded the block on your old account by creating this account. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  Sohom (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)</div></div>

:Note that this would ''technically'' be a clean start ↗, except that you have publicly linked both accounts, which invalidates a clean start (+ the fact that you were under sanctions disqualifies you from doing a clean start). I think the best possible situation here to explain your previous actions, why you did them, what you learnt and ask for a unblock. Based on looking at your old account you were close to getting the standard offer ↗ and if you can convince a reviewing admin, you can probably continue editing under this account since (based on a cursory look) the edits you have made don't appear to be net negative in general. Sohom (talk) 01:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
::Notes for reviewing admin, User:God's_Godzilla is the old account for context. Sohom (talk) 01:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed |1=In lieu of ↗ previous ↗ actions ↗.
:1. I was in a mood to make Wikipedia, back then, an interconnected place, by linking related articles or videos (of which some are still up too this day: Aftermath (2010 TV series) ↗), without realizing the dumb implications ↗, which I took as personal attack ↗, which in hindsight is dumb.
:2. I had a notion of thinking, I was making Wikipedia more interconnected to itself, which I made useless edit links ↗. I was and am wrong. As my edit debacle in Native American genocide ↗ notes. (I dropped my edit war ↗, when we reached a favorable compromise)
:3. I’ve learned to leave / back off from overzealous liking & to be careful with what I link ↗, and decided to switch to formatting, and allow other more experienced editors, do the actual proper writing. |accept = Unblocked by The Anome CoconutOctopus talk 09:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)}}

Procedurally, I think it makes most sense to bring this to WP:AN ↗ for review by the community, as the block was initially imposed by consensus at ANI. I will do so now. signed, '''''Rosguill''''' ''talk'' 17:12, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

:The discussion can be found here ↗. signed, '''''Rosguill''''' ''talk'' 17:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

::See my post below. Doug Weller talk 08:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hello '''KaijuEditor'''! The thread you created at the Teahouse ↗, {{tq|Redirects & Automation?}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Redirects & Automation? ↗}}.


See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:09, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

<div></div>
</div>
|}

You have been unblocked

See discussion here ↗. Welcome to Wikipedia! — The Anome (talk) 07:51, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
:And immediately initiated an edit war https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Daily_Wire&diff=prev&oldid=1316357141 against consensus ↗ FMSky (talk) 00:14, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
::Just ↗ saying ↗. – KaijuEditor (talk) 01:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
:See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Daily_Wire&diff=prev&oldid=1316357141 ↗ Perhaps I am missing something, but the sources I checked do not mention the Daily Wire. Doug Weller talk 08:13, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
::Someone has claimed same thing ↗. I don’t have access to journals ↗, so I just default to policy ↗ on academic journals ↗. – KaijuEditor (talk) 10:02, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
:@The Anome there may be a problem. Doug Weller talk 09:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Please don't edit-war

Please see {{u|Doug Weller}}'s note above. I have temporarily blocked you for 31 hours to give you a breather and prevent further tendentious editing. If you want to make contentious edits, you must justify them on the talk page.

I suggest you might consider refaining from contentious editing completely, since you are coming out from an almost decade-long block. You are welcome to dicuss the block here if you wish. Please be aware that blocking you ''again'' for another 10 years is on the cards if you can't play nicely with others. — The Anome (talk) 01:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

:I’m aware, it was reverting a bad faith removal. As clearly demonstrated in the thread. But, if the consensus, based on a technicality, is a ok, I’ll leave it alone. As for my block, I understand, and will leave it be. – KaijuEditor (talk) 02:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Re {{tl|R from sort name}}

Please note that a sort name is very specifically a human name sorted by last-name first, e.g. Reagan, Ronald ↗, or Chisholm, Shirley ↗. Cheers! '''''BD2412''''' '''T''' 19:28, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

November 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello and welcome to Wikipedia ↗. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia ↗ are appreciated, but a recent edit ↗ of yours to the page :Template:Liberalism US ↗ has an edit summary ↗ that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history ↗, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox ↗ to make test edits. Thank you. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:58, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

:Specifically, look more carefully at what is going on before calling and edit "vandalism". Something as simple as an error does not qualify as vandalism. In this case ↗, there was an unintended artifact in the edit. That's fine to revert - or even better, fix. A very cursory look may seem to be vandalism, but you should first WP:AGF ↗ and look beyond the surface before throwing labels into your edit summaries. TIA. ButlerBlog (talk) 15:03, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Palestine genocide ↗

Hello, KaijuEditor

I edit here too, under the username Shocksingularity and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Palestine genocide ↗, created by you. Your comments are welcome at {{sectionlink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 22#Palestine genocide}}.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Shocksingularity<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Shocksingularity (talk) 01:56, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink| Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 15#FAQ/Readers }}''' until a consensus is reached.  '''consarn ↗ (talck) ↗ (contirbuton s) ↗''' 20:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

American hybrid warfare against Greenland during the second Trump administration

Please don't change the redirect target to a sub section of the article. This is the old title of the article, the title under which it is indexed in Google, linked from many articles and other websites. Tens of thousands of readers are expecting the main article, not a sub section of it, from this link. --Bjerrebæk (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

":Far-left and right politics ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Far-left_and_right_politics&redirect=no Far-left and right politics] has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9#Far-left and right politics}}''' until a consensus is reached.  Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

":WikiIndex ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WikiIndex&redirect=no WikiIndex] has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 4#WikiIndex}}''' until a consensus is reached.  '''Sahib-''e''-Qiran''', EasternShah 00:04, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geologic time scale ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time scale ↗ was added. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Youtube links

Popular science youtubers are not authority for Wikipedia, because they do not really add new content. Please do not add such links. --Altenmann ↗ >talk ↗ 08:52, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Modifying redirect categories using Capricorn

Can you work on something else besides modifying redirect categories using Capricorn, please? You lack the competence to do this; what I'm seeing is mindless button-pushing, requiring others to clean up after you. Thanks wbm1058 (talk) 12:01, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

:Plan to stick to formatting ↗ as I assured ↗ the administrators ↗. – KaijuEditor (talk) 16:30, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi KaijuEditor! I noticed that you recently made an edit at :Triple parentheses ↗ and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit ↗" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typo ↗s or reverting obvious vandalism ↗. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. ''And other edits''  Doug Weller talk 18:19, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

:I’ve been meaning to ask: how would someone ''know'' when it’s minor or '''not'''? (Cause it’s not intuitive]]) – KaijuEditor (talk) 20:35, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
::Please see :WP:MINOR ↗.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏''(ring-ring)'' 21:55, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Great Buddha Arrival ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Buddha ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Re: Promotion and Independent Sources tags on Anarcho-capitalism ↗ page.

KaijuEditor, Please specify the disputed content in detail, on the article's talk page, or your tags will be speedily removed. '''JLMadrigal''' @ 13:51, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

:You may edit the article. Please edit to remove biased sources ↗. No close connections ↗ to the subject per Wikipedia’s rules ↗. – hKaijuEditor (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::What "biased sources"? You need to specify - on the article's talk page. '''JLMadrigal''' @ 22:34, 28 June 2026 (UTC)