User Talk: Jolielover

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Talk header}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
| age =2160
| archiveprefix =User talk:Jolielover/Archive
| numberstart =1
| maxarchsize =75000
| header ={{Archive}}
| minkeepthreads =5
| format = %%i
}}{{Archives|bot=ClueBot III|age=90}}

A kitten for you!

left|150px ↗
The cat is malicious.

'''n.h.huit, 化けの花''' 01:29, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
 

:Thanks! So sorry I forgot to reply jolielover♥talk 16:33, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Friendly Proposal

Hello, how are you doing today? I'm sorry for disturbing you, I was wondering if you would like to be friends, I'm new here and j have no reading partner or friends here. Purnama1 (talk) 20:54, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Upcoming expiry of your ipblock-exempt right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot ↗ to let you know that your WP:IPBE ↗ right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 09:16, 22 April 2026 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked, please submit a new request by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. {{grey|To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion ↗.}} Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

<div style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF; padding: 0.5em 1em 0 1em;" role="article">
right|80px ↗

The May 2026 administrator elections ↗ are set to proceed.

We plan to use the following schedule:

* April 29–May 5: Candidate sign-up

* May 8–May 12: Discussion phase

* May 13–May 19: SecurePoll voting phase

If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections ↗.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list ↗.
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Election – Call for Candidates

<div style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF; padding: 0.5em 1em 0 1em;" role="article">
right|80px ↗
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at '''Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates ↗'''.

Here is the schedule:

April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates

May 8–12: Discussion phase

May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

The requirements to run are identical to RFA ↗—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed ↗.

Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful ↗ and unsuccessful ↗ RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates ↗, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing ↗.

The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.

The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is '''no official difference''' between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.

Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors ↗.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page ↗. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list ↗.
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ | '''New pages patrol ↗''' 
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 May newsletter

The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP ↗. Peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|MCE89}} with 1,333 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Generalissima}} with 1,169 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to shipping ethics controversy in fanfiction ↗, waterways, and Gu Yanwu ↗

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Bgsu98}} with 1,149 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, and featured lists about figure skating, along with many article reviews and two good topics

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Olliefant}} with 830 points, mainly from good and featured articles about television shows, episodes and media, along with nearly four dozen good and featured article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Gommeh}} with 827 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to ''Genshin Impact ↗'' and ''Honkai: Star Rail''

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

News and updates for administrators ↗ from the past month (April 2026).

right|150px ↗

20px|alt= ↗ '''Administrator changes'''

:20px|alt=readded|Readded ↗ {{hlist|class=inline
|Deepfriedokra ↗
}}
:20px|alt=removed|Removed ↗ {{hlist|class=inline
|EvanProdromou ↗
|Wouterstomp ↗
}}

20px|alt= ↗ '''Interface administrator changes'''
:20px|alt=removed|Removed ↗ L235 ↗
:20px|alt=added|Added ↗ Chaotic Enby ↗

20px|alt= ↗ '''CheckUser changes'''
:20px|alt=removed|Removed ↗ {{hlist|class=inline
|TheresNoTime ↗
|Versageek ↗
}}

20px|alt= ↗ '''Oversight changes'''
:20px|alt=removed|Removed ↗ Moneytrees ↗

20px|alt= ↗ '''Guideline and policy news'''

class=skin-invert|20px|alt= ↗ '''Technical news'''

Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055 ↗).

The autoconfirmed ↗ user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484 ↗).

20px|alt= ↗ '''Arbitration'''

The arbitration case ''SchroCat ↗'' has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.

Per a recent motion ↗, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue ↗ are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.

Per a recent motion ↗, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.

The arbitration case ''Maghreb ↗'' has been closed.

class=skin-invert|20px|alt= ↗ '''Miscellaneous'''

The May 2026 administrator elections ↗ are scheduled to run from April 29 to May 19. The call for candidates ↗ ends May 5.

The 2026 Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election ↗ is scheduled to run from April 25 to June 1. Candidacy submissions ↗ close on May 10.

A '''new noticeboard ↗''' for non-urgent, batch page protection requests has been created, primarily for the enforcement of contentious topic restrictions ↗.

----
{{center|{{flatlist|

Discuss this newsletter ↗

Subscribe ↗

Archive ↗

}}}}
{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 3 May 2026 (UTC)}}

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

{{Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/MMS/Discussion phase}} -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

The Celebrity Traitors series 2

You moved the page for Draft:The Traitors (Australian TV series) season 3 ↗ when it was created as it was a series too soon for a page creation.

A page of The Celebrity Traitors series 2 ↗ has been created under similar circumstances. Which should happen, Austraian season 3 be moved to main or Celeb 2 moved to draft?

I am not sure how to move either can you help? Thanks in advance!:) JoyfullySmile (talk) 03:10, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

:The relevant policy is WP:NFTV ↗. Technically, since The Celebrity Traitors series 2 ↗ doesn't appear to have been filmed yet (correct me if I'm wrong - it's not on the page) it shouldn't have an article, although NFTV does note that this is simply {{tq|in most cases}}. As for the draft - it could have a page since it says it was filmed, but again, the "{{tq|in most cases}}". Like NFTV says, there's no sure production and anything could be scrapped at any moment, at which point WP:GNG ↗ is the only thing you need to keep the page in mainspace. I still think the Draft should remain one, at least until a release date is announced. If you want, you can ask folk at WP:Wikiproject Television ↗ their inputs jolielover♥talk 05:51, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

In appreciation

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|100px ↗| 100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Content Creativity Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | With thanks for creating Qojin ↗. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:13, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
|}

:Thank you so much!!! :) jolielover♥talk 01:37, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase

<div style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF; padding: 0.5em 1em 0 1em;" role="article">
right|80px ↗
The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until {{Administrator elections status/data|May 2026|end}} at {{Administrator election time|end}} UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at '''Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase ↗'''.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

{{Administrator elections/Header/daterange|May 2026|begin|end}}: SecurePoll voting phase ('''we are here''')

Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote ↗ has a week to use the SecurePoll ↗ software to vote, which uses a secret ballot ↗. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements ↗ are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page ↗ (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page ↗. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall ↗ candidates must achieve 55.0% support ↗. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ↗ ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page ↗. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list ↗.
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, jolielover, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you now intend to contribute more articles about women. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through the tips in our Ten Simple Rules ↗. Please let me know if you tun into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:54, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you! jolielover♥talk 10:49, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

::Thanks for your additions to Elizabeth Serunye ↗. I've invited Dxviolet to join WiR too.--Ipigott (talk) 14:22, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Alright! jolielover♥talk 14:34, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">

Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

thumb|400px|New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026 ↗

'''Backlog update'''

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

'''2024 and 2025 NPP Awards'''

74px|left ↗{{no ping|JTtheOG}} was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
{{no ping|Hey man im josh}} and {{no ping|MPGuy2824}} won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

{{no ping|BoyTheKingCanDance}}, {{no ping|Rosiestep}}, {{no ping|SunDawn}}, and {{no ping|Vanderwaalforces}} were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame ↗ for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

'''January–February backlog drive'''

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

'''May backlog drive'''

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026 ↗.

'''PageTriage'''

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed ↗ to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket ↗ if you're interested in following along.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord ↗.

Consider adding the project discussion page ↗ to your watchlist.

To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here ↗.

{{refend}}
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Regarding Rathindra Bose ↗

Draft: Rathindra Bose ↗ is already there for AfC ↗. Kindly consider this, thank you and happy editing. '''Rasel ‍Hasan '''Talk 17:52, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you for letting me know, I was unaware. As I do not have advanced page mover permissions, I cannot move that AfC to mainspace, over the current article. I think you will either have to ask someone else, or paste the Draft into the mainspace article. Sorry for this. jolielover♥talk 18:08, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Training minutes

Hello Jolielover, i am trying to upload minutes on our project page and was wondering why the subpage was red yet i had created the page. That's why i deleted and said unreflected page. I am still checking where i may have gone wrong. So please don't delete the page, i am correcting the mess immediately

Wikedits2024 (talk) 06:35, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

:Alright, I've removed the CSD notice. jolielover♥talk 06:36, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you jolielover. I have corrected the issue Wikedits2024 (talk) 06:51, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Alright, I've re-added the CSD notice to the mainspace page. Thanks for the clarity. jolielover♥talk 06:53, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
::::Why re-add Jolie? The mainspace page is correct please. I was creating the minutes page then add the page on the main project page. Was adding that minutes page to this page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Kenyan Circle of Concerned African Women - Wikipedia ↗ Wikedits2024 (talk) 06:58, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::I'm sorry, I'm not really sure what's going on here? I don't think the mainspace page is right, but anyway, I've removed the CSD tag and will let someone else determine the outcome. jolielover♥talk 07:01, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::Thank you jolielover Wikedits2024 (talk) 07:04, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::@Wikedits2024, essentially, what you did was create an ''article'' page called WikiProject Kenyan Circle of Concerned African Women/Minutes/May 19, 2026 ↗. Since this is not an article page, but an internal wikiproject page, that title was incorrect. Another administrator moved the page to User:Wikedits2024/WikiProject Kenyan Circle of Concerned African Women/Minutes/May 19, 2026, where that subpage is now.{{pb}}You may have been looking for Wikipedia:WikiProject Kenyan Circle of Concerned African Women/Minutes/May 19, 2026 ↗ instead. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:44, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::Thank you Epicgenius Wikedits2024 (talk) 16:56, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
::::Ideally, as at now everything is in place so i don't think there is need to add the tag. I started by creating the page then go to project page and add the page. I am not sure if i am making sense. But i request that you remove the tag because everything is in place now Jolielover Wikedits2024 (talk) 07:00, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Cockroach Janta party official flag

please don't remove existing logo ..we are in discussion... whether to keep it as a official flag or new or previouslu existing......I will remove it by myself SALlM BlN YOUSUF (talk) 08:40, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

:we are working continuously to add suitable accepted logo SALlM BlN YOUSUF (talk) 11:46, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
::No, you are edit warring which is not allowed. jolielover♥talk 11:48, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' June 2026 Backlog Drive
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.

Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''

Join the conversations on our talk page ↗.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red - June 2026

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375
 
'''Online events:'''

''New'': LGBTQ+ women ↗ <big>|</big> Alphabet run: Countries starting with I, J, K and L ↗

''Article improvement campaign'': Orphaned women ↗

''Continuing (year-long initiatives)'': #1day1woman ↗ <big>|</big> Sports ↗

{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''

Eiffel women ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

Consider contributing to two of our monthly events at once, and improve coverage of LGBTQ+ women by de-orphaning their articles.

'''Other ways to participate:'''

Become a member ↗. You can always opt-out of notifications ↗.

Join the conversations on our talkpage ↗.

Help us plan future events ↗ and add any general ideas on developing the project.

|} --Rosiestep (talk) 22:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Administrators' newsletter – June 2026

News and updates for administrators ↗ from the past month (May 2026).

right|150px ↗

20px|alt= ↗ '''Administrator changes'''
:20px|alt=added|Added ↗ {{hlist|class=inline
|Asukite ↗
|Bobby Cohn ↗
|Bonadea ↗
|Ca ↗
|Drm310 ↗
|Reconrabbit ↗
|Sammi Brie ↗
}}
:20px|alt=readded|Readded ↗ {{hlist|class=inline|
|Tamzin ↗
|TonyBallioni ↗
}}
:20px|alt=removed|Removed ↗ {{hlist|class=inline
|Ezhiki ↗
|Queen of Hearts ↗
}}

20px|alt= ↗ '''Bureaucrat changes'''
:20px|alt=removed|Removed ↗ {{hlist|class=inline
|WereSpielChequers ↗
}}

20px|alt= ↗ '''Guideline and policy news'''

Following an RfC ↗, the "persistent usage of large language models ↗" has been included as a common reason for a block ↗.

20px|alt= ↗ '''Technical news'''

Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats ↗: Bureaucrats ↗ without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119 ↗, T423120 ↗)

20px|alt= ↗ '''Arbitration'''

The arbitration case ''SchroCat ↗'' has been closed.

The arbitration case ''Michael Jackson ↗'' has opened. Evidence submissions in this case closes on 1 June.

20px|alt= ↗ '''Miscellaneous'''

Voting for the 2026 Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election ↗ closes on 1 June.

----
{{center|{{flatlist|

Discuss this newsletter ↗

Subscribe ↗

Archive ↗

}}}}
{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)}}

Lords of Sidon

Hi. So do the same for Lord of Sidon ↗, right? Thanks. Arminden (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

:It's already a redirect, created in 2005. jolielover♥talk 14:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Nicholas Galitzine ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Nicholas Galitzine ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Nicholas Galitzine/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

DCWC call for coordinators

frameless|right|upright=0.8|The Developing Countries WikiContest Gold Belt Buckle ↗

Hey Jolielover, it's almost that time again! The Developing Countries WikiContest ↗ will be returning for its third year, and the coordinator team is looking for experienced content contributors willing to volunteer. The coordinators are responsible for keeping the contest running and its pages{{mdashb}}including participants' submissions, the points leaderboard, and the list of eligible articles{{mdashb}}updated.

If you would like to apply, please contact one of the coordinators; you may choose to do so privately if you wish: {{user-multi|user=Arconning|t|e}}, {{user-multi|user=sawyer777|t|e}}, or {{user-multi|user=TechnoSquirrel69|t|e}}. (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list ↗.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —'''TechnoSquirrel69''' ('''sigh''') 22:25, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

{{clear right}}

DYK for Qojin

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 6 June 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Qojin ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Genghis Khan's daughter '''Qojin ↗''' got married at 23, older than usual for a Mongol woman?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Qojin ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Qojin ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}} Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈 ↗) 00:03, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Nicholas Galitzine ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Nicholas Galitzine ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:Nicholas Galitzine/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:05, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Barnstar

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color: black" | '''The Women in Red Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray; color: black" | For your excellent article creations and great support in Women in Red articles. Jishara (talk) 14:27, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
|}

:Thank you so much!:) jolielover♥talk 15:23, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 NPP backlog drive – Points award

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | 160px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The New Page Patroller's Barnstar '''  
|-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This award is given in recognition of Jolielover for accumulating at least 100 points in the May 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 14884 articles during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – '''Dream'''Rimmer ■ 15:57, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
|}

Your nomination of Nicholas Galitzine ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Nicholas Galitzine ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Nicholas Galitzine/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:05, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

right|thumb|A ridiculous cat ↗
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please excuse my erroneous edit, likely a mistaken rollback or revert caused by my fat fingers ↗, hypnagogia ↗, or one of my ridiculous cats. I have likely self reverted or noticed the mistake after you corrected it. Again, my apologies. Thank you. '''EvergreenFir''' (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

:It's fine! jolielover♥talk 04:10, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Cyril Karabus ↗

{{ivmbox
|1=On 15 June 2026, '''''In the news ↗''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''Cyril Karabus ↗''''', which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page ↗. '''Spencer'''T•C ↗ 02:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
|2={{Ambox globe current red}}
|imagesize=50px
}}

Films added to list of feature films lists

The films you added to List of feature films with lesbian characters ↗ and List of feature films with gay characters ↗ had to be removed because they are franchise films. They appear in List of film franchises with LGBTQ characters ↗. '''Pyxis Solitary''' (yak). ⚢ – not queer. 13:17, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

:I see, thanks for letting me know jolielover♥talk 14:43, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Editor's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Get this love you Auxuns (talk) 12:31, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
|}

:Thank you! :) jolielover♥talk 12:40, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

The DCWC is back!

frameless|right|upright=0.8|The Developing Countries WikiContest Gold Belt Buckle ↗

Hey Jolielover, the Developing Countries WikiContest ↗ is back for a third year, and '''sign-ups are now open ↗'''! The contest will run from 1{{nbsp}}July to 30{{nbsp}}September, and the objective remains the same: improve as many articles relating to developing countries as you can to help fight systemic bias on Wikipedia ↗.

Thanks to everyone who answered the call for coordinators, and please welcome the new faces on the coordinator team: the 2024 Gold Belt Buckle winner {{user|Generalissima}}; and the record-holder for most India-related submissions in 2024, {{user|Magentic Manifestations}}! Following feedback from last year, adjustments have been made to the scoring rules ↗; discussion can be found on the contest talk page ↗.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or contact one of the coordinators: {{user|Arconning}}, {{user|Generalissima}}, {{user|Magentic Manifestations}}, {{user|sawyer777}}, or {{user|TechnoSquirrel69}}. (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list ↗. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery.) —'''TechnoSquirrel69''' ('''talk''') 16:00, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
{{clear|left}}

New page patroller?

I see from the topics above that you are a NPP. I am curious, did you mark reviewed
the Diane Musho Hamilton ↗ article? If so, thank you. I've been an editor for 21 years but when I look at this talk page I am feeling like a massive under performer. I created another new article recently, Abdul Shamji ↗. I can't tell if that one has been reviewed. That's been up a couple of weeks. Utahredrock (talk) 00:56, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi there - I actually didn't, sorry! And it hasn't been patrolled yet. I like doing little 'fixes' to article (e.g. adding categories, copyediting), and that's what I did with that one. I don't always necessarily patrol such articles. And don't worry about being an 'underperformer' - you're here and that's all that matters, thanks for contributing such articles to Wikipedia! As for Abdul Shamji ↗ - no, it is not patrolled yet. Unfortunately, there is a very large backlog in the new pages feed. I'll have a proper look at sources of both articles sometime today, if you'd like. jolielover♥talk 04:48, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
::That would be great. Just curious . . . how can I tell if something has been patrolled/reviewed? Utahredrock (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Go to the page history, click 'view logs for this page', and check 'review log' jolielover♥talk 15:54, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Thx. I checked both pages and it looks like they haven't been reviewed yet. Appreciate the reply. Utahredrock (talk) 15:59, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Forgot to update, but I did patrol Shamji's article. You should have received a notice when I did, which is another way of knowing if your article is patrolled. jolielover♥talk 19:43, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Mistaken edit

Some people told me he was dead and there were newspaper rticles about him being dead, sorry about that
Luckyducky9999 (talk) 03:58, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi there; the problem with the edit is that it was unsourced. Edits must be verifiable ↗, especially edits claiming someone has died. If you can find one of those articles about his death, you can re-add the information I removed, with that source. jolielover♥talk 04:24, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Barnstar

{| class="barnstar" style="border:1px solid gray; background:#fdffe7;"
|-
|rowspan="2" style="padding-right:5px;" | 100px ↗

|style="font-size:1.65em; padding:0; height: 1.1em;" | The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
|-
|style="border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your dedication to this noble project. Utahredrock (talk) 20:49, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
|}

:Thanks a lot!! :) jolielover♥talk 07:06, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

I hope that when you see this message, it is uplifting!

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000000; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">40px|left ↗

Issac I Navarro (talk) wishes you peace! 

Spread peace and goodwill by adding {{tls|WikiPeace}} to other's talk pages with a friendly message.</div> I sincerely appreciate your thoughts on the RfC at Talk:Clop (erotic fan art) ↗. I understand that the topic as a whole may be upsetting and wanted to say that I valid your input. {{smiley}} I hope that when you see this message, it is uplifting! Once again, thank you for your edits and years of contribution to improving Wikipedia. Issac I Navarro (talk) 01:50, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you for reaching out & sending me that! :) jolielover♥talk 07:06, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Drac0r3g (07:13, 27 June 2026)

Hi! I was wondering if it would be possible for me to create a page on the actor Oscar Morgan? He already has one written about him briefly in German.

Also, in the past I have made edits on here anonymously and I was curious if I would be able to list and credit them as contributions tied to this account. --Drac0r3g (talk) 07:13, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

:Welcome! Each language-edition of Wikipedia has different criterias for pages, and so an article existing on another language-edition does not necessarily mean it can have one here. On the English Wikipedia, articles must meet our general notability criteria ↗. To put it briefly, Oscar Morgan must have significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources, to have a page here. The sources can be of any language. If you believe he does meet the criteria, then yes, be bold ↗ and create the page yourself! And yes, you can attribute edits made while logged out to this account - see WP:LOUT ↗ for more information. jolielover♥talk 07:21, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Topic ban?

I personally think Deacon Vorbis should be topic-banned from edit requests. Do you think this is worth pursuing? ~2026-32492-01 ↗ (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

:If you want, you can bring this up on WP:ANI ↗. Editors will reach a consensus on what to do. jolielover♥talk 17:45, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::Hmm maybe. I've seen first hand, though, that that particular page is filled with power-users who like to back each other up no matter what. I've had to start tagging recent editors on my edit requests for the sake of visibility since Deacon is making sure they're not in the list of active requests. Might be best to wait and let him hang himself with his continued disruptive editing ~2026-32492-01 ↗ (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:::I think you should just go to ANI and let it move on from there, instead of pinging editors. It seems like there is edit-warring involved, Deacon is accusing you of personal attacks ↗, Deacon is calling your edits 'needless churn' ↗, etc. All in all, needs to go to a noticeboard as interactions between the two of you evidently aren't going well. jolielover♥talk 17:55, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

<section begin="July" />
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377
'''Events:'''

''New'': Crime & law ↗ <big>|</big> Alphabet run: Countries starting with M ↗

''Continuing (year-long initiatives)'': #1day1woman ↗ <big>|</big> Sports ↗

{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''
|frameless|100px|right ↗

Women in Red celebrates its 11 Year Anniversary on July 18!

Eiffel women ↗

Developing Countries WikiContest ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

Working on a group of linked articles? Have you thought about creating a navigation box ↗ for the footer of those pages?

'''Other ways to participate:'''

Become a member ↗. You can always opt-out of notifications ↗.

Join the conversations on our talkpage ↗.

Help us plan future events ↗ and add any general ideas on developing the project.

|}<section end="July" />

--MSGJ (talk 22:14, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Addition of unambiguous copyvio at We Are Charlie Kirk ↗

Hi Jolielover, I see that you recently added ↗ a song, in its entirety, with a credited songwriter, to an article about the song.

WP:COPYVIO ↗ says we should not do that. Mikewem (talk) 12:19, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:I was not the original person to add it. If you think the song is a copyright violation, please make a deletion request on commons, which will determine if it is or not; then it can be removed from the page. It was actually 'media of the day' back in January, so I personally doubt it is a copyvio. As stated in the licensing section, as an AI-generated work, it is in the public domain. jolielover♥talk 13:26, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::Editors are responsible for their edits. The song is an unambiguous copyvio, and it is on the page because you added it. Mikewem (talk) 15:36, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Alright, so tag it for deletion? jolielover♥talk 15:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Don’t know how. And not needed because WP:NFCC ↗ 3b applies to usage on Wikipedia pages, not to Commons procedures. If Commons hosts an acceptably short file, then it can be added. But the entire song is the wrong file for this page, and it is an unambiguous copyvio to add that file to this page per 3b. Mikewem (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::The file itself is in public domain. Non-free criteria does not apply to it, it can be on however many pages it wants. See c:File:We Are Charlie Kirk - SPALEXMA.wav ↗. It was kept in February after a deletion discussion ↗. If you can't prove it's copyvio, there's no reason for it to not be on the page. If you want to make a deletion request, see c:Commons:Deletion requests ↗. Like I said, last discussion was just in February, unlikely circumstances have changed much since then. jolielover♥talk 17:16, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::The file is not in the public domain, SP Music Project owns the copyright. NFCC applies.
::::::Back in February, the song was credited solely to Spalexma. Then, the song was taken down from streaming services. Now the song is back up, with a new line that credits Sargis Poghosyan as composer, lyricist and songwriter. It’s copyvio. Mikewem (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Alright, if you think this is the case, nominate it for deletion jolielover♥talk 01:57, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, while peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|MCE89}} with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Bgsu98}} with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Reconrabbit}} with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit ↗ and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|A.Cython}} with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Generalissima}} with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

how to add citation to lil poppa death info by old man sheldon martinez davis, OG Natalac

Pioneer of pimp hop, Jacksonville rapper Natalac - https://worldstar.com/videos/wshhJw5e0FL3649LfFtf/jacksonville-man-blasts-lil-poppas-manager-for-ignoring-his-struggles-she-should-have-used-the-baker-act-on-him ~2026-37491-68 ↗ (talk) 15:09, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:I'm sorry, it seems like Natalac doesn't have an article on Wikipedia at the moment. Tributes should be limited to people who have articles, to prevent overcrowding. jolielover♥talk 15:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Public domain

It is VERY common knowledge that THE STORK CLUB is in the public domain. — Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by ~2026-34021-44 ↗ (talk) 17:13, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:Wikipedia needs tangible sources for this claim, sorry. No original research ↗ is allowed. See Wikipedia:Common knowledge ↗ for more information. jolielover♥talk 17:19, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Eimaeifs (14:26, 30 June 2026)

I need to edit erroneous information on the Wikipedia page about Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems --Eimaeifs (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

:Do you mean Exterior insulation finishing system ↗? It is not protected, so you should be able to edit. Feel free to boldly ↗ make changes! Please do note that text must be supported by citations ↗ to reliable sources ↗. jolielover♥talk 14:53, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

The DCWC is open!

thumb|upright=1.2|See a {{nowrap|{{legend inline|ffb219}} "developing"}} or {{nowrap|{{legend inline|ff562f}} "least}} developed" country? Write about it to earn points! ↗

Hey Jolielover, the third annual Developing Countries WikiContest ↗ is now '''open for submissions'''. Welcome to the contest! You can now list your work at '''your submissions page''' ↗ to earn points ↗. We hope that you enjoy participating in this drive to fight Wikipedia's systemic bias ↗. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions on the talk page ↗.

Got open nominations? List them at the review requests sidebar ↗.

Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles ↗ and eligible reviews ↗.

Not sure if your article qualifies? See the scoring rules ↗ for more information or contact a coordinator ↗.

Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open ↗ throughout the contest, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you the best of luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page ↗ or ask one of the coordinators: {{noping2|Arconning}}, {{noping2|Generalissima}}, {{noping2|Magentic Manifestations}}, {{noping2|sawyer777}}, or {{noping2|TechnoSquirrel69}}. (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list ↗. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery.) —'''TechnoSquirrel69''' ('''talk''') 00:00, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
{{clear|right}}

Administrators' newsletter – July 2026

News and updates for administrators ↗ from the past month (June 2026).

right|150px ↗

20px|alt= ↗ '''Administrator changes'''
:20px|alt=added|Added ↗ {{hlist|class=inline|Chipmunkdavis ↗|TechnoSquirrel69 ↗}}
:20px|alt=removed|Removed ↗ {{hlist|class=inline
|Mlaffs ↗
|SpuriousQ ↗
|Lectonar ↗
|Dennis Brown ↗
|Hog Farm ↗
}}

20px|alt= ↗ '''CheckUser changes'''
:20px|alt=readded|Readded ↗ {{hlist|class=inline
|Giraffer ↗
|TonyBallioni ↗
}}
:20px|alt=removed|Removed ↗ {{hlist|class=inline
|Dbeef ↗
|EdJohnston ↗
}}

20px|alt= ↗ '''Oversight changes'''
:20px|alt=readded|Readded ↗ {{hlist|class=inline
|Giraffer ↗
|TonyBallioni ↗
}}
:20px|alt=removed|Removed ↗ L235 ↗

20px|alt= ↗ '''Guideline and policy news'''

A request for comment ↗ asks whether the criteria for autoconfirmed and extended confirmed should be modified.

A request for comment ↗ proposes an addendum for the Real name section of the Username policy ↗.

20px|alt= ↗ '''Technical news'''

The special page Special:RangeCalculator ↗ has been created for any users to use to find an IP range. (phab:T268429 ↗)

The "indefinitely" button in Special:Block ↗ for temporary accounts can be replaced with a preferred block duration stated on MediaWiki:ipb-indefinite-expiry-temporary-account ↗. (phab:T427125 ↗)

20px|alt= ↗ '''Arbitration'''

Following a series of motions ↗, changes to the contentious topics procedure ↗ to restructure awareness ↗ have been implemented.

The arbitration case ''Michael Jackson ↗'' has been closed.

20px|alt= ↗ '''Miscellaneous'''

The 2026 Developing Countries WikiContest ↗ will run from 1{{nbsp}}July to 30{{nbsp}}September. '''Sign up now ↗'''!

10 candidates have been appointed ↗ to the U4C.

----
{{center|{{flatlist|

Discuss this newsletter ↗

Subscribe ↗

Archive ↗

}}}}
{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 2 July 2026 (UTC)}}

Question from RLRuff (22:48, 5 July 2026)

Hi Jolielover,
I've never edited an article and don't imagine I'll do it again, but I noticed that audiobook narrator/actor Ray Porter's page doesn't include two audiobooks that I've heard him narrate on Audible. Can you please recommend the Help sections I should read to do this? I am very familiar with using Word and I thought the first thing I'd do would be to add lines to the Audiobooks table in his article and enter the books' titles, add the dates and cite to the audiobooks' internet address from Audible's site. Unfortunately, I couldn't find anything about adding something to a preexisting list or table. Hopefully you can help me because if it's too hard to learn how to edit, I may just shine it on. Thanks, Ronda --RLRuff (talk) 22:48, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

:Hi there - you have to click 'edit', and in source editor, follow the format already in place. In this case, it would look like:
:|[Year]
:|[Name of book]
:|[Which characters]
:|[Extra notes, if applicable; you can put the citation here]
:With a '|- ' between each new entry. Can you let me know which entries are missing? I could try to add them myself. jolielover♥talk 07:33, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Maria Afonso

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 10 July 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Maria Afonso ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the reliquary believed to contain the remains of '''Maria Afonso ↗''' may instead hold the body of her infant nephew?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Afonso ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Maria Afonso ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}} ~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 00:16, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Jose Miguel mendez romero

Hola a toda la comunidad puedo crear mi propia biografía o alguien que pueda hacerla soy investigador independiente estaba trabajando en campos confinados en mecánica cuántica mi trabajo es prometedor por seguridad requiere un lugar adecuado no puedo avanzar estoy seguro se tendría que hacer de cualquier modo mi bibliografía está en zenodo haciendo aclaración de trabajo en espera de revisión por pares gracias José Miguel mendez Romero (talk) 05:42, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Palm Beach Pete

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 11 July 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Palm Beach Pete ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''a Florida man in his 70s ↗''' claims an internet following of Gen Zers?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Palm Beach Pete ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Palm Beach Pete ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}} EggRoll97 (talk ↗) 00:03, 11 July 2026 (UTC)