User Talk: Koo-1876

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

thumb|300px|Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative. File:Face-smile.svg|25px ↗ ↗

Hello, Koo-1876, and '''welcome to Wikipedia!''' Thank you for your contributions ↗. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name ↗ on talk pages ↗, by using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.

Check out some of these pages:

*Contributing to Wikipedia ↗

*Introduction to Wikipedia ↗

*How to create your first article ↗ (using the Article Wizard ↗ if you wish)

*The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗ {{!}} Cheatsheet of WikiCode ↗

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse ↗, <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User talk:Rasnaboy|action=edit&section=new}} ask me on my talk page]</span>, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 12:10, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

<inputbox>
type=comment
preload=Template:W-FAQ/Helpme
editintro=Template:W-FAQ/Helpintro
hidden=yes
default={{FULLPAGENAME}}
buttonlabel=Click here for help
</inputbox><br />
{{Hidden|style=width: 50%;|contentstyle=text-align: center;|1=''Why can't I edit some particular pages?''|2= Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected ↗, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates ↗, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators ↗ can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked ↗ or your IP address caught up in a range block.}}
{{Hidden|style=width: 50%;|contentstyle=text-align: center;|1=''Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?''|2=Use the main sandbox ↗ or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.}}
{{Hidden|style=width: 50%;|contentstyle=text-align: center;|1=''How do I create an article?''|2=See how to create your first article ↗, then use the Article Wizard ↗ to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.}}
{{Hidden|style=width: 50%;|contentstyle=text-align: left;|1=''How do I create citations?''|2=#Do a search on Google ↗ or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
#Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
#In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator ↗, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
#Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
#Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <code><nowiki><ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref></nowiki></code>, copy the whole thing).
#In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
#If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
<pre style="overflow: auto">
==References==
{{Reflist}}
</pre>}}
{{Hidden|style=width: 50%;|contentstyle=text-align: center;|1=''What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?''|2=A WikiProject ↗ is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page ↗ for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.}}

Blue and humpback

Please refrain from editing these articles. Your edits are not helpful for these FA articles and most of your sources are of low quality. You should probably practice editing on non-FA/GA articles. LittleJerry (talk) 03:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

:It just contains information that experts have researched. Koo-1876 (talk) 05:48, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
:Then, I think it is not necessary to erase the factual information when it would be enough to just correct the article. Koo-1876 (talk) 05:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
::We are already citing books written by experts. Please move on and don't edit war ↗. Or at least take it to the talk page. LittleJerry (talk) 12:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
:::I see Koo-1876 (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

February 2025

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for edit warring ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes ↗ and seek consensus ↗. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution ↗, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection ↗.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 13:40, 20 February 2025 (UTC)</div></div>

Whales again

You were just blocked for edit warring and not your starting again. As I said we already have citations from books and peer reviewed articles. Why do you insist on adding websites? Go to the talk pages to argue your points. So what your doing now will only get you blocked indefinitely. LittleJerry (talk) 16:35, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

:Better but you also have to learn to paraphrase a source see WP:COPYVIO ↗ and WP:PARAPHRASE ↗. LittleJerry (talk) 11:52, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
::I see Koo-1876 (talk) 13:30, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

And '''again''' at Blue whale ↗ with the rubbish sources, bad phrasing, and edit-warring. Stop this. --<span style="font-family:Courier">Elmidae</span> <small>(talk · contribs ↗)</small> 13:44, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

:Okay, I'll be careful. Koo-1876 (talk) 14:15, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

::You did it again ↗. Why? If you keep doing this, you'll likely be blocked because you'd lose good faith. LittleJerry (talk) 22:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

:Category:Argentinosaurus ↗ has been nominated for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Argentinosaurus ↗ has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. <span style="font-family:Courier">Elmidae</span> <small>(talk · contribs ↗)</small> 09:57, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Fin whales ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Fin whales ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 11:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Minke whale ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Minke whale ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 15:40, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Camarasaurus ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Camarasaurus ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 15:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Brontosaurus ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Brontosaurus ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 15:44, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Lognkosauria ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Lognkosauria ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 15:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Diplodocus ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Diplodocus ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 15:52, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for persistently making disruptive edits ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 15:53, 29 June 2025 (UTC)</div></div>

FA articles

I'd appreciate it if you'd refrain from editing these FAs for the time being and focus on non-FA/GAs for practice. Edits like these: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Humpback_whale&diff=prev&oldid=1308514092 ↗ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Giraffe&diff=prev&oldid=1308089921 ↗ are not helpful. The articles are already built up and contain the most important information. They shouldn't be treated like dumping grounds for random facts. Thank you. LittleJerry (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:I told you to please leave these articles alone. Do it again, and I'm reporting you and you could be blocked. This is your last warning. LittleJerry (talk) 00:16, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

:Category:Humpback whale ↗ has been nominated for merging

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Humpback whale ↗ has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 15:08, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

ANI

"link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. LittleJerry (talk) 20:32, 3 October 2025 (UTC)".

October 2025

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' '''indefinitely ↗''' from editing for persistently making disruptive edits ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 21:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)</div></div>

:My apologies, I was in the wrong for issuing this block. The AN/I discussion linked above (now archived ↗), which I based my block on, may still be applicable and need further discussion. - UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 19:29, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Humpback whale ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Humpback whale ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   UtherSRG (talk) ↗ 21:51, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Humpback whale ↗

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Notice

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. LittleJerry (talk) 00:26, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Orca

Please leave all the FAs alone please. None of them need trivial edits like the largest brain weight. LittleJerry (talk) 19:53, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

:LittleJerry, you only need to delete the minor corrections such as the weight of the big brain, so there is no need to delete other contents as well, and moreover, those contents are only corrections to the existing contents in the literature. Koo-1876 (talk) 23:34, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
::I can't just sort through all your ends. Also I don't trust you represent the sources well either. Change the rest back please. LittleJerry (talk) 01:24, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Even if LittleJerry can't possibly organize every last detail, and you're not even sure if you've properly cited the sources, wouldn't it be better to at least give it some thought and consideration before making a decision. Koo-1876 (talk) 01:56, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
::::{{u|Hemiauchenia}}, already pointed out that you misrepresented a source here ↗. LittleJerry (talk) 02:16, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::I acknowledge that the edit already pointed out by Hemiauchenia misquoted the source. However, for species that grow up to 10 meters tall, this was done after extensive review, including the source itself.https://archive.org/details/mammalsofsov231996gept/page/682/mode/2up ↗ The height of the dorsal fin, lifespan, and gestation period are also in the relevant sources linked below.https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-35651-3_16#Sec3 ↗Koo-1876 (talk) 02:25, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
::::::Please just leave the FAs alone. I keep telling you this and you've lost good faith. LittleJerry (talk) 01:16, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::::I'm satisfied that this time they acknowledged some of the content instead of deleting everything, and I plan to leave the orca article as is, as LittleJerry said. Koo-1876 (talk) 02:22, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Largest body parts ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Donald Albury 11:51, 30 March 2026 (UTC)