User Talk: Kurcke

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!

Hi Kurcke! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing!  Flibirigit (talk) 12:18, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. I noticed that your recent edit to :Tyler Hynes ↗ did not have an edit summary ↗. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary ↗, or by discussion on the talk page ↗. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief ↗.

The edit summary field looks like this:
{{Edit summary field/OOUI}}

or in the visual editor:
{{Edit summary field/VisualEditor}}

{{strong|Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.}} When logged in to your Wikipedia account ↗, you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{myprefs|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}, and then click the "{{int:saveprefs}}" button.
Thanks!{{sp}} – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:02, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, I added Wikilinks to the films which have Wikipedia articles, where this actor acted in. My apologies for not providing an edit summary for my edits. Kurcke (talk) 22:36, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Talk

I am fine with the move to the more widespread concept. Be sure to change the term in every part of article.Barjimoa (talk) 16:00, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you for the reply. I will soon do so. I will inform you, after I rename the article and rename each word. Please check for any possible oversights. Kurcke (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
:Thank you very much. Kurcke (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

::I find a good source and used it to put some order in the page. Do you have other suggestions?Barjimoa (talk) 17:18, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
:::I have no suggestions on the content in the article. However, since there are no other topics and Wikipedia articles called "hyperpower", maybe the article should be renamed as just "Hyperpower". Kurcke (talk) 18:56, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Kirk Thatcher ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Waxworker (talk) 14:09, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Joseph Blaney

Hi. I saw that you changed all the distance measurements on the shark attacks in the United States page ↗ to include a conversion system. I have no problem with most of that, but, for the Blaney incident, the cited distances were part of a quote, and, with quotes, it's advisable to stick to the exact wording, as that's the whole point of citing a quote. Because of that, I changed it back to what the text actually says (unfortunately, the text in question has too many essential qualifiers to be slimmed down or summarized; I tried). If you still want to convert the figures - as I said, I'm OK with the basic idea - then I'd recommend putting those details within [] to indicate that it's been added (you can see several examples of that in the quoted section itself). If it's part of a summary, however, then there are no issues. I hope this was helpful to you. ~2026-33349-86 ↗ (talk) 13:45, 3 July 2026 (UTC)