W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Lcporschen

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Talk header}}

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: List of the Olympic Partner sponsorship programmes ↗ (November 11)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Spiderone was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span><sup><span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span></sup> 13:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Lcporschen'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span><sup><span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span></sup> 13:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: List of the Olympic Partner sponsorship programmes ↗ (November 11)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Qcne was:

{{divbox|gray|3=I think this fails WP:NLIST ↗.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

<span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''<span style="color: GhostWhite">Qcne</span>''' <small><span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span></small></span> 17:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Concern regarding Draft:List of the Olympic Partner sponsorship programmes ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Lcporschen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of the Olympic Partner sponsorship programmes ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of the Olympic Partner sponsorship programmes ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Lcporschen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "List of the Olympic Partner sponsorship programmes ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 17:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Bodyscape ↗ moved to draftspace



An article you recently created, Bodyscape ↗, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable ↗, independent sources ↗. <small>(? ↗)</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability ↗ is of central importance ↗ on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace ↗ (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗ and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:37, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Flexibility ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Flexibility ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flexibility&#32; (2nd nomination) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="color:#8C6A31; ">11WB</span> (talk) 18:15, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!


Hello, Lcporschen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions ↗. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page :Flexibility ↗ did not conform to Wikipedia's '''verifiability policy ↗''', and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a '''reliable source ↗''' for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research ↗ in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the '''guide for citing sources ↗''' or come to ''' The Teahouse ↗''', where experienced Wikipedians ↗ can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! <!-- Template:Welcome-unsourced --> Again, welcome!&nbsp; Ldm1954 (talk) 19:24, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

March 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style ↗ that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in :History of LSD ↗, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page ↗ to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''See MOS:OVERLINK ↗.''<!-- Template:uw-mos1 --> CodeTalker (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

June 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style ↗, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''Please note MOS:OVERLINK ↗, as requested in the notice above this one from March 2026. Common terms should not be linked.''<!-- Template:uw-mos2 --> DrKay (talk) 14:06, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

:Category:Reconstruction ↗ has been nominated for deletion



<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Reconstruction ↗ has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 13:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Sjabloon:Geen bronvermeldingen ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, :Sjabloon:Geen bronvermeldingen ↗, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗ and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox ↗ for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page ↗ if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Sjabloon%3AGeen+bronvermeldingen|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here ↗. <!-- Template:Db-test-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> '''Tatupiplu'''’<sup><small>(''she/her'' ↗ · talk · email ↗)</small></sup> 08:17, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Yoga edits



Hi, I've noted your edits to various yoga pages, and see that you are trying to be constructive. However, some degree of knowledge is required even when making copy-edits. Yoga as therapy ↗ is a case in point, where you seem to have decided (without evidence) that the yoga in question cannot be the kind called 'yoga as exercise ↗'. Presumably you reasoned that if yoga is used as X it can't also be the kind often used as Y. However, 'yoga as exercise' is what the Western world generally calls "yoga" (we can't call it that, as the name is already taken) and academics call "Modern Postural Yoga", i.e. the use of multiple postures and transitions between them principally for exercise, with (and here's the rub) widely varying understandings and degrees of acceptance of yoga ↗'s history and purposes. This sort of yoga is exactly what is used 'as therapy'; another editor has rightly reverted your edits to the article. To sum up, more care, and more research, is required before making edits that change the sense. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:20, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:My reasoning is: that’s what yoga is to the Western World, and Wikipedia is Western World, so on Wikipedia, that’s what yoga is. Lcporschen (talk) 10:28, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::I see, but I'm afraid that doesn't work. We can't ignore the enormous elephant in the room, classical Yoga ↗, a spiritual discipline practised in India for some 2,000 years: nor for that matter Hatha yoga ↗, practised there for perhaps 900 years. It is true that we Westerners cheerfully say "Yoga" to mean the form of exercise, but that cannot displace the classical variety from its secure position both in language and indeed as the owner of the four-letter title here on Wikipedia. None of the academic synonyms for "Yoga as exercise" are really workable as article titles, either (please believe me, I've given this plenty of attention over the years), so we're stuck with the "Yoga as exercise" moniker. Most of the time it gives folks the exactly correct impression, which is the most we can hope for with any name. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:24, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Isn’t hatha yoga in itself sort of a “yoga as exercise”, in that it has sort-of stripped itself of the higher spiritual purposes, and boiled it down to (mere) physical practices (/exercises)? Lcporschen (talk) 08:49, 2 July 2026 (UTC)