User Talk: Livelikemusic

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Statustop|Offline}}
{{User mental health}}
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%;"
| style="width: 100%; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius: 16px; font-size:95%" |

<hr>
{{Talk header}}
{{busy|image=Imbox_notice.png}} 

Welcome to my talk page! Hoping you are well! Please note that all talks here are to follow are to follow the guidelines pointed about by {{TI|Talk header}} above or I will not respond to your inquiry, and it will receive an automatic removal from my talk page. In addition to the header above, please ensure that you title your new section appropriately. Do not edit my page to add and / or remove what you feel you should ↗; if such is done, I will automatically revert the edit(s) without warning — no questions or hesitations about it. If I begin a discussion on your talk page, please do not continue it on this one; keep it to one talk page, to avoid confusion, etc., and do not interrupt on ongoing conversation for your own (ADHD ↗/OCD ↗). Any personal attacks and/or insults ↗ thrown at me or any other editor are automatically deleted, and, if need be, will receive a report to the appropriate noticeboard. Please remember to follow good practice ↗ and avoid unacceptable behaviour ↗. Thank you!

{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no|
# June 2006 – September 2011 ↗
# October – December 2011 ↗
# January – March 2012 ↗
# April – June 2012 ↗
# July – September 2012 ↗
# October 2012 – July 2013 ↗
# August – December 2013 ↗
# January – March 2014 ↗
# April – June 2014 ↗
# July – September 2014 ↗
# October – December 2014 ↗
# January – March 2015 ↗
# April – June 2015 ↗
# July – September 2015 ↗
# October – December 2015 ↗
# January – March 2016 ↗
# April – June 2016 ↗
# July – September 2016 ↗
# October – December 2016 ↗
# January – June 2017 ↗
# July – December 2017 ↗
# January – June 2018 ↗
# July – December 2018 ↗
# 2019 ↗
# 2020 ↗
# 2021–2022 ↗
# 2023–2024 ↗
# 2025 ↗
}}

On my reverted edit in the ''ER'' article

Hey. I'm relatively new here, in a sense, and I'm wondering why you reverted my edit.

I see you refer to consistency (per MOS:YEARRANGE ↗''/''MOS:CONSISTENT ↗) and I'd understand that had my edit been visible, but it was purely with regard to linking if I'm not mistaken (if it was visible, or edited visible dates, that wasn't the intention).

Thanks Lafi90 (talk) 16:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

:On closer inspection I also see that despite the revert, you decided to fix the issue yourself in some way I'm just not sure I comprehend yet. Lafi90 (talk) 16:25, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

:: Thank you for reaching out Lafi90. I assume this has to do with the edit ↗ I made on January 7, 2026, on the list of ''ER'' episodes ↗, yes? While your edit ↗ did fix the issue stemming from this edit ↗, unfortunately, the edit made by the other editor violated Wikipedia's Manual of Style of year ranges, as well as maintaining consistency. Your edit was not the one in the wrong; unfortunately, in undoing the wrong edit, yours needed to be undone as well, to restore the proper edit. Apologies if it appeared otherwise. I can see why you would feel that way. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 16:31, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

:::Yup exactly, followed by a long 'oooooooooooh' okay I get it.
:::Thank you very much. I appreciate the clarity. Lafi90 (talk) 16:37, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

:::: Of course, and thank you for reaching out for the clarity. I do not want you thinking you did anything wrong, when in fact you did the right thing in fixing what you did to ensure things functioned properly. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 16:43, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

:::::Copy that, and again, thank you so much for the help. Will proceed as per WP:BEBOLD ↗. Lafi90 (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

"Worldwide"

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luck..._or_Something&diff=prev&oldid=1334033945 ↗ Can I know where the consensus for not using "worldwide" reached? I have seen several articles still using "worldwide" rather than "various", and when I change this to the latter, it seems that I need to cite the consensus for it. Thanks. '''Camilasdandelions''' (✉️) 05:03, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

: The discussion was over a decade ago, and please keep conversations to article talk pages, please and thank you. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 00:53, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gordon Thomson as Adam Carrington.png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Gordon Thomson as Adam Carrington.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

''Michael'' (2026) Poster Update

Hello, just to let you know that there is a new poster for ''Michael'' (2026) has been released. http://www.impawards.com/2026/michael_ver4.html ↗ https://michael.movie/shareables/image/Michael-intl-poster ↗

I can upload this new poster on the ''Michael'' Wikipedia article.

Thank you. Jjjones2198 (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

: That poster is for the international release; the poster uploaded now is the domestic theatrical release poster, which is the appropriate one for use. Also, the one uploaded one is covered under WP:SIGCOV ↗, as well. There is no need to replace it. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 15:42, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Reason for my edit in Janet Jackson: Las Vegas ↗

Hey there. The reason I removed the ellipsis in the Infobox for the article, Janet Jackson: Las Vegas ↗, was because of a consensus that was reached in Template talk:Infobox concert ↗ from this discussion here ↗. Just thought I'd let you know. HorrorLover555 (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

: Ah, I see. Had no idea about this discussion; however, it was never updated at {{Tl|Infobox concert}} to reflect this consensus. I have updated the template's documentation ↗ to reflect. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 16:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Alleged personal attacks and manner of addressing you

Man, I think saying that I do not respect you is not a personal attack. I don't think you respect everyone or even me to start with.

Also, I will never agree with what you have done, to be honest, it seems to me that it makes the article worse, besides putting italics in the references that do not exist in the title of the articles or parameters that are not usually used, but I apologize for the way I addressed you, I could have been a little more courteous and I admit it. Marco camino 10 (talk) 23:58, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

: A good rule to follow (per WP:NPA ↗) is: {{xt|Comment on ''content'' ↗, not on the ''contributor'' ↗.}} Saying you do not respect someone is, in fact, a personal attack per WP:NPA. But thank you for your apology. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 00:01, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
::Well, okay, my bad. I didn't know that and I didn't want to say it in a rude way, I also admit that was mean and that was irrelevant; ultimately, even though we have different views, we both want to improve the article. I sincerely apologize for my behavior and hope that we can collaborate harmoniously in the future. Marco camino 10 (talk) 00:10, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
|}

ITN recognition for James Van Der Beek ↗

{{ivmbox
|1=On 12 February 2026, '''''In the news ↗''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''James Van Der Beek ↗''''', which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page ↗. Step hen 23:00, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
|2={{Ambox globe current red}}
|imagesize=50px
}}

Grants return 2026

Hi just a thought when Grant comes back again I know it's only a short stint but he's back for an extended run. Do we keep him as guest or change back to regular as he'll be appearing more frequently this time around? Adavid299 (talk) 08:07, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Hilary Duff and Ticketmaster

Hello! I just want some clarification on something. You say Ticketmaster is not a reliable source. Could you please point out the policy saying so? Thanks! Urbanracer34 (talk) 13:35, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

: Ticketmaster ↗ is included on both the site-registered Wikipedia's blacklist ↗ and the global blacklist ↗. Moreover, WP:NTOUR ↗ clearly outlines the criteria necessary for the inclusion of information in articles. Not to mention, stating "it's here" in an edit summary is not acceptable, either. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 16:03, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

:: Understood. Thanks for making things clearer. Urbanracer34 (talk) 21:36, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Closing discussions on Talk:Las Mujeres Ya No Lloran World Tour ↗

Hi! I'm not suggesting that this is wrong to do, but what's the rationale behind closing discussions on this talk page? I haven't seen it done anywhere else but the most contentious of contentious topics, so I'm genuinely curious why this is the case here. '''''Umby''''' 🌕🐶 (talk) 22:21, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Help understanding MOS:MUSICCAPS ↗ - ''Sages''

I noticed that the edit on Loreen discography ↗ has reverted the all caps styling on 'Sages' EP due to the rules of MOS:MUSICCAPS. However, to my understanding it states that's only the case when referring to the artist or band name, not the works of the artist, and states that if the works of an artist contain descriptive phrases in brackets such as 'remix' those words shall not be capitalised as it should not be considered part of the title, implying that the title of the song can be fully capitalised. Could you elaborate on why '''SAGES''' is not allowed?

Thanks :) Beatrix TBS (talk) 01:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

: "{{xt|Exceptions are ''not'' made to mimic logo/cover stylization, even if such mimicry is common in the music press}}." '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 15:28, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

::I understand that, but that is logo and cover stylisation, SAGES is the actual name of the EP. How does that apply in this case then? Beatrix TBS (talk) 20:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

::: Again, it is explained in the sentence above; Wikipedia does not mimic stylization "{{xt|even if such mimicry is common in the music press}}". ''Sages'' is appropriate. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 20:45, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

::::Again, that is for logos, covers and band/artists name, not the titles of songs. Therefore given the information provided SAGES would be appropriate. Beatrix TBS (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

::::: No, it does not. You are misinterpreting what it says. If an article were to exist, we would still write ''Sages'' and then include a byline stating (in all caps ↗). We would not write the title in all-caps. That is not what is done on Wikipedia. MOS:MUSICCAPS covers title of works, as well. The entire quoted sentence above covers this. Just because music press mimicked the all-capital titles, does not Wikipedia does (MOS:ALLCAPS ↗ further covers this). Period. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 21:38, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::::::* <nowiki>''apply to the names of bands and individual artists''</nowiki>
::::::* <nowiki>''Exceptions are not made to mimic logo/cover stylization, even if such mimicry is common in the music press.''</nowiki>
::::::* <nowiki>''descriptive phrases in parentheses or after dashes... should not be considered part of song titles and should not be capitalized...''</nowiki>
::::::I don't believe it is misinterpreted, it makes no mention of song titles not being capitalised. However, to end this 'debate' might I suggest adding '(stylized in all caps ↗)' after 'Sages' as the opening line of Sing (My Chemical Romance song) ↗ has? Beatrix TBS (talk) 21:47, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

::::::: You are taking two different bullet points to try a point across, and it is not landing. It has been discussed, ''multiple'' times, that per MOS:MUSICCAPS, writing in prose (or infobox for this matter) in all-capital letters is '''not''' acceptable. The full quote for the third bullet deals with the title of works, and states as follows: "{{xt|'''The first letter in the first and last words in English-language ↗ titles of works and releases is capitalized.''' The first letter in the other words should also be capitalized, except in words that are short coordinating conjunctions, prepositions, and articles ("short" meaning those with fewer than five letters), as well as the word ''to'' in infinitives (although if the artist has chosen to capitalize short conjunctions, prepositions, etc. then the article title may follow the artist's choice). For more details (including subtitles, hyphenation, incipits, etc.) {{crossref|see {{section link|Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles#Capital letters}}}}. '''Exceptions are {{em|not}} made to mimic logo/cover stylization, even if such mimicry is common in the music press.'''}}" You are not reading the right Manual of Style at all. That is the bullet point that deals with writing titles in prose. This has been discussed, ''ad nauseam'', with ''multiple'' editors. {{!xt|''SAGES''}} is improper and against the Manual of Style; {{xt|''Sages''}} is not. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 21:59, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

About fair usage of photo

Hello! I am writing to ask for permission to use the cover image of Sabrina Carpenter’s latest album on Wikipedia.
The image would be used in the article about the album for informational and educational purposes. Wikipedia is a free, non-commercial encyclopedia, and the image would be used in a limited, low-resolution format with proper credit.
If possible, permission to use the image under a suitable license (or confirmation of its use under fair use conditions) would be greatly appreciated.
Please let me know if you require any additional details.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Andria Gagua (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

: I do not own the permission for either cover image, hence why it is uploaded (and covered by) in relation to non-free content ↗ and use rationale guidelines ↗. You would have to contact either the photographer and/or Carpenter's record label for free usage. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 16:53, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Harry Potter season 1

I don't know why you're just removing all the content from the first season's draft. This is a standard procedure for seasons drafts, as the information from the main article is then passed on to the respective drafts for each season to be published, and the main article is simplified to the most general and necessary information, just as it is in my sandbox, User:Marco camino 10/sandbox. So I'm asking you now, please, or I'll do it myself, to restore it to how it was because when that draft is published, the information in the main article will be simplified and they won't be the same at all. The draft information issue was settled yesterday in two separate discussions that obviously you haven't even checked. Marco camino 10 (talk) 21:14, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

: There was '''no''' discussion at the draft's talk page ↗, which I did check, so please assume good faith ↗. Obviously, if I missed a discussion, then it would be the courteous thing to link to it. Also, I am presently in the process of re-formatting things in a way that it is not a copy-paste move, but it takes more than a bit of time to do so, given the vast amount of information for the season, plus other copy-edit issues. The concept of article drafts is to work in improving the article to meet the general notability guideline ↗ for general publishing, as well as adhering to MOS:TVUPCOMING ↗. Everyone is allowed to edit article drafts, as it is a collaborative effort amongst users. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 21:20, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

::I was referring to other discussion like this one ↗. And what I've described isn't a process I invented; it's one I've seen many times before. Marco camino 10 (talk) 21:34, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

::: Please speak on content, not contributor, as I've pointed out before ↗. Henceforth, I have removed such comments I feel pertain to that, as we settled our bullshit previously, and do not wish to move backwards. And thank you for linking to the discussion I was unaware of had happened; Like you stated prior, "{{xt|we both want to improve the article}}" (or in this case, draft-space), and as I did state, I am presently in the process of re-formatting things in a way that is not presented as a cut-paste move from the main to draft space, alongside producing some copy-editing at the same time. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 21:46, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Question about reverted edits

Hi. I'm new. I see you went through a bunch of my edits and reverted them. For most, I understand because I did not source and will re-do those with proper sourcing.

But I'm wondering why you reverted this ↗ punctuation edit and this ↗ Jen Shah edit.

In the case of Jen Shah, I think that her story is incomplete. The page talks about her getting into trouble but not how the story ended. I think it's notable and important that her prison sentence has been completed and that Andy Cohen believes she may be returning to reality TV. Am I approaching or thinking about this incorrectly? MeadowRidge04 (talk) 20:45, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

: Per MOS:QWQ ↗, the punctuation would not go within the quotation marks. As for the other edit, most of sources you included were not reliable ↗ and one was even user-generated ↗, which is not acceptable for use on Wikipedia. It's also very important to note that Wikipedia is not a tabloid ↗ and not everything needs to be reported on. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 21:35, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
::I don't understand what you mean re: tabloid. What is that referring to? If the Jen Shah edit, that is not an appropriate response. I am sharing reported and newsworthy subjects.
::And related to the reverts you just did on 1-5: yes, those were long-standing but also out-of-line with how the structure looks on the other seasons. I am seeking to establish a consistent format across all 15 seasons. I do not understand your motivation in stopping this from being the case? MeadowRidge04 (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

''Confessions on a Dance Floor: Part II ↗''

Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your recent revert at this article.

The "Released" field in the infobox indicates a future date. Per WP:CRYSTAL ↗, ''"Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place, as even otherwise-notable events can be cancelled or postponed at the last minute by a major incident."'' While the album's expected release date can be addressed in the article, the infobox field should be left blank until this is fait accompli. 162 etc. (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

: Per {{Tl|Infobox album}}, it does state: "{{xt|Do not include future dates unless reliably sourced and near-certain to occur, per WP:CRYSTAL.}}" The release is reliably sourced and near-certain to occur, which is in accordance to WP:CRYSTAL. And per the policy: "{{xt|Individual '''scheduled or expected future events''' should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place.}}" At this point in time, the event is both notably sourced and almost certain to take place. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 18:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
::I've started a thread at Template talk:Infobox album ↗. 162 etc. (talk) 18:30, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: :File:Zara Larsson - Midnight Sun single cover.png ↗

Hello Livelikemusic. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of :File:Zara Larsson - Midnight Sun single cover.png ↗, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: File has a suitable license. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:35, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Were you looking to have it deleted as an unused non-free image? If so, the deletion tag for that is {{tl|di-orphaned non-free use}}. If you are using Twinkle, that is '''not''' in the "CSD" menu. It is in the "DI" menu". -- Whpq (talk) 13:38, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Removing alternative cover

Hello @Livelikemusic, i just wanna let you know why do you need to remove an alternative cover that i create on "Runway ↗". Octaviyanti Dwi Wahyurini (talk) 05:33, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

: Because it is unnecessary per WP:NFCC ↗, as explained in my edit summary ↗ when it was removed. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 14:39, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Dates with films

Just curious re this edit ↗: What's the relevant MOS provision that says we ''must'' follow the mention of a film with the year of release in parentheses, even if it has a very singular title? I couldn't find anything to that effect in MOS:FILM ↗, and, having edited film articles since around the time the first ''Devil Wears Prada ↗'' came out, I have never seen that done consistently anywhere. Daniel Case (talk) 23:07, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Condensing

Hey. Respectfully, while I appreciate condensing down information and excluding exess, you removed my entire summary of 2026 Clare's appearance. You could've edited it down but totally removing stuff is overzealous. You're leaving out too much, one line is very vague and not informative. ErosionMitchell (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

: I am going to assume this addition ↗ is what you are referring to, yes? Adding over one thousand words for a one-episode appearance, especially when most of what was added had little-to-no relevance to the character of Clare Bates ↗, is beyond unnecessary. No offence, but your edits to storyline sections continually include far too much fluff ↗ and trivial details and information ↗, which is neither important to the section nor to the character you are editing. Per the guidelines and recommendations ↗ established by WikiProject Soap Operas ↗, storyline summary sections ''should'' be "{{xt|500-1000 words '''maximum'''}}," so adding over one thousand words for, at that point, a one-day appearance is absolutely uncalled for. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 19:25, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::No actually it's multiple. Clare, Grant and Max.
::Again, I fully agree that condescending is not a problem. Thinks needs editing. Cool. But no offence, you're taking it TOO FAR the other way. You're leaving too much out.
::A one episode appearance still has meat and information someone coming to her page SHOULD know. talking with Lexi is acftually a CORE bit of information you just completely removed. The summaries still need to inform people of stuff, your "one-line" edits do not. What's the point of even having these pages if you won't provide more one a vague, one lne?
::So no,not offended. Edits are fine, I can fluff when writing. But maybe...don't take out ALL The information next time? ErosionMitchell (talk) 05:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Help with new page?

Hi, we previously connected about some changes I tried to make to RHO pages that weren't quite right. Thank you for your help with that, I like to think I'm getting much better!

I recently made a draft for a RHO cast member of some significance as, among other things, the first Asian person to be on the franchise. I think the page is pretty good and factual and well-sourced but I would welcome your feedback (and maybe edits?). The draft is at Draft:Tiffany Moon ↗.

Thank you for lookig. MeadowRidge04 (talk) 13:19, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

"End of an Era" by Niall Horan

Hey there, you seem to have removed "End of an Era" by Niall Horan from the singles list part of the infobox on the ''Dinner Party ↗'' album article. So I'm wondering, before I make any changes, is this actually not a single, but rather something else, like a promotional single? Or did you make a mistake, removing that song from the list? Thanks in advance. ''Jibble''''snark''''86'' (talk) 18:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

: The removal was not a mistake. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 18:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

::Ok. So is it like a promotional single then? Or something like that? I'm just making sure, is all. ''Jibble''''snark''''86'' (talk) 18:58, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

::: Again, the removal was not a mistake. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 19:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

::::Ok. I guess that's pretty much all I need to know then, since that's all you're gonna say. I was simply just asking to see if you knew what it technically is, but I'll leave it alone. Thanks, I guess... ''Jibble''''snark''''86'' (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Soapoperadigest.com

Hi, hope you're well! I'm hoping you can satisfy my curiosity about the way you format soapoperadigest.com refs? I noticed here ↗ that you use cite magazine instead of cite web and I was wondering why? And where do you find the issn and oclc numbers? I haven't seen those added/used before. I have an idea for a couple of character articles from US soaps and just want to make sure the refs are formatted the same way to match other articles. Thanks in advance. - JuneGloom07 Talk ↗ 20:00, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

: Hi. Sorry for the delay in response. Wednesdays can be hectic on my end. I use {{Tl|Cite magazine}} for ''Soap Opera Digest ↗'' because it was a physical magazine and while the physical publishing has ceased, articles continue to be published on its website. And per the template sidebar, {{Tl|Cite web}} is used for "{{xt|web sources not covered by the above}}", which ''Soap Opera Digest'' is by the cite magazine template. And both the ISSN ↗ and OCLC ↗ numbers are located at the article's page within {{Tl|Infobox magazine}}. I hope that I was able to appropriate answer your questions, and again, apologies for the delay in response. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 03:45, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
::My turn to apologise for a late reply! I'm so sorry, I got completely distracted with other tasks. Thank you so much for explaining! I really should take a closer look at {{Tl|Infobox magazine}}. - JuneGloom07 Talk ↗ 21:03, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

::: Oh my goodness, no problem! 🤣 I know how that goes all too well. Just glad I was able to help! Hope you are well, otherwise! '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 21:14, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Reverting without updating

If you're going to keep reverting the changes I made on the Together Together tour page, at least acknowledge the info I added and change it yourself in a way you do approve of. It's currently not up to date. May.Stokhof (talk) 02:07, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

: It is not up to '''me''' to provide it. The burden of proof ↗ is on those who want to make the change, and without a reliable source ↗, it cannot be done. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 02:10, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Cat in the Hat (teaser poster, 2026).png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:The Cat in the Hat (teaser poster, 2026).png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Bizarre

Hey, we haven’t talked in a while, hope you’re doing well. I saw that you’ve been contributing quite a bit of content to ''Confessions II ↗'' and just thought I’d reach out to you for advice. What do you think of this ↗, specifically, the part where it says "{{tq|[t]he single, which Garrix hinted is titled 'Bizarre', is the fourth single from Madonna's upcoming 16-track release, out 3rd July. So far, she has shared 'I Feel So Free', 'Bring Your Love' with Sabrina Carpenter, and 'Love Sensation'}}? ''DJ Mag'' is considered probably one of the more reliable sources in the EDM space but I don’t think it has that much weight in the pop space? Surely I’ll be reverted if I add this as the next single from album, but I do intend on making a standalone article for this song at some point if it gains traction. Hayman30 (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

: I would not put it in as a single, especially since it classifies the song as the fourth single—which contradicts the article and what is known: "I Feel So Free ↗" was not a single from ''Confessions II'', so already the lineup of singles per that citation is not valid. And while I do not discredit the publication's reliability—regardless of its genre-leaning preference—I do not believe it holds weight per WP:SINGLE? ↗, especially when "Love Sensation ↗" just impacted radio as the second single. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 15:51, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Duffy gig

Please do not change the information regarding the Duffy gig. There were more than 50 people in attendance. WaterOfTheValley (talk) 20:12, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

: The information you are ''attempting'' to add is '''not''' supported by the reliable sources ↗ cited in the article prose. As well, the "of" in Queen of Hoxton would not be capitalised, per MOS:TITLECAPS ↗. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 20:44, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

: And I just looked up the information you are attempting to add, and it is only available on TMZ ↗, which is not allowed per WP:TMZ ↗, especially as it is undue in weight ↗. '''livelikemusic''' (TALK!) 20:58, 7 July 2026 (UTC)