User Talk: Locust member

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Name

Hello, @Locust member. Was coming to ask if you know who “J. Fountain” is on the writers track listing section of Megan (album) ↗, i’ve spent a while trying to figure out who it is but couldn’t. Do you? Thank you, '''Cowboygilbert''' - (talk) ♥ 11:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

:Hey @Cowboygilbert! From what I found, J. Fountain is the artist Jay Da 3rd, who's real name is Joe Fountain. I found this from Kstylis' "Booty Hopscotch", which is sampled in Megan Thee Stallion's "Where Them Girls At", in which Kstylis (Kordero Williams) and Jay Da 3rd (Jay Fountain) are credited as songwriters. I didn't realize that I missed this person when editing the page, sorry. Locust member (talk) 15:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
::Oh, your fine. Thank you for finding this, I didn’t see any samples in on WhoSampled when I checked it. Thank you, '''Cowboygilbert''' - (talk) ♥ 16:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 22:01, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

:Awesome!! Thank you so much! 😆 Locust member (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
::yw // Chchcheckit (talk) 23:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:::Hey, I have a question regarding the article. I had a couple of twitter friends give me some photos from his I Care So Much tour that I’d like to use in the article. A. do you know how to credit them so the copyright knows they “donated” these photos to wikimedia and B. would it impede the article’s chances on achieving GA? Thanks! Locust member (talk) 21:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
::::from what i know/understand: 1. They would have to upload the images ↗ '''themselves''' to wikimedia commons ↗ and, in turn, agree to upload them under a creative commons license. 2. i wouldn't think so unless the images uploaded aren't theirs? for further information you should refer (you/them?) to: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:First_steps/Uploading_files, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:A_picture_of_you#Ways_to_submit_photos
::::Hope this helps. // Chchcheckit (talk) 00:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
:::::Yes, this helped, thank you so much! Locust member (talk) 03:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Your GA ↗ nomination of I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All ↗

The article I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 11:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

:Sweet, thank you so much for reviewing this! Locust member (talk) 12:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

A Barnstar

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
| rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |100x100px ↗
| rowspan="2" |
| style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
| style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" |Thank you for your work on ''The Fool ↗''! If you end up nominating it for GA ↗, I would be happy to review it. {{(-:}} CarbonLollipop (talk) 06:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
|}

:Woohoo, thanks! I just nominated it. Locust member (talk) 13:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of The Fool (Bladee album) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:The Fool (Bladee album)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article The Fool (Bladee album) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CarbonLollipop -- CarbonLollipop (talk) 04:05, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of The Fool (Bladee album) ↗

The article The Fool (Bladee album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:The Fool (Bladee album) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:The Fool (Bladee album)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CarbonLollipop -- CarbonLollipop (talk) 05:02, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Congrats! CarbonLollipop (talk) 05:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

:Hell yeah!! Thanks for the review! Locust member (talk) 12:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cypress Grove (EP) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Cypress Grove (EP)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Cypress Grove (EP) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dxneo -- Dxneo (talk) 02:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cypress Grove (EP) ↗

The article Cypress Grove (EP) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cypress Grove (EP) ↗ and Talk:Cypress Grove (EP)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dxneo -- Dxneo (talk) 16:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 03:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cypress Grove (EP) ↗

The article Cypress Grove (EP) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Cypress Grove (EP) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Cypress Grove (EP)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dxneo -- Dxneo (talk) 04:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) ↗

The article All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) ↗ and Talk:All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 05:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) ↗

The article All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:All Dogs Go to Heaven (EP)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 22:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Congrats on this new GA! Glad to have worked with you in my first review. Hope I see you in future GANs! :) CatchMe (talk) 22:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

:Woohoo! Thanks so much! Very glad to have worked with you myself, it was a pleasure. Hope to see you around as well! :D Locust member (talk) 22:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Edit summary

This ↗ is an incorrect edit summary. DuncanHill (talk) 22:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

:I'm not sure what else I could do then. I changed the year on the source and it links to a full source. What else is needed to be done? Locust member (talk) 22:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
::You shouldn't have made that edit summary. I correctly marked it as needing a full citation. You incorrectly said there was one. Instead of acknowledging your mistake, you chose to falsely claim that I had made one. DuncanHill (talk) 22:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
:::Yeah, I'm sorry about that. I thought you were saying that there was no source for that to go to. I didn't realize I made a mistake with the year on that particular source, I wasn't trying to be malicious, I was just confused by what you meant. I acknowledged my mistake afterward and changed the year. Sorry about that Locust member (talk) 22:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

{| style="border: 1px solid purple; background-color: beige;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|100px ↗|100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Music Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your excellent work improving music articles, especially ones related to Bladee albums. You're amazing. Skyshiftertalk 13:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
|}

:Thank you so much! Believe it or not, your Dariacore ↗ article is very influential on how to write a short good article, which helps with the Bladee albums since most have very limited info on them. Appreciate you as well! Locust member (talk) 20:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Good Riddance (album) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Good Riddance (album)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Good Riddance (album) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 19:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Good Riddance (album) ↗

The article Good Riddance (album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Good Riddance (album) ↗ and Talk:Good Riddance (album)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Good Riddance (album) ↗

The article Good Riddance (album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Good Riddance (album) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Good Riddance (album)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 04:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
| rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |100x100px ↗
| rowspan="2" |
| style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
| style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" |Thank you for your work on ''Let's Start Here ↗'' and ''Stoney ↗''. It's nice to see editors getting music-related articles to good article status.
|} TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

:Appreciate it! 😆 Locust member (talk) 16:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Then I'll Be Happy (EP) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Then I'll Be Happy (EP)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Then I'll Be Happy (EP) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 10:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Then I'll Be Happy (EP) ↗

The article Then I'll Be Happy (EP) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Then I'll Be Happy (EP) ↗ and Talk:Then I'll Be Happy (EP)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 11:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Then I'll Be Happy (EP) ↗

The article Then I'll Be Happy (EP) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Then I'll Be Happy (EP) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Then I'll Be Happy (EP)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 16:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Sympathy Is a Knife ↗

The article Sympathy Is a Knife ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sympathy Is a Knife ↗ and Talk:Sympathy Is a Knife/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 23:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Sympathy Is a Knife ↗

The article Sympathy Is a Knife ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Sympathy Is a Knife ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Sympathy Is a Knife/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 07:45, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Stoney (album) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Stoney (album)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Stoney (album) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 15:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) ↗ has been accepted

<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.''' 

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. 

The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=More_than_Life_(Machine_Gun_Kelly_song) help desk]'''. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
AstrooKai (Talk) 20:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)</div>

:Awesome, thanks for taking this! Locust member (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

DYK for I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 3 January 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Glaive ↗ recorded the first track for '''''I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All ↗''''' at the age of 17?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, I Care So Much That I Don't Care at All ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Magic I Want U ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Magic I Want U/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Magic I Want U ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEclipse -- LunaEclipse (talk) 00:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Eversince ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Eversince/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Eversince ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cloak n Dagger ↗

The article Cloak n Dagger ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cloak n Dagger ↗ and Talk:Cloak n Dagger/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 20:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cloak n Dagger ↗

The article Cloak n Dagger ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Cloak n Dagger ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Cloak n Dagger/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

== Invitation to participate in WP:GARC ↗ ==
<div class="floatright" style="margin-bottom:0">60px|alt=|link= ↗</div>
Hello, I noticed you are a user who frequents WP:GAN ↗ and thought you might be interested in Good Article Review Circles ↗. It is an initiative that helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you will review another user's article and get your own GA nomination reviewed in return. '''Check out the project page for more details ↗!''' — 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ('''CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST''') 13:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you! I will take a look at this. Locust member (talk) 14:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Census Designated ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Census Designated/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Census Designated ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 01:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Magic I Want U ↗

The article Magic I Want U ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Magic I Want U ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Magic I Want U/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEclipse -- LunaEclipse (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Eversince ↗

The article Eversince ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eversince ↗ and Talk:Eversince/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 20:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Eversince ↗

The article Eversince ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Eversince ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Eversince/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Census Designated ↗

The article Census Designated ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Census Designated ↗ and Talk:Census Designated/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 06:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Census Designated ↗

The article Census Designated ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Census Designated ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Census Designated/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 16:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Locust member. Thank you for your work on Then I'll Be Happy (EP) ↗. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Nice work}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>North8000<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

''North8000'' (talk) 16:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Revengeseekerz.png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Revengeseekerz.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Do Hollywood ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Do Hollywood/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Do Hollywood ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 15:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Phenomenon GA review

Thanks for your feedback on Phenomenon, I appreciate it. I'll see if I can rework it further. VistaSunset (talk) 04:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

:Absolutely. I see you did great work over at English Standard Version ↗. Phenomenon definitely has the chops for good article, but it just is not ready yet. If you need any help with expanding the article or want to put it up for another review, I will be more than happy to help. :-) Locust member (talk) 04:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Good Riddance (album)

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 20 January 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Good Riddance (album) ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Gracie Abrams ↗ wrote '''''Good Riddance ↗''''' about her breakup from her former collaborator and boyfriend, Blake Slatkin ↗?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Good Riddance (album) ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Good Riddance (album) ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Do Hollywood ↗

The article Do Hollywood ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Do Hollywood ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Do Hollywood/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cold Visions ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Cold Visions/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Cold Visions ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CarbonLollipop -- CarbonLollipop (talk) 03:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cold Visions ↗

The article Cold Visions ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Cold Visions ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Cold Visions/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CarbonLollipop -- CarbonLollipop (talk) 22:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Sympathy Is a Knife

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 25 January 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Sympathy Is a Knife ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that fans speculated that Charli XCX ↗ wrote "'''Sympathy Is a Knife ↗'''" about Taylor Swift and her relationship with Matty Healy?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sympathy Is a Knife ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sympathy Is a Knife ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} 1=Launchballer ↗ 12:02, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) ↗

The article More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) ↗ and Talk:More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) ↗

The article More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:More than Life (Machine Gun Kelly song)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of I Love You, I'm Sorry ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:I Love You, I'm Sorry/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article I Love You, I'm Sorry ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 11:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of American Teenager ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:American Teenager/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article American Teenager ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 12:07, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Dear Amelia ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Dear Amelia/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Dear Amelia ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Out on Bond ↗

The article Out on Bond ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Out on Bond ↗ and Talk:Out on Bond/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 13:02, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Back in Action (EP) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Back in Action (EP)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Back in Action (EP) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 16:05, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Keep It Goin Xav ↗

The article Keep It Goin Xav ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Keep It Goin Xav ↗ and Talk:Keep It Goin Xav/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Out on Bond ↗

The article Out on Bond ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Out on Bond ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Out on Bond/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 23:02, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Keep It Goin Xav ↗

The article Keep It Goin Xav ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Keep It Goin Xav ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Keep It Goin Xav/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 00:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Back in Action (EP) ↗

The article Back in Action (EP) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Back in Action (EP) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Back in Action (EP)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 02:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of I Love You, I'm Sorry ↗

The article I Love You, I'm Sorry ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:I Love You, I'm Sorry ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:I Love You, I'm Sorry/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 03:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Stoney (album) ↗

The article Stoney (album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Stoney (album) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Stoney (album)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 13:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

:Also wanted to say sorry for being slow about the review. // Chchcheckit (talk) 13:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
::No worries !! Thank u for reviewing! Locust member (talk) 13:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Dear Amelia ↗

The article Dear Amelia ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Dear Amelia ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Dear Amelia/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 08:43, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of American Teenager ↗

The article American Teenager ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:American Teenager ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:American Teenager/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 03:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Boneyard AKA Fearmonger ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Boneyard AKA Fearmonger/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Boneyard AKA Fearmonger ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 03:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Cloak n Dagger

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 7 February 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Cloak n Dagger ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the Airbnb ↗ homestay where '''a song ↗''' was recorded by Glaive ↗ and Ericdoa ↗ was dubbed by fans as the "Hyperpop Hype House ↗"?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cloak n Dagger ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cloak n Dagger ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}}  — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Boneyard AKA Fearmonger ↗

The article Boneyard AKA Fearmonger ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Boneyard AKA Fearmonger ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Boneyard AKA Fearmonger/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Census Designated

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 11 February 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Census Designated ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Jane Remover ↗ was inspired to create '''''Census Designated ↗''''' after a self-described "near-death experience" traveling through a blizzard?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Census Designated ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Census Designated ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shoot for the Stars -- Shoot for the Stars (talk) 05:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your digicore articles

Just saw you did most of the work on the census designated article that got DYK, you're a legend thank you. I love Jane remover Tombomp (talk ↗/contribs ↗) 18:54, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you for noticing my work !! I am trying to get digicore as much coverage as it can get on here. Locust member (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Boy (2hollis album) ↗

The article Boy (2hollis album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Boy (2hollis album) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Boy (2hollis album)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 20:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song) ↗

The article Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria ↗. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song) ↗ and Talk:Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shoot for the Stars -- Shoot for the Stars (talk) 11:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song) ↗

The article Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Holy Smokes (Trippie Redd song)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shoot for the Stars -- Shoot for the Stars (talk) 22:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Locust member. Thank you for your work on Take Me by the Hand ↗. Another editor, Skyshifter, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Keep up the good work!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Skyshifter<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Skyshiftertalk 12:28, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Fishmonger (album) ↗ has been accepted

<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Fishmonger (album) ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.''' 

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Fishmonger_(album) help desk]'''. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
RangersRus (talk) 22:28, 23 February 2025 (UTC)</div>

Your GA ↗ nomination of Let's Start Here ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Let's Start Here/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Let's Start Here ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Do Hollywood

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 26 February 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Do Hollywood ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Jonathan Rado ↗ invited the Lemon Twigs ↗ to record '''their debut album ↗''' at his house while they were on a school break?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Do Hollywood ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Do Hollywood ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Let's Start Here ↗

The article Let's Start Here ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria ↗. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Let's Start Here ↗ and Talk:Let's Start Here/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Fishmonger (album) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Fishmonger (album)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Fishmonger (album) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 18:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of I Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:I Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article I Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 14:24, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of I Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall ↗

The article I Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:I Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:I Wanna Slam My Head Against the Wall/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 20:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Astrid (song) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Astrid (song)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Astrid (song) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 06:25, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Stoney (album)

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 5 March 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Stoney (album) ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Post Malone ↗ publicly called '''his debut album ↗''' "mediocre" less than a year after its release?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stoney (album) ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stoney (album) ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}}  — Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Let's Start Here ↗

The article Let's Start Here ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Let's Start Here ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Let's Start Here/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 02:04, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

:also; whilst im not gonna pester you with it (that'd be sad af lmao), i would appreciate it if you did review Speedin' Bullet 2 Heaven ↗. mainly bc the way i wrote that article was def influenced by me reviewing stoney and glaive lp; especially the "song" summary-type sections which i'm still not confident and want to get better at writing basically. the last part is kinda the main reason. other than that idrc tbh dw // Chchcheckit (talk) 02:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
::yess no worries at all, I was planning on it anyway haha. I'm really happy that you were inspired by my work for some of it. I'll snag the review :)) Locust member (talk) 02:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Mano Sundaresan ↗ (March 8)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Reading Beans was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

''in-depth ↗'' (not just passing mentions about the subject)

''reliable'' ↗

''secondary'' ↗

''independent'' ↗ of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Sources only verify he’s the head of content. Best,}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mano Sundaresan ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Mano_Sundaresan '''Articles for creation help desk'''], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reading_Beans&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mano_Sundaresan '''reviewer's talk page'''] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

'''Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia''' 16:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)</div>

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Locust member'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! '''Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia''' 16:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Fishmonger (album) ↗

The article Fishmonger (album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Fishmonger (album) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Fishmonger (album)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 20:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

DYK for American Teenager

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 10 March 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''American Teenager ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Barack Obama ↗ listed '''an anti-war song ↗''' as one of his favorite songs of 2022?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/American Teenager ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, American Teenager ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} RoySmith (talk) ↗ 00:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
{{DYK views|15,688|653.7|March 2025|American Teenager}} GalliumBot (talk • contribs ↗) (he/it ↗) 03:28, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

right|80px ↗
Hi Locust member, I just wanted to let you know that I have added ↗ the autopatrolled user right ↗ to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed ↗. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested ↗ on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers ↗.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject ↗ templates, stub tags ↗, categories ↗, and incoming links ↗ to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies ↗, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller ↗ yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Contingency Song ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Contingency Song/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Contingency Song ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Astrid (song) ↗

The article Astrid (song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Astrid (song) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Astrid (song)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Fuck This Town ↗

The article Fuck This Town ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria ↗. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fuck This Town ↗ and Talk:Fuck This Town/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 21:41, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Contingency Song ↗

The article Contingency Song ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria ↗. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Contingency Song ↗ and Talk:Contingency Song/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 22:01, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Fuck This Town ↗

The article Fuck This Town ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Fuck This Town ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Fuck This Town/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 15:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Contingency Song ↗

The article Contingency Song ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Contingency Song ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Contingency Song/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 11:25, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

left|150px ↗
Thank you for all your hard work on upping the quality of articles related to the current hip hop underground! Thought it was really cool to see ''Keep It Goin Xav ↗'' as a GA.

joeyquism (talk) 21:07, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
 

:Thank you so much for noticing my work!! I feel like that side of music is a bit under represented on here so I try my best to expand coverage on it. Locust member (talk) 21:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Odnt.webp listed for discussion

30px|left ↗ A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Odnt.webp ↗, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion ↗. Please see the '''discussion''' ↗ to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  Binksternet (talk) 20:08, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Spiderr ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Spiderr/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Spiderr ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 18:01, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Overseas (Ken Carson song) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Overseas (Ken Carson song)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Overseas (Ken Carson song) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 15:03, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Spiderr ↗

The article Spiderr ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Spiderr ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Spiderr/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Overseas (Ken Carson song) ↗

The article Overseas (Ken Carson song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Overseas (Ken Carson song) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Overseas (Ken Carson song)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 00:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Great work getting Spiderr ↗ to GA status! I can see it's only one of numerous articles you've done great work on, you deserve a lot of recognition for your efforts. Best wishes and keep up the great work! TylerBurden (talk) 22:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
|}

:Thank you so much!! Locust member (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bladee - Paranoia Intro.ogg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Bladee - Paranoia Intro.ogg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

GLAIVE GOOD TOPIC?

Hey! When I mentioned "GLAIVE GOOD TOPIC?" at Talk:Fuck This Town/GA1 ↗, I was actually mostly referring to the now complete good topic of Then I'll Be Happy (EP) ↗, Cloak n Dagger ↗ and Fuck This Town ↗. I am surprised I didn't see the WP:GTC ↗ nomination coming up, so I guess I'd give you the heads up! Skyshiftertalk 15:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

:OHHH I see! Thank u so much for pointing this out to me, I will nominate it!! Locust member (talk) 01:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Fishmonger (album)

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 31 March 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Fishmonger (album) ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that while filming a music video for her '''debut album ↗''' at a motel, Underscores ↗ had the police called on her by the motel staff because they thought she was shooting a pornographic film?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fishmonger (album) ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fishmonger (album) ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} Cielquiparle (talk) 00:03, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Teen Week ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Teen Week/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Teen Week ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Jump Out ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Jump Out/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Jump Out ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 18:41, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Teen week 2.png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Teen week 2.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

:Wikipedia Talk:Notability (music) ↗ has an RfC ↗

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>''':Wikipedia Talk:Notability (music) ↗''' has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the '''discussion page ↗'''. Thank you. Medxvo (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Red Light (Bladee album) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Red Light (Bladee album)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Red Light (Bladee album) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 05:41, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Red Light (Bladee album) ↗

The article Red Light (Bladee album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria ↗. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Red Light (Bladee album) ↗ and Talk:Red Light (Bladee album)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 06:24, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Exeter (album) ↗

The article Exeter (album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria ↗. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Exeter (album) ↗ and Talk:Exeter (album)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 07:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Red Light (Bladee album) ↗

The article Red Light (Bladee album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Red Light (Bladee album) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Red Light (Bladee album)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 03:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Jump Out ↗

The article Jump Out ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Jump Out ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Jump Out/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Exeter (album) ↗

The article Exeter (album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Exeter (album) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Exeter (album)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CatchMe -- CatchMe (talk) 23:45, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Teen Week ↗

The article Teen Week ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Teen Week ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Teen Week/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 11:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Take Me by the Hand ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Take Me by the Hand/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Take Me by the Hand ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 02:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hypebeast ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of I Didn't Mean to Haunt You ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:I Didn't Mean to Haunt You/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article I Didn't Mean to Haunt You ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 13:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Frailty (Jane Remover album) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Frailty (Jane Remover album)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Frailty (Jane Remover album) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 18:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of I Didn't Mean to Haunt You ↗

The article I Didn't Mean to Haunt You ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:I Didn't Mean to Haunt You ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:I Didn't Mean to Haunt You/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:02, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Teen Week

25px ↗ Hello! Your submission of Teen Week ↗ at the Did You Know nominations page ↗ has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''your nomination's entry ↗''' and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Flibirigit (talk) 02:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

more chaos advice

yoyo. More Chaos is basically done, two things before i GA nom id like yr comment on:

Should I specify the length between versions since CD/LP versions are 49 mins yet digital copies (which most reviews are based on) are 58/61 mins?

Should I remove pierre from the production infobox in light of above info or specify like "digital versions feature pierre" or smth

that is literally it. all is done // Chchcheckit (talk) 13:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

:yooo, nice quick work on it!
:per Template:Infobox album ↗, "only the length of the original album release should be entered" and typically only information from the standard edition of the album is entered in the infobox (so pierre would be removed in this case). but, is there a source that states the standard version of the album is the CD/LP versions instead of the digital and songs like 2000, evolution, and ghoul are not a part of the main album? afaik the album was originally released digitally so wouldn't that be the primary issue? Locust member (talk) 14:03, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
::ok nvm I just read the Billboard ↗ source that states "More Chaos was available in its first week as a standard 18-song album (on color vinyl and a widely available CD and in three deluxe boxed sets containing a T-shirt and CD) and in two widely available expanded digital/streaming editions that added three and four songs, respectively."
::uhh so ya only enter the standard edition (LP/CD) times and remove pierre from infobox. both are still covered in track listing so we're good Locust member (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Risk (song) ↗

The article Risk (song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria ↗. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Risk (song) ↗ and Talk:Risk (song)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 May newsletter

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points ↗ at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table ↗ shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|BeanieFan11}} with 1,233 round points from 24 good articles ↗, 28 Did you know ↗ articles, and one In the news ↗ nomination, mainly about athletes and politicians

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Thebiguglyalien}} with 1,127 round points, almost entirely from two high-multiplier featured articles ↗ on Black Widow (Natasha Romanova) ↗ and Grace Coolidge ↗, in addition to two GAs and two reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|History6042}} with 1,088 round points from four featured lists ↗ about Michelin-starred restaurants, nine good articles and a good topic ↗ mostly on Olympic-related subjects, seven ITN articles, and dozens of reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Gog the Mild}} with 1,085 round points from three FAs, one GA, and four DYKs on military history, as well as 18 reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Arconning}} with 887 round points, mostly from four FLs, six GAs, and seven DYKs on Olympic topics, along with more than two dozen reviews

In addition, we would like to recognize {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Generalissima}} for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Risk (song) ↗

The article Risk (song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Risk (song) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Risk (song)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Medxvo -- Medxvo (talk) 21:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Frailty (Jane Remover album) ↗

The article Frailty (Jane Remover album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Frailty (Jane Remover album) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Frailty (Jane Remover album)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 02:45, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Style (2hollis song) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Style (2hollis song)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Style (2hollis song) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pollosito -- Pollosito (talk) 03:25, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 15:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Style (2hollis song) ↗

The article Style (2hollis song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria ↗. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Style (2hollis song) ↗ and Talk:Style (2hollis song)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pollosito -- Pollosito (talk) 20:04, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Style (2hollis song) ↗

The article Style (2hollis song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Style (2hollis song) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Style (2hollis song)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pollosito -- Pollosito (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song) ↗

The article Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 07:24, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Graphics and templates in FAC nomination pages

Hello. Apologies for the random message, but I wanted to leave a comment about your current FAC ↗ for "Contingency Song ↗". Per the FAC instructions, it is discouraged to use use graphics or complex templates on FAC nomination pages as they slow down the page load time and can lead to potential errors in the FAC archives. For templates, I am referencing the ones like "Done" and "Added. I would kindly ask you to remove that from your current FAC. Apologies again for the random message. I just wanted to raise this to your attention, as it is easy to miss. Aoba47 (talk) 01:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

:Oh, I'm so sorry! This is my first FAC so I was unaware of this rule (although I do see it on the FAC page now). I just removed them, sorry again for the error! Locust member (talk) 02:19, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
::No need to apologize. Thank you for addressing this. Best of luck with your FAC! It is an easy thing to miss, as there is a lot to take in for first-time FAC nominators. It is not really a big deal, as it does not cause any real harm or anything. On a side note, I am always happy to see more songs in the FAC space, and I think that this song would bring some welcome diversity to the current pool of song FAs, as this song's genre is not really represented there. Aoba47 (talk) 02:56, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
:::Thank you so much!! I agree, I would be really happy to get a song such as this one to FA, as there are not many songs of its nature at the status (like you said). Thank u again!! Locust member (talk) 03:51, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Trip at Knight

Hi! I have just nominated the article for a class review. Scientelensia (talk) 19:16, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

:And a GA review Scientelensia (talk) 10:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
::Awesome, I just picked it up! Locust member (talk) 22:17, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
:::Great, thank you!! Scientelensia (talk) 10:05, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Teen Week

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 20 May 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Teen Week ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Jane Remover ↗'s school counselor made sure Remover felt fine after a classmate wrote an essay about lyrics from '''''Teen Week ↗'''''{{-?}}'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Teen Week ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Teen Week ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}}  — Amakuru (talk) 00:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:23, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗

The article Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria ↗. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗ and Talk:Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song)/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗

The article Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:06, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Frailty (Jane Remover album)

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 17 June 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Frailty (Jane Remover album) ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the cover art for '''Jane Remover's debut album ↗''' is a screenshot taken from Google Maps?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frailty (Jane Remover album) ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Frailty (Jane Remover album) ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Days B4 III ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Locust member. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Days B4 III ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Megatron (album) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Megatron (album)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Megatron (album) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cathodography -- Cathodography (talk) 02:06, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Megatron (album) ↗

The article Megatron (album) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Megatron (album) ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Megatron (album)/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cathodography -- Cathodography (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 July newsletter

The third round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 June. This round was again competitive, with three contestants scoring more than 1,000 round points:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|BeanieFan11}} with 1,314 round points, mostly from articles about athletes and politicians, including 20 good articles ↗ and 48 did you know ↗ articles

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Gog the Mild}} with 1,197 round points, mostly from military history articles, including 9 featured topic ↗ articles, two featured articles ↗, and four good articles

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Sammi Brie}} with 1,055 round points, mostly from television station articles, including 27 good articles and 9 good topic ↗ articles

Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn. This table ↗ shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 4 featured articles, 16 featured lists ↗, 1 featured picture ↗, 9 featured-topic articles, 149 good articles, 27 good-topic articles, and more than 90 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 18 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted more than 200 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Ghostholding ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Ghostholding/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Ghostholding ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cathodography -- Cathodography (talk) 01:01, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Ghostholding ↗

The article Ghostholding ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Ghostholding ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Ghostholding/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cathodography -- Cathodography (talk) 00:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Days B4 III ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Hello, Locust member. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Days B4 III ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 00:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ghostholding

25px ↗ Hello! Your submission of Ghostholding ↗ at the Did You Know nominations page ↗ has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''your nomination's entry ↗''' and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Leafy46 (talk) 00:22, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

:I have replied. Locust member (talk) 02:30, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
::I have also just replied, please give it a look whenever you have a chance! Leafy46 (talk) 03:32, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:SERG Restaurant Group ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Locust member. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SERG Restaurant Group ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Drive-By Lullabies ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Drive-By Lullabies ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:Drive-By Lullabies/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 00:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

frailty is the greatest album of all time

frailty ↗ is goated & so r u '''Zszn''' (talk) 02:21, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

:❤️ Locust member (talk) 18:05, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Drive-By Lullabies ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Drive-By Lullabies ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Drive-By Lullabies/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 17:23, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Keep It Goin Xav

I've edited a lot of album pages and none have ever had the music section just copy pasting every single thing a writer has ever said about a track verbatim. That doesn't seem to be policy on Wikipedia album pages. I removed the redundant phrases. There were way too many quotes which also isn't normal practice on Wikipedia. I changed stuff to say "this track was compared to this" rather than a bunch of quotes from the same Pitchfork writer. The article almost felt like it was copy pasting most of the pitchfork review. Aradicus77 (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

:Also it wasn't well sourced. Look at the sources a lot of parts were just not even part of the source. Like when it says characterized by smooth vocals, go to the source, the source makes no mention of that. Aradicus77 (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
::"From wavy and hypnotic production to silky flows, Xaviersobased keeps you wanting more." is stated in the source ↗; the way in which it was written, it changed the wording so it did not violate copyright. Locust member (talk) 18:00, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
:::Yeah but that has nothing to do with "smooth vocals". Anyway you can add what you think needs to be added, but reverting all my contributions when I went through each source to keep what was relevant and remove what wasn't stated makes no sense to me. Aradicus77 (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
::::"Silky flows" = "smooth vocals". If something is silky, it is more often than not smooth. And how are flows presented? By vocals. I am going to go through the article and add back what I think is necessary because you did remove some pretty important details about certain songs. Locust member (talk) 18:03, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
:If there were too many quotes, it would have failed the copyvio criteria in the good article review. Compared to other articles, this article did not have an abundance of quotes. Also, did you fully look through the sources in the section? There were definitely other refs than the p4k article. That article just happened to be the most in depth one about the mixtape. I'm going to redo the article and see if it fits your liking, as a composition section is '''needed'''.
:I recommend you look at which album articles are in good article criteria, and you will see that most have track-by-track coverage of the albums at topic. Locust member (talk) 18:04, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
::I don't know how that got approved. The formatting was strange, it was this big paragraph for the lead and also the song analysis too. It wasn't clear. All I did was trim which is normal on wikipedia for when stuff is too cluttered. Most of that section was relying on mainly the p4k article and then a bunch of small 3-4 sentence reviews from sites like Fader. Aradicus77 (talk) 18:07, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
:::I mean, you "trimmed" (removed) a whole section that is a standard in album articles. Sure, did it include a lot of comparisons from journalists? Yes it did, but as a Wiki editor, you have to understand that WE report what the sources report. So since Pierre and other journalists made a lot of comparisons of the tracks on this mixtape to other songs, then we have to report that as well. I would, again like to direct you to the large list of album good articles ↗ and look at how those are formatted / written. The fact that you have "edited a lot of album pages" does not really mean anything, as anyone can edit on Wikipedia ↗. If you had multiple GAs/FAs under your belt, I would understand that, but I really do not think that you have understood ''what'' exactly a traditional album page looks like (as stripping something as important as a Composition section really shows that).
:::I don't know how you thought the article was cluttered, as it is shorter than the majority of album articles, due to its limited sourcing. I reported what the sources gave me, and that's that. There was no OR ↗ or anything of that nature in the article. And if you can't understand how this article passed for GA, you could perhaps look at the review on the article's talk page ↗; also, when taking a look at earwig ↗, this article is in the green. If this were in the yellow or red, I would understand what you mean by "I don't know how that got approved."
:::For the article itself, I really am struggling to find the issues with it. Each comparison in the Composition section makes more sense for them to be there rather than Critical reception. A comparison isn't necessarily an opinion most of the time; especially since the comparisons are track-by-track and do not cover the mixtape as a whole. Something such as "Darville said Nettspend's appearance on the track sounds like the American rapper and singer Lil Tracy" 100% makes more sense to be in Composition as, by nature, Darville is '''describing''' what Nettspend sounds like, rather than giving his thoughts and opinions on Nettspend's performance (whether he liked it or not, etc.) To me, the lead is clear and consise, and follows WP:LEAD ↗, as it summarizes each section in a short amount of words. Also, if a reader were to wonder what this mixtape sounds like, they would most definitely go to the Composition section. They might see that some tracks were compared to Gucci Mane, while others were compared to Lil Tracy and French Montana. Now, of course, all readers will not be familiar with these names, but if they are, they will most definitely get a greater understanding of what this mixtape sounds like. That is the whole purpose of the section, and stripping the article of that is stripping readers from knowing what this mixtape sounds like without actually hearing it.
:::Also, you did more than trim the article, by adding "On January 27, 2024 Xavier released a music video for "Special," which was followed with a video for "Need Me," on November 30, 2024", which is not sourced at all, contradicting your earlier statement of saying the article "wasn't well sourced". On top of that, the sentence does not comply with Wikipedia's standards as, per MOS:YEAR ↗, a comma would be needed after "2024" and per WP:INOROUT ↗ the comma would be outside of the quotations. Plus, how does "the latter track ends with an audio clip of him in conversation with the mixtape's host, DJ Rennesy during an interview, similar clips are placed throughout the album" relate to the Background section at all?
:::Regardless, I apologize for going on a rant about good faith ↗ changes but I really am struggling to find what was wrong with the article in the first place. In all honesty, your contributions seem to not help the article and rather diminish its quality. I've reverted them again simply because I do not understand how they make the article better. Locust member (talk) 18:33, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
::That page isn't my priority, not gonna edit war u on it but just letting u know why i made those changes Aradicus77 (talk) 18:08, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mano Sundaresan ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Locust member. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mano Sundaresan ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song)

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 11 August 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the song "'''Michelle Pfeiffer ↗'''" has been described as possessing "a cresting emotionality grand enough to fill the tallest IMAX screen"?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song) ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}}  — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 September newsletter

The fourth round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 29 August. The penultimate round saw three contestants score more than 800 points:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|BeanieFan11}} with 1,175 round points, mainly from sports-related articles, including 17 good articles, 27 did you know articles, and 9 in the news ↗ articles

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Arconning}} with 1,090 round points, mainly from articles about athletes and politicians, including a featured article ↗ on Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics ↗, 9 good articles ↗, 28 did you know ↗ articles, and a wide assortment of featured and good article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|AirshipJungleman29}} with 854 round points, mostly from a high-scoring featured article on the Indian leader Rani of Jhansi ↗ and two good articles, in addition to 13 featured and good article reviews

Everyone who competed in Round 4 will advance to Round 5 unless they have withdrawn. This table ↗ shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for Round 4 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 9 featured articles, 12 featured lists ↗, 98 good articles, 9 good topic ↗ articles, more than 150 reviews, nearly 100 did you know articles, and 18 in the news articles.

In advance of the fifth and final round, the judges would like to thank every contestant for their hard work. As a reminder, any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. In addition, note that Round 5 will end on 31 October at 23:59 UTC. Awards at the end of Round 5 will be distributed based on who has the most tournament points over all five rounds, and special awards will be distributed based on high performance in particular areas of content creation (e.g., most featured articles in a single round).

Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges – {{User|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User|Epicgenius}}, {{User|Frostly}}, {{User|Guerillero}} and {{User|Lee Vilenski}} – are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Ghostholding

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 2 September 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Ghostholding ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that a music publication apologized after reporting that '''''Ghostholding ↗''''' was the work of a fictional indie rock band?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ghostholding ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ghostholding ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}}  — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mano Sundaresan ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Locust member. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Mano Sundaresan ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Mano Sundaresan|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. I noticed that your recent edit to :Gender binary ↗ did not have an edit summary ↗. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary ↗, or by discussion on the talk page ↗. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief ↗.

The edit summary field looks like this:
{{Edit summary field/OOUI}}

or in the visual editor:
{{Edit summary field/VisualEditor}}

{{strong|Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.}} When logged in to your Wikipedia account ↗, you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{myprefs|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}, and then click the "{{int:saveprefs}}" button.
Only 37.5% of your edits ↗ have edit summaries.{{sp}} <code style="background:#DFF;white-space:pre">Fred Gandt · talk · contribs ↗</code> 19:20, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of JRJRJR ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article JRJRJR ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:JRJRJR/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nub098765 -- Nub098765 (talk) 07:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of JRJRJR ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article JRJRJR ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See Talk:JRJRJR/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nub098765 -- Nub098765 (talk) 20:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of JRJRJR ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article JRJRJR ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:JRJRJR/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nub098765 -- Nub098765 (talk) 07:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

333 (Bladee album) ↗

Hey! I am just curious to know if you plan to GAN this anytime soon. It seems ready for GA status, and with this being one of my favorite Bladee albums I had to ask :) Skyshiftertalk 01:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

:Yes!! Just nominated it. Locust member (talk) 03:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 November newsletter

The 2025 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seen here ↗), are:
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|BeanieFan11}} with '''1,604''' tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Gog the Mild}} with '''1,075''' tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Arconning}} with '''860''' tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|History6042}} with '''804''' tournament points
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Sammi Brie}} with '''635''' tournament points
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|TheDoctorWho}} with '''386''' tournament points
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|AirshipJungleman29}} with '''373''' tournament points
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Thebiguglyalien}} with '''362''' tournament points

Our high scorers in the final round were:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|BeanieFan11}} with 1,035 round points, mostly from 19 good articles and 21 did you know articles about athletes

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|vigilantcosmicpenguin}} with 819 round points, mostly from 13 good articles and 11 did you know articles about a wide range of topics from abortion topics to African cities

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|TheNuggeteer}} with 508 round points from 9 good articles, 4 good topic articles and 6 did you know articles mainly about Philippines topics, along with 19 good article reviews

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 2 featured articles ↗, 4 featured lists ↗, 106 good articles ↗, 5 good topic ↗ articles, 178 article reviews, 76 did you know ↗ articles, and 9 in the news ↗ articles. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

The top eight scorers will receive awards shortly. The following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. These prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field during the competition.

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Gog the Mild}} wins the featured article prize, with 12 featured articles total, and the featured topic prize, with 9 featured topic articles in total

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Hey man im josh}} wins the featured list prize, with 10 featured lists total

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|AirshipJungleman29}} wins the featured picture prize, submitting the only featured picture in the entire contest during round 3

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|History6042}} wins the featured content reviewer prize, with 127 featured content reviews. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|BeanieFan11}} wins the good article prize, with 100 good articles total, and the DYK prize, with 147 did you know articles in total. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|TheDoctorWho}} wins the good topic prize, with 16 good topic entries in total

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Arconning}} wins the good article reviewer prize, with 68 good article reviews in total

A special mention also goes to these users who scored the highest in a particular category in a single round:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Sammi Brie}}, with 27 good articles in round 3, and 45 good article reviews in round 1

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Tails Wx}}, with 10 in the news articles in round 3

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to '''sign up to participate ↗'''. The WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2026 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

On behalf of the judges, {{User4|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User4|Epicgenius}}, {{User4|Frostly}}, {{User4|Guerillero}} and {{User4|Lee Vilenski}}:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Your nomination of Foreign Exchange (album) ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Foreign Exchange (album) ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Foreign Exchange (album)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Foreign Exchange (album) ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Foreign Exchange (album) ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:Foreign Exchange (album)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

{| style="border:1px solid gray; background-color:#fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size:x-large; padding:0 0.5em 0; vertical-align:middle; height:1.1em;" |'''The Good Article Rescue Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align:middle; border-top:1px solid gray;" | I am impressed by the progress you're making to have so much GA-status articles, especially for Jane Remover ↗. Enjoy! RTSthestardust (talk) 04:10, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
|}

:Thank you so much!!! Locust member (talk) 16:24, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | 200px ↗
| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | '''Hello Locust member, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion ↗. Spread the WikiLove ↗ by wishing another user a Merry Christmas ↗ and a Happy New Year ↗, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing,''' 
'''Wishes from''' '''''Vestrian24Bio'''''
| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | 200px ↗
|}
Click here ↗ to see the Christmas message I wrote...💞! '''''Vestrian24Bio''''' 12:53, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2026 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2026 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found '''here ↗'''. If you have not yet signed up, you can '''add your name here ↗''', and a bot will set up your submissions page within one day, ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page ↗.

For the 2026 WikiCup, the highest-ranking contestants will receive tournament points ↗ at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. This is the same scoring system that we had last year. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants are no longer eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: {{User4|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User4|Epicgenius}}, {{User4|Frostly}}, {{User4|Guerillero}} and {{User4|Lee Vilenski}}. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 333 (Bladee album) ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 333 (Bladee album) ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:333 (Bladee album)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 12:26, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 333 (Bladee album) ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 333 (Bladee album) ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:333 (Bladee album)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 04:25, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SERG Restaurant Group ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Hello, Locust member. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "SERG Restaurant Group ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 03:52, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Take Me by the Hand ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Take Me by the Hand ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Take Me by the Hand/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 05:03, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Take Me by the Hand ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Take Me by the Hand ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Take Me by the Hand/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 March newsletter

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP ↗. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Bgsu98}} with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article ↗, 5 featured lists ↗, 15 good articles ↗, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Olliefant}} with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic ↗ articles, 4 did you know ↗ articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Generalissima}} with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|MCE89}} with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Rollinginhisgrave}} with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Discord

Yo u got discord? It seems a Pitchfork writer might want to do a Wikipedia article thing for Pitchfork and I think it'd be cool if they interviewed you as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aradicus&diff=prev&oldid=1349355451 Aradicus (talk) 01:35, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

:Yes I do have Discord! It’s @locustmember, I would love to be added!!! Thank you so much!!! Locust member (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Five Forever ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Locust member. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Five Forever ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 May newsletter

The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP ↗. Peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|MCE89}} with 1,333 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Generalissima}} with 1,169 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to shipping ethics controversy in fanfiction ↗, waterways, and Gu Yanwu ↗

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Bgsu98}} with 1,149 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, and featured lists about figure skating, along with many article reviews and two good topics

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Olliefant}} with 830 points, mainly from good and featured articles about television shows, episodes and media, along with nearly four dozen good and featured article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Gommeh}} with 827 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to ''Genshin Impact ↗'' and ''Honkai: Star Rail''

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Foreign Exchange (album) ↗ has failed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Foreign Exchange (album) ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''failed'''. See '''Talk:Foreign Exchange (album)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 19:02, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:♡ ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Locust member. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:♡ ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' June 2026 Backlog Drive
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.

Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''

Join the conversations on our talk page ↗.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Five Forever ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Locust member. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Five Forever ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Five Forever|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:25, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:♡ ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Locust member. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "♡ ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:♡|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:25, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, while peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|MCE89}} with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Bgsu98}} with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Reconrabbit}} with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit ↗ and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|A.Cython}} with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Generalissima}} with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)