W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Ltwin

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Archive box|2000s <br>2010s <br>2020s}}

Book of Common Prayer


Hello {{ping|Ltwin}} I wanted to first thank you for your creation of the 1552 BCP page and your other edits—excellent job! I also wanted to make sure that, since it seems like you’re the other person making BCP articles right now, we didn't accidentally overlap on work. I wanted to know if you're going to be producing a 1662 BCP page, as I was planning to produce one after I complete the 1962 Canadian BCP page. If you plan to do it, I'd prefer to leave it to you so I could work on pages for some other BCPs. Thanks and, again, incredible work! ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

:Hey Pbritti, thanks for the appreciation. I had thought about working on a 1662 page eventually, but only after completing the ones that came before it (1552, 1559, and 1604) if I can find enough information to give each its own article. So I have more than enough work right now. If you want to go ahead and create the 1663 article I would be thrilled 😁. Ltwin (talk) 03:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

::Outstanding. When I’ve gotten to it, probably early April, I'll tag you to take a quick look! ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Titling question (and a treat)


{{ping|Ltwin}}: Hi! Since you're really the only consistent contributor on prayer book material right now, I was hoping to pick your brain about a couple questions:

Anyhow, I wanted to express my gratitude, so here's a little something:
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|100px ↗|100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''Richard Hooker ↗ Memorial Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you for your diligence and commitment to Wikiproject Anglicanism ↗, as well as your general kindness! ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
|}

Thank you! ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

:{{ping|Pbritti}}: Thanks for the barnstar! It does seem kind of lonely in the prayer book space right now doesn't it? That kind of surprises me because there is so much scholarship available about Anglican liturgy and I would have thought a Wikipedian would have filled in the gaps by now lol. In regards, to your questions:
:*1. Have you thought of '''American Book of Common Prayer (1928)'''?
:*2. I agree. Something like "Book of Common Prayer (REC)" makes perfect sense to me.
:Ltwin (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

::{{ping|Ltwin}} It is awful peculiar, considering I have found rather extensive online communities that discuss the prayer books with rigor and regularity. In any case, I must admit my hesitancy on referring to it as "American" is largely founded on having encountered complaints that, in the broadest technical sense, "American" applies beyond the U.S. Also, as far as I know, italicizing the title would produce "''American Book of Common Prayer'' (1928)" and mean a different titling convention from the 1979 (and 1892, when I finally get to it). Willing to discuss further and if you move the page post-publication I'll accept it unquestioningly. As for question 2, I'll implement when I start sometime next month. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
:::I don't think we have to worry about too many complaints using "American" since it's widely acknowledged that American is a synonym for the United States. In regards to italicization, Template:Italic title ↗ allows you to pick and choose which parts of the title you want to italicize. I just think American Book of Common Prayer (1928) is a lot better style-wise than "Book of Common Prayer (1928, U.S.)". Ltwin (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Excellent! I’ll implement when I put it in the mainspace. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived



{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hi '''Ltwin'''! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse ↗, {{tq|Splitting page with redirect}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Splitting page with redirect ↗}}.


<small>
See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 24 July 2022 (UTC)</small>

<div><small></small></div>
</div>
|}<!-- User:Muninnbot/Teahouse_archival_notification -->

Anglo-Saxons



Have you got prior consensus on the talk page to change the referencing system per WP:CITEVAR ↗? DuncanHill (talk) 08:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
: User:DuncanHill, I didn't think there would be any objections to it, but if you object I'll change it back. Ltwin (talk) 08:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

User:Ltwin/Draft Anglo-Saxon government



Hi--"Anglo-Saxon", already a misnomer (since it leaves out the Jutes and the Frisian), has become kind of a sus term in scholarship. "Old English" will work just as well--I hope you will consider renaming it. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:26, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

:@Drmies, thanks for the feedback. It's something to think about. Most of the books I've read have used the term "Anglo-Saxon" and that term is more consistent with the other titles used on Wikipedia for this period. I'm about to go live with the article (even though it's not yet where I want it to be), and I would be fine if there were a consensus to move it to a new title. Ltwin (talk) 03:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
::Yeah, it's a matter of developing consensus. I'll see if I can find some relevant discussions. I can tell you that when "my" own book (an edited collection) was going through the press (about three years ago), my co-editor and I decided it was too late for a wholesale adjustment, though I made probably two or three dozen silent redactions. So, yes, most of the books you will find on the library shelves will still use "Anglo-Saxon", but that will change; we have the white supremacists to thank for that. Thanks, and thanks for writing up important albeit esoteric material, Drmies (talk) 13:03, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
:::What was your book on? I will admit a lot of my sources are older. It seems like a lot of the more detailed sources were written at least several decades ago. Ltwin (talk) 13:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
::::Oh, no need to admit anything: printed scholarship is conservative. There's some discussion in Anglo-Saxons#Legacy ↗; the ISAS changing their name (to International Society for the Study of Early Medieval England ↗ was a big thing, prompted by esp. younger scholars (meaning younger than me!) and their newfangled blog posts, haha. This ↗, by Mary Rambaran-Olm ↗, lays out a bunch of the arguments, but as this piece ↗ by Mary Dockray-Miller ↗ indicates, the association of both the field but especially the term to white supremacy was clear for a long time (here, in 1986 ↗. This article ↗ is quite insightful and has very useful links. Again, Mary Rambaran-Olm ↗, on Medium but valid, and this list of resources ↗ (for all relevant fields) is excellent. I met this guy ↗ at a conference and he is where scholarship is going, so you will see this in years to come, and then it will percolate into Wikipedia as well; personally, I'd like to see that sooner rather than later, but I don't want to press the point and I don't want to tell you what to do. After all, we go by published sources and the pendulum hasn't swung over into the "Old English" side. Thanks, and again I appreciate the work you're doing. Drmies (talk) 16:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

History of the British peerage ↗



Hi Ltwin. You added a reference for "Warren 1987" to History of the British peerage ↗, but that work isn't defined in the article. Could you add the required cite to the References section, or let me know what work this refers to? -- LCU '''ActivelyDisinterested''' <small>''∆transmissions∆'' °co-ords ↗°</small> 18:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

:@ActivelyDisinterested. Thanks for letting me know. I will add it. Ltwin (talk) 23:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
::Thanks Ltwin. -- LCU '''ActivelyDisinterested''' <small>''∆transmissions∆'' °co-ords ↗°</small> 23:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

History of Christian theology ↗



Hello again Ltwin. You add "Schnelle 2020" to History of Christian theology ↗ but it's undefined. Same as last time, could you add the required cite or let me know what it is? -- LCU '''ActivelyDisinterested''' <small>''«@»'' °∆t ↗°</small> 13:54, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

:@ActivelyDisinterested thanks for catching that again. I've added the source. Ltwin (talk) 15:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
::Thanks again Ltwin. -- LCU '''ActivelyDisinterested''' <small>''«@»'' °∆t ↗°</small> 15:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy Easter!



{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Easter Joy'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Happy Easter to a fine editor! May you have a kind and joyful Paschaltide! ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
|}

:@Pbritti, thank you so much. I hope you have a wonderful Easter as well! Ltwin (talk) 23:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

An article you could contribute to!



Hello! I started Split of Christianity and Judaism ↗ early this year. It could use knowledgeable editors. Thanks! Zanahary (talk) 19:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Talk:History of monarchy in the United Kingdom#Proposed WP:SPLIT and WP:MERGE ↗



Hi, Ltwin. As you are the principal author of History of monarchy in the United Kingdom ↗, please see this proposal. Thanks and best wishes. PearlyGigs (talk) 16:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks...



... for your extensive editing on Christianisation of Anglo-Saxon England ↗. The clear mark ups of your edits was particularly useful, I wish more people would be just as informative and will aim to follow in your path. Have a good week! OJH (talk) 07:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Thoughts on Affirming Apostolic Pentecostal churches ↗ page


Hello, Ltwin! As a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Charismatic Christianity ↗ and a top editor on Oneness Pentecostalism ↗ as well as myself, I wanted to get your thoughts on an idea I have regarding the Affirming Apostolic Pentecostal churches ↗ page.

My concerns are multifold. First, it seems to me (though I may be wrong) that there is really no analogous page on Wikipedia for a set of churches/organizations within a specific denomination to have their own page in this way on the topic of sexuality, rather than a page detailing ''all'' of the views (whether in opposition to, affirming of, or neutral on the topic of sexuality) within the denomination on this topic. For example, within Template:Christianity and LGBTQ topics ↗, there is a section on Denominational positions that has pages like Presbyterianism and homosexuality ↗, Homosexuality and Lutheranism ↗, Homosexuality and Baptist churches ↗, etc., but I have not seen any page about, for example, Affirming Baptist Churches ↗. Secondly, the page strangely includes Trinitarian ↗ Pentecostals, which are definitionally not Oneness Pentecostals. Finally, the name for the page seems both arbitrary and inaccurate. The Oneness Pentecostal page was renamed in favor of Oneness Pentecostalism over Apostolic Pentecostalism several years ago to align with the scholarly naming and to maintain WP:NPOV ↗; why should this not apply to this page as well, as it is aligned with the same movement but differing in only one point of theology? I don't see any consistent naming convention from the sources either, so the page naming seems arbitrary.

It seems to me that the most logical thing to do would be to create a page such as Pentecostalism and Homosexuality ↗ and merge the contents into the new page to better represent all the positions taken by Pentecostal organizations (both Oneness and Trinitarian), not limited to just those affirming. What do you think of this? For a movement as large as Pentecostalism, it probably is overdue for a page such as this to exist, and it would solve the issues I've raised with the Affirming Apostolic Pentecostal churches page. Let me know your thoughts! JParksT2023 (talk) 18:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
:I have mirrored this message at Talk:Affirming Apostolic Pentecostal churches#Thoughts on the page in its current state ↗, please reply from there. Thank you for your response and your help! JParksT2023 (talk) 21:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
:@JParksT2023, thanks for letting me know. I'll reply on the talk page. Ltwin (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Reformed Anglicanism



Dear User:Ltwin, I noticed your edit here ↗ and thought to myself that it might be helpful to create a separate article on Reformed Anglicanism ↗ as this seems to be a significant camp within that tradition. Would you be interested in starting the article? With regards, Anupam<sup>Talk</sup> 02:16, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Christianity



I was wondering if you are still interested in WikiProject Christianity ↗.
Please respond to this within a week if you are still interested in helping out. If you do not respond within a week you will be classified as inactive on the WikiProject member list. Sheriff U3 &#124; Talk &#124; Con ↗ 06:32, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

''Ichthus'' Special Edition



<!-- BANNER ACROSS TOP OF ISSUE -->
<table width="100%" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="10" style="border-style:ridge ; border-width:0.9px; border-color:#B621FE; background-image: linear-gradient(#0BA5BD,#583ADF)>
<td height='10' colspan='3'></td>
<td width='125'>220px ↗</td>
<td>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Bebas Neue ; color:#ffffff; font-size:30pt;text-align:center;"><p>{{underline|'''A Special Edition of'''}}</p></span>
<span style="font-family: Bebas Neue ; color:#ffffff; font-size:56pt;text-align:center;"><p>{{underline|'''<big>I</big>CHTHUS'''}}</p></span>
</div>
</td>
<td width='125'>120px|WikiProject Christianity ↗
<div style="font-family:Mate SC;font-size:15px;color:black;text-align:center;background-image: linear-gradient(to right, #ffdddd, #583ADF);">'''Special Edition'''</div>
</td>
</table>
<!-- LEFT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:left; width:49%;">
{{large|'''Project Resurrection!'''}}<br>
<small>By FarmerUpbeat</small>

WikiProject Christianity is being revitalized! After an initiative led by Sheriff U3 to categorize participants as active or inactive, as well as organizing roles for those who are active, WP:X members are hopeful for the future of the project as we move into a new era. Any questions about this may be directed to Sheriff U3 ↗ as we move into this new era of the WikiProject!

WikiProject member
FarmerUpbeat has been selected as the new newsletter editor, and greets the readers of ''Ichthus'' with benedictions.

This has been a special edition of ''Ichthus'', official newsletter of WikiProject:Christianity. A '''full edition''' will come in April, stay tuned!
<!-- Article here -->

</div>
<!-- RIGHT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:right; width:49%;">

{{large|'''Scripture Verse'''}}<br>
{{Blockquote
|text=Restore us, O LORD God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved.
|author=Psalm 80:19 ↗, NRSVue
}}
<!-- Article here -->

{{large|'''Help wanted!'''}}<br>

We're looking for writers to contribute to ''Ichthus''. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here ↗.

</div>
<div style="clear:both; width:100%;">
<!-- BOTTOM -->
-----
<div class="center"><small>''Ichthus'' is published by WikiProject Christianity ↗ &bull; Get answers to questions about Christianity here ↗<br>Discuss any of the above stories here ↗ &bull; For submissions contact the Newsroom ↗ &bull; Unsubscribe here ↗<br>Delivered: 22:49, 5 March 2025 (UTC)</small></div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Queen of Hearts@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Christianity/Outreach/Full_content_delivery&oldid=1278301047 -->

Orphaned non-free image File:Anglican Church in North America logo.png


35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Anglican Church in North America logo.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned non-free use-notice --> --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 21 October 2025 (UTC)


Happy First Edit Anniversary Ltwin 🎉



Hey @Ltwin. Your wiki edit anniversary was 2 days ago, marking 18 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -<span style="color:#990000">❙❚❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000"> GnOeee </span><span style="color:#006699">❚❙❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span> ✉ 13:13, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

:@Gnoeee. Thank you for the kind note. Ltwin (talk) 18:38, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Baptism with the Holy Spirit ↗


Baptism with the Holy Spirit ↗ has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page ↗. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:53, 23 January 2026 (UTC)