W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: LunaEatsTuna

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Category:Wikipedians with red-linked categories on their user talk page ↗

See User talk:LunaEatsTuna/Archive (2018–2024) for earlier messages.

Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup!



Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found '''here ↗'''. If you have not yet signed up, you can '''add your name here ↗''' and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page ↗.

For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes ↗ to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points ↗ at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: {{User4|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User4|Epicgenius}}, {{User4|Frostly}}, {{User4|Guerillero}} and {{User4|Lee Vilenski}}. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1266471891 -->

Pending changes reviewer granted



right|130px ↗
Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|pending changes reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits ↗ on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges ↗, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages ↗.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

''See also:''
<span style="color: darkred;">charlotte</span> <sup style="color: darkred;">👸♥</sup> 20:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Heya!



Wasn't sure if you got pinged with my reply or not, Luna ... it looks like your phone should still be supporting telegram at least ↗ (crossing fingers that it does!). Look me up there at @NathanObral :3 <b style="color:#604B38;background:#E3DBD9;padding:3px;">Nathan Obral</b> • he/him • <span style="color:#AB9189">t</span> • <span style="color:#AB9189">c</span> ↗ • 00:56, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA reviews



Hi Luna, when can you start adding comments for the GARs you've started? Otherwise I will seek another editor's input if there's no response/comments within the next days. '''''Dora the Axe-plorer''''' (explore) 07:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Dora the Axe-plorer}} Sure. I'll get to it tonight (utc). <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 00:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
::LunaEatsTuna: There's been no activity on Talk:Childhood nudity/GA1 ↗ since I completed my responses to your first set of comments on March 5th. There is no hurry, but I do have two other articles ready to be nominated, and don't want to be doing more than one GAN at the same time.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of June ↗


The article June ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:June ↗ and Talk:June/GA2 ↗&nbsp;for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack</small> -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:42, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Talk:1957 Farsinaj earthquake/GA1



Hi, if for some reason you've got too much on your plate, feel free to close this one out and I can pick it up. No worries otherwise! <span style="font-variant: small-caps">''Dawnseeker2000''</span> 00:15, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

:Covered it now, but I do appreciate the offer! I did three other earthquakes GANs from the illustrious Dora the Axe-plorer and got slightly burned out with earthquake articles aha. <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 09:36, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 March newsletter



The first round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As a reminder, we are no longer disqualifying the lowest-scoring contestants; everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned from Wikipedia. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points ↗ at the end of each round. Unlike the round points in the main WikiCup table ↗, which are reset at the end of each round, tournament points are carried over between rounds and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers. This table ↗ shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far.

Round 1 was very competitive compared with previous years; two contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 500 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 1 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 18 featured articles, 26 featured lists, 1 featured-topic article, 197 good articles, 38 good-topic articles and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 23 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 550 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2, which begins on 1 March. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1277149992 -->

Your GA ↗ nomination of June ↗


The article June ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:June ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:June/GA2 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack</small> -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

talk page archiving



Hey, just wanted to let you know you might want to archive some sections on your talk page. WP:TALKSIZE ↗ recommends archiving once the page once it had around 75 KB of wikitext, and yours has over 3 times that and is pretty slow to load. Best, Sarsenet (talk) 09:15, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

:Only people with mobile devices after the iPhone 7S and 2012 Android devices are allowed on this talk page. <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 15:44, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Sarsenet}} Fine—is this better now? <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 23:44, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
::Yep, much better. Sarsenet (talk) 07:51, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

"The guestbook"



I almost signed your "guestbook" but then realized it would be redundant heheh :3 <b style="color:#604B38;background:#E3DBD9;padding:3px;">Nathan Obral</b> • he/him • <span style="color:#AB9189">t</span> • <span style="color:#AB9189">c</span> ↗ • 17:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 May newsletter



The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points ↗ at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table ↗ shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:


In addition, we would like to recognize {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Generalissima}} for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1287878793 -->

DYK for June


{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 1 June 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''June ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that no other month in a calendar year starts with the same day of the week as '''June ↗'''?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/June ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(here's how, June ↗)</small>, and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) ↗ 00:02, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 July newsletter



The third round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 June. This round was again competitive, with three contestants scoring more than 1,000 round points:


Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn. This table ↗ shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 4 featured articles, 16 featured lists ↗, 1 featured picture ↗, 9 featured-topic articles, 149 good articles, 27 good-topic articles, and more than 90 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 18 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted more than 200 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1297945660 -->

WikiCup 2025 September newsletter



The fourth round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 29 August. The penultimate round saw three contestants score more than 800 points:


Everyone who competed in Round 4 will advance to Round 5 unless they have withdrawn. This table ↗ shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for Round 4 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 9 featured articles, 12 featured lists ↗, 98 good articles, 9 good topic ↗ articles, more than 150 reviews, nearly 100 did you know articles, and 18 in the news articles.

In advance of the fifth and final round, the judges would like to thank every contestant for their hard work. As a reminder, any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. In addition, note that Round 5 will end on 31 October at 23:59 UTC. Awards at the end of Round 5 will be distributed based on who has the most tournament points over all five rounds, and special awards will be distributed based on high performance in particular areas of content creation (e.g., most featured articles in a single round).

Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges – {{User|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User|Epicgenius}}, {{User|Frostly}}, {{User|Guerillero}} and {{User|Lee Vilenski}} – are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!

<small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1307791499 -->

:There will come a day of reckoning for you, you stupid oilskin clanker. <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 00:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Cite Unseen September 2025 updates



<div lang="en" dir="ltr">
Hello! Thank you for using '''Cite Unseen ↗'''. We are excited to share details about a big update we just deployed. With grant support from Wikimedia CH ↗, we've added several new features, including a citation filtering dashboard, settings dialog, support for localization, and the ability to easily suggest domain categorizations. Cite Unseen now also lives on Meta Wiki, as part of our effort to serve all Wikimedia projects. Our source lists ↗ are now also on Meta-Wiki, where they can be collaboratively edited by the community.

Please see our '''newsletter on Meta-Wiki ↗''' for full details. If you have feature ideas, notice any issues with our new updates, or have any questions, please get in touch via our project talk page ↗. Thank you!

:From '''''<span style="color:#07517C;">Super</span>''<span style="color:#6FA23B;">Hamster</span> ↗''' and '''<span style="color:#765CAE">Super</span><span style="color:#525252">Grey</span>''' ↗, 05:43, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

''<small>This message was sent via global message delivery ↗. You received this message as you've been identified as a user of Cite Unseen. If you are not a Cite Unseen user, or otherwise don't want to receive updates in the future, you can remove yourself from our mailing list here ↗.</small>''
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:SuperHamster@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MassMessage/Lists/Cite_Unseen_Users&oldid=29265595 -->

:I will slaughter your entire family. <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 05:55, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 November newsletter



The 2025 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seen here ↗), are:
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|BeanieFan11}} with '''1,604''' tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Gog the Mild}} with '''1,075''' tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Arconning}} with '''860''' tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|History6042}} with '''804''' tournament points
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Sammi Brie}} with '''635''' tournament points
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|TheDoctorWho}} with '''386''' tournament points
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|AirshipJungleman29}} with '''373''' tournament points
# {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Thebiguglyalien}} with '''362''' tournament points

Our high scorers in the final round were:

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 2 featured articles ↗, 4 featured lists ↗, 106 good articles ↗, 5 good topic ↗ articles, 178 article reviews, 76 did you know ↗ articles, and 9 in the news ↗ articles. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

The top eight scorers will receive awards shortly. The following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. These prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field during the competition.


A special mention also goes to these users who scored the highest in a particular category in a single round:

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to '''sign up to participate ↗'''. The WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2026 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

On behalf of the judges, {{User4|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User4|Epicgenius}}, {{User4|Frostly}}, {{User4|Guerillero}} and {{User4|Lee Vilenski}}:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

<small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1319959775 -->

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1322758768 -->

Welcome to the 2026 WikiCup!



Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2026 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found '''here ↗'''. If you have not yet signed up, you can '''add your name here ↗''', and a bot will set up your submissions page within one day, ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page ↗.

For the 2026 WikiCup, the highest-ranking contestants will receive tournament points ↗ at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. This is the same scoring system that we had last year. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants are no longer eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: {{User4|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User4|Epicgenius}}, {{User4|Frostly}}, {{User4|Guerillero}} and {{User4|Lee Vilenski}}. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1330482987 -->

WikiCup 2026 March newsletter



The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP ↗. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 1 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1340412148 -->

Republic of Slowjamastan symbols



Respectfully, you're inverting the consensus. That RfC made non-inclusion of the symbols the default case, with there needing to be a consensus to ''include'' them on a case by case basis. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:09, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

:{{ping|Hammersoft}} I do not see this mentioned in the RfC itself, unless this fact/nature of RfCs is stated externally somewhere which you could kindly link me. From my understanding at what is written there, status quo probably applies (for both including or excluding a particular symbol, dependent upon which editor makes the original addition) like it would for any article. In any case, the flag is cited to RS so it should be safe to remain per said RfC at the least, but I acknowledge the CoA may not be by that same logic as it is only cited to a primary source at the moment. <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 23:26, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
::The RfC makes it very clear that the conclusion is Option B, no flag or coat of arms. The flag could be included in the article next to prose that is cited, but in the infobox is against what the RfC concluded. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:51, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Hammersoft}} Yes, the RfC indeed makes it clear that they sought Option B, as you say. However, (a) never specifies that they are referring to ''prose'' when they talk about requiring RS or editor discretion to add certain symbols, so, respectfully of course, this seems like an interpretation on your end. I ''presume'' you are citing “Principally, consensus is for option B” and the proposed custom infobox below, which indeed has no flag nor emblem: ''however'', option B notably is also limited to those parameters which they show in the example, but (b) actually says “There is no consensus about the inclusion and use of certain other parameters” and “Participants are generally at an impasse about the propriety of including these parameters when they hold no outside recognition or verifiability,” implying that other parameters are fully allowed to be added per WP:NOCON ↗. For instance, if you cite the shown infobox having no images as being why it should not have images (which is valid obviously), then, should this same logic be applied regarding the parameters (which it would have to be for consistency), this would mean that adding other parameters is explicitly disallowed, ''but'' in my opinion this would certainly contradict what is actually said in (b), not to mention it would violate NOCON. So, I think it is most likely, based on context and what is stated, that (a) refers to the infobox and not to prose (which is never even mentioned), when they say “against ''generally''” and “may be appropriate on a case-by-case basis … symbols which are recognized or reported by reliable sources may be appropriate to add, as important information.“ Of course I could be totally wrong here, and I am indeed fully open to this, but I am going by what I actually see stated and WP's own policies and guidelines. Perhaps the person who wrote that summary was overtly ambiguous or poorly explained what the consensus actually was. :3 <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 00:25, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
::::Well then there's no point to the RfC then and it is meaningless, and we can do as we please with the infobox? --Hammersoft (talk) 00:44, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Hammersoft}} The RfC concluded that micronations are to receive infoboxes, the word 'unrecognised' ''must'' be included somewhere in the infobox—at present we have “micronation (unrecognised entity)”—the flag, emblem and other symbols must only be added upon editor discretion and if cited to RS (“reliably verifiable … recognized or reported by reliable sources“), other parameters per NOCON may be freely added if they are cited to RS (“consensus is that it is appropriate to state verifiable claims, which are identified as such, even within infoboxes”) and that “consensus is against any reference to micronations as "fictitious" in the same sense as "literary fiction"”. Prior to this RfC, micronations used the same infobox as sovereign states (this was thus disallowed per the RfC); the aforementioned unrecognised statement and micronation declaration has been added; and, information in the infobox parameters cited to primary sources are no longer permitted and must usually be instead cited to secondary sources (which are required to be RS). If the RfC was truly “meaningless” as you quip, micronations would still have infoboxes identical to countries, which, evidently, they do not. Also, I am not the one who wrote that rather comical summary nor did I even participate in the RfC, I am just following what it proscribes, as all editors should, so please do not bring (even subtle) attitude into discussions—we are coworkers and I assume we both love Wikipedia! ^w^ <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 01:09, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::Sure, we both love it. But, frankly your interpretation of that RfC is completely wrong. It's unequivocal that Option B was selected, that doesn't include the flag and coat of arms. I don't understand how that is uncertain to anyone. I think we're at an impasse. So, I'm going to seek other inputs. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:24, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Okay, you can go ahead. But, as I mentioned in my (rather thorough and cited) explanation, if Option B was accepted as is then this decision would go against NOCON and fully contradict everything written in (b) though, no? <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 01:35, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::::In other words, (a) and (b) are contextualising, elaborating, ''expanding upon'' the infobox example that they have shown. <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 01:37, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

You might want to slow down on the GA reviews



I think nearly 50 at once is a bit beyond the capacity of a single reviewer. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

:{{ping|PARAKANYAA}} Hey! Thanks for the (valid) concern. I have intentionally chosen articles on the shorter side or topics I am familiar with; I have also cleared my schedule for the month. I do believe that this should take me about 50-100 hours, which is very doable in a two-week period for an unemployed shutin mentally deranged individual such as myself. <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 23:17, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
::@LunaEatsTuna ...fair enough. Good luck! Don't overwork yourself. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:20, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
:::Thanks! Wishing you all the best. <3 <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 23:21, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
::::183 reviews is huge. Didn't realise you were taking on so many, thankyou for all your effort and yeah, don't burn out or overcommit yourself. If you need to take a breath, feel free to ping me in and I can leave some comments. Whonting (talk) 05:16, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 May newsletter



The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP ↗. Peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 2 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1351688849 -->

Open GANs



Hi Luna, you have claimed several GANs that haven't received reviews yet. Please start these as soon as possible, so that nominators can address concerns and these can be closed. In the future, I suggest that an initial review is completed before opening another one so that several editors do not have to wait for comments and the nominations can be reviewed by others. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 01:57, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

:Of course, of course. I have closed two today and will get on the remaining ones as fast as I can… <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 06:04, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

June ↗



Since you got it to GA, I thought you'd be the best to ask; Is there any chance that Bloomsday ↗ and the Bloom Festival ↗ (this article is in poor shape, but the official website of bord bia bloom says june bank holiday) could be included, or is it only the most "important" celebrations? Finnfrog99 (talk) 20:04, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

:{{ping|Finnfrog99}} Sorry for the wait!!!! I think I was going for holidays that were international/global because there are hundreds of local country ones for any given month and I was not sure how to determine which of those to list. <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 20:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
::Alright then! Finnfrog99 (talk) 20:24, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

May music



{{User QAIbox
| image = Park near Lutheran church, Sopot, pansies.jpg
| image_upright = 0.9
| bold = story · music · places
}}
Thank you for a lovely GA review for Herr Gott, dich loben wir, BWV 16 ↗, my New Year's greeting 2026. Can you perhaps cast your diligent eyes on Gott fähret auf mit Jauchzen, BWV 43 ↗ which will hopefully be on the main page in two days, for Ascension Day, - formally in the FAC or informally by copy-edit and talk page? Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:28, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

update: Gott fähret auf mit Jauchzen, BWV 43 ↗ is now a FA. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:17, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

You may be eligible to vote in the U4C election



<section begin="announcement-content" />
I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ↗. You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta ↗, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) ↗ (talk ↗)<section end="announcement-content" />

Keegan (WMF) ↗ (talk ↗) 17:19, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Keegan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Keegan_(WMF)/test&oldid=30569831 -->

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2026 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:TechnoSquirrel69@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/June_2026/Mass_message_list&oldid=1356124266 -->

GA reviews



Hi, are you still planning on reviewing Jaydes ↗ and Wifiskeleton ↗ at some point? NP (talk) 21:19, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

:Yes, thank you for reminding me! <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 23:38, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Dunsink time ↗



Hello! I saw that you've never edited UTC−00:25:21 ↗ and I thought you might want to know about it, since you made many articles about 'Time in (Country)' before '''''<span style="background:#101418"><span style="color:#169B62">Froglord</span> <span style="color:white">(Finnfrog99)</span> <span style="color:#FF883E">(talk)</span></span>''''' 22:05, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

:{{ping|Finnfrog99}} Thanks, I had not heard about it before! It is interesting. <span style="color:#B02698">❧ LunaEatsTuna</span> (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 00:16, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter



The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, while peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1361686567 -->

Precious anniversary


{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Four}}
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 7 July 2026 (UTC)