W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: MCE89

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Talk header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(30d)
| archive=User talk:MCE89/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=8
| maxarchivesize=75K
| archiveheader={{Archive}}
| minthreadsleft=10
| minthreadstoarchive=1
}}
{{Archives}}

New Review of S.D. Holman's Wikipedia Entry



Hello MCE89,

I hope your week is going well.

Wondering if there is a way to expedite the next review of S.D. Holman's Wikipedia entry:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:S._D._Holman

It was edited and re-submitted (I believe) back in March.

With thanks,

Jbentley86 ~2026-34409-14 ↗ (talk) 15:33, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

:@Jbentley86 Sorry that you've been waiting so long for a review, unfortunately the AfC backlog is quite large at the moment. The good news is that your draft is one of the oldest in the queue so it should be reviewed soon. I'd be happy to take a look at it again myself in a couple of days, but before I do it would be great if you could do a bit more to fix the sourcing. As I said in my last review, every statement in the draft should be supported by a citation to a reliable source (ideally one that is also independent and secondary ↗) that verifies ↗ the claim you're making. I've added some {{cn}} tags to the draft to show you where you still need to add citations. MCE89 (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Australian Antarctic Territory


{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 13 June 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Australian Antarctic Territory ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Australia took Japan to the International Court of Justice for its whaling activities near the '''Australian Antarctic Territory ↗'''?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Australian Antarctic Territory ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(here's how, Australian Antarctic Territory ↗)</small>, and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;—&nbsp;Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you


Hello, MCE89, and thank you for your prompt closing of this "sock puppet" investigation ↗. Have a good day.--&#126;2026-34615-72 ↗ (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

:No problem @~2026-34615-72, hope you have a good day as well. MCE89 (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

DYK for David Unaipon


{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 14 June 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''David Unaipon ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that one of the first known books by an Aboriginal Australian author, written by '''David Unaipon ↗''', was not printed under his name for more than 70 years?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Unaipon ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(here's how, David Unaipon ↗)</small>, and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;—&nbsp;Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

re: Thanks



Seems to be :WP:PGAME ↗ with that account.--<span style="color: #005000;">☾Loriendrew☽</span> <span style="color: #000080;">☏''(ring-ring)''</span> 14:16, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Mary Theresa Vidal ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Mary Theresa Vidal ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Mary Theresa Vidal/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mmemaigret</small> -- Mmemaigret (talk) 13:25, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Tung Wah Times ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Tung Wah Times ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Tung Wah Times/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc</small> -- MSincccc (talk) 14:48, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!




{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7; width: 800px; padding: 0.5em;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle; width: 105px;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''SPI barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray; padding-top:0.5em;" | Thanks for processing all those cases. You're the best! Staraction (talk <b>·</b> contribs ↗) 17:40, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
|}<!--Template:Barnstar2-->

:Thanks so much @Staraction! And thank you for all the cases you've been handling too :) MCE89 (talk) 17:50, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Mary Theresa Vidal ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Mary Theresa Vidal ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Mary Theresa Vidal/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mmemaigret</small> -- Mmemaigret (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Barbara Baynton ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Barbara Baynton ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Barbara Baynton/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dizzycheekchewer</small> -- Dizzycheekchewer (talk) 18:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Liane Moriarty ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Liane Moriarty ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Liane Moriarty/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chocmilk03</small> -- Chocmilk03 (talk) 22:44, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Favor for Review



Hello. I would like to ask you a favor to review the one pending draft ↗ I have. It has been submitted from 20 March, one of the oldest drafts right now as I see. I also added more recently a Wikipedia:THREE ↗ comment to facilitate the review, but still there is no comment or feedback or anything from then. I know that the AfC backlog is huge, but more than 3 months is unmanageable to create any new article (currently 20 articles and hopefully some more soon), and this has created to me confusion. I ask this from you, since you have already reviewed many of my previous articles ↗, and I think you are the most efficient reviewer that I have seen here so far. If you make this favor, I promise doing something else back, like some AfDs that I have started to do lately, since the AfC backlog has affected me in how to continue with new drafts. Thank you! Chiserc (talk) 23:24, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

:Sorry @Chiserc, I’m traveling at the moment and won’t really be actively editing for the next couple of weeks. I might try to take a look once I’m back if it hasn’t been reviewed by then. MCE89 (talk) 23:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
::No worries. With the slow rate of reviews, and such a huge backlog, it may reach 4 months, since I don't expect a review within a month. In any case, thanks! Chiserc (talk) 00:11, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
::@MCE89, if you are now active, please take a look on the pending draft, which is now one of the oldest in the AfC queue, since I am afraid the backlog is growing and will continue to grow in 4 or more months. That's why I have stopped making new drafts. Thanks again! Chiserc (talk) 14:42, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of Heard Island and McDonald Islands ↗


{{ivmbox
|image = Cscr-featured.svg
|imagesize=60px
|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;
|text = Congratulations, MCE89! The article you nominated, '''Heard Island and McDonald Islands ↗''', has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The '''nomination discussion ↗''' has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it ↗ to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|Gog the Mild}} via FACBot (talk) 11:05, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
}}<!-- Template:FC pass talk message -->

Wild Australia Show ↗ scheduled for TFA



This is to let you know that Wild Australia Show ↗ has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for 9 August 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2026 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2026 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be posted there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 14:39, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Liane Moriarty ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Liane Moriarty ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Liane Moriarty/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chocmilk03</small> -- Chocmilk03 (talk) 02:24, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Barbara Baynton ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Barbara Baynton ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Barbara Baynton/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dizzycheekchewer</small> -- Dizzycheekchewer (talk) 05:41, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Tung Wah Times ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Tung Wah Times ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Tung Wah Times/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc</small> -- MSincccc (talk) 17:28, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

July 2026



<section begin="July" />
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377</small>
'''Events:'''

{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''
|frameless|100px|right ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}<section end="July" />

--MSGJ (talk 22:14, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:MSGJ@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/M-P&oldid=1361047283 -->

Your nomination of Jessie Catherine Couvreur ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Jessie Catherine Couvreur ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Jessie Catherine Couvreur/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chao Garden</small> -- Chao Garden (talk) 23:23, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Matilda Jane Evans ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Matilda Jane Evans ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Matilda Jane Evans/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chocmilk03</small> -- Chocmilk03 (talk) 23:25, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Jessie Catherine Couvreur ↗ is on hold



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Jessie Catherine Couvreur ↗ has been placed <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:Jessie Catherine Couvreur/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chao Garden</small> -- Chao Garden (talk) 06:43, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter



The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, while peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1361686567 -->

Carmelo Fútbol Club



Carmelo Fútbol Club please can you halp me to create page about club need infobox this is offical link
https://www.ligamvd.com/equipos/Carmelo%20F.C./706/ Urug1948 (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi @Urug1948, and sorry for the slow reply! It looks like you might have used an LLM to create your draft at User:Urug1948/sandbox. If that's the case, please avoid using AI tools on Wikipedia in future — LLMs tend to do a very bad job of following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so using them to create article content is not allowed ↗. To create a page about this football club, the most important thing you need to do first is show that it meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria ↗. To do this, you need to find multiple sources that are reliable ↗, unaffiliated with the club ↗, and that discuss it in detail ↗. For instance, looking for newspaper articles about the club's history might be a good place to start. You can also have a read of WP:YFA ↗ for some tips on creating your first article. Good luck, and let me know if there's anything else I can help you with! MCE89 (talk) 08:06, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Matilda Jane Evans ↗ is on hold



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Matilda Jane Evans ↗ has been placed <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:Matilda Jane Evans/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chocmilk03</small> -- Chocmilk03 (talk) 02:44, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Emily Manning ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Emily Manning ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Emily Manning/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc</small> -- MSincccc (talk) 16:03, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Jessie Catherine Couvreur ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Jessie Catherine Couvreur ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Jessie Catherine Couvreur/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chao Garden</small> -- Chao Garden (talk) 16:43, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The 2026 Core Contest Winners!



The winners of the 2026 Core Contest ↗ are announced 🎉. A ''huge'' turnout that resulted in one of our trickiest deliberation sessions. The judges ({{noping|Aza24}}, {{noping|Femke}} and {{noping|Casliber}}) would like to thank everybody who joined and congratulate the winners!


<small>If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list ↗.</small> – '''<span style="font-family:Lucida;"><span style="color:darkred">Aza24</span><span style="color:#848484"> (talk)</span></span>''' 02:30, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Aza24@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:The_Core_Contest/delivery_list&oldid=1356272704 -->

Core Contest 2026 prize winner



Hello. Thank you for taking part in this year's Core Contest and congratulations on your win. Could you please write to me at karla.marte@wikimedia.org.uk to coordinate your prize. Best wishes, Karla Marte(WMUK) (talk) 09:22, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Further Petukh6786 Socks



@MCE89 I saw that you requested a global lock for the most recent Petukh sock. I found two more socks on other language wikis: JEANNE CALMENT DEBUNKED AGE https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/JEANNE_CALMENT_DEBUNKED_AGE ↗ and DEBIL DEBILOV https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/DEBIL_DEBILOV ↗. I cannot edit the steward request page, but would it be possible for you to add them to your request? EaglesFan37 (talk) 00:33, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

:Thanks for the report @EaglesFan37, I've added those to the lock request. MCE89 (talk) 00:48, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
::@MCE89 Another two have since been created: Edward Slawinski https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Edward_Slawinski ↗ and Waclaw Jan Kroczek (LONGEVIQUEST RESEARCHER) https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Waclaw_Jan_Kroczek_(LONGEVIQUEST_RESEARCHER) ↗. EaglesFan37 (talk) 13:59, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Both have since been globally locked. EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:20, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
::::Sorry @EaglesFan37, I'd been meaning to file this one and it just kept slipping my mind. If you'd like to file these lock requests yourself it should be pretty easy to get yourself autoconfirmed on Meta — I'm pretty sure I just ended up making a few edits to my Meta userpage when I needed to make my first lock request. You might also find meta:User:TenWhile6/XReport ↗ helpful for reporting at SRG. MCE89 (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Perfect Evidence WP:DUCK ↗


Another very clear piece of evidence: Mojtaba's last edit here was on December 10, 2020. He made his last edit on December 28 and was blocked. On December 29, Godney edited this article.

Link:

https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%81%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%AA_%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%84%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C_%D8%AC%D8%A7%D9%85_%DB%8C%D9%88%D9%81%D8%A7_%D9%88_%D9%84%DB%8C%DA%AF_%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%BE%D8%A7&action=history - 10 December 2020

https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%88%DB%8C%DA%98%D9%87:%D9%85%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%A9%D8%AA%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7/Mojtaba2361 - 28 December 2020

https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%81%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%AA_%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%84%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C_%D8%AC%D8%A7%D9%85_%DB%8C%D9%88%D9%81%D8%A7_%D9%88_%D9%84%DB%8C%DA%AF_%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%BE%D8%A7&diff=30742161&oldid=30564031 - 29 December 2020

An article created and completed by Mojtaba's account is selected. However, he is blocked on December 28 and on December 29, he adds the selected tag to it with his other account. Such a sequence on a small wiki like Farsi is not accidental.Klouim (talk) 14:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

He is abusing the IP exemption on Godney's account. So there is a possibility that the investigation will be fruitless. He should be blocked for extortion + illegal account + and very obscene and vulgar language.

For further advice, I will introduce you to three Persian-speaking users:

User talk:Ladsgroup

User talk:Huji

User talk:Hanooz

Anoma Pieris



Hi MCE89. You kindly assisted me [Architect632] in getting the wiki page for Anoma Pieris up. I am having trouble with my password and logging in and need some assistance with adding a further line to the page. After the line "In 2025, Pieris and Australian architect Athanasios Tsakonas are guest co-curating the exhibition Eucalypts of Hodogaya, with Victoria’s Shrine of Remembrance.[16]" can you please insert "In 2026, Pieris and Tsakonas are curating a travelling version of the exhibition Eucalypts of Hodogaya, which opened in April at the Yokohama Archives of History Museum"

The citation for this is <https://kaikou.yokohama-history.org/information/991889/>
The Yokohama Archives of History Museum also has an entry in Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yokohama_Archives_of_History>

Thank you &#126;2026-39135-42 ↗ (talk) 00:41, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

:Hi there! It looks like you managed to make the edit yourself, but just let me know if there's anything else I can help with. MCE89 (talk) 18:07, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | MCE89, thank you for processing a spectacular volume of sockpuppet investigation cases in the past month. There is absolutely no reason you should need an administrator to review your recommended actions instead of simply carrying out those actions yourself.{{pb}}As other editors have mentioned before ↗, your editing history makes you an exceptionally strong candidate for adminship, and if you are interested but hesitating for some reason, I hope this token of encouragement helps you arrive at a decision. Keep up the excellent work! —&nbsp;'''''<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>'''&nbsp;<small><span style="color:#708090;">talk</span></small>'' 23:17, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
|}

:I strongly endorse this message as well. Staraction (talk <b>·</b> contribs ↗) 06:06, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
:Thank you so much @Newslinger, and thank you for handling all of my admin requests! I really appreciate the encouragement :) MCE89 (talk) 06:32, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

Regarding The SPI



Thank you for reviewing the case and for the explanation regarding the WP:TAIV ↗ data. I appreciate you taking the time to look into this.

I understand that the temporary accounts do not appear to be the same person based on the technical evidence. Given that the subject is currently officiating at the World Cup and has received significant off-wiki attention, I accept that these are likely multiple football fans arriving independently to make similar disruptive edits.

I do have two quick questions, if you don't mind:

First, does the technical data also show whether {{user|Maqaumat}} and {{user|Wafitauyan}} are connected to each other? My concern was primarily that these two registered accounts share a distinct political interest (Bangladeshi/Awami League topics) and edited the same page in a similar manner. If they are also unconnected, I am happy to drop the matter entirely.

Second, given that the page has already been protected and the disruptive accounts have been blocked or warned, is there anything further I should do at this point, or should I simply monitor the page and report any new disruptions at WP:AIV ↗ as you suggested?

Thank you again for your time and assistance. I apologise if this filing was unnecessary. I am still learning the SPI process and appreciate your guidance.

<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> BengalMC (talk) 06:05, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

:Hi @BengalMC. Maqaumat and Wafitauyan are already indefinitely blocked, so there's no need for any further investigation of those two at this time. The page is now protected, but if you do see any further disruption feel free to make a report at AIV. As an aside, please also don't use LLMs to communicate on Wikipedia in future — we'd all really rather talk to you directly rather than an LLM. MCE89 (talk) 06:20, 11 July 2026 (UTC)