W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: MarcosFenn

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome


Hello, '''{{PAGENAME}}''', and welcome ↗ to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions ↗. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the '''Newcomers help page ↗''', where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type '''<code>{&#123;helpme}}</code>''' on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages ↗, add a question to the village pump ↗ or ask me on <!-- my Talk page ↗ (broken) --> my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 16:42, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

__TOC__

Linking



When you add links to other wikipedia pages, you do not need the whole URL. Simply put the title of the page you are linking to enclosed in double square brackets. For example, to link to the article Merton Park, type <nowiki>Merton Park ↗</nowiki> which would appear as Merton Park ↗. D<small>aniel</small> (☎ ↗) 11:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Also, the format for external links is

External Links


[x] Where x is the link. Axeman89 01:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion


I've added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article Robert Vial ↗, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion ↗ process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not ↗ and Wikipedia:Notability ↗). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Robert Vial ↗. If you remove the {{tl|dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion ↗, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. olivier 10:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Front Envaliran de Libération


A {{prod ↗}} template has been added to the article Front Envaliran de Libération ↗, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion ↗ process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion ↗, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not ↗" and Wikipedia's deletion policy ↗). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page ↗. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process ↗, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria ↗ or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion ↗, where it may be deleted if consensus ↗ to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{tl|db-author}}. Fram 09:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Nice edit at Politics of Tokelau ↗



I enjoyed your edits today - especially your prose style and evident knowledge. Keep up the good work! <b><span style="color:#0000DD;">A</span><span style="color:#0066FF;">l</span><span style="color:#0099FF;">i</span><span style="color:#00CCFF;">c</span><span style="color:#00EEFF;">e</span></b><span style="color:#FF3333;"><sup>✉</sup></span> ↗ 10:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I see you added the same (or very similar) paragraph to Tokelauan self-determination referendum, 2007 ↗, Politics of Tokelau ↗ and Tokelau ↗. I think this is most appropriate in the politics article, and have removed it from the other two, since it is not normally desirable to repeat the same content in multiple articles. I think the paragraph is well written, and balanced, but as it does not contain citations for the views expressed within it I have tagged it as possible original research ↗. If you could add citations, the {{tl|or}} tag can be removed.-<span style="font-family:cursive; color:#808080;">gadfium</span> 19:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
:Thank you for adding adequate sources, Faroukfarouk. I have taken the liberty of converting them to citeweb format and then removing the original research tag. Merry Christmas to both you and Gadfium! <b><span style="color:#0000DD;">A</span><span style="color:#0066FF;">l</span><span style="color:#0099FF;">i</span><span style="color:#00CCFF;">c</span><span style="color:#00EEFF;">e</span></b><span style="color:#FF3333;"><sup>✉</sup></span> ↗ 23:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas


left|thumb|200px|Wishing you the very best for the season - <b><span style="color:#0000DD;">A</span><span style="color:#0066FF;">l</span><span style="color:#0099FF;">i</span><span style="color:#00CCFF;">c</span><span style="color:#00EEFF;">e</span></b>Special:Emailuser/Alice|<span style="color:#FF3333;"><sup>✉</sup></span> ↗ ↗

:Camille Blanc ↗


left|48px| ↗
Another editor has added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article Camille Blanc ↗, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion ↗ process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not ↗ and Wikipedia:Notability ↗). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page ↗. If you remove the {{tl|prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion ↗, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. <!-- Template:PRODNote --> BJBot (talk) 03:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

William Lyon Mackenzie King


Sorry about that ↗. I was in the wrong tab and changed it back ↗. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) ↗ 05:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Adeang



Hello. First of all, I'd like to thank you for your continuous contributions to the article on David Adeang ↗. We seem to be the two editors who are keeping it up to date with current events. However, I have ''strong'' concerns about your latest edits, which seem not to be in accordance with Wikipedia's NPOV ↗ rule. I've stated my concerns here ↗, and I'd appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks, and I look forward to future collaborative editing with you. Aridd (talk) 08:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Monaco stubs



Hi there, I noticed that you've been adding the <nowiki>{{Monaco stub}}</nowiki> to several articles in the last little while. I agree with quite a few of them, but Prince's Palace of Monaco ↗ gave me pause. This is a featured article ↗ that was on Wikipedia's main page just a few weeks ago, and it's definitely not a stub. I'm inclined to think that AS Monaco FC ↗ isn't a stub either. Do you think you could review your work, and perhaps Wikipedia:STUB ↗ to get a sense of when a stub tag might be most appropriate? I've already removed the tag from Prince's Palace, but will leave you reconsider the others. Thanks. Risker (talk) 04:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Hamilton Jordan ↗



Comment for you over at Jurdin's talk page. Cheers. Unschool (talk) 02:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Regards



Hi, I'm just curious. Are you Uruguayan? You seem to be fond of Uruguay ↗. --Góngora (Talk ↗) 01:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Sectioning


Could you avoid splitting articles into small fragments with only one sentence or paragraph per section? In some cases, this sectioning is useful; for example, with this edit ↗ you added sections of appropriate length (although you also tagged it as a stub, and it's far beyond stub length). At other articles, though, I've seen you create break articles that have only two or three sentences into sections, as well as breaking existing sections into even smaller sections devoted to only a single fact. Everyking (talk) 18:31, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs


30px ↗ Hello Faroukfarouk! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot ↗ alerting you that '''6''' of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons ↗. The biographies of living persons ↗ policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability ↗, all biographies should be based on reliable sources ↗. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current ''{{PAGESINCATEGORY:All_unreferenced_BLPs}} ↗'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

# Jorge Lepra ↗ - <small>{{findsources|Jorge Lepra}}</small>
# Roland Kun ↗ - <small>{{findsources|Roland Kun}}</small>
# Kennan Adeang ↗ - <small>{{findsources|Kennan Adeang}}</small>
# Derog Gioura ↗ - <small>{{findsources|Derog Gioura}}</small>
# Vernon Shaw ↗ - <small>{{findsources|Vernon Shaw}}</small>
# Hugo Fernández Faingold ↗ - <small>{{findsources|Hugo Fernández Faingold}}</small>
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer



right|130px ↗
Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits ↗ on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial ↗ scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed ↗ to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles ↗, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages ↗.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism ↗ or BLP violations ↗, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process ↗). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here ↗.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> Courcelles (talk) 01:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification



Hi. When you recently edited Danilo Pallares Echeverría ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uruguayan ↗ (check to confirm ↗&nbsp;|&nbsp;fix with Dab solver ↗). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


Numbers


Stop adding arbitrary numbers to politicians. Mewulwe (talk) 22:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2014



25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=596346483 your edit] to Christine Dowiyogo ↗ may have broken the syntax ↗ by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Christine Dowiyogo|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}&section=new my operator's talk page].
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, <!-- (0, -1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->BracketBot (talk) 15:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Command Ridge ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aiwo ↗ and Buada ↗ (check to confirm ↗&nbsp;|&nbsp;fix with Dab solver ↗). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gorriti Island ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maldonado ↗ (check to confirm ↗&nbsp;|&nbsp;fix with Dab solver ↗). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liliam Kechichián ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frente Amplio ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luis Almagro ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broad Front ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Dr John Burton ↗ (November 17)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the guidelines on the notability of people ↗ and the golden rule ↗. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable ↗, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable ↗ and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners ↗)</small> to secondary reliable sources ↗ that are entirely independent of the subject.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
{{clear}}

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->


{| style="margin: 2em 0;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello! '''MarcosFenn''',
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 21:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Template:Teahouse_invitation -->
{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{ns:3}}|Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗}}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Dr John Burton ↗ (November 18)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the guidelines on the notability of people ↗ and the golden rule ↗. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable ↗, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable ↗ and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners ↗)</small> to secondary reliable sources ↗ that are entirely independent of the subject.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
{{clear}}

<span style="color:green;">SwisterTwister</span> <span style="color:green;">talk</span> 21:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->

ArbCom elections are now open! ↗



{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 -->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Dr John Burton ↗ (November 24)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Onel5969 was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the guidelines on the notability of people ↗ and the golden rule ↗. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable ↗, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable ↗ and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners ↗)</small> to secondary reliable sources ↗ that are entirely independent of the subject.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
{{clear}}

<b><span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#FFB300;">5969</span></b> <sup><i style="color:blue">TT me</i></sup> 02:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Dr John Burton ↗ (December 24)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in ''reliable'' sources ↗ that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the general guideline on notability ↗ and the golden rule ↗. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners ↗)</small>, so that the information is verifiable ↗, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable ↗ and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
{{clear}}

<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">CatcherStorm</span></span></i></b> <sup><i><span style="color:#2C3539">talk</span></i></sup> 06:11, 24 December 2015 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->

Talkback


{{talkback|CatcherStorm|ts=03:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)}}
<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">CatcherStorm</span></span></i></b> <sup><i><span style="color:#2C3539">talk</span></i></sup> 03:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Talkback


{{talkback|CatcherStorm|ts=07:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC)}}
<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">CatcherStorm</span></span></i></b> <sup><i><span style="color:#2C3539">talk</span></i></sup> 07:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dr John Burton ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, MarcosFenn. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation ↗ draft article submission, "Dr John Burton ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace ↗, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Dr John Burton|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}} or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-afc-notice --> '''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''' <sup><i style="color:blue">TT me</i></sup> 18:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016 ↗: Voting now open!



{{Ivmbox|Hello, MarcosFenn. Voting in the '''2016 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on '''the voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/15&oldid=750692309 -->

Disambiguation link notification for April 27



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zyfflich ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dutch ↗ and Wyler ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message



{{Ivmbox|Hello, MarcosFenn. Voting in the '''2017 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=813406947 -->

Disambiguation link notification for March 18



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raúl Fernando Sendic Rodríguez ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frente Amplio ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ra%C3%BAl_Fernando_Sendic_Rodr%C3%ADguez check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ra%C3%BAl_Fernando_Sendic_Rodr%C3%ADguez?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of :Ron Brown (writer) ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':Ron Brown (writer) ↗''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Brown (writer) ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> Bearcat (talk) 19:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alfredo Navarro ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page César Charlone ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Alfredo_Navarro check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Alfredo_Navarro?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message



{{Ivmbox|Hello, MarcosFenn. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=866998231 -->

ArbCom 2019 election voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=926750292 -->

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=990308077 -->

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1056563129 -->

"Moqua Caves" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗


30px ↗
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Moqua Caves ↗ and has thus listed it for discussion ↗. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 11#Moqua Caves ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> Heanor (talk) 15:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 -->

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 -->

Nomination of :Tuvalu House ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Tuvalu House ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuvalu House ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> AusLondonder (talk) 07:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

:I reckon I would comment also that the article's title revolves around two words, 'Tuvalu' and 'House'. Yes, indeed, the 'House' aspect refers to a suburban residence. The 'Tuvalu' aspect refers to the fact that it represents an independent, sovereign state. Some may argue that some independent, sovereign states are more 'notable' that others; and in theory one can respect this view. From a legal and historical point of view, however, the independent, sovereign status of Tuvalu as a King's Realm of the Commonwealth is a matter of record. (This comment is by way of thinking through the 'notablilty' criteria.) MarcosFenn (talk) 21:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of :Iftikhar A. Ayaz ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Iftikhar A. Ayaz ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iftikhar A. Ayaz ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> AusLondonder (talk) 07:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Lindesay-Bethune, 15th Earl of Lindsay ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Mitchell ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->

Proposed deletion ↗ of :List of contemporary writers from northern Uruguay ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :List of contemporary writers from northern Uruguay ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Tagged as Unreferenced for 15 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article or list from which to translate. Unsourced, it implicates WP:BLP ↗. In ordinary times, not a big problem, but nowadays, this is a legal risk. This is a fork ↗ of List of Uruguayan writers ↗.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> Bearian (talk) 03:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

:Thank-you for the opportunity to comment; the article was started many years ago. As a background to my interest, as a former resident of Uruguay I have for decades been much aware of the cultural distinctives between what is termed 'el interior' - the interior - and the capital Montevideo. The north of Uruguay is the most geographically remote part of the country from Montevideo. Added to this is the fact that for decades of the country's post-independence existence there was an intermittent civil war between Blancos and Colorados; the latter being largely urban-based liberals and the former being identified with agrarian and rural and thus conservative and even less secular thinking. Geographically, northern Uruguay has particular links with Argentina and Brazil; indeed, the borders of the three countries meet near Bella Unio'n; and the city of Rivera is contiguous with Santana do Livramento. Thus the latent geographical and historical distinctness of northern Uruguay must have seemed (to me, at the time) a reason to express a particular categorization. It is hard even today to try to claim that Montevideo and its life and thinking equals Uruguay. In addition, the border dispute between Uruguay and Brazil around the arroyo Invernada dove-tails into perceptions of Uruguayan history; the Battle of Masoller in 1904, which ostensibly ended the series of intermittent civil wars, was followed by the death of Blanco leader Aparicio Saravia: according to Brazilians, he died in Brazil; but according to Uruguayans he died in Uruguay; yet the fact that the Colorado forces could not pursue Saravia over the arroyo Invernada meant that Blancos could still regard themselves as being in Uruguay but in the knowledge that Colorados would not pursue. There is a related aura of mystery also about the death of Villanueva Saravia, departmental leader in Cerro Largo in 1998, which informs a distinct northern Uruguayan historiography. Another Blanco leader, Gumercindo Saravia, was known as an Uruguayan nationalist in Uruguay but a Riograndese regionalist in Brazil: a further intriguing historical fact which is informed by norther Uruguay's distinctness. MarcosFenn (talk) 07:52, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
::By way of addition, to the question, Why was writer Jesús Moraes translated into Portuguese, an answer derived from northern Uruguayan geography is obvious: his home town of Bella Unión is right on the border with Brazil. Circe Maia's Caraguatá poems are rooted in a deeply rural northern Uruguayan environment. To another question: Why was the assassination of former Brazilian President Joao Goulart — a friend of JFK (also assassinated, indeed) — so significant in geographical terms? the answer is because he lived on the Brazilian border with Uruguay. To another question, Why was the Presidency of Brazilian military leader Geisel so significant to Uurguay? the answer is that he had previously been Brazilian military attaché to Uruguay. Northern Uruguay can thus be demonstrated to command perceptions of complexity and even mystery. MarcosFenn (talk) 08:20, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Millicent Aroi ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Millicent Aroi ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''I don't believe this person meets WP:GNG ↗ or WP:NPOL ↗. Appears to have been Nauru's ambassador to Fiji, and ambassadors are not presumptively notable. Insufficient sources found.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> The Bushranger <sub><span style="color: maroon;">One ping only</span></sub> 04:43, 22 March 2026 (UTC)