User Talk: Marval4787
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
<!-- Template from Template:WelcomeMenu -->== Welcome! ==
{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;" cellpadding="0"
|class="MainPageBG" style="border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:lavender; padding:0;"
! <div style="margin:0; background-color:white; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:normal; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">Hello, Marval4787! '''Welcome ↗ to Wikipedia!''' Thank you for your contributions ↗. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page ↗ and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name ↗ on talk pages by clicking link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts|alt= ↗ or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted ↗" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject ↗ to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here ↗ for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary ↗ field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses <span style="border:1px solid #ffa500;background:#ffce7b;"><small>If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback ↗}} message on my talk page.</small></span> @ 09:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC)</div>
|}
{| width="100%" style="background-color:white;"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:Lavender"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Started</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
- Contributing to Wikipedia ↗
- The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗ • Tutorial ↗ • Your first article ↗
- How to: edit a page ↗ • upload an image ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Help</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
- Frequently Asked Questions ↗
- New contributors' help page ↗
- Where to: ask questions ↗ • make requests ↗
- Request administrator attention ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Policies and Guidelines</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
- Neutral point of view ↗ • Reliable sources ↗
- Verifiability ↗ • Citing sources ↗ • No original research ↗
- What Wikipedia is not ↗ • Biographies of living persons ↗
- Simplified Manual of Style ↗ • Three-revert rule ↗
- Copyrights ↗ • Policy for non-free content ↗ • Image use policy ↗
- External links ↗ • Spam ↗ • Vandalism ↗ • Sock puppetry ↗
- Deletion policy ↗ • Conflict of interest ↗ • Notability ↗
|}
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">The Community</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
- Community Portal ↗ • Adopt-a-user program ↗
- Assume good faith ↗ • Civility ↗ • Etiquette ↗
- No personal attacks ↗ • Resolving disputes ↗
- Build consensus ↗ • Village pump ↗
- IRC channels ↗ • Mailing lists ↗
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (''The Signpost'') ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Things to do</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
- '''Be bold in editing ↗''' • Help develop an article ↗
- Maintenance ↗ • Peer review ↗ • Requested articles ↗
- Join a WikiProject ↗ • Translating articles ↗
- Cleaning up: General ↗ • Spam ↗ • Vandalism ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Miscellaneous</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
- Categories ↗ • Disambiguity ↗ • Stubs ↗
- User pages ↗ • Talk pages ↗
- Useful templates ↗ • Tools ↗ • User scripts ↗
|}
|}<!--Template:WelcomeMenu-->
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Medal of Arts ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tod Williams ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open! ↗
Hi,<br>
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election ↗. The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on the voting page ↗. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692268845 -->
== ''Signpost ↗'' exit poll ==
Dear Wikipedian, you recently voted ↗ in the ArbCom election ↗. Your username, along with around 155 other usernames of your fellow Wikipedians, was randomly selected ↗ from the 2000+ Wikipedians who voted this year, with the help of one of the election-commissioners ↗. If you are willing, could you please participate (at your option either on-wiki via userspace or off-wiki via email) in an exit poll ↗, and answer some questions about how you decided amongst the ArbCom ↗ candidates?
If you decide ↗ to participate in this exit poll ↗, the statistical results will be published in the ''Signpost ↗'', an online newspaper with over 1000 Wikipedians among the readership. There are about twelve questions, which have alphanumerical answers; it should take you a few minutes to complete the exit poll questionnaire, and will help improve Wikipedia ↗ by giving future candidates information about what you think is important. This is only an unofficial survey, and will have no impact on your actual vote during this election, nor in any future election.
All questions are individually optional, and this entire exit poll ↗ itself is also entirely optional, though if you choose not to participate, I would appreciate a brief reply indicating why you decided not to take part (see Question Zero). Thanks for being a Wikipedian
=== The questionnaire ===
Dear Wikipedian, please fill out these questions -- at your option via usertalk or via email, see Detailed Instructions at the end of the twelve questions -- by putting the appropriate answer in the blanks provided. If you decide ''not'' to answer a question (all questions are optional), please put the reason down: "undecided" / "private information" / "prefer not to answer" / "question is not well-posed ↗" / "other: please specify". Although the ''Signpost ↗'' cannot guarantee that complex answers can be processed for publication, it will help us improve future exit polls, if you give us comments about why you could not answer specific questions.
{{collapsetop| quick and easy exit poll ↗ , estimated time required: 4 minutes }}
- '''Q#0.''' Will you be responding to the questions in this exit poll ↗? Why or why not?
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#1.''' Arbs must have at least 0k / 2k / 4k / 8k / 16k / 32k+ edits to Wikipedia.
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#2.''' Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years editing Wikipedia.
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#3.''' Arbs...
: <sup>'''B:'''</sup> should preferably ''not'' be an admin
: <sup>'''C:'''</sup> can be but need not be an admin
: <sup>'''D:'''</sup> ''should'' preferably be an admin
: <sup>'''E:'''</sup> ''must'' be or have been an admin
: <sup>'''F:'''</sup> ''must'' currently be an admin
:* Your Single-Letter Answer:
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#4.''' Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years of experience as an admin.
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#5.''' Completely '''''optional''''', as all these questions are completely optional: which candidates did you support ↗ this year, and why?
:* Your Comments:
- '''The Quick&Easy End'''. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion.
:* General Comments:
{{collapsebottom}}
{{collapsetop|the extended exit poll ↗, estimated time required: depends ↗ }}
- '''Q#6.''' Completely '''''optional''''', as all these questions are completely optional: which candidates did you oppose ↗ this year, and why?
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#7.''' Are there any Wikipedians you would ''like'' to see run for ArbCom, in the December 2016 election, twelve months from now? Who?
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#8.''' Why did you vote in the 2015 ArbCom elections? In particular, how did you learn about the election, and what motivated you to participate this year?
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#9.''' For potential arbs, good indicators of the right kind of contributions ''outside'' noticeboard activity, would be:
: <sup>'''B:'''</sup> discussions on the talkpages of articles NOT subject to ArbCom restrictions
: <sup>'''C:'''</sup> sending talkpage notifications e.g. with Twinkle, sticking to formal language
: <sup>'''D:'''</sup> sending talkpage notifications manually, and explaining with informal English
: <sup>'''E:'''</sup> working on policies/guidelines
: <sup>'''F:'''</sup> working on essays/helpdocs
: <sup>'''G:'''</sup> working on GA/FA/DYK/similar content
: <sup>'''H:'''</sup> working on copyedits/infoboxes/pictures/similar content
: <sup>'''I:'''</sup> working on categorization e.g. with HotCat ↗
: <sup>'''J:'''</sup> working on autofixes e.g. with AWB ↗ or REFILL ↗
: <sup>'''K:'''</sup> working with other Wikipedians via wikiprojects e.g. with MILHIST ↗
: <sup>'''L:'''</sup> working with other Wikipedians via IRC e.g. with {{irc|wikipedia-en-help}} or informally
: <sup>'''M:'''</sup> working with other Wikipedians via email e.g. with UTRS ↗ or informally
: <sup>'''N:'''</sup> working with other Wikipedians in person e.g. at edit-a-thons / Wikipedian-in-residence / Wikimania / etc
: <sup>'''O:'''</sup> other types of contribution, please specify in your comments
: Please specify a comma-separated ''list'' of the types of contributions you see as positive indicators ''for arb-candidates to have''.
:* Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#10.''' Arbs who make many well-informed comments at these noticeboards (please specify which!) have the right kind of background, or experience, for ArbCom.
: <small>continued</small>: <sup>'''F:'''</sup> OS/REVDEL ↗, <sup>'''G:'''</sup> CU/SPI ↗, <sup>'''H:'''</sup> AN/I ↗, <sup>'''I:'''</sup> pageprot ↗, <sup>'''J:'''</sup> NAC ↗,
: <small>continued</small>: <sup>'''K:'''</sup> RfC ↗, <sup>'''L:'''</sup> RM ↗, <sup>'''M:'''</sup> DRN ↗, <sup>'''N:'''</sup> EA ↗, <sup>'''O:'''</sup> 3o ↗,
: <small>continued</small>: <sup>'''P:'''</sup> NPOVN ↗, <sup>'''Q:'''</sup> BLPN ↗, <sup>'''R:'''</sup> RSN ↗, <sup>'''S:'''</sup> NORN ↗, <sup>'''T:'''</sup> FTN ↗,
: <small>continued</small>: <sup>'''U:'''</sup> teahouse ↗, <sup>'''V:'''</sup> helpdesk ↗, <sup>'''W:'''</sup> AfC ↗, <sup>'''X:'''</sup> NPP ↗, <sup>'''Y:'''</sup> AfD ↗,
: <small>continued</small>: <sup>'''1:'''</sup> UAA ↗, <sup>'''2:'''</sup> COIN ↗, <sup>'''3:'''</sup> antiSpam ↗, <sup>'''4:'''</sup> AIV ↗, <sup>'''5:'''</sup> 3RR ↗,
: <small>continued</small>: <sup>'''6:'''</sup> CCI ↗, <sup>'''7:'''</sup> NFCC ↗, <sup>'''8:'''</sup> abusefilter ↗, <sup>'''9:'''</sup> BAG ↗, <sup>'''0:'''</sup> VPT ↗,
: <small>continued</small>: <sup>'''Z:'''</sup> Other_noticeboard_not_listed_here_please_wikilink_your_answer ↗
: Please specify a comma-separated ''list'' of the noticeboards you see as important background-experience ''for arb-candidates to have''.
:* Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#11.''' Arbs who make many comments at these noticeboards (please specify!) have the wrong kind of temperament, or personality, for ArbCom.
: Please specify a comma-separated ''list'' of the noticeboards you see as worrisome personality-indicators ''for arb-candidates to have''.
:* Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
:* Your Comments:
- '''Q#12.''' Anything else we ought to know?
:* Your Custom-Designed Answer(s):
- '''The Extended-Answers End'''. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion.
:* General Comments:
{{collapsebottom}}
Detailed Instructions: you are welcome to answer these questions via usertalk (easiest), or via email (for a modicum of privacy).
{{collapsetop| how to submit your answers , estimated time required: 2 minutes }}
- If you wish to '''answer via usertalk''', go ahead and fill in the blanks by editing this subsection. Once you have completed the usertalk-based exit poll ↗ answers, {{edit|User_talk:75.108.94.227|click here to notify the Signpost copy-editor|section=new|preloadtitle=ACE2015 exit poll answers from ~~<nowiki></nowiki>~~}}, leave a short usertalk note, and click save. The point of leaving the usertalk note, is to make sure your answers are processed and published.
- If you wish to '''answer via email''', create a new email to the ''Signpost ↗'' column-editor by clicking Special:EmailUser/GamerPro64 ↗, and then paste the *plaintext* of the questions therein. Once you have completed the email-based exit poll ↗ answers, {{edit|User_talk:GamerPro64|click here to notify the Signpost column-editor|section=new|preloadtitle=ACE2015 exit poll email from ~~<nowiki></nowiki>~~}}, leave a short usertalk note ''specifying the *time* you sent the email'', and click save. The point of leaving the usertalk note, is to make sure your answers are processed and published (not stuck in the spam-folder).
{{collapsebottom}}
We do promise to try hard, not to make any mistakes, in the processing and presentation of your answers. If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact column-editor GamerPro64 ↗, copy-editor 75.108.94.227 ↗, or copy-editor Ryk72 ↗. Thanks for reading, and thanks for helping Wikipedia. Ryk72 <sup>'c.s.n.s.'</sup> 14:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016 ↗: Voting now open!
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Marval4787. Voting in the '''2016 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on '''the voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/49&oldid=750794223 -->
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Marval4787. Voting in the '''2017 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=813406947 -->
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Marval4787. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=866998231 -->
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=926750430 -->
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1056563328 -->
December 2021
30px|left|alt=Stop icon ↗ Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war ↗; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page ↗ to work toward making a version that represents consensus ↗ among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle ↗ for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection ↗.
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing ↗'''—especially if you violate the three-revert rule ↗, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts ↗ on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> MrOllie (talk) 22:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1124425179 -->
Best Actress page revision
Hey there! Just wanted to explain in better detail: Shirley's name was already linked on the line for ''The Turning Point''. As with anyone whose name repeats, per section, one link is sufficient. Especially in the immediate line above, lol. But it was an understandable edit, no doubt. The other aspect was the bold part. Her name was in bold because she WON the Oscar for ''Terms of Endearment''. Hell, I probably don't have to tell you that. You seem like a MacLaine fan. If not for Turning Point, it would be both linked and bold. It just so happened she's the only nominee who has been nominated twice alongside another actress in the leading category. Hope that elucidates why it looks like that. --Cinemaniac<sup>86</sup><sub>Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire ↗</sub> 21:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1187132262 -->
August 2024
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Pbritti. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Adding an unsourced statement based on your personal thoughts then deleting something supported by multiple reliable sources (while asking where those reliable sources are, even though they're cited) is not ideal behavior. ~'' <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> Pbritti (talk) 01:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
:I am very sorry if I have deleted a statement that was supported by multiple reliable sources. I was asking about these sources because I couldn't find/see them at the end of the sentence in question or thought the article. This was an honest question, no sarcastic criticism.
:Furthermore, the original statement is based on illogical reasoning: the release of multiple versions of an album does not necessarily mean that this album will enter or remain at number 1. It means nothing other than that multiple versions of this album are offered for sale. The fact that fans and listeners buy these multiple versions is due to their buying behaviour. They are not forced by the artist to buy these multiple versions; they can choose not to. Multiple versions of an album do not guarantee that more copies of this album are being sold.
:"The release of multiple versions" therefore does not contribute to the longevity of the album at number 1; it is the consumers' willingness to buy these variants and their buying behaviour. Marval4787 (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1258243594 -->
WP:Manual of Style/Music ↗
Please read the MOS:SOPHOMORE portion of this page. Going forward, you're much better off using "second" for counts instead of "sophomore" unless the latter is part of a quote or title. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b> ↗) 01:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you very much for your tip and help, I appreciate this. Even though it doesn't seem relevant for the edit on question anymore (unfortunately it no longer exists), your remark is absolutely helpful for future edits. Thank you! And I hope I didn't cause any major trouble with my sentencing. Marval4787 (talk) 17:46, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
MOS:QUOTETITLE ↗
Just a heads up, in this edit ↗ you violated MOS:QUOTETITLE by not quoting "Shake It Off ↗". '''<span style="font-size:95%;"><span style="color:#2980b9">livelikemusic</span></span>''' <span style="font-size:95%;">(<span style="color:#8e44ad">TALK!</span>)</span> 16:23, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you very much for the heads up and for correcting/editing it. I totally missed it! Thanks! Marval4787 (talk) 16:29, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
No regrets, just love 🫶
{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''KatyCat Award'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Sorry for the heated discussion. Just having a bad day. 143kittypurry (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
|}
:Many thanks for your message and the kind appreciation! Thank you!
:You don't have to apologize in any way. I am sorry for this. I can get a little too engaged with "correct" wordings, guidelines, and facts. No hard feelings. Though I don't consider myself a KatyCat, I have been enjoying her music from the very start, and I still do. IMHO, she is a talented artist with a great discography and numerous hits. It is a shame how the music industry and critics treated her over the past couple of years/albums, and how fast they turn on (female) singers, believing an artist is past their prime (whatever this means).
:I genuinely hope she gets back on track musically (privately, it seems that way) and the recognition she deserves. I myself enjoy Bandaids and the pop-rock sound. Marval4787 (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1322758710 -->
Melania (film) ↗
Vandalism ↗ has a specific definition. This appears to be an edit war over content. --Onorem (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
:@Onorem Many thanks for the gentle reminder, you are right. Marval4787 (talk) 00:49, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I didn't feel like getting back into that discussion. But I saw your reply and to answer your question about determining the weight, the way I did it initially was to compare '''melania movie''' vs. '''melania movie propaganda''' for the recent week. Like if "propaganda" was mentioned at all or most of them, similar results would be upfront. It's like if ''Foo'' was a comedy movie, and we compared '''foo comedy movie''' to '''foo movie''' and should see the same results. Otherwise, one can specify the domain, like '''melania movie site:variety.com''', filtering for the recent week (to filter out pre-release coverage), and see how different articles talk about the film. I did this with other domains and never felt like "propaganda" rose to warrant being upfront, even as commentary definitely existed. Doing that research did make me feel like one could also argue for introducing it as a vanity project or as a money-laundering mechanism (my findings were why I thought Amazon and the money spent were worth covering). I think per MOS:LEADCLUTTER ↗, we can spread out all these particular points in the opening paragraph. It's not like readers stop reading after the first sentence. In any case, I think I've said everything I need to say there. Cheers! Erik (talk | contrib ↗) 12:59, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
:@Erik: I truly appreciate your response and your valuable insights. Actually, your last argument on the talk page (and your analysis here) makes perfect sense to me and was the reason I changed my position from "propaganda film" to "film using documentary format" (or anything else than "propaganda film"). I absolutely support your initial Option C ("documentary film... it received negative reviews...") as well as its adaptation made by Jon ("American film using a documentary format...). I hope that did not come across wrong/differently on the talk page. Marval4787 (talk) 13:20, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
::Glad to know. Thanks! {{smiley}} Erik (talk | contrib ↗) 13:24, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|100px ↗|100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Minor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Minor edits are often-overlooked, but essential, contributions to Wikipedia. Thank you for making minor edits of the utmost quality! Medxvo (talk) 10:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
|}
:Thank you so very much, @Medxvo! I truly appreciate this Barnstar and your acknowledgment. Thank you! Marval4787 (talk) 16:57, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your significant contribution to Taylor Swift ↗ and her albums/singles =) HypnoBlader (talk) 22:18, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
|}
:Thank you very much @HypnoBlader. I greatly appreciate this acknowledgement and your kind words. Many thanks! Marval4787 (talk) 22:51, 20 June 2026 (UTC)