W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Cinemaniac86

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Talkpagecool}}
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{User notification preference}}

Make-Up Artists & Hair Stylists Guild Awards 2024 ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Make-Up Artists & Hair Stylists Guild Awards 2024 ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade <small>(she/her)</small> (talk) 01:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

:That's cool! I got a bit exhausted, awards-page burnout working on the Golden Globes, a couple critics, and this one was of lesser interest to me by default. But how does this work? Because I've never dealt with a draft before. Finish the TV portion, then place the references, and contact you to publish it? Or just publish it on my own? Either way, I'll finish what I started sometime today for sure. --Cinemaniac86<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Stalk ↗</sub> 15:20, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

PROD



Please do not use PROD for pages that you've created yourself, and instead use WP:G7 ↗. I added the G7 tag to 2024 film critics awards ↗, and because of this, it was deleted immediately by an admin. <small><b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b></small> <sup><b style="color:purple">''talk!''</b></sup> 19:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

:Oh okay, sorry about that. I had this drop-down menu and just thought it was the only option. Glad to know about this method for self-made mishaps, should it ever occur again. @CycloneYoris Have a good one! --Cinemaniac86<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Stalk ↗</sub> 05:25, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive



{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | January 2025 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1263150419 -->

March 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Rusty Cat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Glossary of Generation Z slang ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Urban Dictionary is not a reliable source. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ~ Rusty&nbsp;<sup>''meow''</sup> ~ 00:49, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

I recently warned you (now struck) for introducing incorrect pronouns into 97th Academy Awards ↗; this was a mistake. I has missed the intervening edit when reviewing pending changes, and so the diff I saw incorporated both your change and the offending IP's. Please accept my most sincere apologies. <span style="color: #35b794">'''I'''seult</span><span style="color: #3558b7;"><sup>'' Δx '' ↗</sup>talk to me</span> 06:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive



{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2025 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1286647730 -->

Concern regarding Draft:Make-Up Artists & Hair Stylists Guild Awards 2024 ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Cinemaniac86. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Make-Up Artists & Hair Stylists Guild Awards 2024 ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Could label



I could or may say this topic will be "ditto." It would be inconvenient for you though, because if I keep posting on one thread for weeks, months, etc. that could be a slight hassle. I understand you're trying to follow the MOS, I guess everyone here does that. It's open for interpretation on some things, could even be a matter of taste. As for the articles I create, one of which is Jamal Roberts. Yes, bewilderingly, someone tried to delete it. There will be news to add to that page soon. Spectacular01 (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Multiple



We have been editing on some of the same pages. It's not necessary to revert my edits. Let's discuss them as we have been.Spectacular01 (talk) 01:28, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

:Well, tbh, you haven't answered on here though.Spectacular01 (talk) 01:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
:Sure, we can discuss them. @Spectacular01 The reason I concur with @Aspects is the consistency argument. Consistency meaning every entry has CITY, STATE. Your version removes the state from several cities which is unnecessary. Just because the Wikipedia entries don’t have the state in the article title doesn’t mean they need to be listed without the state. The reason the articles exist that way is due to them being major cities. However, on our list, it’s about a consistent flow. Every person should see the city and state as they scroll down, IMO. Consistency is tantamount to entries like this for aesthetic and encyclopedic purposes. So what’s your take? --Cinemaniac86<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Stalk ↗</sub> 04:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
::Not even a bit, it's geographical awareness. Hopefully we're helping people get smarter. I really dislike people saying, especially from Texas. I am from Houston, Texas. Well, where else would you be from? There are 24 places in the world named Houston, four of those are overseas. Same thing for Atlanta. No need to say Atlanta, Georgia. There are about 20 other Atlantas, but those are the ones that should say the state name along with the city. Also your opinions are usually right. Sometimes, yes, I know rarely they aren't, however. It's a lot of work to go around and fix everything but the least we can do is try to improve. Keep in mind Jamal Roberts didn't even have a page on here.Spectacular01 (talk) 08:07, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
:::We're probably not going to get most lists straightened out but Wikipedia may try to get to certain journalistic standards. It's kind of far away from there on many fronts.Spectacular01 (talk) 08:10, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
:::Wikipedia stopped making pages for finalists a while ago. They've only given the okay in the past to create pages for the winners after they've won. There are some finalists whom I know have done more than enough to warrant a page though, compared to some other 11th place losers from past seasons that still have a page just for appearing on the show but doing nothing else noteworthy. And quite frankly it irks me to see why a few randoms have gotten their pages deleted in the past, but nowadays all who are left have been defended to remain. (Which ultimately means those previously deleted could be recreated for consistency, and every finalist in essence. Though we don't quite have to go that far perhaps. Just the more notable ones. But I digress.)
:::No, I get what you are saying about the cities. Yes, it's implied. All of that is obvious. Nevertheless, I am going to open the topic for discussion on the article page for consensus. People on Wikipedia tend to be finicky about consistency, so I'm not sure you'll find much support, but perhaps you might! Let's see. --Cinemaniac86<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Stalk ↗</sub> 08:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
::::If I must I shall try to debate you on each edit. You're not listening. You are too wordy. You don't need 30 words to say something you can say in 17.Spectacular01 (talk) 07:39, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::What are you referring to? The Jelly Roll edit, you said the same words only in reverse order. --Cinemaniac86<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Stalk ↗</sub> 07:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::The first round of songs were chosen by [Jelly Roll (singer)|Jelly Roll]], based off of a list of each contestants' favorite songs (according to host <nowiki>Ryan Seacrest ↗</nowiki> during the telecast). The second round songs were selected by the contestants as dedications to their hometowns, shown after their hometown visits. After Nix had been eliminated in third place, the remaining two performed their intended winner's singles in the final round, Roberts was announced as the winner.
::::::Even that is incorrect. It's not grammatically correct to say Nix had been eliminated in third place. It must be 3rd not third and you can't be eliminated in third place. It should say received, etc. Yes, even this version is not right. Based off a list of each contestants' favorite songs probably could be condensed. You occasionally seem to phrase things incorrectly, which is why I originally reversed the order of the words.Spectacular01 (talk) 08:12, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Why must it be "3rd, not third"? That's incorrect. Don't know where these bizarre concepts of yours derive from, but that is not how we have done things on Wikipedia. When writing in prose, you write the full word, not the ordinal. The ordinals are permitted on the elimination chart or the song title tables.
:::::::And yes, she can and was eliminated from the competition, thereby placing third by default. So "After Nix was eliminated from the competition" would probably suffice, because third place is implied. Come to think of it, that is how I recall it being written in the past.
:::::::But I don't agree that I phrased the "favorite songs" incorrectly. If it's that important to you, by all means condense it though, haha. --Cinemaniac86<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Stalk ↗</sub> 09:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::::Second and third is right. It's when expressing time as in am and pm that you use ordinals not cardinal numbers.Spectacular01 (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::Atlas directions are helpful, useful, even necessary or imperative. This is something that could be hotly debated but it's kind of basic. People don't know these places, it's good to include direction points and no, wikilinking doesn't suffice.Spectacular01 (talk) 17:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::Parentheses are used in that fashion at times. It's not misuse.Spectacular01 (talk) 16:26, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Alice Feetham ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Alice Feetham ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. '''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''' <sup><i style="color:blue">TT me</i></sup> 09:42, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Colin Farrell Sidebar



I think a sidebar for a handful of links related to mentions of Colin Farrell is overkill. Don't you think? All the links, already appear in the article in the appropriate places. <span style="color: green;">Escape Orbit</span> <sup>(Talk) ↗</sup> 13:04, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

:@Escape Orbit It functions the same way a bottom navigation box does, only more aesthetically pleasing with an image. Always room for improvement. The other factor is the navigation ''between'' pages, by clicking on filmography then directly to awards then over to gallery, back to main, over to Penguin, etc., It's been approved for a number of other actors and been accepted on their pages. I thought Colin Farrell was a solid choice, my own fandom aside, because he had a lot of characters that had their own links (be they real people or fictional), which is why I chose him. --Cinemaniac86<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Stalk ↗</sub> 13:08, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
::I've started a discussion on Talk:Colin Farrell ↗. --<span style="color: green;">Escape Orbit</span> <sup>(Talk) ↗</sup> 15:05, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Categories



To follow up on your category edits at Susan Sarandon ↗ -- with the depth of the category tree, it would get a bit ridiculous if we listed every step down the category tree rather than just the most precise category. For example, the category "Actresses from Middlesex County, New Jersey" is a subcategory of "Actresses from New Jersey by county", which is a subcategory of both "Actresses from New Jersey" and "American actresses by county", and the first of those is a subcategory of "Actors from New Jersey", "American actresses by state", "Women in New Jersey", and the first of those is a subcategory of "American actors by state" and "Entertainers from New Jersey", and the first of those is a subcategory of "American actors", "American entertainers by state", and "Actors by first-level administrative country subdivision", and, well, I'll save my time but there's still a few layers to go. So by just putting her in the most precise category, the search tools will find her in all those other categories as well.

WP:DIFFUSE ↗ will give you more of an official explanation on how this works (and note the section below it, which indicates certain exceptions.) -- Nat Gertler (talk) 16:15, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks for that detailed summary! That's why I thanked your edit, obviously. It's nice to have some clarity when learning new things from edits and reversions, rather than just the usual "per WP:YADDABLAH" w/o any words of advice. Much appreciated. I had it in my head they were distinct standalone lists, but now that you mention it, that explains when I look at a category list, and those subcategories are up top with their own subcats beneath them and so forth. So the editor who is going around and specifying counties is really just being more precise than Wikipedia itself probably was before the categories were expanded. --Cinemaniac86<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Stalk ↗</sub> 16:24, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
::I'm glad you understand. The category system is a very old-tech approach, and I often believe that it probably has the most effort put in for the least effect of any major aspect of Wikipedia, but such is life. But yes, the person adding the county is adding a depth that was once not there... but is also not the depth we want. If you look at :Category:Actresses from Middlesex County, New Jersey ↗, you'll see it's a "container" category; we don't want it to include anything but subcategories, those being for actresses from individual towns in the county.
::There was a bit of a foofraw a few years back when someone was moving people's entries from "novelists" to its subcategory "women novelists". Folks not generally involved with Wikipedia categories saw this as erasing women novelists by putting then in their own ghetto and not within novelists. They were not right in most ways; the "Novelist" category isn't supposed to directly have anyone, regardless of gender. Everyone should be moved into subcategories. But the well-intentioned move was having a genuine problematic effect, and that was that people looking to clear out "Novelists" wouldn't see an entry and say "oh, she goes in the 'Mystery novelist' and 'Science fiction novelist'" subcategories. So that's how we ended up with non-diffused categories.
::Thank you for fixing Nicholson on your own! Be well, and have a fine bunch o' days. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 16:51, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Cinemaniac86. Thank you for your work on Alice Feetham ↗. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thanks for creating this page. Feetham is likely to be notable given multiple named roles in notable TV series (WP:NACTOR ↗). However, it would still be helpful to add more citations to definitively demonstrate this, such as sources that focus on Feetham as the primary topic.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Klbrain<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

Klbrain (talk) 11:50, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive



{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | September 2025 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1306969522 -->

Road Movie (1973 film) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Road Movie (1973 film) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:26, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

:Category:Portrayals of real-life people that won an actor an Academy Award ↗ has been nominated for deletion



<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Portrayals of real-life people that won an actor an Academy Award ↗ has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 10:18, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

@Cinemaniac86, was just thinking a little more about this, and the suggestion to replace this category with a list article also makes sense to me. As noted, the category doesn't make sense to me as these articles are largely or entirely about the "real-life people" and not their movie presentations. That said, and while it wouldn't be an article that I would necessarily be personally interested in, I can certainly imagine cinephiles finding that list article interesting. If created, I could imagine the list article usefully including all of 1) the person who won the award, 2) the role it was won for, and 3) the movie in question. (Actually, the year that the award was won might be helpful too.) A sortable table for the list would probably be nice. To be honest, as I'm typing and thinking more about this, this does sound like kind of a nifty article. Something similar might also be worthwhile for notable fictional characters that won Academy Awards, rather than that category. I'd probably limit both lists to people and fictional characters that are notable enough to have their own Wikipedia articles, if only to keep the lists from becoming so long as to be unwieldy. (I guess otherwise *every* acting Academy Award ever would fall into one of the two lists...) Cheers. CAVincent (talk) 04:54, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:Adding, List of actors that won as Academy Award portraying a real person ↗ (or some such name) could probably also be reasonably included in the "See also" sections of the actors' articles, giving some visibility for the list article to readers who are interested in such things. CAVincent (talk) 05:09, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
::Hey, thanks for your interest in brainstorming. I'm glad you think so too! I guess I had a good conccept, just executed with the wrong method. I like that it sparked some positive feedback, and even intrigue for you, haha. You're even getting into it—you could be my page proofreader or first reviewer? =) I too enjoy a good, solid list article—And the Oscars have quite a few too.
::That's what I was also picturing the table like, sortable. Omg of course the year! And film/actor/role/notes.
::And thought of calling it "List of actors that won Academy Awards for portraying non-fictional/biographical roles/characters". @CAVincent Tell me which combo of words you like best? --Cinemaniac86<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Stalk ↗</sub> 05:39, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Hollywood ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Criterion ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Hollywood ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mubi ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Great detective work on New Hollywood (be careful on the Letterboxd reviews next time) Espngeek (talk) 03:39, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
|}

:@Espngeek Thanks! We make a good team; happy to be of assistance, and appreciate you double-checking my discoveries. I guess a few of those Letterboxd reviews were too tenuous in mentioning "New Hollywood"—it's all about context?? I'll work on that. Hopefully, new reviews or different sources continue to arise that might substantiate any of the films removed.
:I have a question too. TV movies don't count, right? I know we have a couple of short films on the list, so I wanted to get your input on that. Because ''The Jericho Mile'' and ''That Certain Summer'' have each shown up before. So I'm curious whether or not these can or should be included. --Cinemaniac86<sup>Talk</sup><sub>Stalk ↗</sub> 08:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

American Idol wiki page



Ngl, I thought I had the top of the page set to “for the upcoming season” and not most recent. Thanks for fixing that lol, do you think I should put the link for season 24 back up? TypicallyRyan (talk) 01:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

WP:DAILYMAIL ↗


Hi, regarding your edit ↗ to :Angela Lansbury ↗, the Daily Mail is a deprecated source. If you see it added to an article, please remove it (and new text cited to it) rather than tag it as "better source needed". Thanks! <span style="color:#066293;">'''Schazjmd'''</span>&nbsp;<span style="color:#738276;">''(talk)''</span> 12:26, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for discussion of :Template:Kathy Bates sidebar ↗


30px|link= ↗:Template:Kathy Bates sidebar ↗ has been nominated for discussion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:55, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for discussion of :Template:Amy Adams sidebar ↗


30px|link= ↗:Template:Amy Adams sidebar ↗ has been nominated for discussion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

The Other Side of Hell ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to The Other Side of Hell ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability''' and '''those sources should be reliable ↗ and independent ↗ with significant coverage ↗ of the film'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade <small>(she/her)</small> (talk) 15:07, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1322758067 -->

New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive



{| style="border: 1px solid #eaecf0; background: #f0feff; color: #202122; padding: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em; border-radius: 6px; box-shadow: 0 1px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.08);"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 150%; font-weight: 600;" | January–February 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ <span style="font-size: 70%; color: #54595d;">| New pages patrol ↗</span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:90%; color:#54595d; padding-top:15px;"|You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here ↗.
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1329717684 -->

Dispute resolution notice


Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion


62px|left ↗
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard ↗ regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "John Gielgud ↗".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! {{clear}}<!--Template:DRN-notice-->
Spectritus (talk) 15:13, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Rose Tattoo (film) ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wild Is the Wind ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Other Side of Hell ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Cinemaniac86. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Other Side of Hell ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive



{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1350894664 -->

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026



<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per H:DL ↗, causes errors for screen readers -->
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

thumb|400px|New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026 ↗

'''Backlog update'''

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

'''2024 and 2025 NPP Awards'''

74px|left ↗{{no ping|JTtheOG}} was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
{{no ping|Hey man im josh}} and {{no ping|MPGuy2824}} won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

{{no ping|BoyTheKingCanDance}}, {{no ping|Rosiestep}}, {{no ping|SunDawn}}, and {{no ping|Vanderwaalforces}} were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame ↗ for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

'''January–February backlog drive'''

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

'''May backlog drive'''

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026 ↗.

'''PageTriage'''

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed ↗ to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket ↗ if you're interested in following along.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

{{refend}}
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Novem Linguae@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1353812553 -->

Disambiguation link notification for June 26



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of William Shakespeare screen adaptations ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amalgamation ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Marcello Mastroianni filmography ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Marcello Mastroianni filmography ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <span style="color:#FF4500">QEnigma</span> <span style="color:#0033FF">论</span> 09:27, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of actors nominated for Academy Awards for performances of the disabled ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pres. ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2026 (UTC)