User Talk: Melonite

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Provisional unblock

The Ban Appeal Subcommittee has considered your appeal and decided to provisionally suspend your ban for three months, subject to the following terms:

1. You edit from one account and one account only;
2. You abide strictly by sockpuppetry ↗ policy, especially the provisions of WP:SHARE ↗. The onus is on you to ensure that your editing and the editing of your colleagues does not overlap.
3. You accept that your account will be checkusered from time to time to verify compliance.
4. If the three months pass without incident, the unblock automatically becomes permanent.

As you have now accepted these terms by email, your account has been unblocked.

For the Arbitration Committee,  '''Roger Davies''' '''talk''' 10:17, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

:I've asked for clarification about this, and requested a topic ban, at the Arbcom noticeboard talk page, Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard ↗. MickMacNee (talk) 15:35, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

:: MickMacNee - Thank you for advising me. Melonite 16:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

EasyPizza

Hi there, I'm here to inform you that I've removed ↗ the speedy tag you placed in EasyPizza ↗ because the result of the discussion was ''not'' delete; in fact, it was withdrawn by the nominator. If you feel this article lacks notability, please submit it to WP:AfD ↗. Thank you. — '''''Σ'''''xplicit 21:42, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Pmn logo.jpg)

'''35px|left|⚠ ↗''' Thanks for uploading ''':File:Pmn logo.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use ↗. However, the image is currently orphaned ↗, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back ↗ if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions ↗" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 20:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

David Cameron ↗ / WP:3RR ↗

Hi Melonite

Apologies for not responding sooner.

David Cameron ↗ (and other articles, e.g. Gordon Brown ↗ have been highly active articles today, due to events in the UK. This was anticipated, and it was expected that a large amount of speculation ↗ and guessing ↗ would be added to these articles - as, in fact, was the case. Reverts made by myself and others were to address this. I believe this was preferable to seeking full-protection to these articles, or allowing the articles to descend into speculation and original research. Discussions did take place on the respective talk pages, however in situations like this - involving large numbers of inexperienced editors - expecting everyone to read the talk pages is unrealistic. The approach I took - and others took - was to revert and then post to the editors concerned explaining why they had been reverted.

I am fully aware of WP:3RR ↗ but believe in situations like this WP:IAR ↗ should apply, in order to accommodate WP:OR ↗ and WP:CRYSTAL ↗.

Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 00:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Missing Claudia Lawrence.jpg

64px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''':File:Missing Claudia Lawrence.jpg ↗'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria ↗, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page ↗, and edit it to include a non-free rationale ↗.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions ↗" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion ↗. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion ↗ and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page ↗. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:35, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open! ↗

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016 ↗: Voting now open!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Melonite. Voting in the '''2016 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on '''the voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Melonite. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Proposed deletion ↗ of :World Wide Check-In ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :World Wide Check-In ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the general notability guideline ↗.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c ↗) 23:24, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

:Sammi, Thanks for making me aware of this. I've made amendments and will add more information over the coming days. Thanks again. Melonite 15:33, 16 June 2026 (UTC)