W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Netherzone

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{wikibreak | message=The Netherzone is sometimes elsewhere, please be patient if you don't receive an answer immediately. | align=left |...}}
frameless|center ↗
{{talk header}}
Please leave a message by clicking here: thumb|left|Dial up modem noises, the original internet dial-up "handshake" with the central hub, through copper wires of course. ↗
<br><br><br>

{{skip to top and bottom}}

{{-}}

''The Signpost'': 21 April 2026



<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-04-21}} </div><!--Volume 22, Issue 6--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full ↗''' * Single-page ↗ * Unsubscribe ↗ * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:48, 21 April 2026 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (User:JPxG/SPS) --></div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1350010934 -->

Haegue Yang



Hi Netherzone,
Hope all is well with you.
I have bee looking at the artists included in the exhibition Making Their Mark: Works from the Shah Garg Collection ↗, currently at NWMA. I spent some time with the article Haegue Yang ↗. I lost steam after cleaning up the Collections ↗ section. I have read through the article several times and it seems to be overly detailed and showing the hands of multiple editors. I feel like it needs to be tagged as "not written in an encyclopedic tone" <code><nowiki>({{tone}}</nowiki></code>. Would you provide a second opinion please? I feel like I have lost perspective. Thanks. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

:@WomenArtistUpdates, I had a short look at it and saw there are issues with it. It may be an AI creation (based on formatting clues), some unsourced sections and claims, possible original research. I don't mean any disrespect to the artist who is distinguished, but the way it is written reminds me of an application for a tenure and promotion application in academia (or a job applicant), having sat on dozens of those committees in the past. This is something I've seen on WP several times in the past for artists who also happen to also be academics. Or perhaps because one of the past-editors was part of a WikiEd class? I'm traveling now but will l have a deeper look soon. Thanks for reaching out! Netherzone (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
:: Safe travels Netherzone! Thanks for taking a look. We can revisit at your convenience. WAU. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:51, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
::: I tagged it (as well as Shahar Tuchner). I am about to tackle some sort of source assessment for Tuchner. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Hi @WomenArtistUpdates, sorry that I completely forgot about this conversation and never followed up on it. I just had a quick look and the promo tool I have installed flagged these words: "Promotional words: dynamic, extensive, globally, inspired by, more than, numerous, ranked, spanning, transform", yikes! Thanks for the gentle nudge, I will read through it and do some work on it.
::::As to the Tuchner it really seems like a TNT situation even if notability checks out. I haven't checked all the sources, but those I did seemed connected or paid-placement, sponsored content/native advertising or user submitted. Lots of puffery.
::::If you find a moment, can you look at Larry Day ↗? He is absolutely notable, however I've had to do a lot of promotionally-toned clean up, and it needs more work. Too much excessive detail. The article was paid for by his wife/widow and submitted by a paid editor who was not following all guidelines correctly.
::::BTW, I had an excellent time traveling for 3 weeks, feel energized now that I'm back home. :-) Netherzone (talk) 23:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Oh my! Larry Day article is some dense stuff! Welcome home. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:48, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::A lot name dropping in the Day article, it is hard to know what to keep and what to trim. So much is sourced to an offline reference, ref # 2. Makes it hard to verify. Netherzone (talk) 03:13, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::@WomenArtistUpdates, thanks for doing the source analysis table for Tuchner; I know it takes a lot of work.
:::::Re: Yang, I've started to clean up the article for tone, verbosity and excessive detail. I've gotten as far as the beginning of the "Light and visibility" sub-section. Do you think it's necessary to have so many subsections and sub-sub sections? To my way of thinking, alot of this belongs in a book chapter on her work, or in an academic paper. I think most encyclopedia readers may lose interest in so much excessive detail. I think it can be pruned quite a bit without losing integrity as an encyclopedia article. BTW, she's a really interesting artist. Netherzone (talk) 17:18, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::: I agree with you that there is too much information. All three article we are looking at right now seem to be more of an "artist statement" than an encyclopedic article. Excessive quotes to do not add to our understanding of the notability of the artist. Excessive quotes in a BLP does not do the artist any favors. The problem I have is that I cannot figure out if that is a style preference on my part or, if indeed, these aren't encyclopedia articles. In an encyclopedia more space is given to more important subjects. That said, can we remove sourced material without violating Wikipedia guidelines? The articles that survive AFD because drive-bys think the article looks "OK" without parsing the quality of sources is disheartening. So, yes! Yang is very interesting, but in my opinion, the page should really be stubified down to brief bio and collections/exhibitions that establish her place in contemporary art. The article has academic assignment malarkey all over it (alas, another peeve of mine :) ) Any article with an exact birthdate raises a red flag for me. I am going to stick to the de-orphaning event over at WIR as I get perspective back, but would certainly like to know if that is how you see the issue too. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 21:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::100% in agreement with you. Articles should be written in summary style, not in a long hagiography spelling out every this-and-that someone has done. I have no problem further trimming to the Yang article or even stubification, and I can help you with that. To my mind, articles should focus on the most important key accomplishments of the person.
:::::::I do think that sourced content can be removed especially if it is sourced to a COI source, marginal source, primary source or personal website, or is simply trivial content. (As I've done in this removal of the "Other activities" section https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Haegue_Yang&diff=1357629415&oldid=1357617487 ↗.) That section seemed to me like what someone puts in their academic application for tenure and/or promotion, or in their academic annual report. Then there is the problem of student editors from undergrads to grads to PhD students "publishing" parts of their dissertation on WP.
:::::::BTW, a keep voter on the Tuchner article just got busted for socking. I also created a Source Analysis Table on Safari for all the sources used one time (all useless for establishing notability), but when I clicked on "generate" it disappeared! Darn! So something is still not right with my settings. A while ago when I was able to make one on Firefox.
:::::::Have a good evening, NZ Netherzone (talk) 23:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::I just moved a bunch of stuff to the talk page for now to help with clean up and trimming. Relevant content can be added back without all the excessive detail. Netherzone (talk) 20:43, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::: Hi Netherzone, The Haegue Yang article is so much better now. Thanks. I have been way from Wikipedia for a bit. I had to cut myself off until I got some projects completed. I am free to edit again :)
:::::::: I see the Tuchner article ↗ got deleted as it should have.
:::::::: I do think Larry Day should be reduced greatly in size. Do you think the editors understand why he article cannot stand as a full length "essay"? It is way too much information that is non-encyclopedic. The article relies heavily on "Body language: the art of Larry Day" and also contains too much quoted material. I don't think I have the patience delete from existing article, but I could work the other way 'round, if you think I should. Nice mid-century stuff! --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 23:21, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::: I too, have had the source table vanish as I was nearing the end :( Usually because I have way too many tabs open and when I sweep through to close tabs, I delete the actual page I am using to create the table. It really hurts. I just have to walk away for the task for a bit at that point.--WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 23:24, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::Hello, @WomenArtistUpdates, hope you had an enjoyable break. The Larry Day ↗ article is still on my "to do" list for clean up. I left the creator a COI message, (they were paid to write the article by Day's widow) per this convo on their talk: User talk:Morganrhobbs#Managing a conflict of interest. The convo is currently stalled, so I may do some trimming in the meantime.
::::::::::The past day, I've been focusing on Locative media art ↗, written in "essay" style. From discussions with the creator, it seems it is a class assignment. It's pretty good and well sourced for student work, but definitely needs some fine tuning. I have not yet checked the sources against the content. And I wonder if how much of it may (or may not) be redundant with Locative media ↗ and if the two should be merged. What do you think? See: User talk:Peripatech for more info on the discussion with the creator, who seems open to feedback.
::::::::::Have a nice evening, Netherzone (talk) 23:58, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red – May 2026



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements from other communities:'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|}
--Chocmilk03 (talk) 04:49, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Chocmilk03@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/M-P&oldid=1350120477 -->

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase



{{Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/MMS/Discussion phase}} -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Sohom Datta@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_elections/Newsletter_list&oldid=1352865969 -->

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase



<div style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF; padding: 0.5em 1em 0 1em;" role="article">
right|80px ↗
The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until {{Administrator elections status/data|May 2026|end}} at {{Administrator election time|end}} UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at '''Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase ↗'''.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote ↗ has a week to use the SecurePoll ↗ software to vote, which uses a secret ballot ↗. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements ↗ are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page ↗ (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page ↗. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall ↗ candidates must achieve 55.0% support ↗. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ↗ ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page ↗. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

<p role="contentinfo" aria-label="May 2026 administrator elections subscription"><span style="font-size: 85%;">You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list ↗.</span></p>
</div><!-- Message sent from Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/MMS/Voting phase ↗ -->

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Giraffer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_elections/Newsletter_list&oldid=1353246318 -->

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026



<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per H:DL ↗, causes errors for screen readers -->
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

thumb|400px|New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026 ↗

'''Backlog update'''

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

'''2024 and 2025 NPP Awards'''

74px|left ↗{{no ping|JTtheOG}} was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
{{no ping|Hey man im josh}} and {{no ping|MPGuy2824}} won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

{{no ping|BoyTheKingCanDance}}, {{no ping|Rosiestep}}, {{no ping|SunDawn}}, and {{no ping|Vanderwaalforces}} were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame ↗ for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

'''January–February backlog drive'''

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

'''May backlog drive'''

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026 ↗.

'''PageTriage'''

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed ↗ to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket ↗ if you're interested in following along.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

{{refend}}
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Novem Linguae@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1353812553 -->

{{-}}

May thanks


{{User QAIbox
| image = Park near Lutheran church, Sopot, pansies.jpg
| image_upright = 0.9
| bold = story · music · places
}}
Thank you for improving article quality in May! - Today: Felicity Lott ↗. If you have little time, just give me a click ;) - If you have more, see her story. If you have more, listen to her singing Friendly Vision ↗. If you have more, listen until she sings the word "peace" (Frieden), floating up high, serenely. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:39, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

''The Signpost'': 22 May 2026



<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-05-22}} </div><!--Volume 22, Issue 7--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full ↗''' * Single-page ↗ * Unsubscribe ↗ * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:17, 22 May 2026 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (User:JPxG/SPS) --></div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Bri@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1355221937 -->

Women in Red - June 2026



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''
{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|} --Rosiestep (talk) 22:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/M-P&oldid=1353777015 -->

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waldemar Tatarczuk ↗



This whole issue was left up in the air. Can you please add reliable sources to the article? Bearian (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hi Bearian, thanks for the heads up, this totally fell off my radar. Will add what I can find in the next week or so, I recently returned from overseas travel so I'm doing real life catch-up, but will get to it, promise. Netherzone (talk) 01:44, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
::Bingo! Added a few citations that demonstrate he meets NARTIST, there's a lot out there about him, will continue to improve. Thanks again. Netherzone (talk) 02:07, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 74



<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> <div style = "font-size: 1.5em; margin: 0 100px"> right|175px ↗</div> <div style = "line-height: 1.2"> <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">'''The Wikipedia Library''': ''Books & Bytes''</span><br /> Issue 74, March–April 2026 </div> <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em">
<big>'''Read the full newsletter ↗'''</big> </div> </div> <small>Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ↗ on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 10:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)</small>

(This message was sent to :User:Netherzone ↗ and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
<!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9 (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=30576650 -->

June music


{{User QAIbox
| image = White hydrangea, Idstein.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = story · music · places
}}
If you look at St. Martin, Idstein ↗, our church, you encounter three recent pics, on top of a concert that Franz Josef Hamm ↗ arranged for his 90th birthday (and invited everybody), a new one of our conductor giving us last uplift before the second concert of Forrest's Jubilate Deo ↗, and at the bottom us (three choirs, soloists and orchestra) taking standing ovations (with our conductor still at the keyboard at that time). The music is quite breathtaking, and the organist (my choral conductor for decades) said we were better than what he had heard on the internet. No youtube upcoming, though, for copyright reason, but I chose one for my story that day. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

:Thanks for sharing flowers and beauty, Gerda. I will check out the links for sure. Wow, so many tiny flowers in those hydrangea blooms. Exquisite. Netherzone (talk) 01:21, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
:: Thank you! - Yesterday was the former German Unity Day, installed when unity was just a dream. I had a story to match, and today, it's another one, with music by Bach ↗ and Mendelssohn ↗ to match, - a DYK hook 15 years ago, which seems like from a different world. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:05, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

''This Month in GLAM'': May 2026



{| style="width:100%;"
| valign="top" align="center" style="border:1px gray solid; padding:1em;" |
{| align="center"
|-
| style="text-align: center;" | 350px|center|link=outreach:GLAM/Newsletter ↗<br />
<hr />
<div style="font-size:12pt; font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center;"><span style="color:darkslategray;">This Month in GLAM – Volume XVI, Issue V, May 2026</span> ↗</div>
<hr /><br />

|- style="text-align: center;"
| <span style="font-size:12pt; font-family:Times New Roman;"> '''<u>Headlines</u>'''</span>
|- style="font-size:10pt; font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center;"
| <div style="text-align:left; column-count:2; column-width:28em; vertical-align:top;">


</div>
|-
| style="font-family:Times New Roman; text-align:center; font-size:85%;" | Read this edition in full ↗ &bull; Single-page ↗
|-
| valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding:0.5em; font-family:Times New Roman;text-align:center; font-size:85%;" |
To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom ↗. Past editions may be viewed here ↗.
|-
|}
|}
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">About ''This Month in GLAM'' ↗ · Subscribe/Unsubscribe ↗ · Global message delivery ↗ · Romaine ↗ 21:21, 12 June 2026 (UTC)</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Romaine@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/GLAM&oldid=30636889 -->

June 24: WikiWednesday NYC Salon, Pride Month Edition



{|style="border:1px solid #6881b9; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;"
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|June 24: WikiWednesday @ Prime Produce ↗
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" |
thumb|right|Prime Produce ↗ on W 54th St ↗

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC ↗ community for our '''WikiWednesday Salon ↗''' at Prime Produce ↗ in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan ↗, with an online-based participation option also available. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome!

This month's salon is a special Pride Month ↗ edition. Help us contribute to the Wiki Loves Pride ↗ global campaign and discuss how we can better represent LGBTQ+ issues on Wikimedia platforms.

All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct ↗ and Photography Policy ↗.

Meeting info:
|}
<small>(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list ↗.)</small>

--Wikimedia New York City Team ↗ via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Pharos@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite_list&oldid=1359192088 -->

''The Signpost'': 21 June 2026



<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-06-21}} </div><!--Volume 22, Issue 8--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full ↗''' * Single-page ↗ * Unsubscribe ↗ * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:18, 21 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (User:JPxG/SPS) --></div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Bri@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1360134346 -->

July 2026



<section begin="July" />
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377</small>
'''Events:'''

{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''
|frameless|100px|right ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}<section end="July" />

--MSGJ (talk 22:14, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:MSGJ@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/M-P&oldid=1361047283 -->

July 10: Free Culture Friday / Wiki Loves Fútbol Watch Party



{|style="border:1px solid #6881b9; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;"
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|July 10: Free Culture Friday @ Prime Produce ↗
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" |
thumb|right|Wiki Loves Fútbol, World Cup Watch Party! ↗

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC ↗ community for our '''Free Culture Friday / Wiki Loves Fútbol World Cup Watch Party ↗''' at Prime Produce ↗ in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan ↗. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome!

This special event will feature starting at 1:30 pm a Wikimedia Foundation ↗ meet-and-greet bringing together local staff and community, and then at 3 pm a Wiki Loves Fútbol ↗ watch party and edit-a-thon for the {{Q|137545497}}.

All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct ↗ and Photography Policy ↗.

Meeting info:
|}
<small>(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list ↗.)</small>

--Wikimedia New York City Team ↗ via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:58, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Pharos@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite_list&oldid=1361340580 -->

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment



48px|left|alt=|link= ↗Your feedback is requested &#32;at '''Talk:Jet Lag: The Game'''&#32; on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment ↗. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service ↗ subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name ↗.</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> SodiumBot (botop|talk ↗|contribs ↗) 21:30, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Quick question



Hello! While engaging a bit with RootOfAllLight, I read your last comment, and then read his Talk page, where, as you noted, saw that this editor has a long history of disruptive editing, and stern warnings. Given your deep edit experience, I was seeking to understand why these warnings never seem to lead to any real enforcement. Is there some red line yet not crossed? Just curious. Thanks. JerryGraf (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2026 (UTC)