W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: OverDriver05

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

OverDriver05, you are invited to the Teahouse!




{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- valign="top"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hi '''OverDriver05'''! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. <br />Be our guest at the Teahouse ↗! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|ChamithN}} (talk ↗).

<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;"><span class="ui-button-text">Visit the Teahouse ↗</span></div>

<div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there!

<small>Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the Teahouse hosts ↗</small>

<small>16:03, 20 October 2020 (UTC)</small></div>
</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation ↗<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation -->



Links to draft articles



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not introduce links ↗ in actual articles to draft ↗ articles, as you did to :List of unofficial Mario media ↗. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style ↗. {{#ifeq:{{lc:}}|yes|An edit has converted these links, into links to the not-currently-existing page (redlinks) where the draft will be placed if it is eventually accepted. Thus the links will automatically become valid links aimed at the correct target when and if the draft is accepted.|These links have been removed.}} Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-Draft-link --> - Arjayay (talk) 09:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: SMG4 ↗ (June 8)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by KylieTastic was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''when they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

KylieTastic (talk) 18:58, 8 June 2021 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: SMG4 ↗ (September 19)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
-->{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Sources not improved since last time - just more unsourced content added}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''when they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

KylieTastic (talk) 09:44, 19 September 2021 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Glitch Productions ↗ has a new comment


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;width: 100%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Glitch Productions ↗. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 12:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC) </div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Glitch Productions ↗ (October 31)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=
<!-- Template:Threeref -->
This draft has been reference-bombed ↗. The reviewer has not checked all of the references and should not be required and is not required to check all of the references. If the author wishes to have some of the references evaluated in review of this draft, please specify, in AFC comments, which of the references are key. Please specify not less than three ↗ nor more than five. This draft will not be reviewed further until the author identifies the key references.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''when they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Robert McClenon (talk) 12:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Murder Drones ↗ (November 4)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Dan arndt was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Fails WP:GNG ↗, needs to demonstrate significant coverage in <u>multiple</u> independent secondary sources. IMDb is not an acceptable source or reference.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''when they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Dan arndt (talk) 03:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Nomination of :Murder Drones ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':Murder Drones ↗''', to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder Drones ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

Nomination of :SMG4 ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':SMG4 ↗''', to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMG4 ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

Creating unsourced fancrust articles


30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced ↗ material to Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced4 --> <b>OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span> <sup>Talk</sup></b> 03:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Blocked 72 hours; the next block will be longer


<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-ucblock --> <b>OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span> <sup>Talk</sup></b> 04:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Glitch Productions ↗ (December 3)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Delta fiver was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Has not substantially edited or changed any information since the last decline.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''when they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 11:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Question



I know this is like a month late, but why did you delete half of the characters in the character section? It was pretty informative if people want to know about more minor/side characters. Also, I decided to put most of the SMG4's Gang section in order of debut because SMG4 and Mario are basically the only protagonists in the show. The rest of the gang are pretty much the other main characters. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by TheGamer2431 (talk • contribs ↗) 12:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

For the most part, most of the minor/side characters were just there to provide gags, but they don't provide anything else in terms of the bigger plot. Tell me this: ''when was the last time a minor character became important in an SMG4 story arc?''

As for the order of arrangement of SMG4's Gang, it was arranged based on their prominence in the series, particularly in story arcs. OverDriver05 (talk) 00:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :List of Symphogear characters ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :List of Symphogear characters ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Unnecessary and unsourced spinout of the main Symphogear ↗ article.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> '''<small style="font-size:80%;">silvia</small>''' '''<small style="font-size:65%;">(BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)</small>''' '''''<small style="font-size:75%;">(inquire within)</small>''''' 23:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

I can move the character article back to the main page, but the article that I have made yesterday will remain unchanged.

The reason for that extensive editing on the character article is due to the amount of new information from the franchise's official website, particularly using the "keywords" used in the franchise.

So yeah, I'll move it now! OverDriver05 (talk) 23:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Fate Rewinder ↗



Hello! I saw you created a new, pretty extensive article here. It looks like all your sources though are from the company publishing the game. You should get some reliable secondary sources ↗ to help establish the notability of the game. See something like Doom (1993 video game) ↗ or Genshin Impact ↗ for some potential reference points. <small style="color:#0080FF;background:#EAEAFF;border:2px solid;border-radius:4px;padding:0 4px">jellyfish</small>&nbsp;&#9993; 16:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

:Not a game. No clue how I got that idea. Sorry for the confusion, but the point about secondary sources still stands. <small style="color:#0080FF;background:#EAEAFF;border:2px solid;border-radius:4px;padding:0 4px">jellyfish</small>&nbsp;&#9993; 16:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
::No problem. Just doing my job. OverDriver05 (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamen Rider ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Man Army ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

:The reason I included "one-man army" in the article is mostly as a trope in regards to the Kamen Riders.
:In lore, it takes an entire ''Super Sentai ↗''/''Power Ranger ↗'' team to take down a single Kamen Rider, and do note that most Riders has access to multiple forms of varying destructive potential, some of which were comparable to that of a god. For reference, Kamen Rider Kuuga ↗ in his "Kuuga Ultimate" form is stated to be so strong that a single Rider Kick for him is enough to destroy entire civilizations, Kamen Rider Geats ↗ in his "Geats IX" form enabled him to rewrite the laws of the world around him to his whims, and Kamen Rider Decade ↗ is widely known as "The Destroyer of Worlds" due to his ability to assume the many powers and forms of both his 10 predecessors and his immediate successors (and possibly even his Showa predecessors as shown in the ''Super Hero Taisen ↗'' movies). OverDriver05 (talk) 09:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1322758895 -->

January 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Papa Zola The Movie ↗. Your edits appear to be disruptive ↗ and have been or will be reverted ↗.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> Media Mender <small>(chat, stalk ↗)</small> 02:23, 24 January 2026 (UTC)