User Talk: Pangalau
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{Talkheader}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=User talk:Pangalau/Archives/
|format=Y/m (F)
|age=1
|minarchthreads=3
|minkeepthreads=3
|archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{resolved|,{{Resolved|,{{done}},{{Done}}</nowiki>
|header={{Talk archive navigation}}
|headerlevel=2
|nogenerateindex=0
|maxkeepthreads=0
|maxkeepbytes=0
|maxarchsize=0
|numberstart=01
|archivebox=yes
|box-separator=yes
|search=yes
|index=yes
|box-advert=no
}}
Adelaide edit-a-thon 7, 10 July 2026
{{Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide/Invite}}
Hi Pangalau, sorry again about the short notice, but it would be great to have your participation in this session to assist with training new editors today. Registration details for in-person or Zoom session and more resources are on the event page ↗. Please let me know if you would be interested in attending a future event. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 06:58, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Bahudhara}} Good news! I will be joining via Zoom for the July 2026 Adelaide edit-a-thon. Do please email me the link. Pangalau (talk) 07:23, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
Proposed deletion ↗ of :Maria Grace Koh ↗
left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗
The article :Maria Grace Koh ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''this article does not hold much significance due to excessive low quality citations and biased writing'''</blockquote>
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Old Parliament House, Adelaide ↗ has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Old Parliament House, Adelaide ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />
The article has been assessed as '''B-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/B percentage}} of accepted submissions, excellent work! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme ↗ to find out how to improve the article.
'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</div>
'''Next steps'''
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article ↗. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories ↗.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article ↗ within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section ↗.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines ↗ once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse ↗, a question and answer hub for new editors.
ChrysGalley (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->
:@Pangalau - this is no big deal, but I changed, rather quickly, some wording due to risk of a "copyvio" (so View History/Copyvio) from one particular source. It was borderline, but the problem was that both your draft and that source inevitably used "Legislative Council", "Old Parliament Building", "New Parliament Building" over and again, which created a baseline, then there were a small number of phrases that were exactly the same in both texts, pushing it over 50%. I did about a dozen changes, so it's down to a perfectly OK 37.9%, but just to explain why some of your nice words are now not so nice. By all means smooth them out, but best not to revert it to the old words. Greetings from the other side. ChrysGalley (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
::Many thanks for letting me know about that and fixing it. Cheers to you for spotting the copyvio problem and letting me know why it happened. I will definitely leave your edits in and if I improve the wording I will not be reverting to the original one. Once again, thank you! Pangalau (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2026 (UTC)