User Talk: PindoramaBoyy

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!

Hi PindoramaBoyy! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button 2|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing!  --Kmhkmh (talk) 15:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Stop with the <s>garbage</s> non-consensus Olympic ring icons

The olympic rings icon is against wikipedia guidelines and not approved by tennis project. Please don't add them to player infoboxes. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Pare de estragar a seção de duplas mistas

Meu amigo, se você não entende de raciocínio lógico, pelo menos, pare de estragar a seção de duplas mistas dos jogadores de tênis de mesa. A seção é sobre OS MELHORES RESULTADOS DA PESSOA e não os melhores resultados por cada maldita dupla que eles fizeram, senão a seção tem potencial de ficar gigantesca, prolixa e cheia de dados completamente inúteis. Ficar botando 3, 4, 5 resultados por cada competição com cada pessoa que ele jogou é inútil textualmente, só serve pra confundir e não ajuda em absolutamente NADA. Pra colocar dados específicos de cada competição e resultado já tem a seção da CARREIRA: se tem alguma coisa faltando (eu imagino que isto JÁ ESTEJA TUDO LÁ), você vai e coloca NESTA SEÇÃO. Pode ter certeza que ninguém vai morrer se não tiver o resultado do Calderano com a Kumahara na segunda rodada de um torneio na seção dos melhores resultados, pare com essa insistência. 2804:F04:90EC:5300:C01:DF9C:FC8D:3AA ↗ (talk) 08:44, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Edit Warring

You and ~2025-31096-91 need to figure this out because I'm quite sure as soon as an administrator sees your warring over multiple articles, a "timeout" will be given to you both. Please stop now before that happens. Fyunck(click) (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

:@Fyunck(click) but he/she is clearly to blame - he/she is removing good editions by mine/other editors for no reason. It's honestly a shame WikiTennis Community let this happen. He/she once again deprecated Zheng Saisai ↗ WTA Tour results after I fixed them PindoramaBoyy (talk) 12:13, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
::@Fyunck(click)Also you can see that user never answer back my invitations to debate - he/she is clearly a troll deprecating female tennis players' profiles PindoramaBoyy (talk) 12:16, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
:::I'm not sure an administrator will care who is to blame, they will simply block you both. That's what I usually see happen. So I'm just letting you know as a curtesy. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}}  Fyunck(click) (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

November 2025

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for Edit warring ↗ and bad-faith / combative editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:09, 20 November 2025 (UTC)</div></div>

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moïse Kouamé ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monastir ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Henry Bernet ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}}  Mellamelina (talk) 15:45, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Olympic rings

Opa, tudo bem? I've been reverting edits with olympics rings like yours (or even your edits) since 2024 per WP:ICON ↗ and WP:III ↗ and yet you keep adding them every time. I'd like to remind you that they are not allowed and make no sense whatsoever, other than satisfying your desire to have a "better" looking infobox... instead it puts unnecessary stuff into it. I've seen someone also warned you here but he wasn't very polite back then... still, I've been adding these informations in edit summaries ever since. So I'll consider this as a single warning. If you keep doing it, I'll have to report you to admins. Please refrain from those updates and keep updating the articles properly. Thanks!n Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

:@Gsfelipe94 Se você se empenha "desde 2024" em remover o símbolo olímpico, por que até agora não fez nada nos perfil dos patinadores artísticos? Como se pode observar nos perfis do Ilia Malinin ↗ ou Alysa Liu ↗. Precisa se 'empenhar' mais, hein? PindoramaBoyy (talk) 01:15, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
::Ok, I'm going to reply in English to make it easier when people come here to watch your behavior. If you wanna act like that, I'm not wasting my time with any polite warnings in the future. Those articles have a different template that I'm not willing to go over every single one of them to correct because I have other things to do than to just edit this page. I do this as a hobby and because I like to help as many articles as possible to improve. If you remain stubborn as you appear to have been for a long time, I'm pretty sure it will come back to bite you. Fica esperto. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
:::@Gsfelipe94 Tantos problemas de vandalismo SÉRIOS nas páginas da Wikipedia mas muitos de vocês resolvem ser austeros com quem tem a melhor das intenções, chega a ser uma piada, mas enfim... pode ficar tranquilo, 'chefia' que eu não preciso disso, tenho muitas edições relevantes PindoramaBoyy (talk) 01:48, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
::::Wikipedia isn't about just reverting vandalism (which I try to revert every single time I see). It has rules and consensus. You can't come here and decide to do things your way just because you like, even though people come to you and explain the proper way to do it. You act like a brat that doesn't like what he hears. It's a shame because you co do better. Anyway, that's my only interaction with you other than a warning as you clearly are not someone available (and should I say worth of after this conversation) to talk. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
:::::Você não sabe o quanto eu já contribuí nessa comunidade em pouco tempo, então com a devida licença e tenha um bom dia PindoramaBoyy (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Victoria Luiza Barros ↗ for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Victoria Luiza Barros ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Luiza Barros ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:01, 9 July 2026 (UTC)