User Talk: Pmaccabe

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

If you have something to say to me, say it here.
Phil 05:02, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Style remarks

Thank you for creating the article cp index ↗ and related. Note that I moved it to this name from Cp Index ↗, as on Wikipedia the style calls for capitals to be used sparingly, only at the beginning of sentence and in proper names. I also did some minor formatting on that and cpk index ↗ and Process capability ↗. Looking at what I did (by checking the history of those articles) may give you a few more hints about style. :) Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:38, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Confirmation Hearings

Thank you for keeping a play by play. I couldn't do so. John wesley 00:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

SCOTUS law clerks

Very ambitious... I'm looking forward to seeing it completed. Be mindful of the need to disambiguate, btw; I noticed a link to "John Adams ↗." Postdlf 22:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
:Yes, a very interesting article. I'm more into the statistical type ↗ of article, but am looking forward to more articles of all types in this area. <span style="color:green;">'''NoSeptember'''</span> 21:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Adding an element in a table to the TOC

Hi, I'm responding to your question at the ''Wikipedia:New contributors' help page''.

Yes it is possible to add a table element to the TOC. Basically you just start the heading on a new line in the table (not after the usual "|"). I have set up some examples in my sandpit, feel free to play about there.

What I am confused about is using {{tl|SCOTUS clerk}} in the list ↗ rather than just putting in the data normally. Perhaps there is a reason I'm not aware of?--Commander Keane 08:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

:If you are comfortable with the template stick with it.--Commander Keane 12:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Spirangles

Hi - I see the work you've done to improve this article. As it stands right now, this is really still just a definition. As you may know, Wikipedia is not a dictionary ↗, so you may want to consider adding more to it in terms of encyclopedic content. i.e. - where are they used (optometry tests?) why are they important, who invented them, etc...  <span style="padding:2px;background: #cccccc; color: #0000cc; BORDER-RIGHT: #6699cc 3px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #6699cc 3px solid;"><span style="background: #cccccc; color: #0000cc;">  '''7'''  </span></span><sup> <span style="color: #006600;">talk </span>| <span style="color: #006600;">Δ </span> ↗|</sup>   03:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

WPBYU_invite

{{WPBYU_invite}}GreenwoodKL (talk) 07:55, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of :List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States ↗ for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States ↗''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
--Jax 0677 (talk) 04:05, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open! ↗

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi Pmaccabe, thanks for the review and comment on ''Muisca bitaeniata ↗''. It cost me a lot of work for such a short article as I searched the original old French source of 1844 and French is only my 5th or 6th language... but the result is there I think. :-) Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 23:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello I am Nirethur can you explain it to me properly on how I can improve my first article I wrote? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by Nirethur (talk • contribs ↗) 07:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)</span></small>

Pterygodermatites peromysci ↗

Hello Pmaccabe. This is user "Adron Ung" thanks for posting the taxonomy of my Pterygodermatites peromysci parasite. I was intending to do that, but I wasn't sure how to write it out. I would like to upload a few figures to the page, but I am not sure how to do that since this is my first article. It's somewhat difficult to compare knowledge of this parasite to others because the Center for Disease Control (CDC) has not posted anything about it. I saw the species description was vacant so I filled it up with some content. I hope to edit the heading, thought it's somewhat hard to describe the scientific community's knowledge of this parasitic nematode. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by Adron Ung (talk • contribs ↗) 03:29, 4 May 2016 (UTC)</span></small>

DataUSA feedback

I appreciate the heads up regarding this page. This is my first foray into page creation territory. In my ignorance I published this rather than developing the full page first-- something I've been gathering is probably the best practice. I'm creating this page for a friend's company I often collaborate with... the website went live this month and I've been interested in becoming more active in the wiki world so thought I'd create an entry. As of now I'm trying to delete/hide the page I created so I can finish putting it together. As far as I've gathered, I shouldn't be in 'promotional' territory as there is nothing for sale nor is there any revenue going to anyone for use of the site (it is a free, open-source development project) ''plus'' it is my plan to have this page be a child to a future page for the developers company (Datawheel, LLC). Let me know if I'm not on the right track. Definitely would welcome any advice or feedback. Thanks!Mattrdini (talk) 20:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: :Www.themchub.com ↗

Hello Pmaccabe, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of :Www.themchub.com ↗, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Not unambiguously promotional.''' You may wish to review the WP:CSD{{!}}Criteria for Speedy Deletion ↗ before tagging further pages. Thank you. - Mr ↗X ↗ 20:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Corisco International Airport

Thank you. Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments ...

Thanks for the comments on the Henry Campbell ↗ article ... yes, he was notable...probably one of a handful of men who designed the early American steam locomotives (Reference the 4-4-0 article and patent litigation ... Herman Haupt resigned form West point to study under the man. He was also part of the early Pennsylvania railroad effort to cross the Alleghenies ... I will continue to work on the article ...
:Risk Engineer (talk) 15:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
:: No problem, that is why I wanted to comment, I don't see any reason to think that it wouldn't be true, but there is no verifiability to any of the sources, which for Wikipedia is a problem. The best thing would be to find some coverage or articles about those more notable contributions. This reference<ref name="White">White, John H., Jr. (1968). ''A history of the American locomotive; its development: 1830-1880''. New York: Dover Publications, pp. 46-. {{ISBN|0-486-23818-0}}</ref> from the 4-4-0 ↗ article might be wise to include on his article, you could even add an additional reference to this which seems to be an online copy of it. http://himedo.net/TheHopkinThomasProject/TimeLine/IndustrialRevAmerica/SteamEngines/JohnWhite.htm. It has some additional details in there like a supposed patent date of Feb 5, 1836. I'd say referencing the patent itself if you can find it along with this information would pretty clearly establish reliable sources. Phil (talk) 16:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello,
Gold is Real Money was put up for informational purposes. It is also a work in progress - not a "finished work" and should not be a "speedy deletion". I thank you for looking into new pages, but bear in mind that not everything put up is just "promotional" - goldbug1933 <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by Goldbug1933 (talk • contribs ↗) 04:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)</span></small> 
{{reflist-talk}}

User group: New Page Reviewer

right|80px ↗
Hello {{safesubst:<includeonly/>BASEPAGENAME}}.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "<code>{{int:Group-patroller}}</code>" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled ↗, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed ↗.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you '''must''' read the new tutorial at New Pages Review ↗, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria ↗. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at '''page reviewer talk''' ↗. {{pb}}

Be nice to new users ↗ - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.

You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.

Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.

Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

{{pb}}The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!right|120px ↗500px|thumb|right|The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days. ↗

'''Backlog update''':

The new page backlog is currently at <big>3819 ↗</big> unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.

We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

'''New Year Backlog Drive results''':

We made ''massive'' progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

'''General project update''':

ACTRIAL ↗ will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.

Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects ↗ for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD ↗.

<hr/>
<small>If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. ↗ 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)</small>
</div>

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! {{Notabilityguide}}

'''ACTRIAL''':

ACTRIAL ↗'s six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed ↗ users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed ↗ again, and the backlog has since increased already by '''~30%'''. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

'''Paid editing'''

Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator <u>if appropriate</u>, and submit the issue to WP:COIN ↗ if necessary.

'''Subject-specific notability guidelines'''

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE ↗ nominating an article for deletion.

Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies ↗. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline? ↗

'''Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled'''

While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled ↗' user right HERE ↗.

'''News'''

The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper ''The Signpost'' ↗ has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including '''''ACTRIAL wrap-up''''' ↗ that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. ''The Signpost'' is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the ''The Signpost's'' editorial team for the next issue.

<hr/>
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, go here. ↗ </small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC) </div>

AfD for Ulisses Soares

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulisses Soares ↗--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 21:16, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! {{Notabilityguide}}

'''ACTRIAL''':

WP:ACREQ ↗ has been implemented. The flow at the feed ↗ has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

'''Deletion tags'''

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

'''Backlog drive''':

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR ↗ for more details. '''NOTE''': It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

'''Editathons'''

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

'''Paid editing - new policy'''

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator <u>if appropriate</u>, and submit the issue to WP:COIN ↗ if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

'''Subject-specific notability guidelines'''

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE ↗ nominating an article for deletion.

Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies ↗.

'''Not English'''

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE ↗. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

'''News'''

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.

The next issue of ''The Signpost'' ↗ has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

<hr/>
<small>Go here ↗ to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. </small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)</div>

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently '''2900''' unreviewed articles, and '''4000''' unreviewed redirects.

<big>'''Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!'''</big>

As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.

Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: 30px|Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar ↗. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 30px|100 review coin ↗, 30px|250 review coin ↗, 30px|500 review coin ↗, 30px|1000 review certificate ↗.

Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we <u>focus on quality reviewing</u>.

<hr/>
<small>Go here ↗ to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — '''''<small>Insertcleverphrasehere <sup>(or here)</sup></small>''''' 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)</small>
</div>

WP:INTDABLINK ↗

When adding a disambiguation parameter to a hatnote, as you did here ↗, please remember to include the "(disambiguation)" term in the part of the parameter before the divider, per WP:INTDABLINK ↗, so that this does not create an error for disambiguators to repair. Cheers! <span style="background:gold">'''''bd2412'''''</span> '''T''' 14:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Tammie Jo Shults

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 6 July 2018 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Tammie Jo Shults ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''Tammie Jo Shults ↗''' ''(pictured)'', captain of '''Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 ↗''', was one of the first female tactical fighter pilots in the US Navy?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tammie Jo Shults ↗. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(here's how, [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-06-26&end=2018-07-16&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Tammie_Jo_Shults Tammie Jo Shults])</small>, and it may be added to the statistics page ↗ if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} — Maile (talk) 00:01, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of :StartEngine ↗ for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':StartEngine ↗''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StartEngine ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ''' DGG''' ( talk ) 05:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miller-Boyett Productions ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Production ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Miller-Boyett_Productions check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Miller-Boyett_Productions?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''New Page Patrol ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|

On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of :Shelflife Records ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Shelflife Records ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelflife Records ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.</div> Boleyn (talk) 08:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Sat Jan 27: Utah Wikipedia Day!

{{Meetup/Utah/WikipediaDay2024/Invite}} Pharos (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Guillaume Verdon ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Guillaume Verdon ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources''', '''it needs more sources to establish notability''' and '''it is promotional and reads like an advertisement'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span><sup>Talk</sup></span>''' 20:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
::I suggest you don't copy this to mainspace until its completly rewritten to fix the myriad problems on the artile. If you copy it out of Draft without fixing it, I will take you an WP:ANI ↗. The thing is a mess. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span><sup>Talk</sup></span>''' 20:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗ to :Draft:Guillaume Verdon ↗ have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising ↗ and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox ↗" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources ↗, and from a neutral perspective ↗. Take a look at the welcome page ↗ to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.{{PAGENAME}} ↗ '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span><sup>Talk</sup></span>''' 20:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

COI Noticeboard

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard ↗ regarding a possible conflict of interest ↗ incident with which you may be involved.  Thank you. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span><sup>Talk</sup></span>''' 20:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Guillaume Verdon ↗ (February 8)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=This is an example of a classic Wikipedia feature. While Effective_accelerationism ↗ might be notable (it has a page), that does not mean that the originator is. There has to be significant coverage of him, and what he has done as against just being outed by Forbes. Note that none of the rest of his career would satisfy any of the notability criteria.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guillaume Verdon ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Guillaume_Verdon '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, on the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ldm1954&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Guillaume_Verdon '''reviewer's talk page''']</span> or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

Ldm1954 (talk) 04:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)</div>

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Pmaccabe'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 04:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">

{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
thumb|400px|New Page Review queue January to March 2024 ↗

'''Backlog update:''' The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to {{no ping|Schminnte}}, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion ↗.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

'''2023 Awards'''
74px|left ↗
{{no ping|Onel5969}} won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. {{no ping|Hey man im josh}} led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page ↗ and the Hall of Fame ↗. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

'''WMF work on PageTriage:''' The WMF Moderator Tools team ↗ and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October ↗, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November ↗. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed ↗, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October ↗. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

'''Recruitment:''' A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

'''Reviewing tip:''' Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser ↗ tool.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord ↗.

Consider adding the project discussion page ↗ to your watchlist.

To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here ↗.

{{refend}}
</div>
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''New Page Patrol ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|80px ↗
|-
|

On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on North Anna Nuclear Generating Station ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :North Anna Nuclear Generating Station ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL ↗ and missing title ↗ error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_Anna_Nuclear_Generating_Station&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1233900154%7CNorth%20Anna%20Nuclear%20Generating%20Station%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Pmaccabe&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:North Anna Nuclear Generating Station}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1233900154 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on North Anna Nuclear Generating Station ↗

A bare URL ↗ and missing title ↗ error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_Anna_Nuclear_Generating_Station&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1233900154%7CNorth%20Anna%20Nuclear%20Generating%20Station%5D%5D Ask for help])

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; color: #000; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''New pages patrol ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">September 2024 Backlog Drive ↗</span>
|rowspan=3|right|80px ↗
|-
|

On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Concern regarding Draft:Guillaume Verdon ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Pmaccabe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guillaume Verdon ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | January 2025 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.

Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.

Streak awards ↗ will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles ↗ previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2025 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Sean Parnell (Pennsylvania politician) ↗ has a new comment

<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sean Parnell (Pennsylvania politician) ↗. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 06:11, 27 June 2025 (UTC) </div>

:I might agree that as a political candidate alone he'd not be notable, I didn't name the Draft page but seems to me he easily clears WP:GNG with what is there already by coverage for multiple things in numerous independent sources. Long before he was a candidate for office he was a notable author as a combat veteran military officer writing about his experience in Afghanistan & now he is a Federal appointee, in a role that seems to be considered notable as you look at others whose comes primarily from that position such as George_E._Little ↗ or Jonathan Rath Hoffman ↗. Maybe the disambiguation part of the page title should be renamed, I'm not sure what would be best instead to avoid confusion with Sean Parnell ↗, but I think the subject is clearly a notable BLP. Phil (talk) 07:19, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | September 2025 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 1px solid #eaecf0; background: #f0feff; color: #202122; padding: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em; border-radius: 6px; box-shadow: 0 1px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.08);"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 150%; font-weight: 600;" | January–February 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ <span style="font-size: 70%; color: #54595d;">| New pages patrol ↗</span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.

The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026.

The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive.

Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants.

Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points.

Streak awards ↗ will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds.

Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles ↗ previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Interested in participating? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:90%; color:#54595d; padding-top:15px;"|You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here ↗.
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">

Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

thumb|400px|New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026 ↗

'''Backlog update'''

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

'''2024 and 2025 NPP Awards'''

74px|left ↗{{no ping|JTtheOG}} was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
{{no ping|Hey man im josh}} and {{no ping|MPGuy2824}} won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

{{no ping|BoyTheKingCanDance}}, {{no ping|Rosiestep}}, {{no ping|SunDawn}}, and {{no ping|Vanderwaalforces}} were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame ↗ for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

'''January–February backlog drive'''

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

'''May backlog drive'''

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026 ↗.

'''PageTriage'''

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed ↗ to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket ↗ if you're interested in following along.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord ↗.

Consider adding the project discussion page ↗ to your watchlist.

To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here ↗.

{{refend}}
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)