User Talk: QuicoleJR

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{notice|This user is aware of '''every''' contentious topic ↗, and should not be given any contentious topic alerts.}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:QuicoleJR/Archive|format= %%i|age=720|maxarchsize=120000|minthreadsleft=5|header={{archive}}|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Users/template
|class=C
|importance=Low}}

ITN recognition for Ralph Haben ↗

{{ivmbox
|1=On 15 June 2026, '''''In the news ↗''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''Ralph Haben ↗''''', which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page ↗. '''Schwede66''' 19:35, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
|2={{Ambox globe current red}}
|imagesize=50px
}}

A beer for you!

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 70px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Glad to read your stress levels are lower! Cheers! GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 22:54, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
|}

:Thanks, Geog! I haven't seen you in a while. How have things been going on your end? In solidarity ↗, QuicoleJR (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
::Been a bit busy with work and dealing with my own life stresses, so less active on Wikipedia this year. Trying to focus on mainspace a bit more where possible, as the main reorganization I was working on in vital articles didn't pass, and I'm really not sure where to go from there. Hope you are able to enjoy the summer and get time to relax away from work or school. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 21:26, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
:::I hope things get better for you in your personal life. I've also been a lot less active at Vital Articles recently simply because I've been spending my editing time on other things (mainspace and ITN). By the way, have you heard about the recent petition ↗ about the WMF's alleged union busting? Over 1000 editors have signed it, so it might be something you'd like to check out. Anyway, like I said, I hope your life stresses calm down. See you around! :) In solidarity ↗, QuicoleJR (talk) 22:38, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Andy Lewis (slackliner) ↗

{{ivmbox
|1=On 21 June 2026, '''''In the news ↗''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''Andy Lewis (slackliner) ↗''''', which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page ↗. PFHLai (talk) 04:35, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
|2={{Ambox globe current red}}
|imagesize=50px
}}

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, while peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|MCE89}} with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Bgsu98}} with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Reconrabbit}} with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit ↗ and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|A.Cython}} with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews

{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Generalissima}} with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)