W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Quoting Querying Questioner

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!


Hello, Quoting Querying Questioner, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Mwwv and I've volunteered to be your '''Wikipedia mentor'''. I'm here for you whenever you need help with Wikipedia. It's great to have you on board to help create this online encyclopedia ↗.
thumb|upright=1|alt=Some chocolate chip cookies stacked on a plate.|Have a plate of cookies! ↗
See your homepage for a brief tutorial ↗. Here are a few links you might find helpful:
{{div col |colwidth=24}}
{{div col end}}

Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage ↗, or the Task Center ↗.

'''Help is available:''' as your Mentor, you can always find me listed in the <span class=plainlinks>"Get editing help ↗" module</span> bottom right on your homepage; there are also additional help links there. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or try the Wikipedia:Teahouse ↗ to get help designed especially for new users from a team of experienced volunteers. So go ahead and ask questions — we’re here to help!

Once again, welcome to Wikipedia!<!-- Template:Welcome mentee --> <span style="color:#f80;font-family:'Cascadia Code',monospace">'''mwwv'''</span> <span style="color:#f80"><sup>converse</sup></span> ↗∫<span style="color:#f80"><sub>edits</sub></span> ↗ 16:01, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

:Hello Mwwv, thank you for the welcome. I received a message from a bot saying I made an error in a reference. I can see the problem, but I'm not sure what I did wrong. Could you help me figure it out? Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 06:32, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
::Do you still need help? - Otherwise ↗ (Talk?) 07:52, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
:::Mwwv answered on their talk page but thank you for following up. Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 07:54, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
::::Of course, anytime! - Otherwise ↗ (Talk?) 07:54, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Otia Imperialia ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Otia Imperialia ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Quoting_Querying_Questioner&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Otia Imperialia}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1332157590 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:28, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Grant (folklore) ↗ has a new comment


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Grant (folklore) ↗. Thanks! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 22:32, 21 January 2026 (UTC) </div>

:I have added the page numbers for Young. I don't have access to Binns right now, but I will add his page numbers when I can get it again. Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 21:30, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
::Added Binns. Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 07:27, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited De vita et moribus philosophorum ↗, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Philemon ↗ and Seneca ↗ were added. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Portunes ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Portunes ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Portunes help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hoary (talk) 06:51, 5 February 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

:. . . but I know nothing about demons, sprites, fairies, etc; and so it's particularly likely that my categorizing of the page is mistaken. Don't hesitate to correct it. -- Hoary (talk) 08:52, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
::I've modified the categories . . . but I know nothing about categories and so it's particularly likely that my categorising of the page is also mistaken. Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 06:44, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Grant (folklore) ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Grant (folklore) ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Grant_(folklore) help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

Thanks again, and happy editing!
TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 05:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Excellent work on British mythology articles! TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
|}

:Thanks for the barnstar! Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 06:39, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Expugnatio Hibernica ↗ has a new comment


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Expugnatio Hibernica ↗. Thanks! ScalarFactor (talk) 22:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC) </div>

:Is there a way to cite different page numbers without duplicating the reference? Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 01:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
::There are a few different approaches, but the {{t|sfn}} or {{t|rp}} templates are good ways to specify page numbers when citing multi-page sources. To pick a few examples from the articles that I've written, Ada Cambridge ↗ uses sfn referencing and The Real Matilda ↗ uses rp referencing (see those little numbers next to each citation?). Just let me know if you have any questions about how to use them.
::Specifying page numbers isn't required though, so I'll go ahead and accept your draft as soon as an administrator has cleared out the existing redirect to allow for the move :) MCE89 (talk) 06:45, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Thank you, I'll try them out and let you know if I have any questions about how to use them. Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Expugnatio Hibernica ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Expugnatio Hibernica ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''B-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/B percentage}} of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.&#32;You may also consider nominating a fact from the article ↗ within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section ↗.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Expugnatio_Hibernica help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

Thanks again, and happy editing!
MCE89 (talk) 11:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Disambiguation link notification for March 22



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited De principis instructione ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seneca ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Gerald of Wales, 1146-1223 ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Gerald of Wales, 1146-1223 ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
<span style="color:#000;font-family:Comic Sans MS;border-radius:30px;background-color:#8ACE00;padding:4px 7px 5px 7px">nil</span><sup> <span style="color:#000">nz</span></sup> 05:10, 5 April 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: De mundi creatione ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''De mundi creatione ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ScalarFactor (talk) 02:56, 9 May 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

:Sorry I missed your question about references last time! (In the future, I'd recommend using {{tl|re}} or an <code>@</code> in the reply tool when replying to a message like these. AfC reviewers tend to leave a ''lot'' of these lying around.)
:For citing more academic sources, a lot of people like to use the {{tl|sfn}}/{{tl|sfnp}} templates. Admittedly I haven't been in a position where I've actually had to use them myself, but I've seen this guide to <code>sfnp</code> passed around previously and I had made a mental note to refer back to it: User:SMcCandlish/How to use the sfnp family of templates.
:Feel free to ask if you have any other questions. ScalarFactor (talk) 03:10, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
::@ScalarFactor Thanks, I will use @ in future.
::I have been using <nowiki>{{rp}}</nowiki>, but I will read that page and try <nowiki>{{sfnp}}</nowiki>. I also had a question about article assessment. I recently did some work on De instructione principis, but I am not sure how the good article process works. Do you think it might be close to that level, or is there something I should do first? Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 07:14, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
:::It looks pretty good to me, but I'm by no means a subject-matter expert. Part of the Good Article process is a review where changes can be made, so it doesn't need to be perfect as-of the nom, just no major issues that cause it to be "a long way away from" meeting any of the Good Article criteria. Peer review ↗ is also an option, but I've heard mixed things about that process compared to just doing a nomination and listening to reviewer feedback. Potentially worth noting that there's going to be a backlog drive ↗ scheduled for nominations by newer participants in June, so if you nominate it now you're likely to get a reviewer sooner rather than later.
:::You can also request copy-editing from the GOCE people ↗, if you'd just like somebody to double-check your writing and potentially help with formatting issues after expansion - you can mention it's for a GA and your first GA. (I've definitely made some awful typos that I've become blind to myself when writing articles.) ScalarFactor (talk) 15:44, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
::::@ScalarFactor Thank you, I have nominated it. Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 21:51, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::Good luck with the nom! One other thing that might be relevant is the source spotcheck - the reviewer should be asking for a random sample of a few of your sources to double check source-text integrity, copyright violations, etc. There's nothing wrong with offline sources/books of course, as they're generally more likely to be reliable anyways - but if the book isn't available online you may need to be able to take some picture(s) of the pages that back up the relevant citations. WP editors have access to a large amount of sources through WP:TWL ↗, but if you were borrowing any of the sources from a university library or something you may want/need to make sure you can still access them. ScalarFactor (talk) 18:08, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::Thank you. I still have access to the sources I used and can provide images of the relevant pages for review purposes, where copyright and access conditions allow.
::::::I was not familiar with TWL. It sounds like it could help with some of the access problems I have had. Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 01:13, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Instruction for a Ruler ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Instruction for a Ruler ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''B-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/B percentage}} of accepted submissions, excellent work! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
MCE89 (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2026 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:TechnoSquirrel69@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/June_2026/Mass_message_list&oldid=1356124266 -->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Speculum Duorum ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Speculum Duorum ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''B-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/B percentage}} of accepted submissions, excellent work! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
MCE89 (talk) 08:32, 21 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Geoffrey de Henlaw ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Geoffrey de Henlaw ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''B-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/B percentage}} of accepted submissions, excellent work! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ChrysGalley (talk) 09:38, 27 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Roger of Norwich ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Roger of Norwich ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time ↗. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
<span style="color: blue">Lynch</span><span style="color:#FFD700">44</span> 11:14, 28 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Llanthony Secunda Priory



Why did you move this page without discussion and without a reliable source for your changes? it appears as '''Llanthony''' priory in all the reliable sources I can find, including Historic England, English Heritage, various articles on the BBC website and the writings of Hugh Conway-Jones, who has published various histories of Gloucester and the docks. Also in formal documents published by Gloucester City Council. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 12:09, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

:@Murgatroyd49 On p. xi of ''The History of Llanthony Priory'' Robert Bartlett writes "the house in Gloucestershire is termed Llanthony 'of', 'outside', or 'by' Gloucester in the Middle Ages, and modern writers often call it Lanthony Secunda, usually with a single 'L'" Quoting Querying Questioner (talk) 08:31, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::Not a good reason to change the title of the article when most relaible sources use the correct spelling. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Geoffrey de Henlaw


25px ↗ Hello! Your submission of Geoffrey de Henlaw ↗ at the Did You Know nominations page ↗ has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''your nomination's entry ↗''' and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> <span style="font-family:Aharoni"><span style="color:#002E63">M</span><span style="color:#2E5894">h</span><span style="color:#318CE7">hossein</span></span> <sup><span style="color:#056608">'''talk'''</span></sup> 21:50, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: History of Llanthony Priory ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''History of Llanthony Priory ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''B-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/B percentage}} of accepted submissions, excellent work! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ChrysGalley (talk) 10:16, 4 July 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: William Cromp ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''William Cromp ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Stub-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time ↗. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
<span style="color: blue">Lynch</span><span style="color:#FFD700">44</span> 12:37, 7 July 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: John de Welyngton ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''John de Welyngton ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
<span style="color: blue">Lynch</span><span style="color:#FFD700">44</span> 12:44, 7 July 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: John Yatton ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''John Yatton ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
<span style="color: blue">Lynch</span><span style="color:#FFD700">44</span> 14:46, 7 July 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your thread has been archived



{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hello '''Quoting Querying Questioner'''! The thread you created at the Teahouse ↗, {{tq|Multiple offices in the infobox}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Multiple offices in the infobox ↗}}.

<small>
See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 8 July 2026 (UTC)</small>

<div><small></small></div>
</div>
|}
<!-- KiranBOTmsgID:1362477969 --><!-- User:KiranBOT/Teahouse_archival_notification -->