User Talk: Rapidfirreee

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

2026 Thinwana Kandu cave diving incident

In the article 2026 Thinwana Kandu cave diving incident ↗ which was mostly written by you, there is a significant lack of citations for most of the article, and it appears to contain very strong conclusions and interpretations for the cause of the accident, which anticipate results of the official investigation. Please help to add more citations. Wikipedia is often consulted by the public and journalists soon after incidents and it is important that articles do not contain original research, low quality sourcing, etc. ~2026-30314-36 ↗ (talk) 13:13, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :2026 Thinwana Kandu cave diving incident ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :2026 Thinwana Kandu cave diving incident ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Thinwana Kandu cave diving incident ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.</div> <span style="font-family: ui-serif">'''Choucas''' 🐦‍⬛</span> 14:04, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you either removed an Articles for deletion notice ↗ from an article, :2026 Thinwana Kandu cave diving incident ↗, or removed another person's comment(s) in an Articles for deletion debate ↗. Removing AfD templates or editing others' comments might make it difficult to create consensus ↗. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment ↗ on the AfD discussion instead. Thank you. <span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span><sup><span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span></sup> 14:29, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not remove Articles for deletion ↗ notices from articles or edit other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with :2026 Thinwana Kandu cave diving incident ↗. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the AfD discussion page. Thank you. <span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span><sup><span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span></sup> 15:37, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not remove maintenance templates ↗ from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to :2026 Thinwana Kandu cave diving incident ↗, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary ↗. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted ↗. Thank you. <span style="font-family: ui-serif">'''Choucas''' 🐦‍⬛</span> 16:22, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

:Now the multi-error template needs to be removed because the references have been added and corrected. Rapidfirreee (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Apparent misuse of Draft space

Can you please explain why you copied the text of 2026 Thinwana Kandu cave diving incident ↗ to Draft:2026 Thinwana Kandu cave diving incident ↗ earlier today? This appears to have almost immediately followed the article's nomination for an AFD discussion, which gives the impression that the intent here is to game the system ↗ and avoid accountability to Wikipedia's guidelines and community consensus. <sub>signed, </sub>'''''Rosguill''''' <sup>''talk''</sup> 16:32, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

:Simply to improve it, according to the indications received from the multiple template error alerts. I tried to improve it in the public interest. At least we know that an accident occurred, the victims, and the location. The investigators will then release the official results of their investigation. Rapidfirreee (talk) 16:38, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
::You're dodging the question. Why did you start a new page in Draftspace, when the existing article is still live and being considered for deletion? <sub>signed, </sub>'''''Rosguill''''' <sup>''talk''</sup> 16:42, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Simply to improve it, the error templates are annoying to read, and after all the time I've put into it, I correct it, reread it, and try to perfect it to make it readable and usable, first for myself and then for everyone. I can print it without annoying error banners. Rapidfirreee (talk) 17:09, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
::::I did not use the draft before to ensure information was available to Wikipedia and the wider community. Rapidfirreee (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
::::Please be mindful of WP:NOTHOST ↗—the purpose of draft space is as a prep ground for future articles. It is not a general purpose webhost or a way for you to maintain ownership ↗ of the article. <sub>signed, </sub>'''''Rosguill''''' <sup>''talk''</sup> 17:21, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::Separately, I'd recommend reading through Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions ↗, as it will help you make more effective arguments at the actual AFD discussion. <sub>signed, </sub>'''''Rosguill''''' <sup>''talk''</sup> 17:29, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::It's simply a way to reflect on events. A legitimate use to improve the article. The article is for Wikipedia; I only recorded a fact, an event, a tragedy. Rapidfirreee (talk) 17:31, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Ferrari tifosi ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Ferrari tifosi ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''This appears to be ''mostly'' just a history of the entire Ferrari brand, and the article appears to be 100% AI-generated.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time. Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 01:44, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Drafts

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Rapidfirreee, I'm Bearcat. Please note that pages in draft space, such as Draft:2026 Italy–US diplomatic crisis ↗ are '''not''' allowed to be categorized alongside finished articles in mainspace, per WP:DRAFTNOCAT ↗. The page ''must'' stay ''out'' of any categories so long as it is outside mainspace, and this is ''not'' an optional rule that you're free to disregard or ignore.

You can provisionally list categories in your draft without affecting content categories by using one of the methods described here ↗.

As the page has had to be pulled out of categories twice in ten hours, ''do not'' readd it to categories again, because draft and sandbox pages are not allowed to be in content categories. Note as well that there can be consequences for disruption ↗ if it doesn't stop, such as page protection ↗ or deletion ↗ and/or the temporary or permanent suspension ↗ of your editing privileges. Bearcat (talk) 10:07, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Re:2026 Italy–US diplomatic crisis

Ciao, io posso tranquillamente farlo, ma mi chiedo: non puoi farlo tu, visto che quel paragrafo è opera tua? Martin Mystère (talk) 20:17, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

:Ciao, veramente lì è riportato un pezzo generato con la AI, che andrebbe cambiato e migliorato.
:Così eliminiamo questo template. Ti ho chiesto una mano perché il pezzo del G7 l'hai realizzato molto bene.
:E io intanto mi portavo avanti con alcuni articoli che ho da ultimare e migliorare.
:La crisi è tutt'altro che conclusa proprio ora altra accusa diretta all'Italia.
:https://www.agi.it/agiprima/trump-starmer-italia-e-germania-si-sono-comportati-male-agi:sur:37688066/ ↗
:Grazie Rapidfirreee (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
::Ho capito. Comunque se mi devi scrivere, o mi invi un messaggio nella mia pagina di discussione o usi il {{tl|ping}}. Martin Mystère (talk) 08:22, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :2026 Italy–US diplomatic crisis ↗ for merging into Italy–United States relations ↗

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :2026 Italy–US diplomatic crisis ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be merged ↗ into Italy–United States relations ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Italy–US diplomatic crisis ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines ↗.

Users may still edit the article ↗, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.</div> <span style="font-family: monospace;">elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)</span> 05:02, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Italy 2038 FIFA World Cup bid ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Italy 2038 FIFA World Cup bid ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Largely WP:OR ↗, with no details and no sources confirming an official bid. Fails WP:CRYSTAL ↗ and WP:TOOSOON ↗'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time. Publicwalrus (talk) 21:57, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Italy 2038 FIFA World Cup bid ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Italy 2038 FIFA World Cup bid ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.
The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italy 2038 FIFA World Cup bid ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines ↗.

Users may still edit the article ↗, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.</div> Publicwalrus (talk) 01:07, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

:Is it up to you to decide everything? There are links and sources, they'll officially announce it as soon as the bid opens. Don't worry, otherwise I'll even write 2042, 2046, and beyond! Rapidfirreee (talk) 01:10, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::No hence why I put it up for others for discussion. Feel free to contribute to it here ↗ or make improvements in the meantime. Publicwalrus (talk) 01:13, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::But with all the articles that need updating about earthquakes and wars, what the fuck do you care about deleting a 2038 bid!!! They're definitely going to officially bid soon. They're not guaranteed to win, but they're definitely going to do it!!! We must now necessarily proceed and lose time a lot of discussions about the article that are weighing on the servers. Rapidfirreee (talk) 01:20, 3 July 2026 (UTC)